Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Several users discuss specific statistical findings and implications of the research, such as the mention of a 74% reduction in daily contacts, highlighting that the measures were essential in reducing transmission rates. The language used, ranging from assertive terms like 'dramatically' to phrases like 'compelling evidence,' indicates a strong belief in the positive impact of the measures as discussed in the publication.
The posts generally support the findings of the publication, noting the effectiveness of physical distancing measures.
There is a strong interest in the topic, as users actively discuss and reference the research.
While some posts dive deep into evidence and specific data, others seem more casual in their discussion.
Many users express a belief that the findings will significantly influence public health policies.
One way to deal with the time issue is to use real-time social contact data (e.g. https://t.co/b2eNQpS9ht) to measure how people are currently interacting, and hence estimate R. But we should still validate these estimates against other data sources such as case curves. 5/
We need data on where transmission happens (e.g. https://t.co/V8y65vDuHp), patterns of social contacts (e.g. https://t.co/b2eNQpS9ht) & longitudinal studies of immunity (e.g. https://t.co/D4m57IttGy). And modelling analysis that can make sense of these combined datasets. 11/11
New #OpenAccess research from @Jarvis_Stats and colleagues: Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the transmission of #COVID19 in the #UK Read it here: https://t.co/uZ1gkvd8dG https://t.co/X4SjuRevjw
@Jarvis_Stats @KevinvZandvoort et al used social contact data to provide early evidence that control measures had reduced R to below 1 in UK: https://t.co/b2eNQpS9ht 12/
(Estimation of B.1.1.7 transmissibility: https://t.co/NRFOS2NTZN & UK contact patterns: https://t.co/b2eNQpS9ht)
Paper by James Rubin and colleagues @LSHTM quantifying the impact of physical distancing in the UK https://t.co/3HxWKtZRp2
This video examines the effectiveness of physical distancing measures in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic. It highlights a 74% reduction in daily contacts, suggesting significant implications for virus transmission…
This study evaluates the effectiveness of physical distancing measures in the UK to control COVID-19. Researchers found a 74% reduction in daily contacts during lockdown, leading to a significant drop in virus…
@USMortality @Jonatha65255939 @jneill Studies line this https://t.co/5kqlz8M8h6 make it very clear that distancing measures dramatically cut rates of contact per day. Given we’re talking about an airborne respiratory virus making any argument this won’t reduce the rate of transmission through a population is daft.
RT @sinichol: @AaronDLinkin @Intuitive_Dream @AmyZ4Yah @VigilantFox Wow, patronising shit much? Here are citations. 1⃣10.8 encounters per…
@AaronDLinkin @Intuitive_Dream @AmyZ4Yah @VigilantFox Wow, patronising shit much? Here are citations. 1⃣10.8 encounters per day (so 11) was sampled in this study, not 12, my bad, but I'm sure you'll make some pedantic point as you seem to be into pointing out off-by-1 errors
@shrewddudescast @johnnutt21 @Michael02364675 @DesG41164958 @freebird_413 @BryanDeanWright What daft absolutism. I’d have far more respect for you if you said the effect they had was not worth it. To say they had none makes you hyperbolic, and just stupid. Studies clearly show NPIs had an impact on the number on daily encounters
@ZwagerRob @Reomretsoo @mkeulemans @mauricedehond @vanranstmarc There is research which confirms effectiveness of social distancing. @realBertBlocken did also for outside situations. https://t.co/u9yzea3bUb https://t.co/3I0w9N9PxP https://t.co/2anBXDK2J0
@msabouri @my_own_RESEARCH @greg_travis @Marco_Piani @jneill @kallmemeg @BallouxFrancois Sure, but this is irrelevant to the larger point in my tweet, how can 25% prior immunity stop spread at 8%? It is for the birds that Tcells caused the 1st peak and not NPIs that were shown to cut contact rates from 10.8/dy to 2.8, plummeting R0
@FrancisxONeill @MPH8689 @hansel21_ @jneill @Alicebellamy @Iandaygmcbooks @JTibballs @AllisonPearson @toadmeister @ONS Still short of 1.25m. The total is now at 650k, with vaccines having preventing the rest having happened. Studies like this https://t.co/5kqlz93J8E have shown NPIs, esp WFH, dropped contact rates from 10.8/dy to 2.8/dy, dramatically cutting transmissions, and lowing R0. 4/
@markuss86653942 https://t.co/7fayNPicoZ https://t.co/5cLf0TiLec https://t.co/hkOGG3LAx3
"CoMix Study – Social Contact Survey in the UK" Speaker: @Jarvis_Stats A behavioural survey with a study sample broadly representative of the UK adult population. Aims to track the reproduction number and mean contacts over time. 17/23 https://t.co/DIoE3SThEj
@hughes_eilir @Lowri_Williams @AngharadHafod @GillibrandPeter @LloydCymru @trishgreenhalgh @dgurdasani1 @globalhlthtwit @LizStokoe @IanDunt @ReicherStephen But wasn't sure if the low public transport wearing reflects also a low proportion of people using public transport that day or whether it is proportion of transport users wearing masks- anyone know? Comix does ask(Q's 54,56,59): https://t.co/mIyJCa1Fhs
@mgmgomes1 One example - contact changes shouldn’t have predicted R so well if immunity was contributing a lot to dynamics. https://t.co/b2eNQpS9ht. Not sure why you’d have expected (a presumably uncontrolled) 2nd wave to be smaller than controlled 1st wave given all the evidence available.
@alkcheet @toadmeister Full plot https://t.co/vcTfhK1U3O shows mobility's the most correlated factor for deaths. Cutting contacts works https://t.co/5kqlz8M8h6. If your job says WFH, they've LD the office. This happen to 50-60% in
RT @sinichol: @ClareCraigPath @nevercunninplan Clare, you're either disingenuous, or you don't understand transmission dynamics. Sure we r…
@ClareCraigPath @nevercunninplan Clare, you're either disingenuous, or you don't understand transmission dynamics. Sure we reached an HIT everytime cases fell, but HIT=1-(1/R0), and R0's a fn of behaviour, cut contact rates to 1/4 https://t.co/5kqlz8M8h6, and the HIT plummets temporarily, last Mar to 8%. 1/
https://t.co/26YOvvBZ3R
Broadstroke, mobility dropped most in 1st
@greg_travis I’m agreeing with you! The main primary driver of suppression has been NPIs, dropping contact rates from 10.8/dy to 2.8. https://t.co/k35sWtcQTE Seasonality is a 2ndary effect and on top adding about 1/5 of the effect, but, alone would be pissing in the wind against C19.
RT @sinichol: @toadmeister This calc is wrong. 80% chance of inf per contact is crazy, more like 20%. Plus
RT @AdamJKucharski: (Estimation of B.1.1.7 transmissibility: https://t.co/NRFOS2NTZN & UK contact patterns: https://t.co/b2eNQpS9ht)
RT @AdamJKucharski: (Estimation of B.1.1.7 transmissibility: https://t.co/NRFOS2NTZN & UK contact patterns: https://t.co/b2eNQpS9ht)
RT @AdamJKucharski: (Estimation of B.1.1.7 transmissibility: https://t.co/NRFOS2NTZN & UK contact patterns: https://t.co/b2eNQpS9ht)
RT @AdamJKucharski: (Estimation of B.1.1.7 transmissibility: https://t.co/NRFOS2NTZN & UK contact patterns: https://t.co/b2eNQpS9ht)
(Estimation of B.1.1.7 transmissibility: https://t.co/NRFOS2NTZN & UK contact patterns: https://t.co/b2eNQpS9ht)
@_PaulMoseley_ @Timothy_Greer_ @Mike_Fabricant @PaulStonehous15 https://t.co/sQ8T3SjzhR Personal fav. John Edmunds is a shill, here he is arguing against lockdown https://t.co/3tLSpduKIM
@randomuser3217B @Timothy_Greer_ @Mike_Fabricant @PaulStonehous15 https://t.co/YiBoFElj7x https://t.co/17HG94x8YR https://t.co/NN0jO4t5lc https://t.co/woUSPm6gko https://t.co/x6Cy0pc6LL https://t.co/tua1tK2v8N
@JamesWard73 @stevebrown2856 @TheMightyKM Some evidence for factor of 4 ("We found a 74% reduction") in lockdown 1: https://t.co/7BKHRB9NHB. Lockdown 1 was probably about as stringent as Jan-Feb 2021 (maybe it was a little more stringent, but I think we're a bit better at masks and stuff now).
@politicaljunkd1 @DavidAOliverJr @jawillick @RogueWPA Here's one study on the effect of distance. If you don't know the difference between one person spreading and dozens, I don't know how to help you.. https://t.co/dKsZF5flQI
CoMix survey reports referenced (“suggest[ing] lower rates of contact in London than the NW of England over the summer”) published from March to September at: https://t.co/5pmNdNOd6g Initial report from March: https://t.co/CT2vymnuYO published in BMC Med. https://t.co/OuaNKStASJ https://t.co/DyADwl8Miu
RT @AdamJKucharski: We need data on where transmission happens (e.g. https://t.co/V8y65vDuHp), patterns of social contacts (e.g. https://t.…
RT @AdamJKucharski: We need data on where transmission happens (e.g. https://t.co/V8y65vDuHp), patterns of social contacts (e.g. https://t.…
RT @AdamJKucharski: We need data on where transmission happens (e.g. https://t.co/V8y65vDuHp), patterns of social contacts (e.g. https://t.…
RT @AdamJKucharski: We need data on where transmission happens (e.g. https://t.co/V8y65vDuHp), patterns of social contacts (e.g. https://t.…
RT @AdamJKucharski: We need data on where transmission happens (e.g. https://t.co/V8y65vDuHp), patterns of social contacts (e.g. https://t.…
RT @AdamJKucharski: We need data on where transmission happens (e.g. https://t.co/V8y65vDuHp), patterns of social contacts (e.g. https://t.…
RT @AdamJKucharski: We need data on where transmission happens (e.g. https://t.co/V8y65vDuHp), patterns of social contacts (e.g. https://t.…
RT @AdamJKucharski: We need data on where transmission happens (e.g. https://t.co/V8y65vDuHp), patterns of social contacts (e.g. https://t.…
RT @AdamJKucharski: We need data on where transmission happens (e.g. https://t.co/V8y65vDuHp), patterns of social contacts (e.g. https://t.…
RT @AdamJKucharski: We need data on where transmission happens (e.g. https://t.co/V8y65vDuHp), patterns of social contacts (e.g. https://t.…
RT @AdamJKucharski: We need data on where transmission happens (e.g. https://t.co/V8y65vDuHp), patterns of social contacts (e.g. https://t.…
We need data on where transmission happens (e.g. https://t.co/V8y65vDuHp), patterns of social contacts (e.g. https://t.co/b2eNQpS9ht) & longitudinal studies of immunity (e.g. https://t.co/D4m57IttGy). And modelling analysis that can make sense of these combined datasets. 11/11
RT @TsioutisC: Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the transmission of COVID-19 in the UK https://t.co/rPXKoARIor The…
Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the transmission of COVID-19 in the UK https://t.co/rPXKoARIor The effect of control strategies to reduce social mixing on outcomes of the COVID-19 epidemic in Wuhan, China: a modelling study https://t.co/Kb3fgN2Bim 5/
As evidence shows (Thanks @AdamJKucharski for info ) av daily contacts dropped to 2.8 after lockdown https://t.co/4UPH9qa3W8 implying about 2/3 of contacts within the home. This measure falling as lockdown eases - but only @DHSCgovuk has or should have latest data
@gendale1 Fizicko distanciranje bi trebalo da traje onoliko koliko se naucnim projektim utvrdi da je potrebno. Razlikuje se od drzave do drzave ali projekat mora da se napravi i izracuna. Evo primera: https://t.co/MlX1v4albj https://t.co/i8KfTIaXVX
RT @AdamJKucharski: @Jarvis_Stats @KevinvZandvoort et al used social contact data to provide early evidence that control measures had reduc…
RT @AdamJKucharski: @Jarvis_Stats @KevinvZandvoort et al used social contact data to provide early evidence that control measures had reduc…
RT @AdamJKucharski: @Jarvis_Stats @KevinvZandvoort et al used social contact data to provide early evidence that control measures had reduc…
RT @AdamJKucharski: @Jarvis_Stats @KevinvZandvoort et al used social contact data to provide early evidence that control measures had reduc…
RT @AdamJKucharski: @Jarvis_Stats @KevinvZandvoort et al used social contact data to provide early evidence that control measures had reduc…
RT @AdamJKucharski: @Jarvis_Stats @KevinvZandvoort et al used social contact data to provide early evidence that control measures had reduc…
@Jarvis_Stats @KevinvZandvoort et al used social contact data to provide early evidence that control measures had reduced R to below 1 in UK: https://t.co/b2eNQpS9ht 12/
RT @AdamJKucharski: One way to deal with the time issue is to use real-time social contact data (e.g. https://t.co/b2eNQpS9ht) to measure h…
RT @VanaSypsa: 2/5 This was assessed using a social contacts survey in a sample of children and adults. The decline is similar to that esti…
RT @VanaSypsa: 2/5 This was assessed using a social contacts survey in a sample of children and adults. The decline is similar to that esti…
2/5 This was assessed using a social contacts survey in a sample of children and adults. The decline is similar to that estimated in two other surveys in China (https://t.co/lOGAerVupO) and UK (adults only in UK) (https://t.co/wRUDmPWohB)
@timcolbourn @globalhlthtwit If that's the view, it's completely implausible. The change in R under lockdown can be predicted by reduction in mobility / number of contacts. See Jarvis et al. Compare US/Sweden to Austria/NZ/UK. In the former, mobility was higher and R went down less. https://t.co/fYAfE7Zs18
RT @twittanfruscole: Del quantizzare 'impatto misure di distanziamento fisico su trasmissione Covid-19' nel Regno Unito. 'Rilevamento cambi…
Del quantizzare 'impatto misure di distanziamento fisico su trasmissione Covid-19' nel Regno Unito. 'Rilevamento cambiamento comportamentale' Vs 'sorveglianza epidemiologica di routine' può consentire una più rapida stima impatto misure dist. fisico https://t.co/suntG3U3nJ
@Life_Disrupted @rowlsmanthorpe The numbers also depend on level of social distancing that remains in place. The baseline figure of 15–40 contacts traced per index case comes from normal UK behavioural patterns, whereas during lockdown people have substantially fewer contacts: https://t.co/b2eNQpS9ht
Di UK, kepatuhan penurunan kontak 75% menurunkan potensi 1 kasus menjadi hampir 3 kasus baru ke kurang dr 1 kasus baru, sejalan dng penurunan penambahan kasus/hari yg terlaporkan dr 20% ke 7% & pemerintah berhasil dng model pembatasan yg diterapkan, CMIIW https://t.co/nYEyGLTgOX
@urigoren @IdoShamirIdo @considerthefish @HelenBranswell זה מחקר שבחן כמה יורד מקדם ההדבקה והקיטוע של קשרים חברתיים. בקצרה, דרמטית. https://t.co/nynlJc4ekL
@pweiskopf @CT_Bergstrom https://t.co/HXjOzZEqG2 "The physical distancing measures adopted by the UK public have substantially reduced contact levels and will likely lead to a substantial impact and a decline in cases in the coming weeks."
RT @AdamJKucharski: One way to deal with the time issue is to use real-time social contact data (e.g. https://t.co/b2eNQpS9ht) to measure h…
RT @BMCMedicine: New #OpenAccess research from @Jarvis_Stats and colleagues: Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the tr…
https://t.co/P01ios753v
RT @BMCMedicine: New #OpenAccess research from @Jarvis_Stats and colleagues: Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the tr…
RT @AdamJKucharski: One way to deal with the time issue is to use real-time social contact data (e.g. https://t.co/b2eNQpS9ht) to measure h…
RT @AdamJKucharski: One way to deal with the time issue is to use real-time social contact data (e.g. https://t.co/b2eNQpS9ht) to measure h…
RT @EPR_HPRU: Paper by James Rubin and colleagues @LSHTM quantifying the impact of physical distancing in the UK https://t.co/3HxWKtZRp2
RT @AdamJKucharski: One way to deal with the time issue is to use real-time social contact data (e.g. https://t.co/b2eNQpS9ht) to measure h…
RT @AdamJKucharski: One way to deal with the time issue is to use real-time social contact data (e.g. https://t.co/b2eNQpS9ht) to measure h…
RT @AdamJKucharski: One way to deal with the time issue is to use real-time social contact data (e.g. https://t.co/b2eNQpS9ht) to measure h…
RT @EPR_HPRU: Paper by James Rubin and colleagues @LSHTM quantifying the impact of physical distancing in the UK https://t.co/3HxWKtZRp2
RT @EPR_HPRU: Paper by James Rubin and colleagues @LSHTM quantifying the impact of physical distancing in the UK https://t.co/3HxWKtZRp2
@alyssoba https://t.co/ZfRvPC3MKf
RT @AdamJKucharski: One way to deal with the time issue is to use real-time social contact data (e.g. https://t.co/b2eNQpS9ht) to measure h…
RT @AdamJKucharski: One way to deal with the time issue is to use real-time social contact data (e.g. https://t.co/b2eNQpS9ht) to measure h…
RT @AdamJKucharski: One way to deal with the time issue is to use real-time social contact data (e.g. https://t.co/b2eNQpS9ht) to measure h…
RT @AdamJKucharski: One way to deal with the time issue is to use real-time social contact data (e.g. https://t.co/b2eNQpS9ht) to measure h…
RT @AdamJKucharski: One way to deal with the time issue is to use real-time social contact data (e.g. https://t.co/b2eNQpS9ht) to measure h…
One way to deal with the time issue is to use real-time social contact data (e.g. https://t.co/b2eNQpS9ht) to measure how people are currently interacting, and hence estimate R. But we should still validate these estimates against other data sources such as case curves. 5/
@KonstantinKisin I suppose some easing of restrictions is justified, however there is compelling new evidence that social distancing reduces the spread of infection, lowering mortality rates. It would therefore seem premature to lift lockdown completely. https://t.co/0IJalABzwT
RT @EPR_HPRU: Paper by James Rubin and colleagues @LSHTM quantifying the impact of physical distancing in the UK https://t.co/3HxWKtZRp2
RT @EPR_HPRU: Paper by James Rubin and colleagues @LSHTM quantifying the impact of physical distancing in the UK https://t.co/3HxWKtZRp2
RT @EPR_HPRU: Paper by James Rubin and colleagues @LSHTM quantifying the impact of physical distancing in the UK https://t.co/3HxWKtZRp2
RT @EPR_HPRU: Paper by James Rubin and colleagues @LSHTM quantifying the impact of physical distancing in the UK https://t.co/3HxWKtZRp2
https://t.co/Z1FJa5emWT
RT @EPR_HPRU: Paper by James Rubin and colleagues @LSHTM quantifying the impact of physical distancing in the UK https://t.co/3HxWKtZRp2
RT @EPR_HPRU: Paper by James Rubin and colleagues @LSHTM quantifying the impact of physical distancing in the UK https://t.co/3HxWKtZRp2
RT @EPR_HPRU: Paper by James Rubin and colleagues @LSHTM quantifying the impact of physical distancing in the UK https://t.co/3HxWKtZRp2
RT @EPR_HPRU: Paper by James Rubin and colleagues @LSHTM quantifying the impact of physical distancing in the UK https://t.co/3HxWKtZRp2
RT @EPR_HPRU: Paper by James Rubin and colleagues @LSHTM quantifying the impact of physical distancing in the UK https://t.co/3HxWKtZRp2
RT @EPR_HPRU: Paper by James Rubin and colleagues @LSHTM quantifying the impact of physical distancing in the UK https://t.co/3HxWKtZRp2
RT @EPR_HPRU: Paper by James Rubin and colleagues @LSHTM quantifying the impact of physical distancing in the UK https://t.co/3HxWKtZRp2
RT @EPR_HPRU: Paper by James Rubin and colleagues @LSHTM quantifying the impact of physical distancing in the UK https://t.co/3HxWKtZRp2
RT @EPR_HPRU: Paper by James Rubin and colleagues @LSHTM quantifying the impact of physical distancing in the UK https://t.co/3HxWKtZRp2
Paper by James Rubin and colleagues @LSHTM quantifying the impact of physical distancing in the UK https://t.co/3HxWKtZRp2
RT @BMCMedicine: New #OpenAccess research from @Jarvis_Stats and colleagues: Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the tr…
RT @BMCMedicine: New #OpenAccess research from @Jarvis_Stats and colleagues: Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the tr…
RT @BMCMedicine: New #OpenAccess research from @Jarvis_Stats and colleagues: Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the tr…
RT @BMCMedicine: New #OpenAccess research from @Jarvis_Stats and colleagues: Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the tr…
RT @BMCMedicine: New #OpenAccess research from @Jarvis_Stats and colleagues: Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the tr…
RT @BMCMedicine: New #OpenAccess research from @Jarvis_Stats and colleagues: Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the tr…
RT @BMCMedicine: New #OpenAccess research from @Jarvis_Stats and colleagues: Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the tr…
RT @BMCMedicine: New #OpenAccess research from @Jarvis_Stats and colleagues: Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the tr…
RT @BMCMedicine: New #OpenAccess research from @Jarvis_Stats and colleagues: Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the tr…
RT @BMCMedicine: New #OpenAccess research from @Jarvis_Stats and colleagues: Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the tr…
RT @BMCMedicine: New #OpenAccess research from @Jarvis_Stats and colleagues: Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the tr…
RT @BMCMedicine: New #OpenAccess research from @Jarvis_Stats and colleagues: Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the tr…
RT @BMCMedicine: New #OpenAccess research from @Jarvis_Stats and colleagues: Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the tr…
RT @BMCMedicine: New #OpenAccess research from @Jarvis_Stats and colleagues: Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the tr…
RT @BMCMedicine: New #OpenAccess research from @Jarvis_Stats and colleagues: Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the tr…
RT @BMCMedicine: New #OpenAccess research from @Jarvis_Stats and colleagues: Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the tr…
RT @BMCMedicine: New #OpenAccess research from @Jarvis_Stats and colleagues: Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the tr…
RT @BMCMedicine: New #OpenAccess research from @Jarvis_Stats and colleagues: Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the tr…
RT @BMCMedicine: New #OpenAccess research from @Jarvis_Stats and colleagues: Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the tr…
RT @BMCMedicine: New #OpenAccess research from @Jarvis_Stats and colleagues: Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the tr…
RT @BMCMedicine: New #OpenAccess research from @Jarvis_Stats and colleagues: Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the tr…
RT @BMCMedicine: New #OpenAccess research from @Jarvis_Stats and colleagues: Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the tr…
New #OpenAccess research from @Jarvis_Stats and colleagues: Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the transmission of #COVID19 in the #UK Read it here: https://t.co/uZ1gkvd8dG https://t.co/X4SjuRevjw
See “Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the transmission of COVID-19 in the UK” for estimating the changes to social interactions during the Stay at Home order. https://t.co/PY3STpa2in
Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the transmission of COVID-19 in the UK https://t.co/iyKAIQUfNA
Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the transmission of COVID-19 in the UK https://t.co/N2rz9IkTY4 #medRxiv
Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the transmission of COVID-19 in the UK https://t.co/uxvycNWPlu. Great work @LSHTM