Int J Pharm Pract December 2020 PMID 32844477

A comparison between Parkinson's medication errors identified through retrospective case note review versus via an incident reporting system during hospital admission.

Deanna Mill, Michael Bakker, Lauren Corre, Amy Page, Jacinta Johnson

Mentions

13
Peak: 4 in Jun 2022
across 4 sources since Jun 2022

Extended reach

1,779
potential audience

Total likes

1

Video views

21

Mentions per month

Jun 2022 – Nov 2022

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter7 posts
  • Reddit3 posts
  • Facebook2 posts
  • YouTube1 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The posts express support for the article's conclusion that combining case note reviews with incident reports provides a more comprehensive understanding of medication errors, often highlighting how the findings could influence hospital safety protocols. Terms like 'important,' 'interesting,' and 'potentially impactful' demonstrate a generally positive tone and recognition of its significance.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most comments recognize the importance of the study in revealing discrepancies between detection methods for medication errors.

InterestModerate interest

Discussions show moderate interest, with some recognizing the significance of better error detection for patient safety.

EngagementModerate engagement

Participants engage with the topic by comparing error types and discussing implications, indicating meaningful involvement.

ImpactModerate impact

The conversations suggest awareness of the potential for improving medication safety practices based on the study's findings.

Abstract in brief

  • The study compares Parkinson's medication errors identified through retrospective case note reviews and incident reporting systems in a hospital setting, finding that case note reviews detect many more errors than incident reports.
  • Different types of medication errors are identified by each method: case note reviews reveal mainly delayed dosing, while incident reports more frequently highlight wrong doses or formulations administered.
  • The conclusion emphasizes that relying solely on incident reports underestimates medication errors; combining both methods provides a more accurate picture of inpatient medication-related problems.]

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
UWA School of Health and Clinical Sciences
@UWA_SAH · X

@deanna_mill compared the frequency and type of inpatient Parkinson’s medication errors reported through an incident report system versus those identified through retrospective case note review in a tertiary teaching hospital. Read more: https://t.co/FvxUP4sIHf @JacintaAdelaide

Jun 15, 2022 · 1 like · 2 shares · 254 followers View post →
UWA WA Centre for Health & Ageing (WACHA)
@UWAHealthAgeing · X

RT @UWA_SAH: @deanna_mill compared the frequency and type of inpatient Parkinson’s medication errors reported through an incident report sy…

Jun 15, 2022 · 2 shares · 613 followers View post →
UWA School of Health and Clinical Sciences
@UWA_SAH · X

A comparison between Parkinson’s medication errors identified through retrospective case note review versus via an incident reporting system during hospital admission https://t.co/FvxUP4sIHf

Nov 17, 2022 · 1 share · 254 followers View post →
UWA School of Health and Clinical Sciences
@UWA_SAH · X

A comparison between Parkinson’s medication errors identified through retrospective case note review versus via an incident reporting system during hospital admission https://t.co/FvxUP4sIHf

Nov 17, 2022 · 1 share · 254 followers View post →
COHERENT
@CoherentRx · X

RT @UWA_SAH: A comparison between Parkinson’s medication errors identified through retrospective case note review versus via an incident re…

Nov 17, 2022 · 1 share · 121 followers View post →
COHERENT
@CoherentRx · X

RT @UWA_SAH: A comparison between Parkinson’s medication errors identified through retrospective case note review versus via an incident re…

Nov 17, 2022 · 1 share · 121 followers View post →

All mentions

COHERENT
@CoherentRx · X

RT @UWA_SAH: A comparison between Parkinson’s medication errors identified through retrospective case note review versus via an incident re…

Nov 17, 2022 · 1 share · 121 followers View post →
COHERENT
@CoherentRx · X

RT @UWA_SAH: A comparison between Parkinson’s medication errors identified through retrospective case note review versus via an incident re…

Nov 17, 2022 · 1 share · 121 followers View post →
UWA School of Health and Clinical Sciences
@UWA_SAH · X

A comparison between Parkinson’s medication errors identified through retrospective case note review versus via an incident reporting system during hospital admission https://t.co/FvxUP4sIHf

Nov 17, 2022 · 1 share · 254 followers View post →
UWA School of Health and Clinical Sciences
@UWA_SAH · X

A comparison between Parkinson’s medication errors identified through retrospective case note review versus via an incident reporting system during hospital admission https://t.co/FvxUP4sIHf

Nov 17, 2022 · 1 share · 254 followers View post →
UWA WA Centre for Health & Ageing (WACHA)
@UWAHealthAgeing · X

RT @UWA_SAH: @deanna_mill compared the frequency and type of inpatient Parkinson’s medication errors reported through an incident report sy…

Jun 15, 2022 · 2 shares · 613 followers View post →
COHERENT
@CoherentRx · X

RT @UWA_SAH: @deanna_mill compared the frequency and type of inpatient Parkinson’s medication errors reported through an incident report sy…

Jun 15, 2022 · 2 shares · 121 followers View post →
UWA School of Health and Clinical Sciences
@UWA_SAH · X

@deanna_mill compared the frequency and type of inpatient Parkinson’s medication errors reported through an incident report system versus those identified through retrospective case note review in a tertiary teaching hospital. Read more: https://t.co/FvxUP4sIHf @JacintaAdelaide

Jun 15, 2022 · 1 like · 2 shares · 254 followers View post →