Synopsis of Social media discussions
Several discussions praise the publication’s role in providing comprehensive, accessible data, such as remarks about its importance for epidemiological analysis and graph interpretation. The tone varies from admiration to calling for better understanding among political leaders, showing that the publication influences both research and public awareness.
Agreement
Moderate agreementMost discussions acknowledge the importance of the database and praise its publication, suggesting support and approval.
Interest
High level of interestPosts express high interest, especially with phrases like 'Very interesting!' and references to key figures and data relevance, indicating engagement with the topic.
Engagement
Moderate level of engagementPosts include mentions of graphs, data interpretation, and specific recognition of the authors’ work, reflecting thoughtful engagement.
Impact
Moderate level of impactMultiple posts highlight the significance of detailed COVID-19 testing data for understanding pandemic responses, suggesting a moderate but meaningful impact.
Social Mentions
YouTube
3 Videos
17 Posts
Blogs
2 Articles
News
3 Articles
Metrics
Video Views
282
Total Likes
28
Extended Reach
107,413
Social Features
25
Timeline: Posts about article
Top Social Media Posts
Posts referencing the article
Global COVID-19 Cases per 100K Population in 2020 Analysis
This video shows how the total confirmed Coronavirus COVID-19 cases per 100K population have changed by country from 2020 January to December 14. It also includes data on total deaths and recoveries, providing a comprehensive overview of the pandemic's progression across countries.
COVID-19 Cases per 100K in Europe During 2020 by Country
This video shows how the total confirmed Coronavirus COVID-19 cases per 100K population have changed in Europe by country from 2020 January to December 15. It provides insights into the distribution and progression of cases across European nations.
-
RT @G11Sven: DNA diefstal > internationale databases. Wie gaf toestemming? https://t.co/zzr3t2bKLW
view full postJanuary 8, 2023
3
-
Roelfiena De Vreugd
@RoelfienaDe (Twitter)RT @G11Sven: DNA diefstal > internationale databases. Wie gaf toestemming? https://t.co/zzr3t2bKLW
view full postJanuary 8, 2023
3
-
Hans Zuidinga #Levenskunstenaar
@hanszuidinga (Twitter)RT @G11Sven: DNA diefstal > internationale databases. Wie gaf toestemming? https://t.co/zzr3t2bKLW
view full postJanuary 8, 2023
3
-
Sven de Groot
@G11Sven (Twitter)DNA diefstal > internationale databases. Wie gaf toestemming? https://t.co/zzr3t2bKLW
view full postJanuary 8, 2023
2
3
-
Scientific Data
@ScientificData (Twitter)Read 'A cross-country database of COVID-19 testing' - one of our most-read recent articles.
view full postMarch 30, 2021
3
-
Roland Hauke
@roland_hauke (Twitter)RT @ScientificData: Read 'A cross-country database of COVID-19 testing' - one of our most-read recent articles.
view full postJanuary 23, 2021
1
-
Scientific Data
@ScientificData (Twitter)Read 'A cross-country database of COVID-19 testing' - one of our most-read recent articles.
view full postJanuary 11, 2021
8
1
-
YA
@Adarchism (Twitter)https://t.co/nwCKq6eV57 A cross-country database of COVID-19 testing
view full postNovember 1, 2020
-
Nino Portschy
@NinoPortschy (Twitter)RT @NinoPortschy: @realDonaldTrump Here for you people out there, who can actually read graphs: Yes, the US tests the most, but relative t…
view full postOctober 18, 2020
1
-
Nino Portschy
@NinoPortschy (Twitter)@realDonaldTrump Here for you people out there, who can actually read graphs: Yes, the US tests the most, but relative to the infected population, they are still standing pretty bad compared to NEU and NZ. Source: A cross-country database of Covid-19 testing, In: Science 10.08.2020. https://t.co/RMfi0VHAfM
view full postOctober 18, 2020
1
-
New Scientist Zone
@NewScientistZon (Twitter)A cross-country database of COVID-19 testing https://t.co/j0gWHBhV6j
view full postOctober 15, 2020
-
Andrés-Leonardo Martínez-Ortiz, PhD
@davilagrau (Twitter)Very interesting! A cross-country database of COVID-19 testing https://t.co/N2Ld9UrifT #research #COVID19 https://t.co/MiH2AECg0p
view full postOctober 11, 2020
-
Bernhard Ebbinghaus
@B_Ebbinghaus (Twitter)RT @B_Ebbinghaus: @MaxCRoser @nature Congratulations to @MaxCRoser and your @OurWorldInData team for getting published in Nature/Scientifi…
view full postOctober 11, 2020
2
-
Lukas Lehner
@LukasLehner_ (Twitter)RT @B_Ebbinghaus: @MaxCRoser @nature Congratulations to @MaxCRoser and your @OurWorldInData team for getting published in Nature/Scientifi…
view full postOctober 11, 2020
2
-
Bernhard Ebbinghaus
@B_Ebbinghaus (Twitter)@MaxCRoser @nature Congratulations to @MaxCRoser and your @OurWorldInData team for getting published in Nature/Scientific Data, a recognition of your impactful up-to-date data on #Covid19 demographics and testing. If only the US president would understand these graphs! https://t.co/SV3qAWSPbZ
view full postOctober 11, 2020
9
2
-
Helen Haskell
@hhask (Twitter)A cross-country database of COVID-19 testing | Scientific Data https://t.co/QWzB14EraX @nature
view full postOctober 9, 2020
-
Scientific Data
@ScientificData (Twitter)#COVID data concerning confirmed cases & deaths must be interpreted alongside accurate data on the extent of #virus testing in different countries. @JoeHasell et al present a cross-country database of COVID-19 testing. https://t.co/PMy2D5vgkY
view full postOctober 8, 2020
3
Abstract Synopsis
- This database compiles official data on COVID-19 PCR testing for 94 countries, including daily testing numbers and metadata on data quality, helping to interpret testing efforts over time.
- It is regularly updated using automated scraping and manual verification, with sources provided for transparency, making the data fully reproducible for researchers.
- The goal is to support epidemiological studies and track how countries responded to COVID-19 by providing accessible, comparable testing data across different nations.]

Lannie
@lannie1963 (Twitter)