Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Overall, the discussions reflect a mixture of skepticism, superficial interest, and occasional calls for clarification or methodological critique, exemplified by comments questioning the causal link and referencing data sources. The tone varies from dismissive to inquisitive, indicating a neutral to skeptical perception of the article's impact.
The discussions show mixed reactions, with some emphasizing the importance of understanding causal relationships and others dismissing or questioning the findings, suggesting no clear overall agreement.
Comments include basic remarks like noting the value of reading habit or questioning the difference between correlation and causality, indicating moderate or minimal interest in the detailed implications of the research.
Several posts reference the methodology or data sources, but overall the engagement appears superficial, with some dismissive or off-topic comments, reflecting limited deep involvement.
The posts suggest that there is no consensus about the significance of the study's findings, with some discussions focusing on methodological critiques and others on general remarks, implying uncertain or minimal perceived impact.
Alexis Descatha présente une des méta-analyses avec la méthodologie jointe @WHO - @OITinfo , ici sur la consommation d'alcool. https://t.co/YHuuUjNaPX
Ici la référence du papier de Pachito, @lode_godderis et de nombreux collègues https://t.co/QPAotmIwWJ
@OttoGuevaraG La lectura es un buen hábito https://t.co/r6zjXfHXyq
@aferbarcr Esta señorita diputada del FA, debe revisar la diferencia entre correlación y causalidad. Y con respecto a horas de trabajo e alcoholismo @FraccionFrente https://t.co/3r0NFbTaJZ
C'est clairement les noeuds papillon Lego qui ont joué en sa faveur. https://t.co/YHuuUjNaPX
@rclaytoneden @WHO Good questions! Re alcohol, we just published a systematic review & meta-analysis of the effect of exposure to long working hours on alcohol use & its disorders. This found “inadequate evidence for harmfulness”; the current body of evidence is uncertain. https://t.co/tooE3wLifO
This systematic review and meta-analysis by WHO and ILO investigates how long working hours impact alcohol consumption, risky drinking behaviors, and alcohol use disorder, highlighting increased risks with extended work…
This systematic review and meta-analysis from WHO and ILO investigates how long working hours influence alcohol consumption, risky drinking, and alcohol use disorder, using comprehensive data to estimate associated…
@Roger_Retana Hay que explicarle diferencia entre correlación y causalidad. 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106205
@OttoGuevaraG La lectura es un buen hábito https://t.co/r6zjXfHXyq
@OttoGuevaraG La lectura es un buen hábito "Evidence from mechanistic data suggests that exposure to long working hours may increase alcohol consumption and cause alcohol use disorder" https://t.co/r6zjXfHXyq
@aferbarcr Esta señorita diputada del FA, debe revisar la diferencia entre correlación y causalidad. Y con respecto a horas de trabajo e alcoholismo @FraccionFrente https://t.co/3r0NFbTaJZ
@RaulCJ @AllanAlcazar21 @iafacr https://t.co/USfu0pOdy8 https://t.co/LwnFJstDjb https://t.co/EP3XGnGgp7 Ahí puedo seguir...
@jonathanchm11 @AllanAlcazar21 https://t.co/LJP9nqzu26 https://t.co/VuvaxXipya https://t.co/EP3XGnGgp7 https://t.co/LwnFJstDjb https://t.co/USfu0pOdy8
@rclaytoneden @WHO Good questions! Re alcohol, we just published a systematic review & meta-analysis of the effect of exposure to long working hours on alcohol use & its disorders. This found “inadequate evidence for harmfulness”; the current body of evidence is uncertain. https://t.co/tooE3wLifO
C'est clairement les noeuds papillon Lego qui ont joué en sa faveur. https://t.co/YHuuUjNaPX
Ici la référence du papier de Pachito, @lode_godderis et de nombreux collègues https://t.co/QPAotmIwWJ
Alexis Descatha présente une des méta-analyses avec la méthodologie jointe @WHO - @OITinfo , ici sur la consommation d'alcool. https://t.co/YHuuUjNaPX