Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Many comments cite the Danish randomized trial and other studies to argue masks are ineffective, describing it as a study that found no significant reduction in COVID-19 transmission, with some posts claiming it was suppressed or ignored by mainstream outlets. The tone varies between scientific critique and outright skepticism, with words like 'useless', 'failed', and 'denied publications' emphasizing distrust in mask effectiveness and scientific authority.
Most comments dismiss the effectiveness of masks based on the Danish study and other research, showing disagreement with mask policies.
Discussions show moderate interest, focusing on studies and evidence, but often with a dismissive tone towards mask mandates.
Posts deeply engage with research findings, sharing links, summarizing results, and debating methodology and interpretation.
The overall influence seems limited; many see the studies as inconclusive or negative regarding masks, but few indicate the discussions are driving policy change.
maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmasını deneyini yapmışlar.. https://t.co/WBwTaFd0sU
酷すぎるなこのアカウントは..幼稚を超えて何か怖い.. 以下論文は2020年RCT、コロナ感染率にマスクが効果の有意性を見出せなかった。 さっさと「何故レプリコンを打ったと嘘を吐いたのか？」に答えて下さい。 貴方のやり方は異常です。 https://t.co/eiMFGYBavF https://t.co/zLPaCd5bE1
T'as raison @lonnibesancon , ce n'est pas éthique de faire de la science qui pourrait montrer que les autorités de santé ont fait n'importe quoi pour faire plaisir aux lobbies pendant la pandémie.
いやこの論文見て「ほら❗️ちょっとは効果あるじゃん❗️」って思うならマジでもう勝手にしろよw知らんわww ホント宗教染みてるわ
このマスク着用に関するランダム化比較試験論文は、コミュニティノートの厚労省資料にも記載されているものの図式化です。 #コミュニティノートもいい加減な判断をするもの だということがわかります。 #子どもたちを守りたい #マスク論争 #科学的根拠 https://t.co/IO7aKryUYH https://t.co/8yHWA0XhTR
The rate of Covid in Denmark at the time - April-May 2020 - was low overall, which kept the results from reaching statistical significance. But as the authors wrote, "the 95% CIs are compatible with a 46% reduction to a 23% increase in infection." https://t.co/jFevd2nUIN
This video examines the effectiveness of health measures like quarantine and social distancing in preventing COVID-19 transmission, specifically among U.S. Marine Corps recruits. We explore data-driven insights on…
This video updates a Cochrane Review on physical interventions to mitigate respiratory virus transmission. It covers rigorous methods for evidence collection, focusing on randomized controlled trials about hand hygiene…
This video analyzes the effect of state mandates for face masks during COVID-19 across fifteen states and Washington, D.C. It highlights significant declines in COVID-19 growth rates and estimates that these measures…
The mask mandate's effectiveness has been questioned since 2020. A recent study published in JAMA Pediatrics, involving seven German authors, reveals that masks may pose significant health risks, especially for…
This study explored whether recommending surgical masks reduces SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among Danish adults. Results showed only a small difference between mask and non-mask groups, suggesting limited additional…
This Danish study evaluates whether recommending surgical masks reduces SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among adults. The findings indicate only a small difference between mask wearers and non-wearers, suggesting limited…
This Danish study examined whether recommending surgical masks outside the home reduces SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among adults. The results showed a small difference between mask wearers and non-wearers, indicating…
In this video, we explore Jérémie Mercier's arguments regarding the effectiveness of masks and health measures during the Covid-19 pandemic. Key findings suggest that vulnerabilities related to public health and…
This video analyzes a study on the effectiveness of public health measures during SARS-CoV-2 transmission among U.S. Marine recruits. With 1,848 recruits involved, the research highlights transmission clusters that…
This episode discusses the Danish mask study and its findings. We explore the study results and focus on the challenges of science communication and literacy among physicians and the public, emphasizing the nuanced role…
@bluebeetle_one @ByTheFaith @1850suite @nycHealthy Danish study. https://t.co/7wLDL1wXHp
@lonnibesancon @epistemethikos Tu insultes également des dizaines de chercheurs depuis 2020. Ton problème avec les RCT sur les masques, c'est qu'ils ne montrent pas les résultats que tu désires? https://t.co/fxgIAhX5o0
@travis4nh The only RCT I know of concluded that masks did not reduce the chance of infection. https://t.co/J2yn3h76Ey
@georgebella @ChildrensHD Yes. Various studies, including the one below, indicated that wearing face coverings had made little to no difference. That study involved thousands of people. For years, the medical system has been a top down thing, with the involvement of Darpa. https://t.co/SyCMCpFNw9
@sega_bsv これ、大嘘です。 このデータは元々、デンマークで行われたDANMASK-19試験の数値です。 この試験は家族の感染については全く試験してません。 つまりコレは捏造のデータということになります。 試験結果のリンクも貼っておきます: https://t.co/JR22wt8yLk
@loscharlos Dr. Anders Tegnell, Sweden's leading epidemiologist, said wearing a mask gave one a false sense of security. Sweden never adopted mask rules; it had fewer virus cases per 100,000. Studies indicated that wearing masks made little to no difference. https://t.co/SyCMCpGllH
@agirlopinions Dr. Anders Tegnell, Sweden's leading epidemiologist, said that wearing masks gave one a false sense of security. Sweden never adopted mask rules; it had fewer virus cases per 100,000 https://t.co/8YYNyfSqPV https://t.co/SyCMCpGllH
@NightShiftMD And the fear thing continues. Dr. Anders Tegnell, Sweden's leading epidemiologist, said that masks gave one a false sense of security. Sweden never adopted mask rules; it had fewer virus cases per 100,000. https://t.co/SyCMCpGllH
@TheTrueJasonM Dr. Anders Tegnell, Sweden's leading epidemiologist, said that wearing a mask gave one a false sense of security. Sweden never adopted mask rules. Here are some studies: https://t.co/SyCMCpGllH https://t.co/8YYNyfSqPV
@DrAnnieHickox @amethystarlight @drseanmullen Dr. Anders Tegnell, Sweden's leading epidemiologist said that wearing masks gave one a false sense of security; Sweden never adopted mask rules. For your reference, herewith are some studies: https://t.co/ECKzaadupL https://t.co/SyCMCpFNw9 https://t.co/YZFZ2o8cwh
@1goodtern https://t.co/wlkR1hbXC7
@K3LLYB33N @mavisclare @Rik12305402 https://t.co/wlkR1hcvrF
@dninio Oops https://t.co/JWE2INUqbl
RT @AlbertaBound9: @brianlilley In Mar 2021, an RCT "DANMASK" study with 4,682 showed #masks don't work in non-hospital settings. "Wear…
RT @AlbertaBound9: @brianlilley In Mar 2021, an RCT "DANMASK" study with 4,682 showed #masks don't work in non-hospital settings. "Wear…
@adamcarolla Uncompromising, defiant truth-teller. Dealer of facts, not fiction. I was an early adopter of reposting the Danish study on masking, which proved it was inneffective: https://t.co/AoTGa2kNx9
@Joe756577222337 @RandPaul https://t.co/J2oUhnHfFv https://t.co/NxhI7DBR99 https://t.co/0SZiQhtAb8 https://t.co/2rZ00xWgEu https://t.co/gNAhuvIzuk https://t.co/PiuW6mnYor
@toddrdoherty @sicksadfilms @MemeTheVan @very_srius_prsn @Alibaba_Qwen You're talking about this study, right? "Inconclusive results, missing data, variable adherence, patient-reported findings on home tests, no blinding, and no assessment of whether masks could decrease disease transmission from mask wearers to others." https://t.co/gcdxme66Lt
@nuko26336013394 @xKpG4bh6EMJL5mk @tabinidetain もう1つ https://t.co/mBWtAa5WqT
@Jaamennn @BadFaithAct @RealJamesWoods @grok Not a meta study. https://t.co/49Rc4K2HqP Measurements: The primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 infection in the mask wearer at 1 month by antibody testing, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), or hospital diagnosis. The secondary outcome was PCR positivity for other respiratory viruses.
@masking__mama @Kimblereturns13 @_lolololno @SuperAmerican_ @TheChefsGardens @LeadingReport We have already established you're exposing your children to toxins & the masks don't mitigate the risks of infection. Young children suffer speech developmental issues via making. I can keep going with the studies but you're in a cult. https://t.co/ZRQ63SWPQS
Some of the many studies that show that masks don't work and never worked. https://t.co/1OqmYRkZzP And that is just a start. Here's Bangladesh. https://t.co/hYNOe3C1Ln Here's DanM.https://t.co/eVmUpNE4A4 But, please do your own research.
Some of the many studies that show that masks don't work and never worked. https://t.co/1OqmYRlxpn And that is just a start. Here's Bangladesh. https://t.co/hYNOe3CzAV Here's DanM.https://t.co/eVmUpNECpC But I have to say, you should have found these links yourself. Sorry to be
@Jutsch80 @Paeddyyy @KenWolfgangsson @DecathlonDE ized Controlled Trial. Annals of Internal Medicine, 174(3), 335–343. https://t.co/uxE9GAAvIp), im Scoping-Review (2024) wird konstatiert, daß prolongiertes Maskentragen sogar gesundheitsschädlich ist, und das über die Verminderung des Blutsauerstoffgehalts hinaus:
@Jutsch80 @Paeddyyy @KenWolfgangsson @DecathlonDE boten (Bundgaard, H., Bundgaard, J. S., Raaschou-Pedersen, D. E. T., von Buchwald, C., Todsen, T., Norsk, J. B., … & Iversen, K. (2021). Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: A Random
@AppleHelix Yes. I also wanted leaders not to panic and to use their brains. This Danish group did one: https://t.co/cmmRx0rj2C
RT @AlbertaBound9: @brianlilley In Mar 2021, an RCT "DANMASK" study with 4,682 showed #masks don't work in non-hospital settings. "Wear…
@thekage75 @DreamingOrbiter @Garnet_2203 You didn't read this and it shows... Here you go. More studies showing they don't work . You should look up what size particulates these masks stop and how big COVID is, it's like stopping sand with a chain link fence https://t.co/V5y1FkymK3 https://t.co/ELITeK3vTz https://t.co/NsH4DFE6Tn
@brianlilley In Mar 2021, an RCT "DANMASK" study with 4,682 showed #masks don't work in non-hospital settings. "Wearing a surgical mask when outside the home did not reduce the statistical significance of SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with no masks."
@skiklutz In Mar 2021, an RCT "DANMASK" study with 4,682 showed #masks don't work in non-hospital settings. "Wearing a surgical mask when outside the home did not reduce the statistical significance of SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with no masks."
@HalucoJK1 @117mimichan117 唯一のRCTがコレ 優位差無し https://t.co/jeWtVgFIkT そもそも、効果あるのなら日本が一番の陽性者になるわけないだろ
@osamu_iga
@Isucceed Economists. smh. Surgical masks don't stop other coronavirus spreads. Ex: Denmark's Randomized controlled trial for surgical masks showed a p value of .38, which is not statistically significant. https://t.co/kfGX8ZOJcI
@lFcW7eOWlm45899 @sega_bsv これかな
@grok @warofthesaints @SenseReceptor https://t.co/GRtQsY8f7d
RT @sudokuvariante: How to fix the problem? Think about pharmaceutical interventions: we do studies with appropriate method to assert causa…
RT @Eco_Ero_ZZ: @kikumaco 引用ポストの左図は、こちらの論文の事を記されているのでしょう。 https://t.co/MPOqJkPoJg この論文によりますと、マスク着用群には、「外出時に公共の場で不織布マスクを着用するよう指示」されました。 しかし実…
@kikumaco 引用ポストの左図は、こちらの論文の事を記されているのでしょう。 https://t.co/MPOqJkPoJg この論文によりますと、マスク着用群には、「外出時に公共の場で不織布マスクを着用するよう指示」されました。 しかし実際は、 “ほぼ”指示通りに実行…46％ 時々着用した…47％ 全く着用しなかった…7％ (続
.Moving onto Laboratory Influenza or SARS-COV-2. APPLES. ORANGES. SIGH. The others we have already seen are confounded from an The Aerosol Perspective. So, 72.6% weight gone. Which leaves us with Bundgaard(2021) 27.4% weighting. The Danmask. https://t.co/ckiYqKDmE9 https://t.co/zvwWEWfO82
@AlexandraS12756 @grok @TheAbsintheSL @MonikaGruber24 https://t.co/rDfJt2i4IY
RT @sudokuvariante: T'as raison @lonnibesancon , ce n'est pas éthique de faire de la science qui pourrait montrer que les autorités de sant…
RT @sudokuvariante: T'as raison @lonnibesancon , ce n'est pas éthique de faire de la science qui pourrait montrer que les autorités de sant…
RT @sudokuvariante: T'as raison @lonnibesancon , ce n'est pas éthique de faire de la science qui pourrait montrer que les autorités de sant…
RT @sudokuvariante: T'as raison @lonnibesancon , ce n'est pas éthique de faire de la science qui pourrait montrer que les autorités de sant…
RT @sudokuvariante: T'as raison @lonnibesancon , ce n'est pas éthique de faire de la science qui pourrait montrer que les autorités de sant…
RT @sudokuvariante: T'as raison @lonnibesancon , ce n'est pas éthique de faire de la science qui pourrait montrer que les autorités de sant…
RT @sudokuvariante: T'as raison @lonnibesancon , ce n'est pas éthique de faire de la science qui pourrait montrer que les autorités de sant…
RT @sudokuvariante: T'as raison @lonnibesancon , ce n'est pas éthique de faire de la science qui pourrait montrer que les autorités de sant…
RT @sudokuvariante: T'as raison @lonnibesancon , ce n'est pas éthique de faire de la science qui pourrait montrer que les autorités de sant…
RT @sudokuvariante: T'as raison @lonnibesancon , ce n'est pas éthique de faire de la science qui pourrait montrer que les autorités de sant…
RT @sudokuvariante: T'as raison @lonnibesancon , ce n'est pas éthique de faire de la science qui pourrait montrer que les autorités de sant…
RT @sudokuvariante: T'as raison @lonnibesancon , ce n'est pas éthique de faire de la science qui pourrait montrer que les autorités de sant…
RT @sudokuvariante: T'as raison @lonnibesancon , ce n'est pas éthique de faire de la science qui pourrait montrer que les autorités de sant…
T'as raison @lonnibesancon , ce n'est pas éthique de faire de la science qui pourrait montrer que les autorités de santé ont fait n'importe quoi pour faire plaisir aux lobbies pendant la pandémie.
@ann_mcnitt https://t.co/IjsOswsKbN https://t.co/fAknv3jwnE https://t.co/xQwAcK5ErE https://t.co/oJkGxVowBh https://t.co/dC2FFxb6vD https://t.co/O6dZgQiG18
@CaVautrin @gouvernementFR @Sante_Gouv Aucune étude ne montre une quelconque utilité du masque chez les enfants, si ce n'est pour les choquer psychologiquement et pour les contrôler. Vous êtes des barbares et des pervers. https://t.co/XuOkYTYz59
RT @DrJ_surgeon: And then there are the only 2 randomized studies looking at effectiveness of masking for preventing Covid - Denmark and Ba…
@PoeBrianL @katiewr31413491 @dwallacewells I am bored, @katiewr31413491. So, I am going to show you this study that you like to proclaim is "seminal." Here are the masking sections from the supplement. First off, we see it is a surgical mask. Better than nothing, but we can do better. /+ https://t.co/zgkQQI8hYh https://t.co/36WLaaT7T3
@MeachamDr @RonFilipkowski He's Smarter than You NEWS FLASH: 2020) Danish mask study that JAMA, NEJM & Lancet REFUSED to publish just published in Annals of Internal Medicine. Largest randomized controlled trial to date w/6,024 subjects #Masks were NOT Effective against infection https://t.co/eRLmgkNiCB
@Hinyai9 @beers70285711 @RynOGames_ @ShitpostGate 1. Masks were not effective in mitigating spread by any significant margin https://t.co/gDsgJgtTHV 2. Social distancing wasn't effective in stopping spread https://t.co/rO4WM0PWjO 3. Natural immunity was as effective, if not better than vaccinations https://t.co/Fh0X7ZAhY0
RT @AlbertaBound9: @RWMaloneMD Back in Mar 2021, an RCT "DANMASK" study with 4,682 showed that #masks don't work in non-hospital settings.…
@ebakazu @hanakihideaki マスクの実状の有効率試験では実生活の環境で初期コロナ時に比較したこちら： https://t.co/D1ZQaAPu5x 成人6,024人を対象に参加者をマスク着用グループと非着用グループに分け、1か月後のコロナ感染率を比較 主な結果： マスク着用群の感染率：1.8％ 非着用群の感染率：2.1％ その差は-0.3%でした。
@parcorix24 @cIhomXj2fRepeLp コクランレビューや、 このデンマークでのRCTの結果での有意差なしの論文等が根拠にされていました。 https://t.co/3JMNL8fIA7
@JonjoBamjo @SalamonSMD https://t.co/IBLReOIc1F
@TysonBarker8 @coffinofspite @QuasiInstitute @libsoftiktok Ugh. This is why I stopped engaging with people. They never do any work themselves. https://t.co/P2kJ8Mkeu4
@donaldkoenig https://t.co/kXUiDKXXyg
@Meaning_in_All @fitterhappierAJ https://t.co/fEqjhLa0JC
@Marco_W_S @FrankBettina Ich wette nicht, das Wetten wäre Glücksspiel und dies ist eine Sünde. ich kann Ihnen auch einzelne Studien aufzählen wie diese: https://t.co/LDVIkKjdzU Es gibt keine Studie, welche die Wirksamkeit des Tragens einer Maske zum Schutz vor COVID-19 kausal belegt.
@PatriciaHaraAJ @Ed_Oliiver @rafaelgloves https://t.co/zFtzdTTdIP
@NiusMarco https://t.co/nHnPxKW3KB https://t.co/qDXmn1GB4l
@Elmechon42 @ettourneur @NiusMarco Le masque ne protege que des bacteries propagées par les miasmes Mais le significatif dans votre post, c'est votre incapacité à etayer votre propos autrement que par votre avis. Sinon il y a des etudes, vous savez les trucs ecrits par des Medecins https://t.co/nHnPxKW3KB https://t.co/YzzoMXVICd
@GMidtbo @tropic_health @VPrasadMDMPH Here's what i found https://t.co/CaB5HR1R0M
@FrankFurter420a In that study, the covid disease rate in recommended mask wearers was 1.8% versus 2.1% in the control group who did not get the recommendation. They did not assess risk in people around an infected mask wearer versus one with no mask. https://t.co/ZgTYWOisPT
@DietmarHaudegen @HBayerhamm36625 @YanSteinschen @jreichelt Bitte schön: https://t.co/I6MlC4yoH9
@CHU4life Etude Danoise sur 6000 patients. 3000 avec le masque et 3000 sans. Conclusion : Aucune différence. Par contre d'autres études démontrent que le port du masque est délétère pour la santé. https://t.co/phIQtN1cII
@laurenceide69 @FreeMIN24465256 Ça vs instruira. Étude avec gr contrôle. Le bénéfice du masque=maigre. Effectiveness of adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers : A Randomized Controlled Trial, Annals of Internal Medicine,volume 174,n°3.
@ClaudetteGGibs1 There was a study that masks made little to no difference https://t.co/jiS8uGvnaf
RT @CorinneReverbel:
@dninio @fill_two_sh @JohnRuddick2 @TonyNikolic10 @Fredy13_Backup @WildColonialGal @JohnLarter000 @NSWCHO @nswpolice @HonTonyAbbott OMG you've resorted to youtube videos because the only randomised controlled showed no benefit of masks. Typical of you to suggest otherwise. Lies. Lies. Lies. https://t.co/BFu8pxxZyf
@DrJohnLoMonaco @rogersbee67 @DrGorfinkel Scientific dogma is challenged, as long, as it’s not about masks, vaccines, trans, climate... DANMASK study https://t.co/B3F8E68f7O a community trial that failed to show mask effectiveness while ultimately published, was initially rejected by major journals . Cochrane Review
@The_Irishman_30 @D_M_Robles @liz_churchill10 https://t.co/pUa1IR9bbu
@Vision4theBlind We've known this for 4 years as Bungdaard et al was published on november 2020 https://t.co/DWSGshLpop
@OFasola @MajaHermanMD Bardzo wiele. Pierwszy z brzegu przykład niegodny tytułu naukowego. Maseczki - badań jest więcej https://t.co/6YDGiSe3qA https://t.co/LentVC5B3j https://t.co/55SQ4NjOzd
@TheJordanHyland @garymelvinx @JennaLaineESPN and what about this one? have fun reading! In no state, region, or city did the mandates show any effect. Stop denying reality. https://t.co/amE4x7dJB5
RT @Z8ZLQj8YJEfwai8: 酷すぎるなこのアカウントは..幼稚を超えて何か怖い.. 以下論文は2020年RCT、コロナ感染率にマスクが効果の有意性を見出せなかった。 さっさと「何故レプリコンを打ったと嘘を吐いたのか？」に答えて下さい。 貴方のやり方は異常です。…
RT @Z8ZLQj8YJEfwai8: 酷すぎるなこのアカウントは..幼稚を超えて何か怖い.. 以下論文は2020年RCT、コロナ感染率にマスクが効果の有意性を見出せなかった。 さっさと「何故レプリコンを打ったと嘘を吐いたのか？」に答えて下さい。 貴方のやり方は異常です。…
RT @Z8ZLQj8YJEfwai8: 酷すぎるなこのアカウントは..幼稚を超えて何か怖い.. 以下論文は2020年RCT、コロナ感染率にマスクが効果の有意性を見出せなかった。 さっさと「何故レプリコンを打ったと嘘を吐いたのか？」に答えて下さい。 貴方のやり方は異常です。…
@Liz_Wheeler A large-scale RCT (Randomized Control Trial) stated that masks were largely ineffective. Many boxes of N-95s clearly stated that they "don't provide protection from nCoV". Yet some sheeple are still gullible. https://t.co/cMnOcXjx0Q https://t.co/nz3MxNeMeX
RT @Z8ZLQj8YJEfwai8: 酷すぎるなこのアカウントは..幼稚を超えて何か怖い.. 以下論文は2020年RCT、コロナ感染率にマスクが効果の有意性を見出せなかった。 さっさと「何故レプリコンを打ったと嘘を吐いたのか？」に答えて下さい。 貴方のやり方は異常です。…
RT @Z8ZLQj8YJEfwai8: 酷すぎるなこのアカウントは..幼稚を超えて何か怖い.. 以下論文は2020年RCT、コロナ感染率にマスクが効果の有意性を見出せなかった。 さっさと「何故レプリコンを打ったと嘘を吐いたのか？」に答えて下さい。 貴方のやり方は異常です。…
RT @Z8ZLQj8YJEfwai8: 酷すぎるなこのアカウントは..幼稚を超えて何か怖い.. 以下論文は2020年RCT、コロナ感染率にマスクが効果の有意性を見出せなかった。 さっさと「何故レプリコンを打ったと嘘を吐いたのか？」に答えて下さい。 貴方のやり方は異常です。…
RT @Z8ZLQj8YJEfwai8: 酷すぎるなこのアカウントは..幼稚を超えて何か怖い.. 以下論文は2020年RCT、コロナ感染率にマスクが効果の有意性を見出せなかった。 さっさと「何故レプリコンを打ったと嘘を吐いたのか？」に答えて下さい。 貴方のやり方は異常です。…
RT @Z8ZLQj8YJEfwai8: 酷すぎるなこのアカウントは..幼稚を超えて何か怖い.. 以下論文は2020年RCT、コロナ感染率にマスクが効果の有意性を見出せなかった。 さっさと「何故レプリコンを打ったと嘘を吐いたのか？」に答えて下さい。 貴方のやり方は異常です。…
@b6M4BV1UxM99254 @studiocorvo マスクはこれ、個人での使用に関しては効果は薄いけど集団でちゃんとつければ効果あるよって出てる。 デンマークのマスク着用者におけるSARS-CoV-2感染予防のための他の公衆衛生対策にマスク着用推奨を追加することの有効性：ランダム化比較試験 https://t.co/P6ySl92Bav
RT @Z8ZLQj8YJEfwai8: 酷すぎるなこのアカウントは..幼稚を超えて何か怖い.. 以下論文は2020年RCT、コロナ感染率にマスクが効果の有意性を見出せなかった。 さっさと「何故レプリコンを打ったと嘘を吐いたのか？」に答えて下さい。 貴方のやり方は異常です。…
RT @Z8ZLQj8YJEfwai8: 酷すぎるなこのアカウントは..幼稚を超えて何か怖い.. 以下論文は2020年RCT、コロナ感染率にマスクが効果の有意性を見出せなかった。 さっさと「何故レプリコンを打ったと嘘を吐いたのか？」に答えて下さい。 貴方のやり方は異常です。…
RT @Z8ZLQj8YJEfwai8: 酷すぎるなこのアカウントは..幼稚を超えて何か怖い.. 以下論文は2020年RCT、コロナ感染率にマスクが効果の有意性を見出せなかった。 さっさと「何故レプリコンを打ったと嘘を吐いたのか？」に答えて下さい。 貴方のやり方は異常です。…
RT @Z8ZLQj8YJEfwai8: 酷すぎるなこのアカウントは..幼稚を超えて何か怖い.. 以下論文は2020年RCT、コロナ感染率にマスクが効果の有意性を見出せなかった。 さっさと「何故レプリコンを打ったと嘘を吐いたのか？」に答えて下さい。 貴方のやり方は異常です。…
@Z8ZLQj8YJEfwai8 「コクランに78もRCTあるじゃないか」は撤回で良いですか？ 元々は、マルス氏は「コクラン、CDC、各RCTでも結果が出ていないものが多数」と言って、多数出せていないという指摘でした。 それに対して、この論文1本を出しただけで、 https://t.co/eFxVY8O9D1
RT @Z8ZLQj8YJEfwai8: 酷すぎるなこのアカウントは..幼稚を超えて何か怖い.. 以下論文は2020年RCT、コロナ感染率にマスクが効果の有意性を見出せなかった。 さっさと「何故レプリコンを打ったと嘘を吐いたのか？」に答えて下さい。 貴方のやり方は異常です。…
RT @Z8ZLQj8YJEfwai8: 酷すぎるなこのアカウントは..幼稚を超えて何か怖い.. 以下論文は2020年RCT、コロナ感染率にマスクが効果の有意性を見出せなかった。 さっさと「何故レプリコンを打ったと嘘を吐いたのか？」に答えて下さい。 貴方のやり方は異常です。…
RT @Z8ZLQj8YJEfwai8: 酷すぎるなこのアカウントは..幼稚を超えて何か怖い.. 以下論文は2020年RCT、コロナ感染率にマスクが効果の有意性を見出せなかった。 さっさと「何故レプリコンを打ったと嘘を吐いたのか？」に答えて下さい。 貴方のやり方は異常です。…
RT @Z8ZLQj8YJEfwai8: 酷すぎるなこのアカウントは..幼稚を超えて何か怖い.. 以下論文は2020年RCT、コロナ感染率にマスクが効果の有意性を見出せなかった。 さっさと「何故レプリコンを打ったと嘘を吐いたのか？」に答えて下さい。 貴方のやり方は異常です。…
酷すぎるなこのアカウントは..幼稚を超えて何か怖い.. 以下論文は2020年RCT、コロナ感染率にマスクが効果の有意性を見出せなかった。 さっさと「何故レプリコンを打ったと嘘を吐いたのか？」に答えて下さい。 貴方のやり方は異常です。 https://t.co/eiMFGYBavF https://t.co/zLPaCd5bE1
@newstart_2024 Dr. Fauci was and is a LIAR, who belongs in prison.
@maxhasadhd @unMaskedRogue Here’s just one https://t.co/M3RX0GmpwR
@Themislv_vls Toute les courbes n'ont montré aucune incidence sur le port du masque, c'est même marqué sur la boîte qui ne protège pas contre les virus , un moment faut accepter les preuves scientifiques... https://t.co/vADXcghmgX, pour désinformer je laisse ça aux médias ...
@ZawiszaZly @jakubwiech Ale to nie jest badanie. To omówienie badań. W tym omówieniu pojawiają się tylko trzy badania randomizowane gdzie ryzyka zakażenia SARS-CoV-2 wynoszą 0,82, 0,85, i 0,51. Ryzyko w najsłynniejszym badaniu zwanym DANMASK wyniosło 0,82. Tu jet opis badania: https://t.co/MGAJDfy3OE
@AltenbergLee I have replied to each of these sources, this is not convincing at all. Here are the top three that prove masks useless. In the real world https://t.co/GPhuwMS7mL https://t.co/57mCNjvzTu https://t.co/ZTA9SDstzY Not to mention the proven dangers and harms of masks
@delmoi @deedee1996 @thegaywhostrayd Annals of Internal Medicine: "The recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among wearers by more than 50% in a community with modest infection rates" https://t.co/Oep3qLvnnC
@Jean_Gilbert_D @APouliotPCQ Voici un essai contrôlé randomisé avec une cohorte de 6024 personnes sorti en 2020 concernant les masques. https://t.co/To69ecAnLm
RT @___Anna22: Nel settembre del 2021 all'epoca dei fatti lo studio di Henning Bundgaard, professore di cardiologia dell'Università di Cope…
RT @___Anna22: Nel settembre del 2021 all'epoca dei fatti lo studio di Henning Bundgaard, professore di cardiologia dell'Università di Cope…
Nel settembre del 2021 all'epoca dei fatti lo studio di Henning Bundgaard, professore di cardiologia dell'Università di Copenhagen era già uscito da più di un anno, quindi le forze dell'ordine hanno agito sulla base legale di superstizioni e stregoneria.https://t.co/7MaCBQaOBo https://t.co/KVFMXkPEJ5
@VPrasadMDMPH On the bright side there was a Danish study in 2020 https://t.co/KNLhRbxdx2 The downside was because they found no evidence masks reduced the spread of Covid-19, no journal wanted to publish it. Political bias beat science once more.
RT @GianlucaDAgos13: @CesareSacchetti @GiorgiaMeloni @Piantedosim Nel settembre del 2021 all'epoca dei fatti lo studio di Henning Bundgaard…
@CesareSacchetti @GiorgiaMeloni @Piantedosim Nel settembre del 2021 all'epoca dei fatti lo studio di Henning Bundgaard, professore di cardiologia dell'Università di Copenhagen era già uscito da più di un anno, quindi le forze dell'ordine hanno agito sulla base legale di superstizioni e stregoneria. https://t.co/lAnwwM9r9r
@Rekat1 @HolliFeeley @4TiffanyJustice Actually, there have been many studies that show that masks in public don't stop transmission of Sars-Cov-2. Here is one of them. https://t.co/SesHKF8fDG
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/H58ycg3Ogg Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYecMaG MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSjulA Ra…
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/H58ycg3Ogg Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYecMaG MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSjulA Ra…
RT @justin_hart: MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/H58ycg3Ogg Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYecMaG MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSjulA Ra…
MacIntyre 2013: https://t.co/H58ycg3Ogg Barasheed 2014: https://t.co/VhunYecMaG MacIntyre 2016: https://t.co/s8d8xSjulA Radonovich 2019: https://t.co/8DPzEsVQOL Alfelali 2020: https://t.co/6gm2bRJ8A3 Bundgaard 2021: https://t.co/LhQFPCysxD Abaluck, 2022: https://t.co/MzkTf0nCZS
RT @andrewbostom: NOTE: The NULL DANMASK RCT of community masking to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection was ALREADY published 11/18/20 https://t.…
RT @andrewbostom: NOTE: The NULL DANMASK RCT of community masking to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection was ALREADY published 11/18/20 https://t.…
RT @andrewbostom: NOTE: The NULL DANMASK RCT of community masking to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection was ALREADY published 11/18/20 https://t.…
NOTE: The NULL DANMASK RCT of community masking to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection was ALREADY published 11/18/20 https://t.co/u740usABFH, PRECEDED by the 5/20 publication of a meta-analysis of community masking RCTs NULL for flu prevention https://t.co/6EpifQ80cb https://t.co/dY2Pu10eLm
RT @covid_clarity: The largest randomized clinical trial on mask use was published today. The study failed to show masks were effective.…
@finn_oluna @peamilkstan https://t.co/f9b2ilcU3i
@clintvz1 @DellAnnaLuca oh, and yet. https://t.co/f9PtI03um1 Please shut the fuck up, Luca. Never tweet again.
@Segl03966132 @NielsANielsen @jorgenponder Jeg er ikke sikker på, at han har forstået sit eget studie af ... surgical masks: https://t.co/T0N0Lpgzrc
@dsimms239 @Bregisdog @Unstablesportz @_MLFootball Ok, you are officially a soft titted bitch. You would get smacked around talking like that. Hide behind your anon pfp. When you look in the mirror, you know you are a little, fat, weak pussy. There is zero testosterone in you, little guy. https://t.co/NIqSXK2I0w
@OddBackgrowy @randomizer88996 @Wantmy2dollars_ @bubba6186422393 @medwoman1 @JimlikesBB @AIUnbreaded @KirchoffSh62598 @8BrianVogel4 @DaddyBrianMC @Synyster63 @TreatHunterDog @theProgEqualist @FlattieLoverDeb @Caperloo5 @NatashaForTrump @Bruh888888888 @Silver_Strike @MolaRamLinux @CivilLost @alshadowdancer @LifeOnMarz7 @MucusMucous1 @TraitortR @jeffsmith0000 @itisjustmebabe @ThinkyTexan @VinceGottalotta @JenCages @scottstocker4 @deathbyorcas @Budleo_Morgan @DNAIntelligence @whagyjr @_Kel_Varnsen_ @cl1ntonserver @eanstrainserver @redkingdom986 @TomSmit74870120 @laneisrad @Mary95342400 @RepublicanRehab @TeekeeMon @FifthDonkey @_CapitalOffense @Sinner_Lilith @Karlton111 @isthishell25 @Krispi_Largo @MichalYouDoing I can go on all day https://t.co/7b0txTF9ez
Useful estimate on impact of air filters, albeit with considerable uncertainty: 22% reduction (95% CI: -14% to 47%) in SARS-CoV-2 infection hazard over several months. Interestingly, similar to 18% (95% CI: -23% to 46%) reduction estimated in DANMASK trial (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33205991/) ....
@TimothyLane @sweden_justice @BeckyJohnson222 @SCMountainGoat @crewdog1963 Also, a mask study from Denmark was published. 6,000 people in the trial. 50% wore masks, 50% didn t, randomly assigned. After one month the results showed no statistically significant difference in COVID infection rates. https://t.co/q3cuqNt1Wg
RT @rubiaconceptual: Un ensayo controlado aleatorio danés 6000 participantes, publicado Annals of Internal Medicine en 11/2020, no encontró…
RT @rubiaconceptual: Un ensayo controlado aleatorio danés 6000 participantes, publicado Annals of Internal Medicine en 11/2020, no encontró…
@MEUNIERPatric11 @Like_a_conne @Leila__craft https://t.co/MZJKJiqiX0
@Figment_Imagine @TomsTidbits @jjoque E.g.: https://t.co/i0s2AG7BM9 In this Danish RCT, mask wears saw a not stastically significant 0.3% reduction in COVID after a month (1.8% of mask wearers infected compared to 2.1% of controls). I wouldn't call a 0.3% absolute reduction (or 14$ relative) "substantial."
@novemberain_exe Excuse me, i do apologize for grabbing the wrong link. https://t.co/ROWIWlsORU
@Visitor51171015 @as1ap @Spicyman1980_ @DrPuerner https://t.co/ubovNfvlng Studie von mehr Masken zu weniger Infektionen. https://t.co/8j8uVgNeke Hinweis auf Reduzierung von Infektionen bei Masken zu anderen Maßnahmen (Statistische Signifikanz knapp nicht erreicht). Die beiden letzten Additionen zu Cochrane
@LaMadreDeSatan Y ojo, que el otro RCT que incluye (aunque no tenga mucha potencia) lo que muestra es que no hay ninguna diferencia significativa en los 2 grupos. https://t.co/sIk6wzms1H https://t.co/X8RXxJ2Eju
RT @CuendetV: Alors que : 8/n https://t.co/CMMQ9IDqKg
補強するのに使われるべきではないではなく結論付けるのに使われるべきでないでした失礼 ちなみにこの論文です https://t.co/cRb2WIk7Al
@mousewheel1124 @makimura0314 @noiver どうせ論文貼っても読めないから画像貼ってあげたのに https://t.co/3ZFwKyaNgy
RT @Acinonyx_3: @GoddessAnat @combatCarpincho @georgehahn That a load of bull! Is that a thumb suck fact? Real science proves you dead WRON…
RT @Acinonyx_3: @combatCarpincho @georgehahn https://t.co/gUMShYcrmB WRONG! It makes no significant difference according to the scientific…
RT @Mightyjack1: @YANxIX5JjSQy3hk @774nyannyan この論文やね。 ここにはこう書かれてるよ。 「この調査結果からマスク着用が感染防止に効果的ではないと結論付けることはできない」ってな。 https://t.co/jlFL7hKU…
@YANxIX5JjSQy3hk @774nyannyan この論文やね。 ここにはこう書かれてるよ。 「この調査結果からマスク着用が感染防止に効果的ではないと結論付けることはできない」ってな。 https://t.co/jlFL7hKUky https://t.co/AmPhzF18Oh
@twtomcat @cgarchitekt https://t.co/VizK1rF2ra
@maidmania_iidx @ryotaro5512 本当ですね 元の論文 https://t.co/FXUBbZDSS6 では Two-sided P values less than 0.05〜 で見ていて、ファクトチェックの該当文章は前半後半が別の話ですね 調査もマスク着用効果を調べればよかったのに、介入（サージカルマスク配布と説明）有無の効果を陽性率で見ようとして要素入れすぎです…
@CAnsermoz @MerciBonSens Ça ne marche pas ou très peu avec les autres virus respiratoires, il y avait peu de chance que ça marche avec le covid. Le premier essai randomisé dans le cadre du covid a été fait au Danemark et publié en novembre 2020: https://t.co/IifqnhnCOk 3/n
@BeckerLabCRTD @NaWi_Berlin @Horfenn @Karl_Lauterbach Ich halte mich daran https://t.co/jVdoQvLGYk
@JonathanSarfat1 There's also the remaining question of whether you can get behavior changes without mandates. In an ideal world you could. https://t.co/JHL8JGAHc3 https://t.co/BPTYfYTWbZ [https://t.co/pqJdHLN47u https://t.co/eoOVAnueay https://t.co/wSEM7uDCQm (https://t.co/bZonxEQ5ij)]
@Ryouma_Koji なんかおすすめ出てきたので 1個目 URL見えん 2個目 https://t.co/fdKy3QS9cw マスク着用しない集団(デンマーク)で着用に差はなかった 3個目 https://t.co/qo2r3HN9Be 病院でマスクはめちゃくちゃ効果あったよ 引用みたらこんな感じなのでマスクは適切につけたら効果があるってことで！ てか引用古っ
@dad66_debbie @elonmusk Yes. Actual STUDIES on the efficacy of masking (largely suppressed by govts/media/big tech) demonstrated ~zero impact on C19 infections but MAJOR, NEGATIVE impact on multitude of other things (education, oral health, social cohesion, psych health, etc.) https://t.co/ueFxTy1Y49
@apsmunro DANMASK RCT in 2020 also tested 1-way surgicalmask use, found no stat sig difference. Placebo effect might have been less of an issue as masks were not widely promoted in Denmark at time of study. https://t.co/g4TKgVqpMH
@GidMK @apsmunro So I'm guessing you care more about the results based on testing/diagnosis from Solberg et al.? https://t.co/BPTYfYTWbZ [https://t.co/2JztTBs4Et https://t.co/ghjyPUBwjS https://t.co/wSEM7uDCQm (https://t.co/bZonxEQ5ij)] https://t.co/JHL8JGAHc3 https://t.co/HA680Ove3E
@CylonSaysNo @GininaTeacup1 https://t.co/CVRgP7IG0V No statistically significant difference.
@DontVoteSplit True. https://t.co/ONFcL8iosk
@Heal_with_Rife デンマークの論文。 → 「マスク着用の習慣がない所でマスク着用の【推奨】をしたらどうなるだろ？https://t.co/3hjc17uzDP」って観点の研究。 結論は「マスクの有無で殆ど差が出ぇへんかったけど、この研究結果では【マスクが感染防止に効果的やないと結論付けられないので】」
@Hxsyth @Imaran87458054 @joe97559604 @realChrisBrunet @TheOmniLiberal https://t.co/bruhzT0QqV
@GrantDenn @MustangMedicX @CBSNews It's been long known & common knowledge among the medical community that they don't stop transmission of colds (Another Coronavirus)/flu, etc. There are many studies. Even predating Covid. https://t.co/kfGX8ZOJcI https://t.co/oLqhgQBzbt
@Valeria__79 @Biga17207571 @MarioMbx1900 @ilpost 2020. E' una meta analisi scarsina, alcuni dei commenti non sono proprio ottimali, non vedo stratificazioni per età. Ma lo stesso anno è uscita una revisione del Cochrane molto più comprensiva di quella. Io parlo di cose come questa: https://t.co/XSr7Io1CZW
@dcj_21 @drsimonwilliams (1)Bundgaard, H., et al. (2020). “Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers.” Annals of Internal Medicine Over 6,000 participants. found no statistically significant difference in
@LupoBlu11 @MarioMbx1900 @Agenzia_Ansa https://t.co/NvIWXwepV6 https://t.co/XSr7Io2aPu
@xandersohn @Sammyvdxx @BNE535 @chadfelixg Do you prefer the Danish or Cochrane metanalysis? Neither indicated that masks were particularly effective in the real world (vs. lab) at preventing COVID. https://t.co/ClD5m49a1B https://t.co/muN8WnaOTW
@DrAdriano86 https://t.co/nCxFsBrw9b It's studies like these that make me wonder how you get to that % If 'random masking' were this good, how would it be possible to get this data? Unless these guys have high conflict of interest
@onlythefinest07 @LiberalGenXVet @PeterSweden7 https://t.co/34QgY5STVS "The recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among wearers by more than 50%"
@t_NYC That's it...blame you neuroses on your child. And then pass that neurotic behavior on to her. Great job, dad.
@pitland77 デンマークのマスク着用者におけるSARS-CoV-2感染を防ぐための他の公衆衛生対策にマスク推奨を追加することの有効性 https://t.co/BzZk5fiJXi
RT @bread_shockpan7: いやこの論文見て「ほら❗️ちょっとは効果あるじゃん❗️」って思うならマジでもう勝手にしろよw知らんわww ホント宗教染みてるわ
@greg_travis @BenK_Data Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers https://t.co/82BDVqvyce https://t.co/pG4OeZrdo0 https://t.co/dhctj9QjSa https://t.co/URfCKLvfVC
いやこの論文見て「ほら❗️ちょっとは効果あるじゃん❗️」って思うならマジでもう勝手にしろよw知らんわww ホント宗教染みてるわ
@Doctor_Eric_B @MustachMcGee Does a ">>>>>>>>>" dominance of surgical masks over no masks mean a confidence interval from 46% reduction to 23% increase in risk from covid in an RCT with 95 participants? https://t.co/PK8cvH5sEZ
@PoeBrianL @GininaTeacup1 @TIME Multiple rcts show no benefit. Including massive one. But hey, go ahead and provide your silly "modeled" studies that prove nothing. Hell, even the manufacturerers don't claim effectiveness. Why? https://t.co/WEcIJj4e0J
@Petruskas_ @CarlosRuas https://t.co/DsN0qDNDof; https://t.co/T8rdmKjyq5; https://t.co/VmKnD5EhsZ; https://t.co/X05MtmjJpU; https://t.co/HJz51nJiXg E por aí vai.
@D9870565 https://t.co/z5lsf6STaC マスク着用による換算対策に有意差が出なかった論文（参考として反証論文も添付します）
@Oliviersanstom @LeCovidOfficiel Celle là par exemple Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: A Randomized Controlled Trial: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 174, No 3 (https://t.co/hpRKHTfhzR). Il y en a plein d'autres
@thehatsofdean @DrHoenderkamp @ProfKarolSikora https://t.co/KVn8zceQd3
@14Josegar @frantastikko @GeoingenieriaMu @FisionB @cromatic7 @20m https://t.co/2UpJNJjFip
@jaxxdragonan @Dcatz77 @EpiEllie Explain the charts. Why does the effective mitigation not show up? Here is the study. https://t.co/sRAD38AqR3
@BonCitoyenJP Conclusion en anglais, çà ira ? https://t.co/w7CiTAHuRK https://t.co/TlR8v0bKM8
@Buenrolloreturn https://t.co/7eCPKyxZ5i
Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: A Randomized Controlled Trial https://t.co/2IadIRVMBp
@goddeketal @AlaskaAir The Absolute Risk Reduction of wearing a face mask is 0.3%. From: "Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers - A Randomized Controlled Trial”, by Henning Bundgaard, et al, 2020.
@catturd2 “Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers - A Randomized Controlled Trial”, by Henning Bundgaard, et al (21 other authors), 2020.. The Absolute Risk Reduction was 0.3%.
@AbraarKaran @JAMA_current @Stanford "Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers - A Randomized Controlled Trial" 2020. The Absolute Risk Reduction was 0.3%. The outcome of wearing a mask is a coin toss.
@DrTomFrieden "Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers - A Randomized Controlled Trial" 2020. Absolute Risk Reduction was 0.3%. I never wore a mask and never got sick. Wearing a mask was a coin toss.
@shrewddudescast @jvipondmd https://t.co/hm98kFT37c https://t.co/oanwOaqoEy https://t.co/tY8u9AXBXK I'm sure you will find reasons to dismiss these, there are plenty more. There are no easy answers, but I think you are more opposed to being told what to do than the minor inconvenience of wearing a mask. Bye
RT @Jikkyleaks: @RichardWWard1 @_untampered @FrancieNolan6 @VPrasadMDMPH @CDCMMWR @vkprasadlab RCT. No significant effect. Your turn. Plea…
RT @Jikkyleaks: @RichardWWard1 @_untampered @FrancieNolan6 @VPrasadMDMPH @CDCMMWR @vkprasadlab RCT. No significant effect. Your turn. Plea…
@RichardWWard1 @_untampered @FrancieNolan6 @VPrasadMDMPH @CDCMMWR @vkprasadlab RCT. No significant effect. Your turn. Please show an RCT that demonstrates a beneficial effect of community masking. It should include the downstream consequences such as fear and reduced medical attendance. https://t.co/BFu8pxxZyf
RT @MsDicekey: @yfuruse @kutsunasatoshi わざわざありがとうございます。拝見します。 こちらもぜひご一読ください。 着用の有無に有意差なし 1) Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation t…
RT @MsDicekey: @yfuruse @kutsunasatoshi わざわざありがとうございます。拝見します。 こちらもぜひご一読ください。 着用の有無に有意差なし 1) Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation t…
RT @MsDicekey: @yfuruse @kutsunasatoshi わざわざありがとうございます。拝見します。 こちらもぜひご一読ください。 着用の有無に有意差なし 1) Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation t…
@QuickToshi @kutsunasatoshi ではこれらの 科学的論文 はいかがでしょうか？ 着用の有無に有意差なし 1) Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers, Bundgaard, 2021 2) SARS-CoV-2 Transmission among Marine Recruits during
@yfuruse @kutsunasatoshi わざわざありがとうございます。拝見します。 こちらもぜひご一読ください。 着用の有無に有意差なし 1) Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers, Bundgaard, 2021 2) SARS-CoV-2 Transmission among
@Su15100307 @lisa_iannattone ahhh, thank you for providing actual links and studies. Most of them have been either debunked or have some serious issues. For example "supply of 50 surgical masks" (https://t.co/bvIW6PneZe) is meaningless cause surgical masks are not effective when only used by target.
@ME_LisaZett https://t.co/MeS6XBC2eT
@bhavanti @koichi_kawakami 千葉県の決定の科学的根拠とされたものです よくわかりませんが果たして？！ @wilsonstheorem 立憲千葉がまい進した道 秋葉就一県議となんとかエンジェルによる請願 自民は反対で反対多数。知事が覆す https://t.co/kyJq0vL4jN
@Claude__Cat @J_that_is @AnnaForFlorida 1. The existence of translational medicine is true, and its purpose is what I said it was. So, your overall conclusion is demonstrably false. 2. Masks https://t.co/j7HQ4qRLnQ https://t.co/Il2LmvdrKy
@OpDracula @GeneralMayhem @thatsnotmine125 Covid is airborne. Do you understand anything. https://t.co/zxufThHWuR
@yoshkapundrick @jonathanstea The Danish mask study. And again, no evidence they work. https://t.co/eVA2wL8tkG
@juro789 Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses Effectiveness of adding a mask recommendation to other public health measures to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in Danish mask wearers これらはマスク効果なし派よりの論文 目を通してみな
See, you directly lied about what the study found. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33205991/ The very first line of the abstract: Observational evidence suggests that mask wearing mitigates transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).
RT @jonathanalbaba: /14 Remember when i said masks didn't work. They don't Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public H…
RT @orientis312: コクランレビューの引用しろ、このデンマークの研究チームの論文にしろ、議員さんはちゃんと内容を把握し、情報をアップデートした上で発信しないとデマ拡散になってしまいますよ。 https://t.co/ZuOJoJEnLr
RT @orientis312: コクランレビューの引用しろ、このデンマークの研究チームの論文にしろ、議員さんはちゃんと内容を把握し、情報をアップデートした上で発信しないとデマ拡散になってしまいますよ。 https://t.co/ZuOJoJEnLr
RT @orientis312: コクランレビューの引用しろ、このデンマークの研究チームの論文にしろ、議員さんはちゃんと内容を把握し、情報をアップデートした上で発信しないとデマ拡散になってしまいますよ。 https://t.co/ZuOJoJEnLr
@no81738923995 @Jaytee116James @IdunsDaughter @cbeckj @TonyBaduy @dann58638436 @ryanbeed @Wammy517 @richykirsh @ptcjoneses @JimeeLiberty @jilel76 @Pouldeau61 @JonathanHannah @Bobbert69572732 @LummHandy @BuynKing @Charlie81207771 @lazlowoodbine42 @iamromieb @Frenchg11623069 @IndyTim40 @jtmayes3 @JKelleyK @MaureenStroud @GreenGuerilla1 @SariellaForever @TakethatCt @pawley_robert @Scary7Dr @TnAlistair @zee_parody @provaxtexan @doom37455413 @ogilville1 @SkepticalMutant @doritmi @Monstercoyliar @paramaniac9 @Arsibd @NamelessGhoulTX @FemmeVoilet @Trumpbangskids @ConsequentialBr @absurd_dad @DocDeezWhat @JordanDoll7 @Kathmarval @mcfunny @kevinoler Poor Sheila NO experience. Can't even READ the Title of a study EMBARRASSING It's NOT a study of MASK EFFECTIVENESS "Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection" That's embarrassin
RT @orientis312: コクランレビューの引用しろ、このデンマークの研究チームの論文にしろ、議員さんはちゃんと内容を把握し、情報をアップデートした上で発信しないとデマ拡散になってしまいますよ。 https://t.co/ZuOJoJEnLr
RT @purplephrase: このマスク着用に関するランダム化比較試験論文は、コミュニティノートの厚労省資料にも記載されているものの図式化です。 #コミュニティノートもいい加減な判断をするもの だということがわかります。 #子どもたちを守りたい #マスク論争 #科学的根拠…
RT @purplephrase: このマスク着用に関するランダム化比較試験論文は、コミュニティノートの厚労省資料にも記載されているものの図式化です。 #コミュニティノートもいい加減な判断をするもの だということがわかります。 #子どもたちを守りたい #マスク論争 #科学的根拠…
RT @orientis312: コクランレビューの引用しろ、このデンマークの研究チームの論文にしろ、議員さんはちゃんと内容を把握し、情報をアップデートした上で発信しないとデマ拡散になってしまいますよ。 https://t.co/ZuOJoJEnLr
RT @orientis312: コクランレビューの引用しろ、このデンマークの研究チームの論文にしろ、議員さんはちゃんと内容を把握し、情報をアップデートした上で発信しないとデマ拡散になってしまいますよ。 https://t.co/ZuOJoJEnLr
RT @orientis312: コクランレビューの引用しろ、このデンマークの研究チームの論文にしろ、議員さんはちゃんと内容を把握し、情報をアップデートした上で発信しないとデマ拡散になってしまいますよ。 https://t.co/ZuOJoJEnLr
コクランレビューの引用しろ、このデンマークの研究チームの論文にしろ、議員さんはちゃんと内容を把握し、情報をアップデートした上で発信しないとデマ拡散になってしまいますよ。 https://t.co/ZuOJoJEnLr https://t.co/tNw77gtBJP
RT @purplephrase: このマスク着用に関するランダム化比較試験論文は、コミュニティノートの厚労省資料にも記載されているものの図式化です。 #コミュニティノートもいい加減な判断をするもの だということがわかります。 #子どもたちを守りたい #マスク論争 #科学的根拠…
RT @purplephrase: このマスク着用に関するランダム化比較試験論文は、コミュニティノートの厚労省資料にも記載されているものの図式化です。 #コミュニティノートもいい加減な判断をするもの だということがわかります。 #子どもたちを守りたい #マスク論争 #科学的根拠…
RT @purplephrase: このマスク着用に関するランダム化比較試験論文は、コミュニティノートの厚労省資料にも記載されているものの図式化です。 #コミュニティノートもいい加減な判断をするもの だということがわかります。 #子どもたちを守りたい #マスク論争 #科学的根拠…
RT @purplephrase: このマスク着用に関するランダム化比較試験論文は、コミュニティノートの厚労省資料にも記載されているものの図式化です。 #コミュニティノートもいい加減な判断をするもの だということがわかります。 #子どもたちを守りたい #マスク論争 #科学的根拠…
RT @purplephrase: このマスク着用に関するランダム化比較試験論文は、コミュニティノートの厚労省資料にも記載されているものの図式化です。 #コミュニティノートもいい加減な判断をするもの だということがわかります。 #子どもたちを守りたい #マスク論争 #科学的根拠…
RT @purplephrase: このマスク着用に関するランダム化比較試験論文は、コミュニティノートの厚労省資料にも記載されているものの図式化です。 #コミュニティノートもいい加減な判断をするもの だということがわかります。 #子どもたちを守りたい #マスク論争 #科学的根拠…
RT @purplephrase: このマスク着用に関するランダム化比較試験論文は、コミュニティノートの厚労省資料にも記載されているものの図式化です。 #コミュニティノートもいい加減な判断をするもの だということがわかります。 #子どもたちを守りたい #マスク論争 #科学的根拠…
RT @purplephrase: このマスク着用に関するランダム化比較試験論文は、コミュニティノートの厚労省資料にも記載されているものの図式化です。 #コミュニティノートもいい加減な判断をするもの だということがわかります。 #子どもたちを守りたい #マスク論争 #科学的根拠…
RT @purplephrase: このマスク着用に関するランダム化比較試験論文は、コミュニティノートの厚労省資料にも記載されているものの図式化です。 #コミュニティノートもいい加減な判断をするもの だということがわかります。 #子どもたちを守りたい #マスク論争 #科学的根拠…
RT @purplephrase: このマスク着用に関するランダム化比較試験論文は、コミュニティノートの厚労省資料にも記載されているものの図式化です。 #コミュニティノートもいい加減な判断をするもの だということがわかります。 #子どもたちを守りたい #マスク論争 #科学的根拠…
このマスク着用に関するランダム化比較試験論文は、コミュニティノートの厚労省資料にも記載されているものの図式化です。 #コミュニティノートもいい加減な判断をするもの だということがわかります。 #子どもたちを守りたい #マスク論争 #科学的根拠 https://t.co/IO7aKryUYH https://t.co/8yHWA0XhTR
@CgqoaLk @kawaiiahiruchan コミュニティノートの厚労省資料にも本論文は記載されていますよ？ コミュニティノートもいい加減な判断をするものですね。 https://t.co/IO7aKryUYH
@bee2216 @jvipondmd Masks don't work. "4862 completed the study. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 occurred in 42 participants recommended masks (1.8%) and 53 control participants (2.1%)." https://t.co/gDZRRB2LKX
@JessarmandoGme1 @FLMIRONES @doctormacias @jeffgilchrist 1 único estudio randomiz prospect de mascarillas frente placebo a nivel individual (los de más fiabilidad) es DanMask, q mostró su ineficacia. En revisiones sistemáticas (no "narrativas") la mayor autoridad es Cochrane. No eficacia. https://t.co/onuVba35YW https://t.co/pxlIRTpVTw
@DopplerEffect93 @tomscott99 @USMortality You seem to be a religious mask believer although I trow evidence at you they don’t work and you cannot show RCT they do work. There is one Danish RCT. No significant differences. https://t.co/FRrVAyvWjb https://t.co/LSBxtOIgua
RT @jonathanalbaba: /14 Remember when i said masks didn't work. They don't Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public H…
@DancerDad @boutros555 @myrrlyn @DavidEmmerson_D @MartinKulldorff @HRaleighspeaks The abstract tells what the study found so yeah, i ned that over a list of study titles "Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers : a Randomized Controlled Trial" What does this say?
@Themislv_vls je vous comprends. Le masque de papier, version simple https://t.co/umxMBNkjN0 version compliquée https://t.co/w7CiTAHuRK
@SaiyanBio Gestes barrieres version simple https://t.co/umxMBNkjN0 version compliquée https://t.co/w7CiTAHuRK
RT @_be_el_tee_: @OttawaHospital .@OttawaHospital is lying again about masks Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public…
Le port du masque de papier Version simple https://t.co/umxMBNkRCy version compliquée https://t.co/w7CiTAI2Hi
@OttawaHospital .@OttawaHospital is lying again about masks Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers A Randomized Controlled Trial https://t.co/iRQmJNcv99 https://t.co/3H0kgauPyC
@why_not_nemo @DgCostagliola Deja entendu dire par ma concierge, sinon... https://t.co/v9X1WPy5a5 https://t.co/w7CiTAHuRK
@Ghani_Du92 @VSainement @OffLalanne qui t'es toi ? https://t.co/w7CiTAHuRK
RT @JamesSurowiecki: The rate of Covid in Denmark at the time - April-May 2020 - was low overall, which kept the results from reaching stat…
RT @JamesSurowiecki: The rate of Covid in Denmark at the time - April-May 2020 - was low overall, which kept the results from reaching stat…
The rate of Covid in Denmark at the time - April-May 2020 - was low overall, which kept the results from reaching statistical significance. But as the authors wrote, "the 95% CIs are compatible with a 46% reduction to a 23% increase in infection." https://t.co/jFevd2nUIN
@jsm2334 @kevinnbass https://t.co/j7HQ4qRLnQ
@MrStillwater @KartikLakhotia @kevinnbass No, it is all observational. Here is the Danish RCT. Result: Not significant. You believe in masks and try to prove they work, which they don’t. https://t.co/FRrVAyvotD
@KartikLakhotia @MrStillwater @kevinnbass Simple: Masks don’t work against viruses. There is one RCT in Denmark. Result: not significant. The Bangladesh study is flawed. Observational and laboratory are useless. https://t.co/FRrVAyvotD
@JackRavenswood @Signe05693625 @DocPepper_FR @Sochalila Dommage https://t.co/5qYmVfpLpa
RT @FreeMIN24465256: Rappel scientifique sur le port du masque. Une étude a été faite pour le virus du COVID (https://t.co/Jlk2kuUdlA) Rés…
@jorjorward @DerekPunsWard @Liz_Wheeler Here is the study that settled it for me. https://t.co/nTvot3mLQi
RT @FreeMIN24465256: Rappel scientifique sur le port du masque. Une étude a été faite pour le virus du COVID (https://t.co/Jlk2kuUdlA) Rés…
RT @FreeMIN24465256: Rappel scientifique sur le port du masque. Une étude a été faite pour le virus du COVID (https://t.co/Jlk2kuUdlA) Rés…
RT @FreeMIN24465256: Rappel scientifique sur le port du masque. Une étude a été faite pour le virus du COVID (https://t.co/Jlk2kuUdlA) Rés…
RT @FreeMIN24465256: Rappel scientifique sur le port du masque. Une étude a été faite pour le virus du COVID (https://t.co/Jlk2kuUdlA) Rés…
RT @FreeMIN24465256: Rappel scientifique sur le port du masque. Une étude a été faite pour le virus du COVID (https://t.co/Jlk2kuUdlA) Rés…
RT @FreeMIN24465256: Rappel scientifique sur le port du masque. Une étude a été faite pour le virus du COVID (https://t.co/Jlk2kuUdlA) Rés…
RT @FreeMIN24465256: Rappel scientifique sur le port du masque. Une étude a été faite pour le virus du COVID (https://t.co/Jlk2kuUdlA) Rés…
Rappel scientifique sur le port du masque. Une étude a été faite pour le virus du COVID (https://t.co/Jlk2kuUdlA) Résultats: 1,8% de gens personnes pourtant le masque ont été infectées contre 2.1% des personnes ne le portant pas. Donc une différence de 3 personnes sur 1000 https://t.co/2mqiG7a1Vz
Rappel scientifique sur le port du masque. Une étude a été faite pour le virus du COVID (https://t.co/Jlk2kuUdlA) Résultats: 1,8% de gens personnes pourtant le masque ont été infectées contre 2.1% des personnes ne le portant pas. Donc une différence de 3 personnes sur 1000 https://t.co/TVXXUd2utA
Rappel scientifique sur le port du masque. Une étude a été faite pour le virus du COVID (https://t.co/Jlk2kuUdlA) Résultats: 1,8% de gens personnes pourtant le masque ont été infecté contre 2.1% des personnes ne le portant pas donc une différence de 3 personnes sur 1000 https://t.co/2N0h1O4smZ
RT @jonathanalbaba: /14 Remember when i said masks didn't work. They don't Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public H…
@50Words_forsnow @StevenArra Bundgaard H, Bundgaard JS, Raaschou-Pedersen DET, et al. Effectiveness of adding a mask recommendation to other public health measures to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in Danish mask wearers: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2021;174(3):335–343.
@briancheeek @sylwie_sch Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers A Randomized Controlled Trial https://t.co/iRQmJNcv99 https://t.co/lEKhbjiJsO
@smurfsj @DrLoupis @Fynnderella1 Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers A Randomized Controlled Trial https://t.co/iRQmJNcv99 https://t.co/iw74GIMUq5
@Kevin_McKernan @Thomas_Binder It is not ok when studies against the “narrative” have difficulties being published. It destroys real science. An example: A huge Danish study from 2020 showing no effect of the public wearing masks. The Lancet etc would not publish it. Link: https://t.co/zFzlrxYey1
RT @carpe_diem0820: マスク着用推奨効果を評価したRCT マスク着用率46％で感染率は推奨群1.8％、対照群2.1％で有意差なし 感染率↓には高い着用率が必要 Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to O…
@Malkira420 @justin_hart Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers A Randomized Controlled Trial https://t.co/Unqe6W3gRb
@lweisenthal @kevinnbass @SeattleiteLeo Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: A Randomized Controlled Trial: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 174, No 3 https://t.co/WYoJHT3e4g
@WalkerHenrySmi1 @GiveUsAQuid I'll trust science rather than your enraged howls of being exposed as a lying disinformation bot. Lol Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers https://t.co/kaANrxxE68
Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers : A Randomized Controlled Trial https://t.co/XpmZIv8Y9C
@k24hr1 @kuratamagohan 新型coronaのみを対象としたものなら2020年にデンマークで行われた研究結果が同年に出ています。「Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Weares」というタイトルです。
against their narrative. So let’s start: - Masks:
Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: A Randomized Controlled Trial: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 174, No 3 https://t.co/fGT3EUmJQf
RT @Vicke_2011: 反マスク派がマスクに効果がない根拠としていたので、 論文"Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-…
@TruePatriot8472 @ClownWorld_ 2022 Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers https://t.co/sBdZ8evhju
RT @jonathanalbaba: /14 Remember when i said masks didn't work. They don't Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public H…
@m_g_bauer @DrEliDavid Masks do not make a difference. See this amazing study that the Lancet did not want to publish because they did not like the conclusion: https://t.co/zFzlrxYey1
@James___Morris @LizHighleyman Full disclosure: I'm sure masks work, b/ there's a slew of epidemiological RCT studies that claim there's no evidence they work at population levels. It bugs the heck out of me b/c I don't have much to push back with. This is the only tidbit I can offer… https://t.co/soTiqJzn4e
@beowulf888 @MichaelSFuhrer @andyaschmidt Adherence in the
@VPrasadMDMPH @MartyMakary This large Danish study on mask use was not published in the Lancet etc because they did not like the conclusion - that wearing masks don’t make a difference https://t.co/zFzlrxYey1
@DrMarcoPaez @GidMK It's not compliance in all studies. The
RT @mebaruhirame: Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish M…
RT @mebaruhirame: Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish M…
Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Weare デンマークのマスク着用者の SARS-CoV-2 感染を防ぐために、他の公衆衛生対策にマスクの『推奨事項を追加することの有効性』 https://t.co/D36AWMkcK7
2. Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers A Randomized Controlled Trial Henning Bundgaard, et al. https://t.co/mFccelzp3j
Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: A Randomized Controlled Trial: https://t.co/Y6qtESvt9D 3030人がマスク着用推奨群に、2994人が対照群に無作為に割り付けられ、4862人が研究を完了した。
@healthbyjames 3) Nope. 2022 Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers https://t.co/sBdZ8evP92
RT @jonathanalbaba: /14 Remember when i said masks didn't work. They don't Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public H…
@vmarino @zipthelip987123 @SGamble1234 @TaraBull808 @ThTh72201958 3) 2022 Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers https://t.co/sBdZ8evP92
Danish study finds no clear evidence face masks protect wearer from Covid-19 infection https://t.co/urQOonM6G3
@chrismartenson There was one big study, 6,000 participants: no difference in infection rate between mask/no mask. Lancet etc denied to publish it because “they” did not like the result: https://t.co/zFzlrxYey1
@nelsonepega Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers https://t.co/n186zhnfrR
@nelsonepega Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers https://t.co/n186zhnfrR
(87/170) 42. Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: A Randomized Controlled Trial “The recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce
@Crow123456 @FatEmperor There was a thorough large Danish Study that found no significant difference. The big journals did not want to publish it because they did not like the result. Here the link: https://t.co/zFzlrxYMnz
RT @jonathanalbaba: /14 Remember when i said masks didn't work. They don't Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public H…
Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: A Randomized Controlled Trial: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 174, No 3 https://t.co/CNpQmyBbxK
Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: A Randomized Controlled Trial: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 174, No 3 https://t.co/6HGFhBQ6ik
@Chrissy19993 “In this community-based, randomized controlled trial, a recommendation to wear a surgical mask when outside the home. Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers https://t.co/8zNBVQuq8e
@dan613 @GaryWhi27400978 @fullytyped @DianneWatts4BC I am absolutely correct Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers : A Randomized Controlled Trial
Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers https://t.co/cW3fmLrHUl PT2
RT @jonathanalbaba: /14 Remember when i said masks didn't work. They don't Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public H…
RT @jonathanalbaba: /14 Remember when i said masks didn't work. They don't Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public H…
Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: A Randomized Controlled Trial: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 174, No 3 https://t.co/p1fKP7ijVF
@gadfly @RepThomasMassie Can you address these studies? Draconian PHOs are unscientific & harmful. https://t.co/ELkAB5Muic Masks do not immunize from transmission. https://t.co/hj7ddxR4cD Arrogant Uniparty [American globalist elitists] have awakened a Monster with overreach. People are VERY IRRITATED. https://t.co/4V1dDffJNK
@anvisa_oficial da uma lida pelo menos! Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: A Randomized Controlled Trial: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 174, No 3 https://t.co/Iz7gUHq9p1
@aweaselnamedfee @DISOBEYsupply @TraceySurette1 @TWilsonOttawa Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers A Randomized Controlled Trial https://t.co/QuTMw1Vtzr https://t.co/SIGBx7XDGX
@aweaselnamedfee @DISOBEYsupply @TraceySurette1 @TWilsonOttawa Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers A Randomized Controlled Trial https://t.co/QuTMw1Vtzr
ANVISA, VEJA a ineficiência da máscara. Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: A Randomized Controlled Trial: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 174, No 3 https://t.co/ecnrzhMogb
RT @nilobezerra: Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Ma…
Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: A Randomized Controlled Trial: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 174, No 3 https://t.co/sojQVjD3Mk
RT @florfernandes16: @filipebarrost @mqueiroga2 @mqueiroga2 O senhor estuda? Aproveite e leia: https://t.co/V3ZY2zusES
RT @florfernandes16: @filipebarrost @mqueiroga2 @mqueiroga2 O senhor estuda? Aproveite e leia: https://t.co/V3ZY2zusES
Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: A Randomized Controlled Trial: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 174, No 3 https://t.co/JgCcalPHIS
Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: A Randomized Controlled Trial: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 174, No 3 https://t.co/SIwVHPShUo
RT @florfernandes16: @filipebarrost @mqueiroga2 @mqueiroga2 O senhor estuda? Aproveite e leia: https://t.co/V3ZY2zusES
RT @florfernandes16: @filipebarrost @mqueiroga2 @mqueiroga2 O senhor estuda? Aproveite e leia: https://t.co/V3ZY2zusES
@filipebarrost @mqueiroga2 @mqueiroga2 O senhor estuda? Aproveite e leia: https://t.co/V3ZY2zusES
@C_01997 @lisalacey79 @IMHeatherAmI @YorkUniversity Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers A Randomized Controlled Trial https://t.co/QuTMw2d4qZ https://t.co/8d4zOPFp63
@lisalacey79 @IMHeatherAmI @YorkUniversity Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers They never stopped the spread of anything since 1918 https://t.co/QuTMw1Vtzr https://t.co/71EP1pcjNY
@Dorotheacalm @CristinaMallai @SKGandhiMD @mattprescott 5. "Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers."https://t.co/noDkAB8klO 6. "Contamination by respiratory viruses on outer surface of medical masks https://t.co/RYx4kLfKwU
@Jerome_bg Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: A Randomized Controlled Trial: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 174, No 3 https://t.co/WYoJHT3e4g
Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: A Randomized Controlled Trial: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 174, No 3 https://t.co/l3PCnWeErD
@sandrousseau Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers: A Randomized Controlled Trial: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 174, No 3 https://t.co/WYoJHT3LTO
RT @jonathanalbaba: @CoryBMorgan Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infect…
@CoryBMorgan Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers A Randomized Controlled Trial https://t.co/ZHyEv48GJW https://t.co/IgaVjjOIRX
RT @jonathanalbaba: /14 Remember when i said masks didn't work. They don't Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public H…
RT @jonathanalbaba: /14 Remember when i said masks didn't work. They don't Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public H…
Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures "Our results suggest that the recommendation to wear a surgical mask when outside the home among others did not reduce the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in mask wearers" https://t.co/47bRe2g8Lf
RT @jonathanalbaba: /14 Remember when i said masks didn't work. They don't Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public H…
RT @RCustardo: @EbonyJHilton_MD @TrishtheDish_7 @TheNickFoy DANMASK was the first RCT on masking specific to covid, could not find statisti…
@EbonyJHilton_MD @TrishtheDish_7 @TheNickFoy DANMASK was the first RCT on masking specific to covid, could not find statistical significance (it was underpowered, designed to identify >50% effect size and it did not) https://t.co/Cvy9SmfJCo https://t.co/mNFuGqg27Q
RT @Vegan_Bobcat: @PachuauMatana @FLSurgeonGen Here are the two RCTs on face masks/SARS-CoV-2: https://t.co/ZA6hLfVbuN https://t.co/zvN9sSl…
@PachuauMatana @FLSurgeonGen Here are the two RCTs on face masks/SARS-CoV-2: https://t.co/ZA6hLfVbuN https://t.co/zvN9sSlepS WHO meta-analysis of RCTs on face masks/influenza (Page 26): https://t.co/ChmizBLa1S
@JBinToronto @Mayday77754000 @NightShiftMD Bundgaard H, et al. Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers. 18 November 2020. Annals of Internal Medicine. https://t.co/y5znKXEwEb
RT @fatsoby: @ajlamesa "a small to moderate effect". Or no effect (e.g. https://t.co/TaJFUdqb97). Or a perverse effect (e.g. https://t.co/E…
RT @fatsoby: @ajlamesa "a small to moderate effect". Or no effect (e.g. https://t.co/TaJFUdqb97). Or a perverse effect (e.g. https://t.co/E…
@Pawel_IT @DailyJLee @lisa_iannattone @trendless https://t.co/WlWpOOPOBf
RT @samanesi92: @aseman_1396 آهای ملت ایران! اگه کودکان یاعزیزانتون توی بیمارستانها براثر #کووید_۱۹ و #قارچ_سیاه فوت شدن،یک #دروغ بزرگ به ش…
RT @samanesi92: @aseman_1396 آهای ملت ایران! اگه کودکان یاعزیزانتون توی بیمارستانها براثر #کووید_۱۹ و #قارچ_سیاه فوت شدن،یک #دروغ بزرگ به ش…
RT @samanesi92: @aseman_1396 آهای ملت ایران! اگه کودکان یاعزیزانتون توی بیمارستانها براثر #کووید_۱۹ و #قارچ_سیاه فوت شدن،یک #دروغ بزرگ به ش…
RT @samanesi92: @aseman_1396 آهای ملت ایران! اگه کودکان یاعزیزانتون توی بیمارستانها براثر #کووید_۱۹ و #قارچ_سیاه فوت شدن،یک #دروغ بزرگ به ش…
RT @samanesi92: @aseman_1396 آهای ملت ایران! اگه کودکان یاعزیزانتون توی بیمارستانها براثر #کووید_۱۹ و #قارچ_سیاه فوت شدن،یک #دروغ بزرگ به ش…
RT @samanesi92: @aseman_1396 آهای ملت ایران! اگه کودکان یاعزیزانتون توی بیمارستانها براثر #کووید_۱۹ و #قارچ_سیاه فوت شدن،یک #دروغ بزرگ به ش…
RT @samanesi92: @aseman_1396 آهای ملت ایران! اگه کودکان یاعزیزانتون توی بیمارستانها براثر #کووید_۱۹ و #قارچ_سیاه فوت شدن،یک #دروغ بزرگ به ش…
RT @samanesi92: @aseman_1396 آهای ملت ایران! اگه کودکان یاعزیزانتون توی بیمارستانها براثر #کووید_۱۹ و #قارچ_سیاه فوت شدن،یک #دروغ بزرگ به ش…
RT @samanesi92: @aseman_1396 آهای ملت ایران! اگه کودکان یاعزیزانتون توی بیمارستانها براثر #کووید_۱۹ و #قارچ_سیاه فوت شدن،یک #دروغ بزرگ به ش…
RT @samanesi92: @aseman_1396 آهای ملت ایران! اگه کودکان یاعزیزانتون توی بیمارستانها براثر #کووید_۱۹ و #قارچ_سیاه فوت شدن،یک #دروغ بزرگ به ش…
RT @samanesi92: @aseman_1396 آهای ملت ایران! اگه کودکان یاعزیزانتون توی بیمارستانها براثر #کووید_۱۹ و #قارچ_سیاه فوت شدن،یک #دروغ بزرگ به ش…
RT @samanesi92: @aseman_1396 آهای ملت ایران! اگه کودکان یاعزیزانتون توی بیمارستانها براثر #کووید_۱۹ و #قارچ_سیاه فوت شدن،یک #دروغ بزرگ به ش…
@aseman_1396 آهای ملت ایران! اگه کودکان یاعزیزانتون توی بیمارستانها براثر #کووید_۱۹ و #قارچ_سیاه فوت شدن،یک #دروغ بزرگ به شما گفتن دیگه نمیتونم شاهد مرگ کودکان باشم و مصلحت اندیشی کنم! دارن به فریبکاری بی شرمانشون ادامه میدن ماسکها دربرابر بیماری بی اثر هستن این هم سند https://t.co/tRUoZrVyRX
@AllanMarkby @Margin00Walker @IrfanDhalla DANMASK is the first one: https://t.co/Cvy9SmfbMQ It was underpowered, but couldn't find a statistically significant effect. The 2nd one was the Bangladesh RCT: https://t.co/HWAAP7UFZi Cloth - no effect surgical - no effect under 50 years old (??)
@ardeophyte @AlastairBitsoi Ok, let's go there, assuming you actually work in health care, Surely you are aware of the DANMASK study (https://t.co/Wo36MrzVOz) which found no statistically significant difference between masked and unmasked populations. More to come. 1/
@dvtbarton @yugly @rreedsing @gopTODD Two days ago reviewing the DANMASK study (https://t.co/Wo36MrzVOz) which found no statistically significant difference in COVID infection rates between masked and unmasked populations.
@SteveHiltonx @SaraCarterDC Not public servants, they're CONS •"Experts" out of sync. •Must not “believe in Science” [™️Fauch] Worldwide, elitists ➡️back putsch of the USA. ➡️expect Uniparty alligator to not eat them first. ➡️are clueless about masks: https://t.co/D4CB7MJDuu POLI-SPLAINING to the plebs. https://t.co/hV8E3gx1qo
RT @ci2twit: @catturd2 Draconian PHOs are unscientific & harmful. https://t.co/ELkAB63xkc Masks do not immunize from transmission. https:/…
@catturd2 Draconian PHOs are unscientific & harmful. https://t.co/ELkAB63xkc Masks do not immunize from transmission. https://t.co/hj7ddxyUYv Arrogant Uniparty [American globalist elitists] have awakened a Monster with overreach. The People are VERY IRRITATED. https://t.co/NY8nTZbMJT https://t.co/KGsfDMHoPW
@kali0x2a I ended up turning to Chris Martenson's podcasts. He discusses outdoor transmission data (link at relevant point in video). https://t.co/5CS5OqTt1s
@Emiodont @toni17lopez @RaulBlancoRueda ¿Sólo sabes soltar falacias como esas? Que se te han pedido RCTs o meta-análisis de RCTs, y pones un meta-análisis que NO es de RCTs. Que sólo incluye UNO, y es el danés 2020, la referencia 66 del enlace que pone, que volvió a demostrar lo mismo que todos: https://t.co/phEHaBs2lO
@DixielandBlue @JJRodV Do you have source data on that? Because from everything I've read, unless you are properly trained and fitted for an N95 it's pointless. See this for good factual data: https://t.co/KpElqpEXXi
How are masks effective Vs Covid? https://t.co/kD6kwZMj3z
The 4 Easy Steps To Avoid COVID https://t.co/Np4GQPYMNW via @YouTube
RT @BM7791: @TimHowe73500437 @NAJ562 Check out this transmission study carried out on US marines. Masks didn't do anything under the most s…
@jabeale https://t.co/z2Ud2yjAMm No statistical difference in mask wearing in prevention of transmission SARS-CoV-2. The
@MartinKulldorff Again !!!!! this is the 5th study that shows that masks dont work for respiratory virus, check the others: https://t.co/NWmFfX51ki https://t.co/CnLiGemVyF https://t.co/zM7uHaMGRn https://t.co/a4vj9D118s
@ajlamesa "a small to moderate effect". Or no effect (e.g. https://t.co/TaJFUdqb97). Or a perverse effect (e.g. https://t.co/EVadMWSqOE). And what about the negative physiological and psychological impact?
RT @cptmphil: The 4 Easy Steps To Avoid COVID https://t.co/u3WRophoht via @YouTube @FatEmperor discussion on the use of masks including D…
The 4 Easy Steps To Avoid COVID https://t.co/u3WRophoht via @YouTube @FatEmperor discussion on the use of masks including Denmark. Lesser known but solid study done by USMC with recruits during basic training. Masks are generally useless- video done by a data guy, like you
@nadhimzahawi A lot of us could do without your "protection"
@NHSuk He's a video about @GVDBossche and what he thinks https://t.co/rgLGOxYGHi
@YoRosesYo @AlexBerenson Maybe you should watch this video and listen to @GVDBossche more https://t.co/rgLGOxYGHi
@davidfrum Yet, where’s your science? The people you mock know: • PHOs are harmful https://t.co/kCK0BjPDIO • Masks ineffective https://t.co/tunRn7lPuK & • mRNA “vax” untested & dangerous https://t.co/u6yGFExesH Empiricism=“Prove me wrong.” SCIENCE ISN’T MATTER OF POPULARITY OR PARTY. https://t.co/uzwVwKeduK https://t.co/C6fysCKV3M
RT @scwheeler24: @RealMattCouch He really does his homework. Hard to argue against what he says. https://t.co/6nyk2GIIgy
@rickyllesor1 @Krazy_Boy_Fredo @RealMattCouch He makes good sense. https://t.co/6nyk2GIIgy
@RealMattCouch He really does his homework. Hard to argue against what he says. https://t.co/6nyk2GIIgy
@FreyaMeansLady @Harvard2H Blame the right people. Science doesn’t support the agitprop. https://t.co/0uIu6r8Wju Regardless of origin, “memory antibodies selected over time by natural infection have greater potency and breadth than [] by vaccination.” https://t.co/ELkAB63xkc https://t.co/hj7ddxyUYv
@clarencejohnsn @NeedsFarmers @presscitizen Keep smelling those roses! https://t.co/HjrvREruKx
@RheaBoydMD Draconian PHOs unscientific & harmful https://t.co/ELkAB63xkc Masks do not immunize from transmission https://t.co/hj7ddxyUYv •❖• ABNORMAL response to COVID-19 has far reaching & longterm adverse impact on mental & physical health WHY ISN’T CHILD SUICIDE A GREATER CONCERN? https://t.co/h64UIKZ2CI https://t.co/Xp8LnTcuML
Couldn't agree more - like this study - the only RCT on the issue in Henning Bundgaard et al. Annals of Internal Medicine November 2020; doi:https://t.co/POwTEmFKjU summarised here: https://t.co/TacUhTwKcz https://t.co/J0fHCiVREg
@MuffinScript @sparkmark71 @mkolken @LateNightBobbyD Just follow science . . . Masks do not immunize from transmission. https://t.co/hj7ddxyUYv Draconian PHOs are unscientific & harmful. https://t.co/ELkAB63xkc With overreach, arrogant Uniparty [American globalist elitists] have awakened a Monster. The People are VERY IRRITATED. https://t.co/8oEhyDXkz3 https://t.co/4V1dDfwMPK
@Club_Star_Wars @ginacarano This video says differently https://t.co/rgLGOxYGHi
@catvaxlax @ClarkeMicah Is he still referencing it FFS? Henning Bundgaard et al. Annals of Internal Medicine November 2020; doi:https://t.co/YQZ4pGFHV5
@ScottAdamsSays https://t.co/M7z9F8ri0g
@ScottAdamsSays @chrismartenson https://t.co/LHhEGLUyBu
@RyanRadia @JamesSurowiecki If you want a decent mask study look no further than this transmission study carried out on US marines. Masks did nothing under the most strict conditions you could hope for. https://t.co/tLy5lC3C0D Explained @ 11m here courtesy of @chrismartenson https://t.co/R7hfMs2eFd
@mtgreenee @SebGorka Masks are not scientifically supportable — so why force them on kids?! Are Pols that clueless about the mask studies? https://t.co/oZ0bQ6PuNd; https://t.co/6f5YzJrgfA COVID-based power grabs are destructive! “Who’s going to give back lost childhoods?” https://t.co/lQihFbQHIe https://t.co/PxiMifp1WR
@ianmSC @FratboyMarxist Masks don’t make sense. If you can smell odors through them, why think they’ll stop viral particles? Draconian PHOs are unscientific & harmful. https://t.co/eIHmsSPPCD Masks do not immunize from transmission. https://t.co/oZ0bQ6PuNd; https://t.co/6f5YzJrgfA https://t.co/03KMM5xh7F
@RebeccaBNurse @Joannechocolat Check out this recent transmission study carried out on US marines. Masks didn't do anything under the most strict conditions you could hope to impose. https://t.co/tLy5lC3C0D Explained @ around 11m here courtesy of @chrismartenson https://t.co/R7hfMs2eFd
@jenneheise @KrutikaKuppalli https://t.co/wB3vmaR3H8 and https://t.co/FRi8jlZ5TJ
Pure virtue signalling! https://t.co/tOHPlu5Cng proved masks have 0 statistically significant effect on transmission, & many other studies (& common sense) show that masking up for long hours can have serious adverse effects on health. MASKERS are the real unscientific idiots. https://t.co/uUOsjIhWIJ
@NrkOtkNrcsm @shabanais @AzamAnwarMD @ZubyMusic Then check out this transmission study carried out on US marines. Masks didn't do anything under the most strict conditions you could hope to impose. https://t.co/tLy5lC3C0D Explained @ around 11m here courtesy of @chrismartenson https://t.co/R7hfMs2eFd
RT @cptmphil: @NoelAnderson_ https://t.co/u3WRophoht Discusses the highs and lows of various mask studies and brings it down to a few simpl…
@EhrineAshbark @NeilClark66 @Waterstones Poor quality article. Check out this transmission study carried out on US marines. Masks didn't do anything under the most strict conditions you could hope to impose. https://t.co/tLy5lC3C0D Explained @ around 11m here courtesy of @chrismartenson https://t.co/R7hfMs2eFd
@ZackPolanski @CarolineLucas Nice outlet
RT @BM7791: @DurkinSusan @abirballan Vitriolic assertion doesnt make it true. Check out this study carried out on US marines. Masks didn't…
@DurkinSusan @abirballan Vitriolic assertion doesnt make it true. Check out this study carried out on US marines. Masks didn't do anything under the most strict conditions you could hope to impose. https://t.co/tLy5lC3C0D Explained @ around 11m here courtesy of @chrismartenson https://t.co/R7hfMs2eFd
@poochiewalker @LBC @MaajidNawaz ... this transmission study carried out on US marines. Masks didn't do anything under the most strict conditions you could hope to impose. https://t.co/tLy5lC3C0D Explained @ around 11m here by @chrismartenson https://t.co/R7hfMs2eFd P.S. Masks may have downsides too
@Kadeena8 @MaajidNawaz Check out this transmission study carried out on US marines. Masks didn't do anything under the most strict conditions you could hope to impose. https://t.co/tLy5lC3C0D Explained @ around 11m here by @chrismartenson https://t.co/R7hfMs2eFd P.S. Masks may have downsides too
@ca1ue @ScarFaceHat @GeorgeMonbiot Check out this transmission study carried out on US marines. Masks didn't do anything under the most strict conditions you could hope to impose. https://t.co/tLy5lC3C0D Explained @ around 11m here by @chrismartenson https://t.co/R7hfMs2eFd P.S. Masks may have downsides too
@Finndog2018 @ToniaBuxton @GeorgeMonbiot @ProfSpada ...this transmission study carried out on US marines. Masks didn't do anything under the most strict conditions you could hope to impose. https://t.co/tLy5lC3C0D Explained @ around 11m here courtesy of @chrismartenson https://t.co/R7hfMs2eFd
@MrJLebeau1 @JudyWeb92176381 @SarahOwen_ Check out this transmission study carried out on US marines. Masks didn't do anything under the most strict conditions you could hope to impose. https://t.co/tLy5lC3C0D Explained @ around 11m here courtesy of @chrismartenson https://t.co/R7hfMs2eFd
@NeilfromScone @TiceRichard @Julie34479 ...transmission. See this transmission study carried out on US marines. Masks didn't do anything under the most strict conditions you could hope to impose. https://t.co/tLy5lC3C0D Explained @ around 11m here courtesy of @chrismartenson https://t.co/R7hfMs2eFd
RT @BM7791: @TimHowe73500437 @NAJ562 Check out this transmission study carried out on US marines. Masks didn't do anything under the most s…
@TimHowe73500437 @NAJ562 Check out this transmission study carried out on US marines. Masks didn't do anything under the most strict conditions you could hope to impose. https://t.co/tLy5lC3C0D Explained @ around 11m here courtesy of @chrismartenson https://t.co/R7hfMs2eFd
@NAJ562 @Baileyphoto1 @JamesEFoster Strong, direct evidence can be found in this transmission study carried out on US marines. Masks had no effect under the most strict conditions you could hope to impose. https://t.co/tLy5lC3C0D Explained @ around 11m here courtesy of @chrismartenson https://t.co/R7hfMs2eFd
@NAJ562 For those interested in real science, check out this transmission study carried out on US marines. Masks ineffective under the most strict conditions you could hope for: https://t.co/tLy5lC3C0D Explained @ around 11m here courtesy of @chrismartenson: https://t.co/R7hfMs2eFd
@ToniaBuxton ...evidence for ineffectiveness is in this transmission study carried out on US marines. Masks didn't do anything under the most strict conditions you could hope to impose. https://t.co/tLy5lC3C0D Explained @ around 11m here courtesy of @chrismartenson https://t.co/R7hfMs2eFd
@TiceRichard @TiceRichard check out this transmission study carried out on US marines. Masks didn't do anything under the most strict conditions you could hope to impose. https://t.co/tLy5lC3C0D Explained @ around 11m here courtesy of @chrismartenson https://t.co/R7hfMs2eFd
RT @BM7791: @MaajidNawaz @MaajidNawaz check out this transmission study carried out on US marines. Masks didn't do anything under the most…
@MaajidNawaz @MaajidNawaz check out this transmission study carried out on US marines. Masks didn't do anything under the most strict conditions you could hope to impose. https://t.co/tLy5lC3C0D Explained @ around 11m here courtesy of @chrismartenson https://t.co/R7hfMs2eFd
@rolandsatchell @PluckleySave @MaajidNawaz @LBC @carlheneghan As i understand it the main transmission route is thought to be aerosols. Great vid looking at masks here from @chrismartenson https://t.co/R7hfMs2eFd
The 4 Easy Steps To Avoid COVID https://t.co/apSa8LfL7K via @YouTube
https://t.co/hGcpQN7X5l
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
RT @secondvirus: maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmas…
maskelerin yayılmayı önlediğine dair istatistik yok.. açık havada (1000’de 1) bulaşmadığı ise ayrı bir gerçek.. araştırmasını deneyini yapmışlar.. https://t.co/WBwTaFd0sU
Making kids wear masks at school is just silly. None of the facts support such idiocy. No kids die from Covid these are just facts #COVIDIOTS sad thing is parents don't do anything about it, that's sad https://t.co/YTIRNvOAWG
@CovidBlindWife https://t.co/5DchRV1ei6
https://t.co/e0vTupCY65
@steveinbath @KathyConWom I'm just gonna leave this here for all the geniuses... https://t.co/ohKslgsQG5
https://t.co/O7QrCYqek1
@JeffMillerCA2TX FWIW You Uniparty types are disgusting. You waged a petty passive-aggressive war on Trump for years & now expand ur attack to the People. PHOs unscientific https://t.co/ELkAB63xkc; https://t.co/hj7ddxyUYv; https://t.co/7aDewv5G2Y. Arrogant fools, The People are VERY IRRITATED https://t.co/Q5rj2788sG
@Bret_Sears Useless. Masking & PHOs are unscientific: https://t.co/eIHmsSyee3; https://t.co/oZ0bQ6xToD; https://t.co/6f5YzJ9ER0.
@TiceRichard Mask wearing is an exercise in population compliance. The only Randomised Control Trial (e. i. high quality) research project on efficacy of mask wearing DANMASK -19 clearly shows that masks are NOT working. https://t.co/JRhfkkt2oc
@stacy_redvirgo @bigplaincircle @DailyCaller They are. PHOs are unscientific: https://t.co/ELkAB63xkc; https://t.co/hj7ddxyUYv; https://t.co/7aDewv5G2Y. ~•~ We had much greater global warming in pre-industrial eras, & the course of world history was even warmer. We are actually in an interglacial period of an Ice Age. https://t.co/m3jbC7bB60
https://t.co/Eu21lg7TXe https://t.co/HkNv6urcNc https://t.co/du7Mh5ke48 https://t.co/T5UP5GkbpP https://t.co/FPWWFSeKlV https://t.co/gicXcQeYO9
@DarlaShine Draconian PHOs are unscientific & harmful. https://t.co/p5OdUDfKRf Masks do not immunize from transmission. https://t.co/D4CB7MJ5EW Arrogant Uniparty [American globalist elitists] have awakened a Monster with overreach. The People are VERY IRRITATED. https://t.co/B9AjM7GLNf https://t.co/fXwaTbeZcj
@PerkyBiscuits People can’t survive the social upheaval of PHOs, isolation, chronic fear & masking.
@BuckSexton Draconian PHOs are unscientific & harmful. https://t.co/tvL78Bouj0 Masks do not immunize from transmission. https://t.co/7VZb5w7wj4 Arrogant Uniparty [American globalist elitists] have awakened a Monster with overreach. The People are VERY IRRITATED. https://t.co/NY8nTZto8t
@janenb @andrewbostom https://t.co/Hhi15u8rda
RT @2u3v4w: 新型コロナ感染のマスクの効果に関する最近の論文： メタ解析：結論は出ていないが、マスクを推奨 https://t.co/Fsm6YsT3zZ 横断研究：マスクに感染制御の効果あり https://t.co/SWCuEyaM9m 上記に対する意見…
DR RAUNER UPDATE Dr.s at UNMC alarmed about capacity; fatalities from other causes will go up from attn to COVID cases; those dying are losing 5-30 yrs of life; lower infection rates in Kans, Nebr. cities w/mask ordinances in metro & surrounding areas. https://t.co/odJVf3d2Mg
2020 Nov 24 Coronavirus Community Update v51 Recording https://t.co/tm74BaKoN5 via @YouTube
RT @willyloman1: Covid-9/11 Chat w/churchdog42 on JFK Anniversary: Mask Research & Mandat... https://t.co/FFmNfp4c3t via @YouTube
RT @willyloman1: Covid-9/11 Chat w/churchdog42 on JFK Anniversary: Mask Research & Mandat... https://t.co/FFmNfp4c3t via @YouTube
RT @willyloman1: Covid-9/11 Chat w/churchdog42 on JFK Anniversary: Mask Research & Mandat... https://t.co/FFmNfp4c3t via @YouTube
Covid-9/11 Chat w/churchdog42 on JFK Anniversary: Mask Research & Mandat... https://t.co/FFmNfp4c3t via @YouTube
Randomized control trial fails to find protection from infection by wearing masks. https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817 But @DrTomFrieden & @ShamaCashG offer a commentary on the limits of the study https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-7499
J
FS
J
AN
み
?
J
J
BR
T
UE
ハ
W
R
م