Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf https://t.co/XwR4nvISQE https://t.co/KaenOvva8K
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Nov 2020 – Nov 2025Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter365 posts
-
News71 articles
-
Facebook10 posts
-
Reddit9 posts
-
Blogs9 articles
-
Bluesky5 posts
-
YouTube4 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The discussions encompass a variety of opinions, often highlighting points from the review. For instance, users frequently reference statements like 'wearing masks probably makes little or no difference' and the mention of 'low certainty evidence' to substantiate their arguments. This choice of wording and the tone reflects a decisive stance against mask mandates, with phrases such as 'pseudoscience' and 'negligible effect,' underscoring their conviction about the study's implications for future public health directives.
The majority of discussions reflect a strong consensus around the publication's findings, particularly regarding the limited effectiveness of masks.
Participants express high curiosity, referencing various aspects of the study and engaging with its implications for public health.
Many users show deep engagement by discussing specific details from the publication, such as the methodology and outcomes of the trials.
There is a widespread belief that the publication's findings could significantly influence public discussion and policy regarding mask mandates.
Abstract in brief
- The text discusses the global threat posed by respiratory virus epidemics, emphasizing past pandemics like H1N1, SARS, and COVID-19, and notes that antiviral drugs and vaccines alone may not effectively stop their spread.
- It presents an update to a Cochrane Review on physical interventions aimed at reducing the spread of respiratory viruses, detailing the methods used for evidence collection and analysis, including searches in multiple databases and citation analysis.
- The review focuses specifically on randomized controlled trials of interventions such as hand hygiene, face masks, and physical distancing, which are seen as essential in preventing transmission, while prioritizing rigorous data extraction methods to ensure accuracy and reliability amid urgent health concerns.
Top posts
Most liked on X and Bluesky@VPrasadMDMPH Also, N95s don't stop viruses. https://t.co/UNG7kclJbN https://t.co/uCM6QLJ2xf
Mask have never been shown to work. Check out the work of the Cochrane group. https://t.co/7g8A5Xxpvc https://t.co/YPwwJzrdmx
Reminder, this is the Cochrane Review on the subject: https://t.co/UNG7kc4G9N https://t.co/XkDDDkGM3B
@_stah Mechanistic studies? Come on. Here is the Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf https://t.co/JNCQ9Opm3a
Cochrane vient de confirmer que les masques sont inutiles à prévenir les infections respiratoires virales notamment, N'oubliez pas que CE N'EST PAS une nouveauté. https://t.co/qI1Ic9VAxI Ils l'avaient déjà dit en 2020. https://t.co/kxY9NBFMoy Donc on se fout de nous! ⏬ https://t.co/FFX6UlIryH
All mentions
Cochrane Review: Efficacy of Masks in Reducing Virus Spread
This video discusses the updated Cochrane evidence on masking for influenza and COVID-19. Masking, hand hygiene, and physical distancing are crucial in preventing the spread of respiratory viruses, based on randomized…
Physical Interventions to Curb Respiratory Virus Spread
This video updates a Cochrane Review on physical interventions to mitigate respiratory virus transmission. It covers rigorous methods for evidence collection, focusing on randomized controlled trials about hand hygiene…
Occult Crime Police Task Force
United States A Nation Dedicated to the Occult a Nation Founded on the Occult
Strategies to Reduce the Spread of Respiratory Viruses
Today, we discuss effective strategies to reduce the spread of respiratory viruses like COVID-19. Physical interventions, including hand hygiene, face masks, and social distancing, are critical in preventing…
Hyödylliset naamiot
RT @AlexZwitter2: @USMortality Previously from @cochranecollab Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory vir…
もう2025年だぞ?少しは勉強しろ https://t.co/zZzFB9XCuA Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses https://t.co/imLBnzZitV https://t.co/4KcLBuU9w5
@NotOpCue @broadwaybabyto @grok Findings of the Cochrane Review on Masks The relevant Cochrane review is the 2023 update to *Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses* (Jefferson et al., published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, covering 78 randomized
@grok @NotOpCue @broadwaybabyto Findings of the Cochrane Review on Masks The relevant Cochrane review is the 2023 update to *Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses* (Jefferson et al., published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, covering 78 randomized
@grok @NotOpCue @broadwaybabyto Findings of the Cochrane Review on Masks The relevant Cochrane review is the 2023 update to *Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses* (Jefferson et al., published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, covering 78 randomized
@Jimo0404 @shiharasiri @nagi_yoiti_15 コクランレビューはCochrane Libraryの公式レビュー「Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory
@NUBRF4WrQGoewsv @rikorara09 コクラン共同計画の2023年レビュー「Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses」(Jefferson et al.、Cochrane
@illegal_lemur @fireballfilms @LeoAKoerner @realchrisrufo The Cochrane review "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses" (Jefferson et al., updated 2023) pools RCTs showing no clear reduction in infections from medical/surgical masks in community settings, aligning with his claim of inconsistent
@K3LLYB33N @mavisclare @Rik12305402 Cochrane Review (Jefferson et al., 2023): Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses https://t.co/PHcFkJVPaC Please
RT @KarenBearss: @DrSuneelDhand ‼️COCHRANE MASK STUDY There is low certainty evidence from nine trials (3507 participants) that wearing a m…
RT @KarenBearss: @DrSuneelDhand ‼️COCHRANE MASK STUDY There is low certainty evidence from nine trials (3507 participants) that wearing a m…
@DrSuneelDhand ‼️COCHRANE MASK STUDY There is low certainty evidence from nine trials (3507 participants) that wearing a mask may make little or no difference to the outcome of influenza‐like illness (ILI) compared to not wearing a mask https://t.co/Wbp5NQfflN
@dan__berry @Antonio_Caramia @madforfree So cosa siano le Cochrane review (non proprio infallibili, HPV anyone?) e conosco lo studio in questione, 'Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses', caratterizzato da un discreto grado di incertezza e dall'eterogeneità degli studi /
@Drfahadalnajjar @RandPaul 1. Cochrane Systematic Review: Physical Interventions to Interrupt or Reduce the Spread of Respiratory Viruses (Updated January 2023) • Overview: This comprehensive review analyzed 78 RCTs (over 610,000 participants) on masks and other interventions against respiratory viruses,
@yan_tyabouzu こちらがマスクの有効性に関するコクランレビュー(Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses)のリンクです:https://t.co/7DLevNCvXE 詳細はこちらでご確認ください。
Thinking about pulling out that old COVID-19 Mask and putting your virtue on display? The Cochrane review titled "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses," published in Jan '23, found no efficacy in wearing masks, mainly because the masks
@catturd2 The Cochrane review titled "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses," published in Jan '23, found no efficacy in wearing masks, mainly because the masks were worn incorrectly or inconsistently, or the masks themselves were the wrong type of
@DavidCTower1 @Rebate462 @DrNeilStone The 2023 Cochrane Review on “Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses” examined a total of 78 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Of these, 12 trials specifically evaluated the effect of mask interventions, such as providing masks and
@MrBellamySan @gaughen Yeah busy with life. Here’s a recent review. I prefer pre-covid studies but this will do. Many more out there. https://t.co/O3yJ7BU6Kj(1
@grok @mooncave3 @grok Tom Jeffersonによるコクランズレビューにおいてマスクの有効性に関する調査を引き合いに出す人がいますが、著者はマスク着用はまったく意味がないと言っている? 論文名:Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses
@TriciaDearborn @shycollie Cochraine says otherwise https://t.co/dWAAxyiQ4I
@abetokyo 例えば例のコクランレビューを「マスクには感染予防効果がない」と誤解釈していたり Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses: https://t.co/hiq2CLWd6A
@nack555 @kozokozo54 @hosp_tohoku 2023年のコクラン・レビュー(Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory
@JohnTho04985400 @BGatesIsaPyscho Jefferson et al. (2023) - "Physical Interventions to Interrupt or Reduce the Spread of Respiratory Viruses" (Cochrane Review, updated version)
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses マスク論争してる方々はぜひ一読ください 78のRCTをまとめた論文です PubMedで読めますよ
@GhostOfSocrates Jokes is on you, they aren't any more effective https://t.co/dWAAxyiQ4I
いや? マスクは、感染の拡大を抑制しないんだよ。 https://t.co/zZzFB9XCuA Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses https://t.co/hqdBEkJxg8
@stegwort23 @EileenMoun9522 @tonyver45 @marie_ide80526 @grandpamac63 @DrNeilStone Even the "gold-standard" Cochrane Review states that masking was ineffective and many of the studies were from 2009 to 2016. It was known. They Knew "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses" https://t.co/287oGFWP8c https://t.co/4UrIij9tDJ
Update: Selected solid Science AGAINST MASKS (7/19) lack of effectiveness 38)-49) 38)https://t.co/hO9nPKX4Qt 39)https://t.co/C0p81vzzMI 40)https://t.co/hvG8b2ugQB 41)https://t.co/B2x8Qqw90L 42)https://t.co/MOpE4Dal39 43)https://t.co/rBkETabweN 44)https://t.co/w5hE7aj0XS https://t.co/lXI3rPv2FS
@christyfraser But this was started in 2020. https://t.co/pJfmNnrE3l https://t.co/UQSsUcEJkv
@beverins @Jo_11__ @ghhughes @BrentAWilliams2 https://t.co/7WtyZTNx0Q https://t.co/NV7ngUwuAx
@ClareCraigPath And the dreadful delays and misleading editorial by Cochrane regarding the 2023 update to this one 'Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses'
@PoeBrianL @OverrHypocrissy @dwallacewells @PeterHotez definitive meta-analysis of 78 studies with awesome combined statistical power: Cochrane Review (2023) - Physical Interventions to Interrupt or Reduce the Spread of Respiratory Viruses Then on top there's my 33 years as a board certified internist. Assessing on the level of
RT @CochraneLibrary: The Cochrane Review 'Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses' was published in…
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses - Jefferson, T - 2020 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/BpLoJkSJae
@B1llyHossness @adventurelife30 @armysman30 @Tennesseine @joe2boogaloo https://t.co/ETjeI0uZmQ Based on this study that showed single cloth masks didn't do much to stop the spread of COVID as we discovered it was air. This study was finished 3 months before that statement. Smart people often change their opinion based on new information around them
@TheMFingCOO @JeffNippard Karla Soares-Weiser, editor in chief of the cochrane library, made a statement in 2024 about the 2023 review of "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses", saying that people like you misinterpreted the results of the review
@Archestry @goddeketal “Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses” is the name of one scientific study published by the NIH. There are others.
@smurfsj https://t.co/AbeXG83MuB This study concluded that there’s no sufficient evidence to make such conclusions. We can go back and forth all day.
https://t.co/zZzFB9XCuA Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses Authors' declarations of interestTom Jefferson Version published: 30 January 2023 Version history https://t.co/aZhq2XpHyR https://t.co/YxxvYA8Jd1
@21Kerstin @goranga68 @schroeder_k @aya_velazquez Da bin ich aber froh, dass Sie mir Ihr umfangreiches Wissen meinem Nichtwissen gegenüberstellen. Cochrane-Review (2023): Physical Interventions to Interrupt or Reduce the Spread of Respiratory Viruses Quelle: Jefferson T et al., Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2023
RT @perfektworld: @grok @allestrinker @l8nighttracker Es gibt noch eine weitere wichtige Studie⤵️ Quantitative errors in the Cochrane revi…
RT @perfektworld: @grok @allestrinker @l8nighttracker Es gibt noch eine weitere wichtige Studie⤵️ Quantitative errors in the Cochrane revi…
RT @perfektworld: @grok @allestrinker @l8nighttracker Es gibt noch eine weitere wichtige Studie⤵️ Quantitative errors in the Cochrane revi…
RT @perfektworld: @grok @allestrinker @l8nighttracker Es gibt noch eine weitere wichtige Studie⤵️ Quantitative errors in the Cochrane revi…
@grok @allestrinker @l8nighttracker Es gibt noch eine weitere wichtige Studie⤵️ Quantitative errors in the Cochrane review on "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses" Yaneer Bar-Yam, Jon Samet, Alexander Siegenfeld, Nassim Taleb https://t.co/as6QyfRljx
@SecKennedy @CDCgov We don't believe you. Maybe if she publicly declares that masks, VAX, lockdowns, etc were all false & harmful & CDC deliberately lied. Here's a Cochrane review in 2020 on masks that I got silenced by biden for posting https://t.co/jXQCFjElgB
@mixed_recycling @trohyhusband @mantarnyc @esjesjesj Since studies were asked for and then immediately blocked here is the gold standard of meta analysis. https://t.co/n0Fr2VyYMm
@bjeansonne Most comprehensive study ever done said zero evidence masking makes any difference in preventing transmission. ZERO. Why WOULD you do it? Just to conform? It's not like history has ever shown that's a bad idea or anything....https://t.co/nJB5TZJUCM
https://t.co/geeyibreM0 But of course claims will be made, how could we have known? https://t.co/lTrqeLq3af
@Elmechon42 @ettourneur @NiusMarco toi aussi, principalement des conneries https://t.co/kRqUemb5Oq https://t.co/sGiLS2bEVk
@Jennife08816442 @grok @VPrasadMDMPH @Jennife08816442 @grok @VPrasadMDMPH Look up 'Jefferson T, et al. Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses' Cochrane Database 2023. Raw data > opinions. But they'd rather you not read the actual science.
@K3LLYB33N This sounds persuasive. But the data show that even N95 masks are ineffective at preventing airborne viruses. See: "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses" by the Cochrane Review. Masks don't work. This is propaganda.
RT @AnteMedicus: Update -Solid Science AGAINST MASKS (2/3) 10)https://t.co/Bo4JyxaZYD 11)https://t.co/B2x8QqvBbd 12)https://t.co/SfWQAjAgLL…
@k_b_lvi @twuntastical @BigGeeGee1 @BreezerGalway @TheIronLady67 @TBD77 @basil_ireton @chillipope @readthestudy @MarkChangizi https://t.co/WGKv9kEBBO
RT @AnteMedicus: Update -Solid Science AGAINST MASKS (2/3) 10)https://t.co/Bo4JyxaZYD 11)https://t.co/B2x8QqvBbd 12)https://t.co/SfWQAjAgLL…
@basil_ireton @k_b_lvi @BreezerGalway @chillipope @readthestudy @MarkChangizi Welcome to the conversation number 4! You need another 26 now. Lmao! You don't understand how aerosols work simpleton. Or how to read, apparently. https://t.co/WGKv9kEBBO
@k_b_lvi @BigGeeGee1 @BreezerGalway @chillipope @readthestudy @MarkChangizi How many shots have you had. Lots of them is vague. Screen shot from a study on masks efficacy? Come now, is that your only retort? https://t.co/WGKv9kEBBO
@k_b_lvi @BigGeeGee1 @BreezerGalway @chillipope @readthestudy @MarkChangizi https://t.co/WGKv9kEBBO https://t.co/vObjViDkj1
@k_b_lvi @BreezerGalway @chillipope @readthestudy @MarkChangizi Ha ha ha ha you better retreat Tweedle Dum! https://t.co/WGKv9kEBBO
@k_b_lvi @BreezerGalway @chillipope @readthestudy @MarkChangizi Get another 27 knuckleheads, and I'll consider retreat. https://t.co/WGKv9kEBBO
@k_b_lvi @BreezerGalway @chillipope @readthestudy @MarkChangizi https://t.co/WGKv9kEBBO https://t.co/bL72QocaJS
@k_b_lvi @BigGeeGee1 @BreezerGalway @chillipope @readthestudy @MarkChangizi Ah, thank you for posting your ignorant question repeatedly. It allows me to post this again over and over. Maybe you read it this time Tweedle Dum. https://t.co/WGKv9kEBBO
@BreezerGalway https://t.co/WGKv9kEBBO
@BreezerGalway https://t.co/WGKv9kEBBO https://t.co/PzIfHdl46x
@USMortality Previously from @cochranecollab Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses - https://t.co/QCtUwSLPLz “There was limited evidence that social distancing was effective, especially if related to the risk of exposure.” "There is moderate
Another study providing evidence the New Abnormal is not "safe & effective" - https://t.co/OTURU1VARZ Previously from @cochranecollab Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses - https://t.co/aRh4G4v29j “There was limited evidence that https://t.co/gbxdZ5xsCB
@MieckaAniolowa Interwencje fizyczne mające na celu przerwanie lub ograniczenie rozprzestrzeniania się wirusów układu oddechowego – Cochrane Library Źródło: Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses https://t.co/6OhHM0f4Q1 Tło: Epidemie wirusowe lub https://t.co/7wNGIiKEgM
@AnnaWol72142016 @Vegan_Freiburg @der_veganer Langsamen hätte es spätestens mit dem Cochrane Review im November 2020 [*2] klar sein müssen. War's aber nicht... [*1] https://t.co/haTinfwHRl [*2] https://t.co/x5uz7yvUne 2/2
@AvivBrokman Here's the Cochrane Review published in 2020, for example: https://t.co/8iA5v6iMDm https://t.co/FzPtmzzkoM
@ctvedmonton Was Dr. Conly compensated for his input on the report? It cites his 2020 article, which wrongly minimized the effectiveness of N95s and masking in general. Yet, the Task Force interviewed him—likely for "Chapter 5: Masking", given his stance on masking.
@TheBreakdownAB The Conly paper wrongly equated N95s with surgical masks and claimed surgical masks offer little to no protection—no wonder the UCP cited him. Conly continues to be wrong on so many Covid-related issues. https://t.co/XBjHVE7F6j https://t.co/7uDffVCq8v
@jeanbarbeau2 @SaiyanBio Cochrane review statement on the study Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses by Tom Jefferson et al : « the results were inconclusive. » March 2023 https://t.co/joN4Ff0moK
@waynemcdougall @flowirin Cochrane review statement on the study Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses by Tom Jefferson et al : « the results were inconclusive. » https://t.co/joN4Ff0moK
@jrseihgstein @QI_181 Cochrane review Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses : « the results were inconclusive. » « Les résultats n’ont pas été concluants. » (!) Consulter aussi cette discussion : https://t.co/j5HcY0csf4
@jrseihgstein @QI_181 Communiqué officiel de la revue Cochrane en juin 2024 à propos de l'étude Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses de Tom Jefferson et al : https://t.co/joN4Ff0moK
@mcfunny @ReiffRN @MdBreathe @aeeverest The 4th update of the Cochrane review tells a different story. https://t.co/raYM8reRy6 Surgeons wore masks but not all day. You can ask your dentist about "Mask Mouth" infections and gum disease. https://t.co/If0RmuQ7GG
@fight4newjersey How about reliable evidence that mask do not work? Like this meta analysis of RTCs? https://t.co/PipWaJxq94
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2023(1), cd006207 - January 2023 https://t.co/uOidMIsASV
@utah_moderate @DumbNailPounder @DChadwickAuthor https://t.co/ToJDCXa2Kh
@ModSlotPro @ErikCumps @sigridschollen @IBonnx @uzgent Als je het niet begrijpt, ben je misschien wat traag van begrip omdat je een hekel hebt aan mondkapjes. "The Cochrane Review 'Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses' was published in January 2023 and has been widely misinterpreted." Karla
@MasukuShac87060 @minoru_s2023 @myceliumR マスクの情報確認していっているのですが、コクランレビューってこれでしょうか? https://t.co/nRFEi4cMPC
@Dixies0420 マスクとワクチンはよくわかりませんが、手指消毒とうがいは感染対策に効果ありそうです 厚生労働科学研究 https://t.co/d8ofG6kDp5 Cochrane Database https://t.co/nRFEi4cMPC
RT @Xochipelli1953: @ZeClint Cochrane Review: Les masques ne protègent pas… quels que soient leurs types L’étude Cochrane est intitulée “P…
RT @Xochipelli1953: @ZeClint Cochrane Review: Les masques ne protègent pas… quels que soient leurs types L’étude Cochrane est intitulée “P…
@ZeClint Cochrane Review: Les masques ne protègent pas… quels que soient leurs types L’étude Cochrane est intitulée “Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses”. https://t.co/tXt1rrpTL6
@nycexpatmom “Fact-checkers” who labeled reposts of the Cochrane Review “Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses” with no commentary as potentially harmful misinformation. It’s apparent that Brian fails to understand that FB “fact-checkers” are not
「フェイスマスクの効果については不確実性がある。エビデンスの確実性が低~中程度であることは、効果の推定値に対する信頼が限られており、真の効果は観察された効果の推定値と異なる可能性があることを意味している」 Physical interventions to interrupt https://t.co/E67uTtGc89
https://t.co/IPl0HLpQC3 https://t.co/wSh5YXh20U
@izutorishima 「マスク付けたらインフルの流行を防げる」と言うのは幻想です。実際につけるかどうかに関わらず「マスクしてれば流行が防げるだろう」と考える人の方が多そうですから、何れにせよインフルの流行が防げません。その点で、人類が愚かだと言うことには同意します。 https://t.co/nTVF1p6wI8
@kitazatosatuki ●Effectiveness of Masks and Respirators Against Respiratory Infections in Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis https://t.co/XCvD1lS2UY ●Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses https://t.co/I5nqtnqE2B
@kima_jones Masks are ineffective. So says the 2023 Cochrane Review. https://t.co/EDIYhsxFdg
@yaneerbaryam My mistake. The Cochrane Study showing no mask efficacy was 2023, not 2020. https://t.co/EDIYhsxFdg
@yaneerbaryam Face masks do not discernible good. That includes the N95 variety. Cochran Study. https://t.co/EDIYhsxFdg You know masks do no good. Dana Farber Cancer Institute knows masks do no good. And yet Dana Farber Cancer Institute requires them anyway. In the business of sowing fear.
アンタごときに採点できるほど安い人間ではないので
爆笑した 腹痛てぇー
死ぬほど笑った
じゃあ、Idahoの読解力を採点してやろう ほれ、これを読み、何が書かれているか答えろ https://t.co/zZzFB9XCuA Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses https://t.co/78glnQFf76
https://t.co/zZzFB9XCuA Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses まだ理解できえねのか? 失笑
Idahoは理解できない
お前、コクラン・レビューを知らないのか? 呆れた
https://t.co/zZzFB9XCuA じゃあ、お前は、これ読んだか? 何が書かれている? 答えてみ Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses https://t.co/xRpXDwOjGe
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses 読んで理解できたか? 何が書かれてある、答えてみろ https://t.co/zZzFB9XCuA https://t.co/aXgxM4qIz1
@Placeb0Mad @wallstwolverine "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses" – 2020 "Face masks to prevent transmission of influenza virus: a systematic review" – 2010 "Effectiveness of Masks and Respirators Against Respiratory Infections in Healthcare Workers 2017
@leashless @Melissa_suze @jenniferolchowy @PlanetEarth_HD @MaryGR65 @flo_mask @westinghouse That they don't work. https://t.co/dWAAxyjnUg
@NChartierET https://t.co/WGKv9kEBBO
@delmoi @deedee1996 @thegaywhostrayd `Cochrane Library: "There is moderate certainty evidence that wearing a mask probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory‐confirmed influenza compared to not wearing a mask" https://t.co/7WtyZTO4Qo
[Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses] 「呼吸器ウイルスの拡散を阻止または抑制するための物理的介入」 (注:英語が原文。日本語は公式翻訳では無い)
@MonaLis88125391 @tomdabassman Haben Sie es denn überhaupt nicht gelesen……?
@pipeystallion @Tyler_A_Harper Sorry - 6 Cochrane Reviews: 2007, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2020 and 2023: https://t.co/ADcK5fFifh
Link: https://t.co/q6HfYcZXlR
@dpfdpf But the report's extraordinary claim about "well established" science re: mask-wearing being shown to reduce the spread of Covid does *not* include a reference to the Cochrane Review: "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses".
@Demosthenessaid @legittreehugger @eeidiqu @greg_travis You are confused. Read the title. 'Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses' physical interventions is a synonym for MASKS. What a self-own. You don't even understand the article you - yourself linked. HILARIOUS.
@DoctorJanette @aacuna1 @FoxNews Are you apparently not familiar with scientific evidence? Every RCT finds masks have no effect on a respiratory virus. Here's a Cochrane review (even more evidence updated since this). @realDonaldTrump @RobertKennedyJr @JDVance @elonmusk @VivekGRamaswamy https://t.co/jXQCFjElgB
Let's recall that the editor-in-chief made a clarification statement where the 2023 Cochrane review of non-pharmaceutical interventions was—controversially—limited to RCTs. It was interpreted by the press and not all of the authors to mean that “masks don’t work” and “mask mandates did nothing”.
@willathewisp it shows that you cant read and interpret science. https://t.co/wpnCFhDrXJ
@VPrasadMDMPH Once again: Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses - Jefferson, T - 2023 | Cochrane Library
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 30 January 2023 Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses We included 11 new RCTs and cluster‐RCTs (610,872 participants) in this update, bringing the total number of RCTs to 78 Wearing masks in the
@cheese_breath @ianmSC Here's the most up to date: https://t.co/i6H7Wazt7W On surgical masks: "Wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory‐confirmed influenza/SARS‐CoV‐2 compared to not wearing masks (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.42; 6 trials,
@LerouxArthur10 30/01/2023 Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses, Tom Jefferson et al. https://t.co/PsB5IJgInR @Pr_Chabriere_E https://t.co/eL5fZGqkbk
@pesAntsFoot @peterdaou Okay. https://t.co/u3IF1MXtwG https://t.co/tQfaE0jFXX https://t.co/xin4BNaVFA https://t.co/PINTF0BYJG
@T_Brautigan Why do you stil wear a mask? https://t.co/dWAAxyiQ4I
@EnemyInAState https://t.co/oiAgCplnQP https://t.co/bFPGCMdQzP https://t.co/bdtWLMZy81
@JustineKirby @CDCDirector Please see the 2023 analysis of 78 RCTs which found no evidence of what you claim Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses - PubMed
RT @RBystrianyk: Mask have never been shown to work. Check out the work of the Cochrane group. https://t.co/7g8A5Xxpvc
RT @RBystrianyk: Mask have never been shown to work. Check out the work of the Cochrane group. https://t.co/7g8A5Xxpvc
RT @RBystrianyk: Mask have never been shown to work. Check out the work of the Cochrane group. https://t.co/7g8A5Xxpvc
RT @RBystrianyk: Mask have never been shown to work. Check out the work of the Cochrane group. https://t.co/7g8A5Xxpvc
RT @RBystrianyk: Mask have never been shown to work. Check out the work of the Cochrane group. https://t.co/7g8A5Xxpvc
RT @RBystrianyk: Mask have never been shown to work. Check out the work of the Cochrane group. https://t.co/7g8A5Xxpvc
RT @RBystrianyk: Mask have never been shown to work. Check out the work of the Cochrane group. https://t.co/7g8A5Xxpvc
Mask have never been shown to work. Check out the work of the Cochrane group. https://t.co/7g8A5Xxpvc https://t.co/YPwwJzrdmx
@DrMaireadDB Yup. It's useful when the idiots tell you they're idiots. Fallacious assumptions and conclusion. You'd think an Education PhD would know better ... or perhaps not. Try some science like "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses -
@FifthDonkey @alshadowdancer @OddBackgrowy @randomizer88996 @Wantmy2dollars_ @bubba6186422393 @medwoman1 @JimlikesBB @AIUnbreaded @KirchoffSh62598 @8BrianVogel4 @DaddyBrianMC @Synyster63 @TreatHunterDog @theProgEqualist @FlattieLoverDeb @Caperloo5 @NatashaForTrump @Bruh888888888 @Silver_Strike @MolaRamLinux @CivilLost @LifeOnMarz7 @MucusMucous1 @TraitortR @jeffsmith0000 @itisjustmebabe @ThinkyTexan @VinceGottalotta @JenCages @scottstocker4 @deathbyorcas @Budleo_Morgan @DNAIntelligence @whagyjr @_Kel_Varnsen_ @cl1ntonserver @eanstrainserver @redkingdom986 @TomSmit74870120 @laneisrad @Mary95342400 @RepublicanRehab @TeekeeMon @_CapitalOffense @Sinner_Lilith @Karlton111 @isthishell25 @Krispi_Largo @MichalYouDoing Also not true https://t.co/SgkbxOLBrL
@evelio_prieto @gomez_rial5 Rial se refiere últimamente al infame estudio sobre "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses", publicado en Cochrane el año pasado y del que tuvo que publicar la redactora jefa una aclaración porque es claramente sesgado y desinformador
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses - PMC https://t.co/pSsTglu4EG COVID-19 Vaccine Contaminants, Self-Assembling Structures, Nanobots, and Never-Ending Spike Production https://t.co/w8004FZe6E
RT @MarkChangizi:
@blueshiftmusic @Janetb172 @kylenabecker @elonmusk Study https://t.co/DRamCMmyWs
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses - Jefferson, T - 2023 | Cochrane Library - did they work? https://t.co/ADbpXCLLVs
@pia_mapia @etelorrain @bibinhafc @AlexSamTG @CongasMaracas @LaLoucheMarius bof bof, par contre laver les mains, oui. et se lever ou rester assis (j'deconne) Combien d'etudes veux tu ? https://t.co/kRqUemb5Oq https://t.co/wx5spP7sdO
@cleebennett @realDonaldTrump FAUCI was the one who lied to us that masks would stop covid not Trump you jerk. As we all know now- masks do virtually nothing to stop covid. https://t.co/cN6OJcfg2h https://t.co/SwNb9TJeGa https://t.co/1hE8WTBvOQ
RT @ScienceBlog3: @ebennett74 @RigMatthew @AmerAcadPeds @US_FDA
@Coopm1Coopman @picardonhealth @OttawaCitizen You realize that real information can be found on YouTube as well as nonsense? But if you prefer peer reviewed publications, a Cochrane review, deemed the highest standard in Medical literature, tells you masks show no benefit: https://t.co/OnCkgVwifm
RT @BurbankLola: @NunezFeijoo @srgacio Los resultados agrupados de los ensayos aleatorizados no mostraron una reducción clara de la infecci…
@NunezFeijoo @srgacio Los resultados agrupados de los ensayos aleatorizados no mostraron una reducción clara de la infección viral respiratoria con el uso de mascarillas. Eso sí, buena caja hicisteis https://t.co/19ILhBqJdY
@raubreywhite @tomdottcom https://t.co/Q3n4DVzMrj https://t.co/NGqLEYkUZl https://t.co/C3tyWPnf1D https://t.co/zvAJJM3fWA https://t.co/4kur1WHUjQ
@michael_trumper @BaboonTje @smurfsj @covid_priest @RobGoodall6 @DreddCrypto @Bryce_Nickels https://t.co/C2vCu7Vlcf
@HorizonHealthNB https://t.co/RiupdAmYPu “randomized trials did not show a reduction in respiratory viral infection with the use of medical/surgical masks during seasonal influenza. There were no differences between the use of medical/surgical masks compared with N95/P2 respirators”
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses - Jefferson, T - 2023 | Cochrane Library https://t.co/SSV0LPv5mh
@sheebadigeebies The Cochrane 'Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses' review called and said “It’s déjà vu all over again!”.
@SteveRDaugh @Ronutan @Mogulseeker @walt_horn @OffThePress1 https://t.co/2MprnrsFcm https://t.co/wGljyiyUlQ
Statement on 'Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses' review | Cochrane https://t.co/7d3x6t6EqD
RT @MarieNat23: @newstart_2024 @respect65 And it's utterly useless except if you need to kill slowly. + No aerosol for mpox. https://t.co/…
@newstart_2024 @respect65 And it's utterly useless except if you need to kill slowly. + No aerosol for mpox. https://t.co/Gcm8v2V6JL 1. https://t.co/d0zzTcYBV5 2. https://t.co/0MWRR2Mevx 3. https://t.co/8hsjY1tyG6 4. https://t.co/cd6lnciKfj 5. https://t.co/TPpFN02psO 6. https://t.co/lOfOfgiTvP
“Comment on Cochrane review Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses” https://t.co/ZTL3EXaRaJ
Comment on Cochrane review Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses https://t.co/KD7QkVs1gw
@slyk_j @luckytran Guess you better go cover your face, ingest some microplastics and bacteria then. Interesting that areas with mask mandates had the same or higher rates of infection don't ya think? https://t.co/gtC3p0n44t
@taipan168 @TheRealKonstas @VicGovDH Yes, that’s part of the statement I posted. If you read further… “Original statement from March 2023: The Cochrane Review 'Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses' was published in January 2023 and has been widely misinterpreted.”
@longduckydong @ComatoseGoat @TheBabelFish1 The Cochrane Review 'Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses' [2 was published in January 2023 and has been widely misinterpreted. Karla Soares-Weiser, Editor-in-Chief of the Cochrane Library, has responded on behalf of Cochrane: https://t.co/rXdLuEliTq
RT @mama_melaleuca: 1年半後に政府の会見で このレベルの質問が飛ぶって 異常だと思うけど… 公開してくれたのがせめてもの…かしら
RT @mama_melaleuca: 1年半後に政府の会見で このレベルの質問が飛ぶって 異常だと思うけど… 公開してくれたのがせめてもの…かしら
RT @mama_melaleuca: 1年半後に政府の会見で このレベルの質問が飛ぶって 異常だと思うけど… 公開してくれたのがせめてもの…かしら
1年半後に政府の会見で このレベルの質問が飛ぶって 異常だと思うけど… 公開してくれたのがせめてもの…かしら
@JANVIERClaude1 @SudRadio Vous conseillez de réduire l'oxygénation de l'organisme ?? Et d'augmenter le stress oxydatif ? Surtout que les virus ne sont pas pathogènes exogènes. https://t.co/xOCrUtIlAy https://t.co/44S0cjvAU0 https://t.co/nvND92Lgg2 https://t.co/PvNl5Eb2as https://t.co/Gcm8v2V6JL https://t.co/PLdbxo717D
@SwinnenKurt @hansvantelling @FrankPeeters4 @EvenepoelRemco Daar is geen bewijs voor https://t.co/6KlYRHnWoy
RT @ScienceBlog3: @ebennett74 @RigMatthew @AmerAcadPeds @US_FDA
@SenfScharf Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses https://t.co/yukmEberhm https://t.co/SEBrq4gaCA
@TruthsimplLove + Le manque d'oxygène détruit ! Revue de 67 essais contrôlés randomisés "Les résultats des essais randomisés n'ont pas montré que les masques médicaux/ chirurgicaux réduisaient la fréquence des infections respiratoires pendant la saison de la grippe." https://t.co/Gcm8v2V6JL
RT @JoshWalkos: Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses (The now infamous Cochrane review) “The po…
@VrijWimpie @ovenschotel10 Overigens zijn mondkapjes natuurlijk nutteloos https://t.co/6KlYRHnWoy
@nerodenc @julia_doubleday I can google too https://t.co/2Mlke58gt1
RT @chefofmembers: @WHOWPRO Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses https://t.co/6AebivOXYh https:/…
RT @chefofmembers: @WHOWPRO Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses https://t.co/6AebivOXYh https:/…
RT @chefofmembers: @WHOWPRO Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses https://t.co/6AebivOXYh https:/…
@NASA_Johnson Why are these idiots wearing marks again. It does ZERO read the Cochrane studies. https://t.co/ZS5u7F357h
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
RT @BanounHelene: Merci d'apporter les preuves de l'utilité des masques pour se prévenir de la Covid! et des virus respiratoires https://t.…
@denpamonkey39ra ●Effectiveness of Masks and Respirators Against Respiratory Infections in Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis https://t.co/XCvD1lS2UY ●Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses https://t.co/I5nqtnqE2B
@fakeaccount1939 @DrTimothyKelly Go through these 2 at least: https://t.co/2to8zuKis6 https://t.co/OspBOItNyF
@Dallas_Holladay @thevegdoc @RyanMarino Mask do not prevent respiratory viruses! https://t.co/U0yp33dbvH
RT @DerSchwubler: @tomorgel @MeyFrie 8) https://t.co/AVSmxLAXcB 9) https://t.co/L0jMuM6TE5 10) https://t.co/a9ifzGqL9V 11) https://t.co/…
Quantitative errors in the Cochrane review on "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses" www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-3...
Quantitative errors in the Cochrane review on "Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses". http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.15198
@FLAHAULT Quand l’agrégation de très nombreuses études et données occidentales arrivent à la conclusion qu’il n’est pas possible d’établir l’efficacité du masque contre la transmission du virus, une étude chinoise est elle de nature à conclure autrement ? https://t.co/MTZj5rM1vs
youtu.be/XZ1n_woWVkQ?...
@nordicteija @SirkkuSE @Suviquu1 “There is moderate certainty evidence that wearing a mask probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory-confirmed influenza compared to not wearing a mask” https://t.co/74ZMRRQVt4
@WBATDM @CallMeEOnly @GotWokified @Mr_Magoo5 @BretWeinstein Couldn't find your post regarding masks. Here ya go. Read until your heart's content. https://t.co/h1xX30LhL1
@arghavan_salles https://t.co/RiupdAmYPu “randomized trials did not show a reduction in respiratory viral infection with the use of medical/surgical masks during seasonal influenza. There were no differences between the use of medical/surgical masks compared with N95/P2 respirators”
RT @mandylynda222: @sj_ca1867 @brianlilley https://t.co/RiupdAmYPu “randomized trials did not show a reduction in respiratory viral infecti…
@sj_ca1867 @brianlilley https://t.co/RiupdAmYPu “randomized trials did not show a reduction in respiratory viral infection with the use of medical/surgical masks during seasonal influenza. There were no differences between the use of medical/surgical masks compared with N95/P2 respirators
@tatiann69922625 Rappel : déja en 2020 ils arrivaient à la même conclusion https://t.co/kxY9NBGke6
@SpikeKavalench @LisaSingerUBC @rusty0216 Not the block button. I can’t go on without your wisdom “There is moderate certainty evidence that wearing a mask probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory-confirmed influenza compared to not wearing a mask” Study article: https://t.co/VB4JxXmarr
@ol1vebranch @bete_n0ire @BluesRagdoll @julimsw_juli @GovKathyHochul @MTA @PABusTerminal @NYstateparks @javitscenter @NYSDHSES "There were no clear differences between the use of medical/surgical masks compared with N95/P2 respirators in healthcare workers when used in routine care to reduce respiratory viral infection" I hoped i helped you with your delusion https://t.co/29GAAjjnt5
@doc_gero Cochrane 2020 and Cochrane 2023 show there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis. https://t.co/e1ooyE54yy https://t.co/0KvSPUR92d
@Grimasaur @KasimirUrbanski There is no proof that reduction in flu cases was due to masking. In fact, Cochrane 2020 and Cochrane 2023 beg to differ https://t.co/e1ooyE54yy https://t.co/0KvSPUR92d
RT @EmilyTVproducer: @thevivafrei @OmarAlghabra https://t.co/zmGHhuwvuK
@nursekelsey Masks don't work. https://t.co/PcklgbaFmr
@georg_henning @EthicallyByme Es gibt ein universell anerkanntes Plausibilitätsdenken. Aber es gibt eben keine Evidenz: https://t.co/P1ZHXis3wS Im Review wird darauf hingewiesen, dass negative Effekte so gut wie nicht untersucht sind. Zu physiologischen Negativeffekten wurde inzwischen einiges publiziert.
@Ultrogoth2 https://t.co/G63yY9o8bI
@Tuathee @jajanosik Sugeruje Pan, że praktycznie nikt w Polsce (prawie 38 mln obywateli) się aktualnie nie szczepi przeciwko grypie i C-19, przez dr Witczaka @PiotrWitczak_ ?
@MatthewLillard I watched Animal Room again last night #SayPubic “There is moderate certainty evidence that wearing a mask probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory-confirmed influenza compared to not wearing a mask” Study article: https://t.co/VB4JxXmarr
@thestaresnest @IAmManBearPig2 @Eolas_na_Iontas @rtenews https://t.co/WjZcwnNBkW
@BinsQuan @jasmith_yorku Wearing a mask may make little or no difference to the outcome of influenza-like illness (ILI) compared to not wearing a mask. https://t.co/lKkOgbKbEU https://t.co/QODPcHcRDH… https://t.co/iIuglPVUdE… https://t.co/vr575PlXSw… https://t.co/KzFlDsrDL8… https://t.co/XMz2tER7aG…
wearing a mask may make little or no difference to the outcome of influenza-like illness (ILI) compared to not wearing a mask. https://t.co/lKkOgbKbEU https://t.co/QODPcHcRDH… https://t.co/iIuglPVUdE… https://t.co/vr575PlXSw… https://t.co/KzFlDsrDL8… https://t.co/XMz2tER7aG… https://t.co/n5sHEP7qFY
@jasmith_yorku “wearing a mask may make little or no difference to the outcome of influenza-like illness (ILI) compared to not wearing a mask.” https://t.co/349TaRjZ2u https://t.co/fj43qdBqZc https://t.co/Ez3Z9sMT9j https://t.co/q1nHlfkTL2 https://t.co/OTuLwSkN9M https://t.co/p9Vuiss3HM
RT @AnteMedicus: Update -Solid Science AGAINST MASKS (2/3) 10)https://t.co/Bo4JyxaZYD 11)https://t.co/B2x8QqvBbd 12)https://t.co/SfWQAjAgLL…
マスクに効果は無し。RCTメタ分析 https://t.co/HwEV92MRFg… https://t.co/JAQvQpEiEAコロナのRCT。マスクは効果無しという結果
@ModelAyshaMirza @Empress_Zombie @rohangilkes https://t.co/D2Xd65WsdX https://t.co/WUGqC7ggj3
@EB_Charlie @emmera2 @nicolasberrod Mars 2023 > Cochrane vient de confirmer que les masques sont inutiles à prévenir les infections respiratoires virales notamment. N'oubliez pas que CE N'EST PAS une nouveauté. Ils l'avaient déjà dit en 2020. https://t.co/MLn1IzSuLu
RT @MEUNIERPatric11: @Philippe_Parola Cochrane vient de confirmer que les masques sont inutiles à prévenir les infections respiratoires vir…
RT @MEUNIERPatric11: @Philippe_Parola Cochrane vient de confirmer que les masques sont inutiles à prévenir les infections respiratoires vir…
RT @MEUNIERPatric11: @Philippe_Parola Cochrane vient de confirmer que les masques sont inutiles à prévenir les infections respiratoires vir…
@Philippe_Parola Cochrane vient de confirmer que les masques sont inutiles à prévenir les infections respiratoires virales notamment. N'oubliez pas que CE N'EST PAS une nouveauté. Ils l'avaient déjà dit en 2020. https://t.co/rkz3vMy4XZ Donc on se fout de nous! Vraiment. https://t.co/mj2rt24NL1
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses - PubMed https://t.co/ynCUaGIG18
@OyunPapagan @goddeketal https://t.co/T7TRvH2k2l “There is moderate certainty evidence that wearing a mask probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory-confirmed influenza compared to not wearing a mask”
@Martina08695302 @PolizeiSachsen Das Original Interview find ich nicht mehr. Fakt ist, im Nov 2020 lag das vor. Spätestens da hätte die Maskerade beendet werden müssen! https://t.co/vwwRF9Lu4k und das Update dann am 30.1.2023 https://t.co/keAdUApmu0
RT @MEUNIERPatric11: Cochrane vient de confirmer que les masques sont inutiles à prévenir les infections respiratoires virales notamment, N…
RT @RealUnsweetDee: @NohaAboelataMD @christin3_t @masking__mama I know, why don’t they ever read any of the studies?! So frustrating http…
RT @RealUnsweetDee: @NohaAboelataMD @christin3_t @masking__mama I know, why don’t they ever read any of the studies?! So frustrating http…
@NohaAboelataMD @christin3_t @masking__mama I know, why don’t they ever read any of the studies?! So frustrating https://t.co/2wEkrKiZ6P https://t.co/pvqT8mtlHJ https://t.co/iKg8DQmw0I https://t.co/xg9r0MGUBn https://t.co/ofaOzcad2A https://t.co/S34wL1zQK5 https://t.co/jIVPFrXfer https://t.co/a0b4olzGUP
RT @MEUNIERPatric11: Cochrane vient de confirmer que les masques sont inutiles à prévenir les infections respiratoires virales notamment, N…
RT @MEUNIERPatric11: Cochrane vient de confirmer que les masques sont inutiles à prévenir les infections respiratoires virales notamment, N…
RT @MEUNIERPatric11: Cochrane vient de confirmer que les masques sont inutiles à prévenir les infections respiratoires virales notamment, N…
RT @MEUNIERPatric11: Cochrane vient de confirmer que les masques sont inutiles à prévenir les infections respiratoires virales notamment, N…
RT @MEUNIERPatric11: Cochrane vient de confirmer que les masques sont inutiles à prévenir les infections respiratoires virales notamment, N…
RT @MEUNIERPatric11: Cochrane vient de confirmer que les masques sont inutiles à prévenir les infections respiratoires virales notamment, N…
RT @MEUNIERPatric11: Cochrane vient de confirmer que les masques sont inutiles à prévenir les infections respiratoires virales notamment, N…
RT @MEUNIERPatric11: Cochrane vient de confirmer que les masques sont inutiles à prévenir les infections respiratoires virales notamment, N…
RT @MEUNIERPatric11: Cochrane vient de confirmer que les masques sont inutiles à prévenir les infections respiratoires virales notamment, N…
RT @MEUNIERPatric11: Cochrane vient de confirmer que les masques sont inutiles à prévenir les infections respiratoires virales notamment, N…
RT @MEUNIERPatric11: Cochrane vient de confirmer que les masques sont inutiles à prévenir les infections respiratoires virales notamment, N…
RT @MEUNIERPatric11: Cochrane vient de confirmer que les masques sont inutiles à prévenir les infections respiratoires virales notamment, N…
RT @MEUNIERPatric11: Cochrane vient de confirmer que les masques sont inutiles à prévenir les infections respiratoires virales notamment, N…
Cochrane vient de confirmer que les masques sont inutiles à prévenir les infections respiratoires virales notamment, N'oubliez pas que CE N'EST PAS une nouveauté. https://t.co/qI1Ic9VAxI Ils l'avaient déjà dit en 2020. https://t.co/kxY9NBFMoy Donc on se fout de nous! ⏬ https://t.co/FFX6UlIryH
https://t.co/vSLesqbAUN
@RyanHalvorsen1 @KATUNews https://t.co/E6nUH4YjjZ do you know how to tell differences in research studies? You should learn.
@graemeblake @TRyanGregory I’m just following science. Per the study: “randomized trials did not show a reduction in respiratory viral infection… There were no differences between the use of medical/surgical masks compared with N95/P2 respirators” https://t.co/G0LKKgYoiJ
@MichaelPSenger @TRyanGregory https://t.co/RiupdAmYPu “randomized trials did not show a reduction in respiratory viral infection with the use of medical/surgical masks during seasonal influenza. There were no differences between the use of medical/surgical masks compared with N95/P2 respirators”
@EffTexas @hannah_ockerman @cathyrusson "This analysis concluded that there is low certainty evidence from all trials reviewed that wearing a mask may make little or no difference to the outcome of respiratory illness compared to not wearing a mask." https://t.co/CgVQ0KGXvV
“There is moderate certainty evidence that wearing a mask probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory-confirmed influenza compared to not wearing a mask” https://t.co/njxUI3Nvbn
@EbonyJHilton_MD @TechDoctors4u @RepNancyMace @GOPoversight @Twitter 11)https://t.co/AFG7ysMBZz 12)https://t.co/XRBeR5dpJr 13)https://t.co/21cJXo1bep 14)https://t.co/Y2HtzgzZMN 15)https://t.co/7yzLY9rr7Y 16)https://t.co/yPUnGa2M5R 17)https://t.co/h6GX6RK8UE 18)https://t.co/YGRNk0kBR8 19)https://t.co/imHJD5wSKN 20)https://t.co/OZgBZ2Ykbu
@ToshiAkima In case someone wants to think for themselves and actually read the review he’s trying to disclaim… https://t.co/QliLRjNqfz
@larrywright @MattRay4110 @ChrisWhitton13 @KanekoaTheGreat @gatewaypundit @P_McCulloughMD @RWMaloneMD @akheriaty @PierreKory You've merely found several articles making the same bad correlation. View this randomized controlled study: https://t.co/AUO4y380Oo
RT @akadaijiro: 2020/11/20 マスクの有効性はみられない https://t.co/qg90OZcQMs 一ヶ月後 2020/12/19 マスクは感染を効果的に防ぐ https://t.co/KylRkct5dD 今回 2023/01/30 マスクはガイ…
RT @PBasiukiewicz: https://t.co/0KPHjvKVYd https://t.co/D0NZf8O8Cj
RT @shikama_kcmc: 2020年前半まではマスクと呼吸器系ウイルスに関するロクなデータがなかったというコクランレビュー。 世界中でシャカリキに集めた結果がこれから次々レビューされることでしょう。 Physical interventions to interru…
RT @shikama_kcmc: 2020年前半まではマスクと呼吸器系ウイルスに関するロクなデータがなかったというコクランレビュー。 世界中でシャカリキに集めた結果がこれから次々レビューされることでしょう。 Physical interventions to interru…
2020年前半まではマスクと呼吸器系ウイルスに関するロクなデータがなかったというコクランレビュー。 世界中でシャカリキに集めた結果がこれから次々レビューされることでしょう。 Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses https://t.co/4Lrgpn20fT
RT @akadaijiro: 2020/11/20 マスクの有効性はみられない https://t.co/qg90OZcQMs 一ヶ月後 2020/12/19 マスクは感染を効果的に防ぐ https://t.co/KylRkct5dD 今回 2023/01/30 マスクはガイ…
RT @akadaijiro: 2020/11/20 マスクの有効性はみられない https://t.co/qg90OZcQMs 一ヶ月後 2020/12/19 マスクは感染を効果的に防ぐ https://t.co/KylRkct5dD 今回 2023/01/30 マスクはガイ…
RT @akadaijiro: 2020/11/20 マスクの有効性はみられない https://t.co/qg90OZcQMs 一ヶ月後 2020/12/19 マスクは感染を効果的に防ぐ https://t.co/KylRkct5dD 今回 2023/01/30 マスクはガイ…
RT @akadaijiro: 2020/11/20 マスクの有効性はみられない https://t.co/qg90OZcQMs 一ヶ月後 2020/12/19 マスクは感染を効果的に防ぐ https://t.co/KylRkct5dD 今回 2023/01/30 マスクはガイ…
RT @EmilyTVproducer: Masks make "little or no difference." Same goes for N95s. https://t.co/zmGHhuwvuK Now: get out of my face. And stay ou…
RT @EmilyTVproducer: Masks make "little or no difference." Same goes for N95s. https://t.co/zmGHhuwvuK Now: get out of my face. And stay ou…
‘Physical Interventions to Interrupt or Reduce the Spread of Respiratory Viruses’. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 1 (20 January 2010): CD006207. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub3.
RT @kerpen: Reminder, this is the Cochrane Review on the subject: https://t.co/UNG7kc4G9N https://t.co/XkDDDkGM3B
RT @kerpen: Reminder, this is the Cochrane Review on the subject: https://t.co/UNG7kc4G9N https://t.co/XkDDDkGM3B
RT @kerpen: Reminder, this is the Cochrane Review on the subject: https://t.co/UNG7kc4G9N https://t.co/XkDDDkGM3B
RT @kerpen: Reminder, this is the Cochrane Review on the subject: https://t.co/UNG7kc4G9N https://t.co/XkDDDkGM3B
Reminder, this is the Cochrane Review on the subject: https://t.co/UNG7kc4G9N https://t.co/XkDDDkGM3B
@BrockUniversity Why should the students pay tuition when the university ruins the teaching environment by mandating masks? Shame on Brock admins for failing to base their decisions on high-grade evidence! https://t.co/K1FWXXVWQe
@BUFABrock @BrockUniversity @StCatStandard Shame on you, BUFA, for ignoring all the high quality empirical evidence showing masks to be ineffective at preventing viral transmission: https://t.co/K1FWXXVWQe
@BrockUniversity Shame on you Brock administrators for abusing your power, ignoring provincial public health guidelines, and promoting the pseudo-science of masks. Almost all randomized controlled trials on masks have found them ineffective at preventing viral transmission:https://t.co/K1FWXXVWQe
@WesternU Shame on you Western Uni, for promoting the pseudoscience of masks - all randomized controlled trials have failed to show they protect against viral infection: https://t.co/K1FWXXWuFM
@MichaelVerstrae mbt mondmaskers zijn er tal van studies die stellen dat het weinig of niet werkt. bv een cochrane review van jefferson https://t.co/gUmLu8jjO6
@owenhardy1234 @DLeonhardt Based on what do you believe that? Here's the Cochrane Review. https://t.co/UNG7kc4G9N https://t.co/pe4Te1RCf4
@sunilbhop @ProfSarahJLewis @ElizAthertonSop @R_Hughes1 @JeremyFarrar The Cochrane Review found 15 prior to Covid https://t.co/XMMgl3Q0gF. I am only aware of 2 reported post-Covid - Denmark and Bangladesh. Both came up with the 'wrong' answer (Nil to minimal benefit in reducing community transmission.
@BrockUniversity Shame on you Brock University for propagating pseudoscience and superstition. Whatever happened to evidence-based medicine? See, for example, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: https://t.co/K1FWXXVWQe
@jason_metcalfe @jordanbpeterson https://t.co/c8erNzEVUw that one? You may want to read it yourself. That is certainly not the conclusion they came to
RT @kerpen: Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf https://t.co/XwR4nvISQE
RT @kerpen: Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf https://t.co/XwR4nvISQE
RT @kerpen: Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf https://t.co/XwR4nvISQE
RT @kerpen: Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf https://t.co/XwR4nvISQE
RT @kerpen: Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf https://t.co/XwR4nvISQE
RT @kerpen: Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf https://t.co/XwR4nvISQE
RT @kerpen: Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf https://t.co/XwR4nvISQE
RT @kerpen: Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf https://t.co/XwR4nvISQE
RT @kerpen: Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf https://t.co/XwR4nvISQE
RT @kerpen: Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf https://t.co/XwR4nvISQE
RT @kerpen: Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf https://t.co/XwR4nvISQE
RT @kerpen: Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf https://t.co/XwR4nvISQE
RT @kerpen: Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf https://t.co/XwR4nvISQE
RT @kerpen: Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf https://t.co/XwR4nvISQE
RT @kerpen: Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf https://t.co/XwR4nvISQE
RT @kerpen: Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf https://t.co/XwR4nvISQE
RT @kerpen: Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf https://t.co/XwR4nvISQE
RT @kerpen: Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf https://t.co/XwR4nvISQE
RT @kerpen: Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf https://t.co/XwR4nvISQE
RT @kerpen: Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf https://t.co/XwR4nvISQE
RT @kerpen: Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf https://t.co/XwR4nvISQE
RT @kerpen: Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf https://t.co/XwR4nvISQE
Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf https://t.co/XwR4nvISQE https://t.co/KaenOvva8K
RT @kerpen: @BerneStober This is the Cochrane review. N95s don't work either. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf
@BerneStober This is the Cochrane review. N95s don't work either. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf
@ja1rad @JohnBarronMill3 @BullMoonRising Not sure I've seen that one, but all the studies are null. Hence the Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kclJbN https://t.co/2YGnTFGMUt
RT @kerpen: @_stah Mechanistic studies? Come on. Here is the Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf https://t.co/JNCQ9Opm3a
@_stah Mechanistic studies? Come on. Here is the Cochrane review. https://t.co/UNG7kc48kf https://t.co/JNCQ9Opm3a
RT @kerpen: @VPrasadMDMPH Also, N95s don't stop viruses. https://t.co/UNG7kclJbN https://t.co/uCM6QLJ2xf
RT @kerpen: @VPrasadMDMPH Also, N95s don't stop viruses. https://t.co/UNG7kclJbN https://t.co/uCM6QLJ2xf
RT @kerpen: @VPrasadMDMPH Also, N95s don't stop viruses. https://t.co/UNG7kclJbN https://t.co/uCM6QLJ2xf
RT @kerpen: @VPrasadMDMPH Also, N95s don't stop viruses. https://t.co/UNG7kclJbN https://t.co/uCM6QLJ2xf
RT @kerpen: @VPrasadMDMPH Also, N95s don't stop viruses. https://t.co/UNG7kclJbN https://t.co/uCM6QLJ2xf
RT @kerpen: @VPrasadMDMPH Also, N95s don't stop viruses. https://t.co/UNG7kclJbN https://t.co/uCM6QLJ2xf
RT @kerpen: @VPrasadMDMPH Also, N95s don't stop viruses. https://t.co/UNG7kclJbN https://t.co/uCM6QLJ2xf
RT @kerpen: @VPrasadMDMPH Also, N95s don't stop viruses. https://t.co/UNG7kclJbN https://t.co/uCM6QLJ2xf
RT @kerpen: @VPrasadMDMPH Also, N95s don't stop viruses. https://t.co/UNG7kclJbN https://t.co/uCM6QLJ2xf
RT @kerpen: @VPrasadMDMPH Also, N95s don't stop viruses. https://t.co/UNG7kclJbN https://t.co/uCM6QLJ2xf
@VPrasadMDMPH Also, N95s don't stop viruses. https://t.co/UNG7kclJbN https://t.co/uCM6QLJ2xf
@jdceulaer @_Kyle_98 professor de ceulaer, waar zijn jouw bronnen?? ik vind geen bron waar staat dat een mondkapje effectief is, alleen de Deense studie die niet significant is. ik zal je de mijne geven: https://t.co/Ol1SiQQzm0 https://t.co/5dgyV5JlO7 https://t.co/kTMX65vgNr https://t.co/gUmLu8jjO6
@Lynx__RedLeft @humanrightsstar @fakerholic follow the science zou ik zeggen, maar dan wel diegene met een degelijk onderzoeksdesign met name RCT of meta-analyses. en de combinatie is het allerbeste. je stelling klopt niet. https://t.co/gUmLu8jjO6
@humanrightsstar @fakerholic @Lynx__RedLeft er zijn daarbij voldoende meta-analyses die aangeven dat mondmaskers niet effectief zijn https://t.co/gUmLu8jjO6
@liversedge @cydney0071 @politequestions @john_actuary @JamesWard73 Of course being Twitter, a simple request above has been met with arrogance and contempt as if one's position is beyond question. Another view (pre-Covid): https://t.co/E8qLt9DFx6 https://t.co/27AgIgqlJf
@denise_dewald The well-informed so-called anti-maskers are well aware of the scientific literature and know that the best clinical trials ever conducted concluded that masks have a negligible effect on virus transmission. Inform yourself: https://t.co/yjjXybxycj
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
RT @rwjdingwall: Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like illnes…
Актуальные новости про коронавирус Приемно-сортировочная, выпуск 7 https://t.co/nmZ7NUVyCX через @YouTube
Ой, на прямой эфир попала. Водовозов! Приемно-сортировочная, выпуск 7 https://t.co/KQbv2yfefV через @YouTube
PK
RB
MP
MF
MD
PT
G
?
YZ
KB
A
E
LM
RC
J
N
P
DT
し
B
MA
LL
LM
NM
長
M
L
R
A
N
S
G
S
DQ
BI
BG
E
TH
VL
TM
A
LK
C
KP
?
DN
W
J
A
DK
DS
く
DQ
XG
AK
ア
DI
バ
リ真
PF
FC
ね
N
TD
IS
HK
J
AP
HS
O
PM
DR
AL
O
PF
HL
BH
AG
CM
P
KC
RD
TM
BV
CJ
WR
MM
AF
NP
C
LB
R
SP
LR
も
CL
B
WG
LL
M
SC
KH
W
MN
左ひ
は
D
M某
C
JF
M
T
FK
RS
JW
J
OL
T
Y
DE
A
M
GW
ML
B
A
DS
NT
UF
MM
TG
EF
D
MM
MB
DP
D
M
CC
MN
DM
A
BT
B
J
R
W
P
DN
M
B
LD
OB
MS
N
AS
PJ
D
EP
S
ひ
WU
P
S
FI
G
B
LM
D
AM
VD
S
HP
IM
F
SV
T
T
M
CK
AE
GJ
F
B
M
C
MS
LE
K
FS
J
OT
翁P
F
G
湘
YS
リ
Dス
童グ
U
FF
TC
CM
MO
TL
M
RD
R
N
M
B
AN
B
NS
FG
DH
NG
SB
DE
CF
GP
G
FJ
CP
D
DE
DF
RK
E
CN
SB
BG
T
SE
R
LD
HJ
L
II
N
LL
L
SC
ST
ME
DC
A
SK
S
F
R
LJ
T
D
W
UA
T
T
G
DH
ML
LH
ML
RR
MM
SH