Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
In the digital discussions, several users emphasize the importance of the Orch OR theory by stating it has 'far more explanatory power, biology, and experimental validation' than other theories like Integrated Information Theory (IIT). The language used, such as calling Orch OR the 'most complete' and 'easily falsifiable theory,' reflects a strong endorsement and conveys a sense of urgency for serious consideration. Additionally, others voiced skepticism toward competing theories, which fosters an environment ripe for debate characterized by terms like 'banned' and 'ignored,' underscoring a sense of contention in the field.
Many discussions reflect an overall positive reception of the Orch OR theory, acknowledging its strengths while also suggesting areas for critique.
Participants show high curiosity toward the concept, indicating a desire to explore its implications and scientific grounding.
While some posts highlight informative aspects, many discussions also question or seek clarification, displaying moderate engagement.
Overall, users perceive the Orch OR theory as having significant implications for the understanding of consciousness, suggesting it could influence future research.
This is a good,recent description of Orch OR published at the onset of our TWCF-funded experiments. In it we predicted quantum states in microtubules which would be inhibited by anesthesia, both considered long shots. See next tweet. https://t.co/HCGrckjHcJ
Nothing’s been won yet. Cartoon neuron theories get attention but have no evidence, explanatory power or biological connection. Orch OR has all 3 but is suppressed, banned and ignored by so-called leaders in Consciousness Studies. Orch OR will win. See: https://t.co/Je2mMPTHQk. https://t.co/PrghMPoxWS
Anil, how many different ‘hard problems’, ‘real problems’, ‘meta problems’ do you need as decoys to obfuscate the fact you don’t have a clue about the actual hard problem (which even Dave is running away from)? Don’t ignore, criticize please: https://t.co/HCGrckjHcJ https://t.co/55tmmmSVxX
Orch OR is the only theory in the TWCF program which 1) stated predictions, 2) did experiments to test them, and 3) validated predictions. Predictions here https://t.co/HCGrckjHcJ Results described here: https://t.co/HSpoBpadSA Why did Dave ban Orch OR from ASSC? https://t.co/55tmmmSVxX
@MedEckardt @BrianRoemmele I respect your skepticism. But what other biology can offer plausible testable mechanisms? Anesthesia seems to selectively act on quantum effects in microtubules. Memory encoded in synapses alone would only last hours.
@EngagingThe @tinyklaus @Peter_Levenda Garry Nolan has also spoken about this in relation to the work of Stuart Hameroff and Roger Penrose. https://t.co/sn0P3lBCPx
This video delves into the concept of pervivencia, a theme that provokes questions about existence and the afterlife. We will explore recent scientific findings related to brain death, the complexities of organ…
This video explores recent research on mechanisms leading to near-death experiences, focusing on ego dissolution and traumatic events. It highlights how NDEs can alter the sense of self beyond cultural or religious…
Discover recent research on mechanisms behind near-death experiences, highlighting ego dissolution and trauma. These experiences often involve altered self-perception and feelings of unity, transcending cultural and…
This video delves into the questions surrounding existence and death, addressing the roles of neurologists in understanding brain function related to death. We will examine clinical practices, brain death legislation…
https://t.co/nMa25VOzVW
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33232193/
@Qivshi1 @PopMech Doesn't seem to be paywalled through Google Scholar https://t.co/rrzvFH0LNW
@YaC_osaurus @StuartHameroff here is the sources cited Citations: [1] https://t.co/y1jSyDxpfM [2] https://t.co/i4mKfCGArN [3] https://t.co/8td0h2PKjR [4] https://t.co/mLO2OyErF3 [5] https://t.co/Y7EJ3kg0Io [6] https://t.co/DOx9dkjRzi [7] https://t.co/CGZPihftNN [8] https://t.co/63zByfRopK
@SterlingCooley Orch-OR: https://t.co/zNGlWbVjU6
@hamptonism Wait why https://t.co/KHtYv4acZy
For further thought. Cells as quantum tuning, signaling and processing resources. https://t.co/e8Ue3WQ1nP
@CascadiaEric Orch OR fitting into the third theory of consciousness is from this paper https://t.co/IXfNH7yvQn
Some other references… https://t.co/OUVraytP7u https://t.co/H6GS06r6gh https://t.co/OnjAdhQvOK
@teslaownersSV 'Orch OR' is the most complete, and most easily falsifiable theory of consciousness https://t.co/PW5paWSTgS https://t.co/f8mgcWrsBQ
https://t.co/HpxRu50nH6 According to some medics (and a mathematician) Quantum Gravity is the reason we are conscious! https://t.co/8Z1whSqLGE
RT @StuartHameroff: Nothing’s been won yet. Cartoon neuron theories get attention but have no evidence, explanatory power or biological con…
RT @StuartHameroff: Nothing’s been won yet. Cartoon neuron theories get attention but have no evidence, explanatory power or biological con…
RT @StuartHameroff: Nothing’s been won yet. Cartoon neuron theories get attention but have no evidence, explanatory power or biological con…
Nothing’s been won yet. Cartoon neuron theories get attention but have no evidence, explanatory power or biological connection. Orch OR has all 3 but is suppressed, banned and ignored by so-called leaders in Consciousness Studies. Orch OR will win. See: https://t.co/Je2mMPTHQk. https://t.co/PrghMPoxWS
Is there a potential for quantum entanglement to explain the synchronization of microtubule vibrations linked to consciousness? https://t.co/9bERjdNdKs #QuantumEntanglement #MindMysteries
@SterlingCooley @dylan_heinkel @StevenMusielski @PalSun1 Finish the debate : https://t.co/FZEXMoZeS7
@SterlingCooley Whoa... I just read this and what it's saying makes a ton of sense: https://t.co/z77G7TV8UH I've always suspected a quantum explanation for consciousness. The brain just works too fast and does too much too efficiently to be explained as just a "biological computer" How can
Orch-OR by Penrose & Hameroff Is the most complete theory of consciousness - and no other theory comes close https://t.co/nvqJgpjcwp
@roninhahn @Maria7797943007 @Promptmethus @StuartHameroff @davidchalmers42 @DavidDeutschOxf @Plinz @ComputingByArts @anatolykern @LiamPaulGotch @sapinker @RichardDawkins @JeffDean @ShaneLegg @demishassabis @ilyasut @geoffreyhinton Orch or what are you falsifying about it i guess https://t.co/nvqJgpiEGR
@ComputingByArts @roninhahn Pdf linked - and this paper too - Google images has a ton of alpha to search this stuff https://t.co/nvqJgpjcwp
Hameroff, Stuart. “'Orch OR' is the most complete, and most easily falsifiable theory of consciousness.” Cognitive neurosciencevol. 12,2 (2021) https://t.co/6flXxx6Lik https://t.co/mHnfznKfBL https://t.co/ZAQebgEk40
More Orch OR: https://t.co/0t8e00hDBP
@DerwoDamaso Also, I realize you may "word thinking" a bit too much here by over-focusing on Objective Reduction, and overlooking the pretty straightforward claim of Orch OR theory "attributes consciousness to quantum computations in microtubules inside brain neurons" https://t.co/zmlEYSkvFR
@FoldMani @WiringTheBrain Easily the most evidence based theory of consciousness in existence today https://t.co/UeD3Kva3p0
@hamzoidcaliph @Jake_Hallam_ https://t.co/w80pdj6d0r
@anilkseth @thandrillon @ConversationEDU Except that Orch OR is a far more studied proposal for consciousness - which you continually try to ignore and downplay. I heard you used to be more open to quantum effects in consciousness - what happened Anil ? Why the sudden change ? https://t.co/zmlEYSkvFR
@DiegoborbonR Orch OR can be falsified. So - YES - it is more than a "philosophical proposal". https://t.co/7IxphKXUZe
Just curious. Why is Orch OR a bad option? Feel free to criticize, but please don’t dismiss it out of hand or ignore it. https://t.co/HCGrckjHcJ https://t.co/FvLcqmiVhJ
RT @StuartHameroff: Anil, how many different ‘hard problems’, ‘real problems’, ‘meta problems’ do you need as decoys to obfuscate the fact…
Please ask Dan Dennett (and anyone else) if Orch OR should now be considered the leading theory of consciousness. Predictions: https://t.co/dcP5XuTpni Results: https://t.co/zWBZ2JQR96 If not, why not? https://t.co/MDJWzNNMPV
Hi John IIT, Dave and Christof snuffed Orch OR, banned it from ASSC, such that you won’t even mention it! It’s the only actual theory of consciousness. Criticize it please! Don’t ignore. Predictions: https://t.co/dcP5XuTpni Results: https://t.co/zWBZ2JQR96 @StuartHameroff https://t.co/PzctHyQfWn
RT @StuartHameroff: Anil, how many different ‘hard problems’, ‘real problems’, ‘meta problems’ do you need as decoys to obfuscate the fact…
Anil, how many different ‘hard problems’, ‘real problems’, ‘meta problems’ do you need as decoys to obfuscate the fact you don’t have a clue about the actual hard problem (which even Dave is running away from)? Don’t ignore, criticize please: https://t.co/HCGrckjHcJ https://t.co/55tmmmSVxX
I agree. We have numerous hard problems, real problem, meta meta problems, Bayesian Bayesianism and unidentified integrated information all dancing around consciousness and sucking up to AI. Where’s the brain? Where’s the biology? Where’s life? https://t.co/dcP5XuTpni https://t.co/M07x83EzaV
Adversarial collaborations (ACs) work between similar theories. Orch OR couldn’t AC with IIT so TWCF funded low cost experiments to falsify Orch OR. Predictions: https://t.co/dcP5XuTpni Results: https://t.co/zWBZ2JQR96 Biology better than Bayesianism https://t.co/MF7CJBL4MY
RT @StuartHameroff: Orch OR is the only theory in the TWCF program which 1) stated predictions, 2) did experiments to test them, and 3) val…
RT @StuartHameroff: Orch OR is the only theory in the TWCF program which 1) stated predictions, 2) did experiments to test them, and 3) val…
Orch OR is the only theory in the TWCF program which 1) stated predictions, 2) did experiments to test them, and 3) validated predictions. Predictions here https://t.co/HCGrckjHcJ Results described here: https://t.co/HSpoBpadSA Why did Dave ban Orch OR from ASSC? https://t.co/55tmmmSVxX
RT @StuartHameroff: This is a good,recent description of Orch OR published at the onset of our TWCF-funded experiments. In it we predicted…
RT @StuartHameroff: This is a good,recent description of Orch OR published at the onset of our TWCF-funded experiments. In it we predicted…
RT @StuartHameroff: This is a good,recent description of Orch OR published at the onset of our TWCF-funded experiments. In it we predicted…
RT @StuartHameroff: This is a good,recent description of Orch OR published at the onset of our TWCF-funded experiments. In it we predicted…
RT @StuartHameroff: This is a good,recent description of Orch OR published at the onset of our TWCF-funded experiments. In it we predicted…
RT @StuartHameroff: This is a good,recent description of Orch OR published at the onset of our TWCF-funded experiments. In it we predicted…
RT @StuartHameroff: This is a good,recent description of Orch OR published at the onset of our TWCF-funded experiments. In it we predicted…
This is a good,recent description of Orch OR published at the onset of our TWCF-funded experiments. In it we predicted quantum states in microtubules which would be inhibited by anesthesia, both considered long shots. See next tweet. https://t.co/HCGrckjHcJ
@PaulPcf22 Except one of those is already on the moon, it’s called Orch OR. https://t.co/zmlEYSkvFR
@canalesjohnson Except one of those is already on the moon - it’s called Orch OR. https://t.co/zmlEYSkvFR
@David_desJ @Jake_Browning00 *Orch OR enters the room* Not all, thankfully. https://t.co/zmlEYSkvFR
@t_vettukattil @hakwanlau Yes, it's called Orch OR, it has all of the ingredients for a theory of consciousness - biological basis in Microtubules, mechanism of action to modify consciousness (anesthetics), and mathematical models developed by Oxford Physicist Sir Roger Penrose. https://t.co/nvqJgpjcwp
@ThouArtThat This is simply not true, but understandable if you only read Anil Seth's work in the past. Orchestrated Objective Reduction (Orch OR) is a solid materialist scientific approach to consciousness. https://t.co/nvqJgpjcwp
IIT folks and ASSC will still not acknowledge Orch OR which puts forth biological locations for consciousness, mechanisms of modifying consciousness (anesthesia), and has mathematical models developed by Oxford Physicist Sir Roger Penrose. https://t.co/nvqJgpjcwp
@JoannaSzczotka @davidchalmers42 Orch OR actually put forth biological locations where consciousness is happening, a mechanism by which it can be modified (anesthetics, ultrasound & psychedelics), and is mathematically validated by Oxford Physicist Sir Roger Penrose. https://t.co/nvqJgpjcwp
@cabosman Behold ! Something called Orch OR. You’re welcome ☺️ https://t.co/zmlEYSkvFR
For those trying to backpedal and now claim there is *no* theory that addresses the question of consciousness - you are invited to learn about Orchestrated Objective Reduction (Orch OR) the Penrose-Hameroff interpretation specifically. https://t.co/vsJ6Fhimcz.
@Deepfryguy76 @algekalipso One of the more interesting theories I've encountered is the "Orch OR" model of consciousness proposed by Penrose and Hameroff. I don't pretend to understand it fully, but the basic idea has to do with quantum mechanical events involving microtubules. https://t.co/bgfGfcRFoF
@andrzejdragan Orch OR, mikrotubule, świadomość i takie tam, w aktualnych badaniach i nie tylko https://t.co/y1FD4RJpnu https://t.co/suih9CNxQg
'Orch OR' is the most complete, and most easily falsifiable theory of consciousness - PubMed https://t.co/Ug7PqaJZZ3.
@jjfahrenfort @assc25 @StanDehaene @smfleming @melanieboly @VictorLamme @ncc_lab @Liad_Mudrik Great Debate ASSC25 Final Comments Orch OR has far more explanatory power, biology and experimental validation than these theories ocombined. GNW, PC, HoT and IIT could all be correct, and still require Orch OR inside neurons for consciousness. https://t.co/HCGrckjHcJ
@jjfahrenfort @assc25 @StanDehaene @smfleming @melanieboly @VictorLamme @ncc_lab @Liad_Mudrik Great Debate ASSC 25 Final Comment Orch OR attributes consciousness to quantum processes in microtubules inside brain neurons. Orch OR has, by far, more explanatory power, brain biology, and supportive evidence than GNW, HoT, RP and IIT combined. ✌️
RT @StuartHameroff: @MedEckardt @BrianRoemmele I respect your skepticism. But what other biology can offer plausible testable mechanisms? A…
RT @StuartHameroff: @MedEckardt @BrianRoemmele I respect your skepticism. But what other biology can offer plausible testable mechanisms? A…
@MedEckardt @BrianRoemmele I respect your skepticism. But what other biology can offer plausible testable mechanisms? Anesthesia seems to selectively act on quantum effects in microtubules. Memory encoded in synapses alone would only last hours.
@HauntedBeaker @SkullAndUxV I already gave an outline about consciousness's connection to the Universe as demonstrated by quantum effects. You'd have to tell me where your gaps are. It's a broad field. There is some consensus that Consciousness relies on quantum effects : https://t.co/YVyj1e8wmk
@PumaBare @ToriatheistTori I recommend that you check the research: https://t.co/YVyj1e94bS
'Orch OR' is the most complete, and most easily falsifiable theory of consciousness https://t.co/UHBXLmRteu @taylerv__
@blknyd @davidchalmers42 A dynamic instability. Stuart Hameroff offers a similar view, but restricted to a cellular instability.
RT @THP_22_22: @EngagingThe @tinyklaus @Peter_Levenda Garry Nolan has also spoken about this in relation to the work of Stuart Hameroff and…
@EngagingThe @tinyklaus @Peter_Levenda Garry Nolan has also spoken about this in relation to the work of Stuart Hameroff and Roger Penrose. https://t.co/sn0P3lBCPx
I just wanted to share a great article with those who may not be familiar with Microtubule consciousness theory. It has not actually been falsified yet, and holds up to this day. Please familiarize yourself with it, thank you
@Frankie82uk Ooh you haven’t yet heard of ORCH OR by Hameroff et al. https://t.co/zmlEYSkvFR
Not withstanding that Penrose and Hameroff propose the microtubles act as quantum devices I think that a simpler relationship exists. https://t.co/yfAyCKYhpn
@WillieC69626896 Your conclusion is not logically derived from what comes before in your statement. 'Memories aren't stored in the brain' does not mean there's a god/s. See the Orch-Or theory of consciousness for example https://t.co/PTaSAMvBIx
@xzistor @SurviveThrive2 @lexfridman @rjhaier https://t.co/ezVafSUZrt
‘Orch OR’ is the most complete, and most easily falsifiable theory of consciousness Stuart Hameroff https://t.co/f6wMqzqxhA
@willwjack @nickcammarata i didn't realize that hameroff has continued working on this in the past ten or so years. beyond that, the wiki article cites two pop sci pieces w/o linking the work, lol. do you happen to recall the article you're thinking of? https://t.co/QvW1bnxLtd
@ProfRobHoward @David27221696 @jonathanstea @DrAnnieHickox @oliviaaaroseh I’ll tell you what to think, Dr. H. In my house, I’m the final arbiter, or like to think so, anyway. So, what’s your question? Anything from the bio model of psych to Hameroff’s quantum theory of consciousness, I’m your man. https://t.co/e36jBStojc
Citované zdroje
@ylecun @MetaAI https://t.co/S2VbobCR9Z
La conciencia - La reducción objetiva orquestada es una hipótesis que establece que la conciencia es originada por procesos en microtubulos dentro de la neurona y no de procesos entre neuronas (COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE): https://t.co/fkWx0Czx4y
Orch OR - how microtubules, 'quantum', and consciousness meet. Highly acclaimed hypnosis with plenty of supporting evidence. https://t.co/vSMLvMTsTO
@infinity_vis Here’s a somewhat new thought on the origin of consciousness that I built my undergrad research off of, great paper from one of the original scholars involved with the hypothesis - https://t.co/NVJNbWwaVc