Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The tone is largely dismissive, exemplified by comments questioning the study’s relevance and the choice of publication venue, using words like 'neither tropical nor neglected' and sarcastic remarks about its presence in the journal. The tone and wording suggest a superficial engagement and limited perceived impact of the publication on wider societal discussions.
Most discussions express neutral or skeptical views about the publication, questioning why the study was published given its focus on China and lack of context relevance.
While some users show curiosity about the research findings, overall interest appears modest due to the dismissive tone and lack of detailed engagement.
Individuals tend to make brief comments or sarcastic remarks rather than in-depth analysis, indicating low engagement depth.
The discussions seem to have minimal influence on broader debates or policy considerations, mostly serving as brief reactions or side remarks.
As it is neither tropical, nor neglected (clearly!) how did this paper end up in #PLOSNTDs: Understanding COVID-19 vaccine demand and hesitancy: A nationwide online survey in China https://t.co/xAdcUkp5CB
https://t.co/MNcmH3mDm3 https://t.co/bStpNrxIF0
https://t.co/kWDhuboIKB
RT @irishrailwayman: https://t.co/MNcmH3mDm3
This study surveyed over 3,500 people in China in 2020 to understand their vaccination intentions, willingness to pay, and factors influencing vaccine acceptance, highlighting the importance of trust in local vaccines…
https://t.co/kWDhuboIKB
RT @irishrailwayman: https://t.co/MNcmH3mDm3
https://t.co/MNcmH3mDm3 https://t.co/bStpNrxIF0
As it is neither tropical, nor neglected (clearly!) how did this paper end up in #PLOSNTDs: Understanding COVID-19 vaccine demand and hesitancy: A nationwide online survey in China https://t.co/xAdcUkp5CB