Endoscopy January 2022 PMID 33506454

Endoscopic internal drainage and low negative-pressure endoscopic vacuum therapy for anastomotic leaks after oncologic upper gastrointestinal surgery.

Carlo Felix Maria Jung, Rachel Hallit, Annegret Müller-Dornieden, Mélanie Calmels, Diane Goere, Ulriikka Chaput, Marine Camus, Jean Michel Gonzalez, Marc Barthet, Jérémie Jacques, Romain Legros, Thierry Barrioz, Fabian Kück, Ali Seif Amir Hosseini, Michael Ghadimi

Full text PDF Download social card

Mentions

Peak: 8 in Jan 2022

across 3 sources since Dec 2021

Extended reach

35,863

potential audience

Total likes

Video views

329

Mentions per month

Dec 2021 – Jan 2022

Where it's discussed

X / Twitter8 posts
Facebook2 posts
YouTube1 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The discussions demonstrate strong interest and moderate engagement by highlighting the promising success rates of internal drainage and vacuum therapy, using positive language such as 'read more here' and emphasizing the significance of the techniques, which suggests an overall belief in their potential impact on clinical practice.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the efficacy of the presented treatments, with some emphasizing their clinical significance, reflecting a general consensus.

InterestHigh interest

The enthusiasm for new techniques is high, as posters show curiosity and engagement about the methods and outcomes.

EngagementModerate engagement

Discussions include mentions of the authors, the specific procedures, and calls to watch videos, indicating active participation.

ImpactModerate impact

Posters recognize the potential for these therapies to influence practice, though some consider the need for further validation.

Abstract in brief

This study compares two treatment options, endoscopic internal drainage (EID) using double-pigtail stents and low negative-pressure endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT), for managing leaks after upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery.
Results show both EID and EVT have high success rates in closing leaks, with EID achieving a 100% success rate and EVT 85.2%, but EID requires fewer procedures and a longer treatment duration, while EVT is faster but needs more interventions.
Overall, both techniques are effective, but choosing between them may depend on factors like the urgency of treatment and the patient's condition, since EVT offers quicker healing at the cost of more procedures.]

Read the full abstract

All mentions

Endoscopic Drainage and Vacuum Therapy for Gastrointestinal Leaks

Carlo Jung discusses endoscopic internal drainage and low negative-pressure endoscopic vacuum therapy for treating leaks after upper gastrointestinal surgery. Both methods show high success rates, with EVT offering…

endoscopythieme · Dec 16, 2021 329 views