The discussions reveal a generally supportive attitude, with some users emphasizing their familiarity with the topic by citing technical sources or clarifying misconceptions, such as correcting misunderstandings about gene deletion. The tone varies from cautious skepticism to informative reassurance, reflecting a balanced engagement with both scientific accuracy and public concern.
AgreementModerate agreement
Most discussions show support and trust in the publication’s findings about Ad26 vectors, with some emphasizing its safety profiles.
InterestModerate interest
Participants demonstrate moderate curiosity, often referencing specific details about adenovirus vectors and their implications.
EngagementModerate engagement
Posts frequently analyze technical details, debunk misconceptions, or cite sources, indicating active involvement.
ImpactModerate impact
The debates could influence perceptions around the vaccine technology and safety, possibly affecting public trust or scientific understanding.
Abstract in brief
Replication-incompetent Ad26 viral vectors are being explored for vaccine development because they can safely deliver transgenes without replicating within the host, and they are manufactured efficiently at scale using mammalian cell lines.
These Ad26-based vaccines have been extensively tested in clinical trials involving over 114,000 participants, showing good safety profiles with no major safety concerns, and they induce strong and durable immune responses, both humoral (antibody) and cellular.
Despite preexisting immunity to Ad26 in some individuals, studies indicate it does not significantly affect the vaccine’s ability to generate an immune response, with ongoing evaluations to confirm their safety and effectiveness, including the approval of the first Ad26-based Ebola vaccine.
#10 Adenoviruses used in both the Johnson & Johnson shot and the AstraZeneca shots pose a risk of cancer.
https://t.co/HfCCLPND8s
https://t.co/qf1HBBmpxF
https://t.co/vnpeW964ql
https://t.co/DjUaJAc7Yg
May 22, 2021 · 3 likes · 1 share · 5,827 followersView post →
DN
D.S. Nelson
@process_x · X
@keesaroo @WellLahTeeFuKin @FaithInJesus1st @swhotmess @lonestarangle @painadvocateAR @2Spaceninja15 @Anonylyzer13 @InAMadWorld111 @Jesusis53688620 @Jesussaves_77 @AndersJonita @haterdeep2 This woman is either fear-mongering or doesn't know what she's talking about.
Patent: https://t.co/gI5IHLlSR8
She claims the patent says it deletes the E1 gene in HUMANS. It doesn't. This is referring to the E1 gene in the adenovirus vector.
See: https://t.co/MxFowGyPzq
Nov 18, 2021 · 3 likes · 5,715 followersView post →
AM
A$AP mAbs
@ImmunoGangsta · X
@DopplerEffect93 @SaltaoVladimir @ENirenberg @weldeiry @Debunk_the_Funk @DravenS17 @Jikkyleaks @gorskon Tell me, is process DNA present under regulatory limits still a contaminant?
"Won't do anything", "anti-vax scheme"... now you are just babbling.
See: https://t.co/iZAf3ErGHz
It is what the J&J folk base their risk analysis on here: https://t.co/9m2gr8wUft
Oct 14, 2023 · 3 likes · 2,038 followersView post →
IU
IDI-UCV
@IdiUcv · X
Vacunas basadas en vectores virales Ad26 incompetentes para la replicación: plantilla estandarizada con consideraciones clave para una evaluación de riesgo / beneficio.
https://t.co/299pAyCqQz https://t.co/xapyCQnMAF
Oct 3, 2020 · 2 likes · 4 shares · 2,949 followersView post →
JC
Javi Ciborro
@papayaykware · X
Los adenovirus y el riesgo de cáncer
La inyección actualmente autorizada por Johnson and Johnson está hecha con la cáscara Ad26.COV-2.S, un adenovirus humano aislado por primera vez en 1956 a partir de una muestra anal obtenida de un bebé varón de 9 meses https://t.co/UvPBhtRqrS
Vaccines for COVID19 explores your top questions. We explain the medical scientific evidence in plain terms, including how vaccines work and their safety profiles, with animations.
In this video I break down the scientific literature on the Johnson Johnson COVID19 vaccines in a simple way for all to understand. The vaccine uses a replication-incompetent Ad26 viral vector, delivering transgenes…
@ImmunoGangsta @tenebra99 @syrupfrogger @Rosewind2007 If you're going to discuss Ad26, then cite sources on Ad26.
Don't cite sources on Ad5 and then act like it applies to Ad26, because you were incompetently confused them.
https://t.co/Sy3ajchYKu
https://t.co/G5GUDIPmuL https://t.co/t9jn0Q7SE6
@DopplerEffect93 @SaltaoVladimir @ENirenberg @weldeiry @Debunk_the_Funk @DravenS17 @Jikkyleaks @gorskon Tell me, is process DNA present under regulatory limits still a contaminant?
"Won't do anything", "anti-vax scheme"... now you are just babbling.
See: https://t.co/iZAf3ErGHz
It is what the J&J folk base their risk analysis on here: https://t.co/9m2gr8wUft
Oct 14, 2023 · 3 likes · 2,038 followersView post →
RH
Roy v Heesbeen
@rvh15374957 · X
@mholkers Dit artikel is wel een aardige samenvatting over Ad26 (wel enigszins outdated) https://t.co/I5vryOou7A
@Jesussaves_77 @keesaroo @WellLahTeeFuKin @FaithInJesus1st @swhotmess @lonestarangle @painadvocateAR @2Spaceninja15 @Anonylyzer13 @InAMadWorld111 @Jesusis53688620 @AndersJonita @haterdeep2 It's E1 in the vector that's deleted, which I assume you'd want.
"Replication-incompetent adenoviral vectors have been under investigation as a platform to carry a variety of transgenes, and express them as a basis for vaccine development."
https://t.co/MxFowGyPzq
@keesaroo @WellLahTeeFuKin @FaithInJesus1st @swhotmess @lonestarangle @painadvocateAR @2Spaceninja15 @Anonylyzer13 @InAMadWorld111 @Jesusis53688620 @Jesussaves_77 @AndersJonita @haterdeep2 This woman is either fear-mongering or doesn't know what she's talking about.
Patent: https://t.co/gI5IHLlSR8
She claims the patent says it deletes the E1 gene in HUMANS. It doesn't. This is referring to the E1 gene in the adenovirus vector.
See: https://t.co/MxFowGyPzq
Nov 18, 2021 · 3 likes · 5,715 followersView post →
AW
Adriaan W
@JansensAdriaan · X
@sn0rx https://t.co/Gg1vMeYDdb
Nov 15, 2021 · 1 like · 3,827 followersView post →
#10 Adenoviruses used in both the Johnson & Johnson shot and the AstraZeneca shots pose a risk of cancer.
https://t.co/HfCCLPND8s
https://t.co/qf1HBBmpxF
https://t.co/vnpeW964ql
https://t.co/DjUaJAc7Yg
May 22, 2021 · 3 likes · 1 share · 5,827 followersView post →
JC
Javi Ciborro
@papayaykware · X
Los adenovirus y el riesgo de cáncer
La inyección actualmente autorizada por Johnson and Johnson está hecha con la cáscara Ad26.COV-2.S, un adenovirus humano aislado por primera vez en 1956 a partir de una muestra anal obtenida de un bebé varón de 9 meses https://t.co/UvPBhtRqrS
https://t.co/qyoXmkIL0C
Vaccines based on replication incompetent Ad26 viral vectors: Standardized template with key considerations for a risk/benefit assessment
Vacunas basadas en vectores virales Ad26 incompetentes para la replicación: plantilla estandarizada con consideraciones clave para una evaluación de riesgo / beneficio.
https://t.co/299pAyCqQz https://t.co/xapyCQnMAF
Oct 3, 2020 · 2 likes · 4 shares · 2,949 followersView post →
N
In situ structural analysis of SARS-CoV-2 spike reveals flexibility ...
News
10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.018 · Web of Science · Google Scholar. a [...] with the ... https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127404 · Crossref. Andrea Mussini ...