PubHawk
August 2021 PMID 34162501

Robot technology in dentistry, part two of a systematic review: an overview of initiatives.

Tom C T van Riet, Kevin T H Chin Jen Sem, Jean-Pierre T F Ho, René Spijker, Jens Kober, Jan de Lange

Download social card

Mentions

3
Peak: 2 in May 2025
across 2 sources since Jun 2021

Extended reach

1,309
potential audience

Total likes

6

Video views

732

Mentions per month

Jun 2021 – May 2025

Where it's discussed

  • YouTube2 videos
  • X / Twitter1 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The overall tone reflects cautious optimism, with posters recognizing the potential of robotics in dentistry while also pointing out the need for more rigorous evidence, as seen in phrases like 'exciting developments' and concerns about 'limited clinical validation.' The language and tone suggest an interest in future possibilities but a recognition of current limitations, contributing to moderate agreement and impact scores.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most posts agree that the review highlights promising advancements but also notes the current limitations, reflecting cautious optimism.

InterestModerate interest

Discussions show moderate interest, with some posters expressing curiosity about future developments but overall engagement remains balanced.

EngagementNeutral engagement

Posts tend to briefly acknowledge the article's points without deep analysis, indicating low to moderate engagement.

ImpactModerate impact

The discussions suggest the article may influence future research directions and clinical practices, though the impact is perceived as moderate at this stage.

Abstract in brief

  • This systematic review examines the development and use of physical robot technology in various fields of dentistry from 1985 to 2020, analyzing 94 relevant articles to provide an overview of initiatives and applications.
  • It highlights that, although many innovative robot projects have been reported, the overall quality of clinical validation and scientific evidence on their benefits, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness remain limited, emphasizing the need for more rigorous research.
  • The authors are optimistic about the future potential of robotics in dentistry, especially with the rise of open-source systems and specialized robot designs, but they advocate for an evidence-based approach to ensure safe and effective integration into clinical practice.]
Read the full abstract

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
SystRev in Dentistry
@SystRevDent · X

Robot technology in dentistry, part two of a systematic review: an overview of initiatives https://t.co/Z50sOn6eLT

Jun 24, 2021 · 1 like · 578 followers View post →

All mentions

SystRev in Dentistry
@SystRevDent · X

Robot technology in dentistry, part two of a systematic review: an overview of initiatives https://t.co/Z50sOn6eLT

Jun 24, 2021 · 1 like · 578 followers View post →