Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Discussions show strong curiosity and support for re-evaluating traditional practices, with some posters noting the safety and potential benefits of avoiding routine intubation, while others reference the study's findings to consider changing clinical approaches. The tone and choice of words like 'questioning' and 'safety' indicate engagement aimed at practical implications and acknowledgment of recent evidence.
Many discussions reflect support or neutrality towards the publication, indicating general agreement with questioning the necessity of routine intubation.
The topic sparks significant interest, as seen in lively discussions and references to implications for practice.
Posts reference specific aspects of the study, such as the safety of bedside closure without intubation, demonstrating moderate engagement.
The debates suggest the publication could influence clinical decisions and protocols, hence a moderate impact.
“Tu-be or not tu-be? Is routine endotracheal intubation necessary for successful bedside reduction and primary closure of gastroschisis” Miyata et al. Full text here: https://t.co/N0LEpJtYrg #SoMe4PedSurg Cred: @RodGerardo https://t.co/ezQG9hutp3
RT @StayCurrentMD: “Tu-be or not tu-be? Is routine endotracheal intubation necessary for successful bedside reduction and primary closure o…
RT @StayCurrentMD: “Tu-be or not tu-be? Is routine endotracheal intubation necessary for successful bedside reduction and primary closure o…
RT @StayCurrentMD: “Tu-be or not tu-be? Is routine endotracheal intubation necessary for successful bedside reduction and primary closure o…
Routine endotracheal intubation during gastroschisis closure does not significantly impact success rates and may increase ventilation time, but postoperative outcomes are similar. It is generally safe to attempt bedside…
The study compares helicopter versus ground transport of pediatric trauma patients, finding that while helicopter transport is associated with more urgent procedures, many patients did not require these, indicating…
RT @StayCurrentMD: “Tu-be or not tu-be? Is routine endotracheal intubation necessary for successful bedside reduction and primary closure o…
RT @StayCurrentMD: “Tu-be or not tu-be? Is routine endotracheal intubation necessary for successful bedside reduction and primary closure o…
RT @StayCurrentMD: “Tu-be or not tu-be? Is routine endotracheal intubation necessary for successful bedside reduction and primary closure o…
“Tu-be or not tu-be? Is routine endotracheal intubation necessary for successful bedside reduction and primary closure of gastroschisis” Miyata et al. Full text here: https://t.co/N0LEpJtYrg #SoMe4PedSurg Cred: @RodGerardo https://t.co/ezQG9hutp3
doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.06.011. Epub 2021 Jul 15. PMID: 34274211. 289 ... jpedsurg.2021.03.004. Epub 2021 Mar 11. PMID: 33814182. 812 ...
S
RD
SP
CW