Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Numerous discussions highlight key findings from the study, such as the claim that each additional 1,000 steps walked daily can reduce the risk of death by about 12%. Phrases like 'every step counts' and comparisons of walking to quitting smoking reflect a tone of urgency and empowerment, suggesting that viewers are motivated to incorporate walking into their daily routines.
The majority of discussions echo positive agreement with the study's findings on the benefits of walking.
Posts demonstrate a high level of curiosity about the relationship between daily steps and mortality risk.
Many users deeply engage with the content, discussing specific figures and implications for health.
Participants recognize the significant health implications of the study, often emphasizing how these findings could influence public health messaging.
It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if we don’t. https://t.co/tn4n37mD1T
Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~10,000 steps per day, and then diminishing returns past around ~12,000. https://t.co/spadY96BkJ https://t.co/m3BB33xzu1
Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan más, viven más https://t.co/2SCaroYdQ3
Original study: https://t.co/ly7Z5OIspP Breakdown by Stronger by Science: https://t.co/GLgOsUqLyS
Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
Daily Step Count and All-Cause #Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies #PhysicalActivity #PublicHealth #SportsMedicine https://t.co/wc8UZHZK3s
Maintaining activity is vital for optimal health and quality of life. This video explains the science behind walking 10,000 steps a day and how to incorporate effective strategies to combat sedentary behavior…
@AlecStapp Ok. But here’s the science: https://t.co/wkyj3bgm50
https://t.co/erNQlB4lot
Ref: Javedi. Daily step count and all-cause mortality: a dose response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Sports Med 2021
A meta-analysis demonstrates a significant inverse association between daily step count and all-cause mortality and CV mortality with more the better over the cut-off point of 3867 steps/day for all-cause mortality and only 2337 steps for CV mortality www.independent.co.uk/health-and-f...
En conclusión, si buscas longevidad, ten como meta propuesta llegar a los 16,000 pasos diarios. Referencia: https://t.co/pLSu2vMWII
RT @AsimovIsaac1919: Cuando algo es bueno en poca cantidad, no significa que tomarlo en mayor cantidad será mejor, necesariamente. https://…
Cuando algo es bueno en poca cantidad, no significa que tomarlo en mayor cantidad será mejor, necesariamente. https://t.co/E76lkpHmTY
@MohammedAlo "Dose-response meta-analysis indicated a strong inverse association, wherein the risk decreased linearly from 2700 to 17,000 steps per day." https://t.co/1cm5dnaanl
“Dose–response meta-analysis indicated a strong inverse association, wherein the risk decreased linearly from 2700 to 17,000 steps per day.“ https://t.co/NcPzEzi03X
According to scientists at Semnan University of Medical Sciences who analyzed the results of seven studies involving 28,141 participants, all-cause mortality (death from all causes) dropped about 12% for every 1,000 steps people took every day. https://t.co/mitq0IOPi2
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
@BitPaine Don't fucking smoke, don't do it But... ACSKHUALLY walking has a bigger net reduction in all cause mortality than tobacco increases it ;) https://t.co/Lu6v9ZAMou
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
@BourreauShira @Julien_Gpl @jleonidasbrr Je l’ai dit : il y a des études contradictoires. Ici une méta-analyse (un ensemble d’études) publiée en 2022 montre une réduction de la mortalité maximale jusqu’à 17 000 pas https://t.co/b8PlvKkkVD
Every step counts. For every 1,000 additional steps, your risk of death lowers by 12% (all-cause). Increasing from 2,700 to 16,000 steps is like quitting smoking! More from @StrongerByScience: https://t.co/h21KGAOemu The meta-analysis: https://t.co/kalOpxDCsr #movement #health https://t.co/l3v4gM2DaX
Recuento diario de pasos y mortalidad por todas las causas: un metanálisis de dosis-respuesta de estudios prospectivos de cohortes. No solo importa el hecho de ir al gym o entrenar, claro que es muy bueno para la salud. También importa movernos en el DÍA https://t.co/THlDkLG1WK
This great study looked at data from 7 different studies which basically showed the further you walked (up to 10000 steps), the less your chance of dying from all causes of death. #wednesdaywisdom #walkmore #getfit #getmoving https://t.co/cFzjX0ObJI https://t.co/lNh5dfnnih
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
https://t.co/PMP9V1QbCc
Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies | SpringerLink https://t.co/XagNoPKWFm
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
Humans were designed to be active 24/7. Walk was much as you can. https://t.co/tXFmsTbwhE
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
Some of my friends are getting walking pads for their office...I'm thinking about it... https://t.co/JMpoi5kQ6O
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies | SpringerLink https://t.co/oHIrcwfqJv
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
RT @Cernovich: It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if…
It’s legitimately trippy to go down into the rabbit hole of how much we are supposed to move our bodies and what happens if we don’t. https://t.co/tn4n37mD1T
Daily Step Count vs All-Cause Mortality (Dose–Response Meta-analysis n=175,370) – Hazard ratio for each 1000 steps/day HR=0.88 (0.83/0.93) – Dose–response: risk decreased linearly from 2700 to 17,000 steps/day – For 10,000 steps per day HR=0.44 (0.31/0.63) https://t.co/VwyYKaVmFB https://t.co/0ZQeBQpyGT
@jackmurphylive Another: Steps decrease all cause mortality in a dose-dependent way. https://t.co/9NDRW67EOE https://t.co/9m9277ThJg
Jayedi, Ahmad et al. “Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.” Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) vol. 52,1 (2022): 89-99. doi:10.1007/s40279-021-01536-4
3. Jayedi, A., Gohari, A. and Shab-Bidar, S. (2021) “Daily Step count and all-cause mortality: A dose–response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies,” Sports Medicine, 52(1), pp. 89–99. Available at: https://t.co/QmEuPjXcKx
This great study looked at data from 7 different studies which basically showed the further you walked (up to 10000 steps), the less your chance of dying from all causes of death. #wednesdaywisdom #walkmore #getfit #getmoving https://t.co/cFzjX0ObJI https://t.co/8v7rJ3sZlp
@felipeisidro13 @EstebanDL De verdad ocupas evidencia para saber que caminar más de 8,000 pasos al día reduces la mortalidad por todas las causas?? Jayedi, A., Gohari, A., & Shab-Bidar, S. (2022). Daily step count and all-cause mortality: a dose–response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.
Basically, the more steps you took per day (up to 17,000) the lower your risk of all-cause mortality was. https://t.co/hVdKvlQEE9
RT @JSantamariafit: #Caminar más se asocia con menor riesgo de mortalidad.
@KennethBodin @JacobGudiol There's also this quite recent meta analysis of prospective accelerometry studies: ~linear benefits for each added 1k daily steps. But many of the included studies didn't adjust for intensity - maybe a reason for no comparison of intensity vs total count https://t.co/hXlAckbFSM
RT @muscleforlife: According to scientists at Semnan University of Medical Sciences who analyzed the results of seven studies involving 28,…
RT @muscleforlife: According to scientists at Semnan University of Medical Sciences who analyzed the results of seven studies involving 28,…
RT @muscleforlife: According to scientists at Semnan University of Medical Sciences who analyzed the results of seven studies involving 28,…
@rolle @Urcheon No paremmuutta on vähän huono mitata :D Kyllä päivittäisaskeleilla on ihan älytön korrelaatio terveysvaikutuksiin. Viime vuonna julkastu meta osottaa 3k -> 17k askelilla olevan lineaarinen korrelaatio terveysvaikutuksiin https://t.co/SVArWmXR6q
RT @muscleforlife: According to scientists at Semnan University of Medical Sciences who analyzed the results of seven studies involving 28,…
RT @muscleforlife: According to scientists at Semnan University of Medical Sciences who analyzed the results of seven studies involving 28,…
RT @muscleforlife: According to scientists at Semnan University of Medical Sciences who analyzed the results of seven studies involving 28,…
According to scientists at Semnan University of Medical Sciences who analyzed the results of seven studies involving 28,141 participants, all-cause mortality (death from all causes) dropped about 12% for every 1,000 steps people took every day. https://t.co/mitq0IxdTs
@RottenInDenmark I do remember a recent (jan 22) meta analysis regarding steps per day which had a pretty huge amount of data - https://t.co/XfjIlf1Drw
Another study. https://t.co/x4Gty4qwyc
..the risks of all cause mortality. Each increase of 1000 steps/d saw the risk decrease in linear pattern. (2000-17000 steps/day.) https://t.co/5V9EZs7f83 Simply put,walk more to reduce incidence of factors wch can lead to death (lifestyle related). Start walking guys 2/3
一日何歩くらい歩けば良いか問題。 この研究では17000歩くらいまでは歩数増えると死亡リスク下がるという結果。 いきなりたくさんがんばって歩かなくても、3000歩くらいからは歩数増えると死亡リスク下がる傾向あるのでできる範囲で増やせると良いというメッセージ https://t.co/ENViUyqlS6
RT @muscleforlife: Study: For every 1,000 steps you walk per day, your rate of dying from all causes drops about 12%. So move around a lot…
RT @muscleforlife: Study: For every 1,000 steps you walk per day, your rate of dying from all causes drops about 12%. So move around a lot…
Study: For every 1,000 steps you walk per day, your rate of dying from all causes drops about 12%. So move around a lot every day. It does your body good. https://t.co/mitq0IOPi2
Entre otras cosas #Silvia consiguió esto hace 7 años ¿Por qué no repetirlo o mejorarlo @CamiloLS7? https://t.co/3hWWRBgM5a
Can your step count add years onto your life? Even a modest increase in steps per day may be associated with a lower risk of death. Start today! Getting in roughly 7500 steps per day on average may improve quality of life and life expectancy. Ref article: https://t.co/SwIhS1FZlp https://t.co/nNy21OQVAh
Walk your way to a longer life says meta-analysis. Check out this study! https://t.co/ko2dtq7qox #orthoresearch #medtwitter https://t.co/YcJcl2ghpH
RT @Joseph_Watso: New study from 175,370 person-years finds more steps per day reduces mortality risk in a linear fashion. Every step count…
RT @DenhamMark: Walk your way to a longer life says meta-analysis by @SportsMedicineJ! #walking #health https://t.co/NPwY2u7SLA https://t.c…
RT @DenhamMark: Walk your way to a longer life says meta-analysis by @SportsMedicineJ! #walking #health https://t.co/NPwY2u7SLA https://t.c…
RT @DenhamMark: Walk your way to a longer life says meta-analysis by @SportsMedicineJ! #walking #health https://t.co/NPwY2u7SLA https://t.c…
Walk your way to a longer life says meta-analysis by @SportsMedicineJ! #walking #health https://t.co/NPwY2u7SLA https://t.co/XrLtpNvoF4
Another big study looking at daily step count and mortality. Good review by @Examinecom here: https://t.co/4pjdQnEAhN tl;dr: the more steps/day, the better, generally. And a ~1,000 steps/day increase is a good minimum clinically important difference. https://t.co/fHymE24axy
RT @scienceforfit: A recent meta-analysis indicates that even modest increases in daily step count (1,000 steps/day more) can result in sig…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
RT @tednaiman: Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~…
Walking is good—inversely associated with all-cause mortality. More is better, up to a point . Pretty solid evidence for ~10,000 steps per day, and then diminishing returns past around ~12,000. https://t.co/spadY96BkJ https://t.co/m3BB33xzu1
RT @Paablofdezz_:
RT @agingdoc1: Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies https://t.co/z8MicGxV…
RT @agingdoc1: Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies https://t.co/z8MicGxV…
Jayedi, A., Gohari, A. & Shab-Bidar, S. Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. Sports Med 52, 89–99 (2022). https://t.co/xosEN3TFGT Download citation
Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies https://t.co/z8MicGxVgV "Even a modest increase in steps per day may be associated with a lower risk of death."
RT @heydannymiranda: Original study: https://t.co/ly7Z5OIspP Breakdown by Stronger by Science: https://t.co/GLgOsUqLyS
RT @heydannymiranda: Original study: https://t.co/ly7Z5OIspP Breakdown by Stronger by Science: https://t.co/GLgOsUqLyS
مريت على دراسة ضخمة نشرت هالشهر تقولك إن إذا زاد عدد خطواتك اليومية زاد عمرك رابطها: https://t.co/tPTZfutcgK
دراسة ضخمة نشرت هذا الشهر تبيّن أن طول العمر مرتبط بعدد الخطوات اللي تمشيها يوميا (كل مامشيت أكثر كل ماطال عمرك) رابط الدراسة: https://t.co/8DoddUBkAy https://t.co/gCsElmKlP4
RT @heydannymiranda: Original study: https://t.co/ly7Z5OIspP Breakdown by Stronger by Science: https://t.co/GLgOsUqLyS
RT @heydannymiranda: Original study: https://t.co/ly7Z5OIspP Breakdown by Stronger by Science: https://t.co/GLgOsUqLyS
RT @heydannymiranda: Original study: https://t.co/ly7Z5OIspP Breakdown by Stronger by Science: https://t.co/GLgOsUqLyS
RT @heydannymiranda: Original study: https://t.co/ly7Z5OIspP Breakdown by Stronger by Science: https://t.co/GLgOsUqLyS
Just get moving
RT @heydannymiranda: Original study: https://t.co/ly7Z5OIspP Breakdown by Stronger by Science: https://t.co/GLgOsUqLyS
RT @heydannymiranda: Original study: https://t.co/ly7Z5OIspP Breakdown by Stronger by Science: https://t.co/GLgOsUqLyS
Original study: https://t.co/ly7Z5OIspP Breakdown by Stronger by Science: https://t.co/GLgOsUqLyS
RT @JaviBueAnt:
RT @JaviBueAnt:
RT @JaviBueAnt:
RT @MurrayNutrition: Step it up https://t.co/pHe0G4jfmd https://t.co/hyo4oI3q3D
RT @MurrayNutrition: Step it up https://t.co/pHe0G4jfmd https://t.co/hyo4oI3q3D
Step it up https://t.co/pHe0G4jfmd https://t.co/hyo4oI3q3D
RT @scienceforfit: A recent meta-analysis indicates that even modest increases in daily step count (1,000 steps/day more) can result in sig…
Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies https://t.co/WjBAl01uam
#FightAging #EndAging #Lifespan #Healthspan https://t.co/Nfk9g3bEEp
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
A recent meta-analysis indicates that even modest increases in daily step count (1,000 steps/day more) can result in significant reductions (12%) in rates of all-cause mortality. https://t.co/VJayEuLQKa
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
RT @FITrebelde: Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan…
Un nuevo estudio concluye que no hay reducción del beneficio de caminar incluso hasta 17.000 pasos diarios. Los que caminan más, viven más https://t.co/2SCaroYdQ3
Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis https://t.co/HKfZrxUIae comm: https://t.co/zN08MgvbXP
Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis https://t.co/iRW3KEigop (https://t.co/lc0FlDGUyV)
Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies https://t.co/oH2k0BgZ2s
Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis ... https://t.co/q6EdswEST1 https://t.co/QN9T5UTDCu
RT @cmueller_PhD: Daily Step Count and All-Cause #Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies #PhysicalActivity…
RT @andimabxl: Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies https://t.co/14OeDegKTR
Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies https://t.co/14OeDegKTR
Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis https://t.co/4zQRvrLhRE (https://t.co/iwCgO8NKEh)
Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies "Conclusions: Even a modest increase in steps per day may be associated with a lower risk of death." https://t.co/fon5CkxKYR
RT @SymDataSec: Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis https://t.co/VX7ChhJChX Ahmad Jayedi et al. Sports…
RT @SymDataSec: Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis https://t.co/VX7ChhJChX Ahmad Jayedi et al. Sports…
Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis https://t.co/VX7ChhJChX Ahmad Jayedi et al. Sports Med. 2022 Jan. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01536-4. Epub 2021 Aug 21. Authors Ahmad Jayedi 1 2 , Ali Gohari 3 , Sakineh Shab-B… https://t.co/ztD1IQWDpk
Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis Link: https://t.co/3j9JZ7GtpT Comments: https://t.co/boIW6jq3GZ
Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis https://t.co/pPD2OoKH0h 3
Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis L: https://t.co/5KeyWTi58D C: https://t.co/6WmFXQnGsK
RT @guptapooja15: Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies | SpringerLink…
Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies | SpringerLink Interesting study
RT @cmueller_PhD: Daily Step Count and All-Cause #Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies #PhysicalActivity…
RT @cmueller_PhD: Daily Step Count and All-Cause #Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies #PhysicalActivity…
RT @cmueller_PhD: Daily Step Count and All-Cause #Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies #PhysicalActivity…
RT @cmueller_PhD: Daily Step Count and All-Cause #Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies #PhysicalActivity…
RT @cmueller_PhD: Daily Step Count and All-Cause #Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies #PhysicalActivity…
RT @cmueller_PhD: Daily Step Count and All-Cause #Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies #PhysicalActivity…
RT @cmueller_PhD: Daily Step Count and All-Cause #Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies #PhysicalActivity…
RT @cmueller_PhD: Daily Step Count and All-Cause #Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies #PhysicalActivity…
RT @cmueller_PhD: Daily Step Count and All-Cause #Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies #PhysicalActivity…
RT @cmueller_PhD: Daily Step Count and All-Cause #Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies #PhysicalActivity…
RT @cmueller_PhD: Daily Step Count and All-Cause #Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies #PhysicalActivity…
RT @cmueller_PhD: Daily Step Count and All-Cause #Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies #PhysicalActivity…
RT @cmueller_PhD: Daily Step Count and All-Cause #Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies #PhysicalActivity…
Daily Step Count and All-Cause #Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies #PhysicalActivity #PublicHealth #SportsMedicine https://t.co/wc8UZHZK3s
Caminar desde 2700 pasos diarios reduce la mortalidad por cualquier causa y el riesgo disminuye 18% por cada 1000 pasos que se aumenten. https://t.co/SvpHAXsrnj https://t.co/MSuigCsZ7k
RT @nick_krontiris: Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. https://t.co/Hf…
Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. https://t.co/Hf7fFqL6nC #exercise #Workout #TrainHard #GymLife #GymTime #muscle #strength #lift #GetStrong #cardio #hiit #longevity
Más es mejor...a recetar pasos! Jayedi A, Gohari A, Shab-Bidar S. Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. Sport Med [Internet]. 2021; Available from: https://t.co/FJYJyDaBr2 https://t.co/1pFP1jNQH2
Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies | SpringerLink https://t.co/WRabL8uBMN
Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies https://t.co/2Drx8K4kuv
Best news I’ve gotten in a while!!! Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies | SpringerLink https://t.co/owj84jzHq1
RT @PhysioMeScience: Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
RT @PhysioMeScience: Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
RT @PhysioMeScience: Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
RT @PhysioMeScience: Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
RT @PhysioMeScience: Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
RT @PhysioMeScience: Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
RT @PhysioMeScience: Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
RT @PhysioMeScience: Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
RT @PhysioMeScience: Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
RT @PhysioMeScience: Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
RT @PhysioMeScience: Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
RT @PhysioMeScience: Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
RT @PhysioMeScience: Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
RT @PhysioMeScience: Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
RT @PhysioMeScience: Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
RT @PhysioMeScience: Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
RT @PhysioMeScience: Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
RT @PhysioMeScience: Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
RT @PhysioMeScience: Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose–Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies https://t.co/obNw86igyH
C
TN
MF
DM
PS
CM
DB
DY
DD
L
MJ
MA
AG
LH
MM
MK
LC
JJ
SL
BP
N
F
LF
AT
TJ
JJ
KT
AA
I
T
T
SC
C
SH
J
A
MZ
F
U
JC
F
AV
W
C
M
JG
S
EP
CR
P
EA
LP
SC
H
KS
UF
SS
YC
R
B
AP
R
RR
SD
B
AN
G
MN
MO
TT
TT
I
S
B
MO
ST
DA
LV
JB
RC
S
RM
OR
RD
SN
A
BB
TS
A
JE
NV
A
DJ
JF
JC
S
ML
WR
D
D
RP
E
K
PJ
YP
DB
SE
KT
TI
HJ
KK
G奈
SM
MD
CM
A
S
DS
CC
AL
A
RB
RP
X
W
I
CR
AK
L
DD
RU
EC
T
DG
BM
DW
E
AM
BU
HT
F
DJ
MW
F
SH
SL
RP
EM
CB
SB
DU
PF
CC
OU
JM
A
R
UN
T
دM
L
L
J
CR
RE
S
P
JH
NK
MM
AT
MP
H
ML
SF
J
O
JM
JG
A
GE
DI
R
A
S
JB
J
RC
FP
CI
JM
DC
G
S
FH
C
GV
MR
IS
AA
MB
J
LB
D
P
KG
P
FG
M
F
PD
AV
FN
RC
D
N
CE
CM
P
EG
A
D
Z
IH
HN
J
N
KP
S
A
HN
DC
T
SL
H
S
HP
PG
MA
BP
WA
NM
HH
WF
A
FL
DR
ИБ
DF
L
JA
JJ
DM
MA
SL
JC
F
JC
CL
AP
JG
KS
GO
RC
HO
PA
NF
PC
IV
AA
DJ
PC
S