Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: https://t.co/hdoVQ6TWlv ⬆️LDL = better health, ⬇️non-CVD mortality, no greater CVD in the elderly @bschermd @DrAseemMalhotra @lowcarbGP @DoctorTro @ifixhearts https://t.co/6T8ya89T5p
Low density lipoprotein cholesterol and all-cause mortality rate: findings from a study on Japanese community-dwelling persons.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Sep 2021 – Aug 2025Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter165 posts
-
YouTube2 videos
-
Facebook2 posts
-
Reddit2 posts
AI synopsis
What people are saying
Several posts emphasize an inverse relationship between LDL-C levels and mortality risk, quoting specifics from the study like, 'The higher your cholesterol, the longer you'll live!' and 'The lowest LDL associated with worst survival.' The language used suggests a challenge to traditional views, with phrases like 'fallacy' and 'please be more skeptical,' which highlight a tone of critical inquiry. Overall, the choice of words and assertive tone reflect a community highly engaged and discussing significant health implications stemming from the research.
A majority of discussions express support for the study's findings regarding LDL cholesterol and mortality, although some express skepticism about established beliefs.
Many participants show a strong interest in the implications of LDL levels on health and longevity.
The discussions indicate deep engagement as many users reference statistical data and other studies, demonstrating critical analysis of the publication.
There is a perception of high impact as participants discuss the implications of LDL levels, suggesting they believe this research could change how cholesterol is viewed in relation to health.
Abstract in brief
- The study investigates the impact of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) on all-cause mortality in a Japanese community, highlighting its role in aging and cardiovascular health.
- It included 3,684 participants (1,610 men and 2,074 women) who were followed for 7 to 10 years, finding that lower LDLC levels are significant predictors of higher mortality rates.
- Key risk factors included being male, older age, low body mass index, diabetes presence, and varying LDLC levels, with those having LDLC under 70 mg/dL showing a substantially higher risk of mortality.
Top posts
Most liked on X and Bluesky3/3 cancer ? Did you miss a trick ? https://t.co/Gr9PmPrPg7
https://t.co/3iEeFEzfkP
@drpablocorral @society_eas This belief that LDL cholesterol is a linear predictor of health is not based on science. Both low & high LDL-C levels predict increased mortality. Lowest risk is at moderate LDL-C. DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077949 DOI 10.1186/s12944-021-01533-6 DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-01738-w
@cremieuxrecueil Fallacy that LDL causes heart disease. LDL -> longevity. OXIDIZED LDL ceases to be taken up by the liver and is a much more plausible cause. Please be more skeptical, particularly in the light of phrama propaganda. https://t.co/254OFwcwS8 https://t.co/m9B2CBvd0q https://t.co/XkvtiKJe3l
“…having very low LDL-C levels (< 70 mg/dL) is predictive of higher all-cause mortality…”
All mentions
Cholesterol, Eggs, and Heart Disease: New Insights on Health Risks
In this video, we investigate common myths and truths about eggs, cholesterol, and heart disease. We highlight the role of nutrition, lifestyle, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in cardiovascular health…
Examining Cholesterol's Role in Heart Disease and Mortality Rates
In this video, we explore myths and truths about cholesterol and its link to heart disease. We highlight key findings on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and its impact on mortality rates, addressing risk factors…
@sebagz1 @jpcostabel https://t.co/pmzlgT1a7w https://t.co/r5eD7AyHTR Ahi van dos cisnes mas Estamos llenos de observacionales prospectivos con causalidad inversa en lipidos... https://t.co/NWMNHxiVOU
@drpablocorral @society_eas This belief that LDL cholesterol is a linear predictor of health is not based on science. Both low & high LDL-C levels predict increased mortality. Lowest risk is at moderate LDL-C. DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077949 DOI 10.1186/s12944-021-01533-6 DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-01738-w
@VentureCoMining Basically anyone telling you to lower your ldl cholesterol (if you're levels are already 150 or less) is behind the times and doesn't have you're best interest in mind. https://t.co/BC0QDyniNM
@cremieuxrecueil @TerranceJones80 For the elderly in Japan, the highest category of LDL corresponded to the best longevity. The upper threshold was 144mg/dL, consistent with the other findings. https://t.co/254OFwd4HG
@JennUnfiltered There is an inverse relationship between LDL-C levels and the risk of all-cause mortality, and this association is statistically significant. https://t.co/kjZZlhEVG5
@ifixhearts Yep The higher your cholesterol, the longer you'll live! Here's a study from pub med showing that higher LDL equals longevity! https://t.co/kjZZlhEVG5
@nosidechain @ifixhearts Here's a study from pub med showing that higher LDL equals longevity! https://t.co/kjZZlhEVG5
RT @climateobs: @cremieuxrecueil Fallacy that LDL causes heart disease. LDL -> longevity. OXIDIZED LDL ceases to be taken up by the liver…
@cremieuxrecueil @Pask218337 "There is an inverse relationship between LDL-C levels and the risk of all-cause mortality, and this association is statistically significant." https://t.co/254OFwcwS8
RT @climateobs: @cremieuxrecueil Fallacy that LDL causes heart disease. LDL -> longevity. OXIDIZED LDL ceases to be taken up by the liver…
@cremieuxrecueil Fallacy that LDL causes heart disease. LDL -> longevity. OXIDIZED LDL ceases to be taken up by the liver and is a much more plausible cause. Please be more skeptical, particularly in the light of phrama propaganda. https://t.co/254OFwcwS8 https://t.co/m9B2CBvd0q https://t.co/XkvtiKJe3l
RT @gaby_marx: Quellen: https://t.co/QZ7Xip71Kg und https://t.co/1uQ8XYIfNC
RT @gaby_marx: Quellen: https://t.co/QZ7Xip71Kg und https://t.co/1uQ8XYIfNC
Quellen: https://t.co/QZ7Xip71Kg und https://t.co/1uQ8XYIfNC
@samwose @MohammedAlo PMID: 34511127 “After adjustment for possible confounding factors, results showed that participants with the very low LDL-C levels (< 70 mg/dL) were at a significantly higher risk for all-cause mortality than those with high LDL-C levels (≥ 144 mg/dL)” https://t.co/0Y15uwIzwC
@scienceboi420 @NikosNoulezas @thelowcarb_rd “After adjustment for possible confounding factors, the results showed that participants with the very low LDL-C levels (< 70 mg/dL) were at a significantly higher risk for all-cause mortality than those with high LDL-C levels (≥ 144 mg/dL)” https://t.co/ASVf54yvGc
@_OliverVenture @thelowcarb_rd @TheDDiabetic https://t.co/ASVf54yvGc
RT @hdh150: أظهرت دراسة يابانية أن ارتفاع نسبة الكولسترول LDL ( > 144 ملغم/ديسيلتر) يقلل فرص الموت! وحدوث زيادة بنسبة 250% في الوفيات ال…
RT @hdh150: أظهرت دراسة يابانية أن ارتفاع نسبة الكولسترول LDL ( > 144 ملغم/ديسيلتر) يقلل فرص الموت! وحدوث زيادة بنسبة 250% في الوفيات ال…
أظهرت دراسة يابانية أن ارتفاع نسبة الكولسترول LDL ( > 144 ملغم/ديسيلتر) يقلل فرص الموت! وحدوث زيادة بنسبة 250% في الوفيات الناجمة عن جميع الأسباب لدى مجموعة الكولسترول الأقل من (LDL < 70 ملجم/ديسيلتر) https://t.co/Sxz2bSnbKs
Existe una relación inversa entre los niveles de Colesterol LDL-C y el riesgo de mortalidad por todas las casuas. https://t.co/Da5RlFgMii ¿Será tan malo como lo pintan? Yo lo tengo claro.
@BeyondMeat @WitnessIAm the highest LDL levels, 144 mg/dl or higher, were associated with the best survival in older (>60) people. Lowest LDL associated with worst survival. Dose-response. https://t.co/CMQhe1fpLF
@JamieRohu https://t.co/xxxs2Mo6Vb
@nutrition_facts https://t.co/ZCXXJfVB8k There is an inverse relationship between LDL-C levels and the risk of all-cause mortality, and this association is statistically significant.
@MohammedAlo By the way... "Greater 10-year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels." https://t.co/L9jXmzsL0o https://t.co/qBzQSibHZw
@Tellit007 the highest LDL levels, 144 mg/dl or higher, were associated with the best survival in older (>60) people. Lowest LDL associated with worst survival. Dose-response. https://t.co/CMQhe1fpLF
@MohammedAlo the highest LDL levels, 144 mg/dl or higher, were associated with the best survival in older (>60) people. Lowest LDL associated with worst survival. Dose-response. https://t.co/CMQhe1fpLF
@theproof Any explanation, even conjectural, why these long-lived people have high ldl? https://t.co/sdzk3sGyVf
@MohammedAlo https://t.co/sdzk3sH6KN high ldl -> longevity How does this study fit in?
@GinnJuice96 @SBakerMD Not true. Based on the lipid/heart hypothesis, that beans “lower cholesterol ,” know this: There is an inverse relationship between LDL-C levels and the risk of all-cause mortality, and this association is statistically significant. https://t.co/kjZZlhEVG5
@PaloSamo @dr_cois @MeTheAngryCat @DrPaulMason Greater 10-year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. Well..... https://t.co/L9jXmzsL0o https://t.co/U5jern0oIl
@RicardoMFerrei4 @skathire @PrakritiGaba @TIMIStudyGroup To your point, some are just happy with high ldl https://t.co/sdzk3sH6KN
@skathire @MigsRunner @PrakritiGaba @TIMIStudyGroup https://t.co/sdzk3sH6KN but high ldl leads to long lives.
@sguyenet How do you explain this https://t.co/sdzk3sGyVf
@NutritionMadeS3 https://t.co/sdzk3sH6KN how does it jive with that?
@theproof @jsdron This https://t.co/sdzk3sH6KN says higher LDL leads to longer life.
@DoctorTro Personally I would never want an LDL level under 150… https://t.co/xMbDzDFqkR
@NutritionMadeS3 What if you look beyond cvd -- https://t.co/sdzk3sH6KN
@jsdron @JAMACardio @broadinstitute @CGM_MGH @AniruddhPatelMD @JurgensSean @DimitriMaamari @wallacemwang @pnatarajanmd @amitvkhera Later, we have https://t.co/sdzk3sH6KN
@skathire @jsdron @pnatarajanmd @amitvkhera @Drlipid Check this out https://t.co/sdzk3sH6KN
@theproof I bet your followers will want to hear you about this https://t.co/sdzk3sH6KN
@ScottAdamsSays Before I answer, please tell us whether you got scammed into taking a statin. https://t.co/1KK5dyC127
RT @Mangan150: https://t.co/3iEeFEzfkP
RT @Mangan150: https://t.co/3iEeFEzfkP
https://t.co/3iEeFEzfkP
@Raul96096294 @josemacatalina 10.5551/jat.e529 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2012.08.002 10.1038/s41598-021-01738-w 10.1186/s12944-021-01533-6 entre muchos otros más
Low density lipoprotein cholesterol and all-cause mortality rate: findings from a study on Japanese community-dwelling persons | Lipids in Health and Disease | Full Text https://t.co/nARzYuNvqn
@polaman3 @SBakerMD @nutrition_facts Incorrect. The higher your cholesterol the longer you’ll live. There is an inverse relationship between LDL-C levels and the risk of all-cause mortality, and this association is statistically significant. https://t.co/kjZZlhEVG5
RT @RichardZChengMD: Similar to this study. (https://t.co/WIvWSWtHQM). Cholesterol is not the root cause, inflammation is, of CVD
RT @RichardZChengMD: Similar to this study. (https://t.co/WIvWSWtHQM). Cholesterol is not the root cause, inflammation is, of CVD
Similar to this study. (https://t.co/WIvWSWtHQM). Cholesterol is not the root cause, inflammation is, of CVD https://t.co/gT7WNTHWaw
RT @holmanm: 3/3 cancer ? Did you miss a trick ? https://t.co/Gr9PmPrPg7
RT @jsenior64: Importante diferenciar marcador de riesgo con factor de riesgo. En la práctica podemos encontrar cualquiera de ellos, inclus…
RT @jsenior64: Importante diferenciar marcador de riesgo con factor de riesgo. En la práctica podemos encontrar cualquiera de ellos, inclus…
RT @jsenior64: Importante diferenciar marcador de riesgo con factor de riesgo. En la práctica podemos encontrar cualquiera de ellos, inclus…
Importante diferenciar marcador de riesgo con factor de riesgo. En la práctica podemos encontrar cualquiera de ellos, incluso algunos se comportan como ambos; depende del escenario se comporta como marcador o como factor. LDL es uno de ellos. https://t.co/vqHSF7mm8e
@clairetlipide https://t.co/UTRTDwnKIl
RT @holmanm: 3/3 cancer ? Did you miss a trick ? https://t.co/Gr9PmPrPg7
RT @holmanm: 3/3 cancer ? Did you miss a trick ? https://t.co/Gr9PmPrPg7
RT @holmanm: 3/3 cancer ? Did you miss a trick ? https://t.co/Gr9PmPrPg7
RT @holmanm: 3/3 cancer ? Did you miss a trick ? https://t.co/Gr9PmPrPg7
RT @holmanm: 3/3 cancer ? Did you miss a trick ? https://t.co/Gr9PmPrPg7
RT @holmanm: 3/3 cancer ? Did you miss a trick ? https://t.co/Gr9PmPrPg7
RT @holmanm: 3/3 cancer ? Did you miss a trick ? https://t.co/Gr9PmPrPg7
RT @holmanm: 3/3 cancer ? Did you miss a trick ? https://t.co/Gr9PmPrPg7
RT @holmanm: 3/3 cancer ? Did you miss a trick ? https://t.co/Gr9PmPrPg7
RT @holmanm: 3/3 cancer ? Did you miss a trick ? https://t.co/Gr9PmPrPg7
3/3 cancer ? Did you miss a trick ? https://t.co/Gr9PmPrPg7
@xinggang_wang @wyadvd @NutritionMadeS3 https://t.co/kvXSZaonYw
https://t.co/kvXSZaonYw
RT @xinggang_wang: @NutritionMadeS3 The lower the LD L-C, the higher the all-cause mortality…
RT @xinggang_wang: @NutritionMadeS3 The lower the LD L-C, the higher the all-cause mortality…
@NutritionMadeS3 The lower the LD L-C, the higher the all-cause mortality…
RT @mrc314: @MichaelSandstro @SBakerMD https://t.co/IUQ8Mr2oin
@MichaelAlbertMD Low density lipoprotein cholesterol and all-cause mortality rate: findings from a study on Japanese community-dwelling persons DOI: 10.1186/s12944-021-01533-6
@MacroFour Ignoring your sarcasm and responding with what may be the latest in a series of population based studies that suggest optimal ldl levels maybe somewhat above zero. https://t.co/EmfpYT1eHR
RT @mrc314: @MichaelSandstro @SBakerMD https://t.co/IUQ8Mr2oin
LDL cholesterol vs all-cause mortality — Compared with individuals with LDL-C levels of 144 mg/dL or higher, HR for all-cause mortality was: 2.54 (1.58–4.07) LDL-C <70 mg/dL 1.71 (1.15–2.54) LDL-C 70-92 mg/dL 1.21 (0.87–1.68) LDL-C between 93-143 mg/dL https://t.co/hNX54ZhvJy
@guilherme_paiao @agingdoc1 @DWeinberger27 @Blagosklonny @MacroView02 @retiredzorro That is not what the majority of these studies conclude. For example: https://t.co/TGYqzWsPE0 https://t.co/xZTv0dNSUd
@PeterAttiaMD https://t.co/TGYqzWshOs
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @mrc314: @MichaelSandstro @SBakerMD https://t.co/IUQ8Mr2oin
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @DiscoStew66: “There is an inverse relationship between LDL-C levels and the risk of all-cause mortality, and this association is statis…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @mrc314: @MichaelSandstro @SBakerMD https://t.co/IUQ8Mr2oin
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @DiscoStew66: “There is an inverse relationship between LDL-C levels and the risk of all-cause mortality, and this association is statis…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @mrc314: @MichaelSandstro @SBakerMD https://t.co/IUQ8Mr2oin
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
@MichaelSandstro @SBakerMD https://t.co/IUQ8Mr2oin
RT @DiscoStew66: “There is an inverse relationship between LDL-C levels and the risk of all-cause mortality, and this association is statis…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @DiscoStew66: “There is an inverse relationship between LDL-C levels and the risk of all-cause mortality, and this association is statis…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
RT @LDLSkeptic: Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: http…
Greater 10 year all-cause survival with high vs low LDL levels. https://t.co/KAucVwSV67 we showed this in our review: https://t.co/hdoVQ6TWlv ⬆️LDL = better health, ⬇️non-CVD mortality, no greater CVD in the elderly @bschermd @DrAseemMalhotra @lowcarbGP @DoctorTro @ifixhearts https://t.co/6T8ya89T5p
RT @DiscoStew66: “There is an inverse relationship between LDL-C levels and the risk of all-cause mortality, and this association is statis…
“There is an inverse relationship between LDL-C levels and the risk of all-cause mortality, and this association is statistically significant.” https://t.co/y0yURKvLbT
@Tom_Babington1 @Plant_proof @AmandaZZ100 @ScepticalDoctor @dylanarmbruste3 @krosenque @NutritionMadeS3 @deirdre_tobias @realDaveFeldman @MacroEight @MattMadore576 @MyNutritionSci @drmatthewnagra @The_Nutrivore So if you think the Japanese scientist critics are crackpots, here is a recent example of that 'inverse association'. I guess it's ironic that a Japanese scientist discovered statins. https://t.co/qZayZcs0Ts
RT @DiscoStew66: “…having very low LDL-C levels (< 70 mg/dL) is predictive of higher all-cause mortality…”
Low #LDL ➡️ #mortality #increases #cholesterol #HDL #Japan https://t.co/wy7WSWaFwj
RT @DiscoStew66: “…having very low LDL-C levels (< 70 mg/dL) is predictive of higher all-cause mortality…”
“…having very low LDL-C levels (< 70 mg/dL) is predictive of higher all-cause mortality…”
@Mi_Chudzik @krystynastu @brunet_dr Co do cholesterolu, to takie coś kilka dni wyszło: "Conclusions: There is an inverse relationship between LDL-C levels and the risk of all-cause mortality, and this association is statistically significant" https://t.co/wBwciTfX1V
Nuevo estudio en japón establece una relación inversa significativa entre niveles de LDL-C y mortalidad https://t.co/0asGYNFye9
Low density lipoprotein cholesterol and all-cause mortality rate: findings from a study on Japanese community-dwelling persons https://t.co/6SPiCqus5n
Low density lipoprotein cholesterol and all-cause mortality rate: findings from a study on Japanese community-dwelling persons | Lipids in Health and Disease | Full Text https://t.co/bd1o4e3KNG
Low density lipoprotein cholesterol and all-cause mortality rate: findings from a study on Japanese community-dwelling persons https://t.co/kqRTewDnNK