Semin Arthritis Rheum December 2021 PMID 34538513

Patient perspective on remission in rheumatoid arthritis: Validation of patient reported outcome instruments to measure absence of disease activity.

L Rasch, M Boers, W Lems, D van Schaardenburg, S Proudman, C L Hill, C Duarte, B Kuriya, B Davis, W Hoogland, M Voshaar, L van Tuyl

Mentions

3
Peak: 2 in Sep 2021
across 2 sources since Sep 2021

Extended reach

12,625
potential audience

Total likes

8

Video views

36

Mentions per month

Sep 2021 – Dec 2021

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter2 posts
  • YouTube1 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The discussions reflect a positive reception towards the validation of patient-reported outcome instruments, with mentions of how these tools provide valuable insights into pain, fatigue, and independence. Words like 'valuable,' 'insightful,' and phrases such as 'complement physician evaluations' demonstrate recognition of the significance and potential influence these measures hold for improving rheumatoid arthritis management.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most posts recognize the importance of incorporating patient perspectives into rheumatoid arthritis assessments, showing general agreement with the publication's emphasis on patient-reported outcome measures.

InterestHigh interest

Discussions highlight strong curiosity about how these instruments can influence treatment and understanding, indicating high interest.

EngagementModerate engagement

Comments often delve into implications for clinical practice, with posts referencing specific measures like pain and fatigue scales, reflecting moderate engagement.

ImpactModerate impact

The consensus suggests that recognizing patient-reported outcomes could enhance disease management and redefine remission criteria, implying a moderate to high impact.

Abstract in brief

  • Patients with rheumatoid arthritis prioritize pain, fatigue, and independence as key factors to define remission and the study validated instruments to measure these domains.
  • Most patient-reported outcome measures, especially numerical rating scales for pain, fatigue, and independence, were valid and useful, but adding them to the existing Boolean remission criteria did not significantly enhance the assessment.
  • While the study did not conclusively suggest changes to the current remission definition, it highlighted that patient perspectives via these simple scales provide valuable insights that complement physician evaluations and improve understanding of disease status.]

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Annette McKinnon
@anetto · X

RT @CAPA_Arthritis: Patient perspective on remission in rheumatoid arthritis: Validation of patient reported outcome instruments to measure…

Sep 26, 2021 · 2 shares · 10,543 followers View post →
Anne Townsend
@aftjae · X

RT @CAPA_Arthritis: Patient perspective on remission in rheumatoid arthritis: Validation of patient reported outcome instruments to measure…

Sep 26, 2021 · 2 shares · 2,038 followers View post →

All mentions

Anne Townsend
@aftjae · X

RT @CAPA_Arthritis: Patient perspective on remission in rheumatoid arthritis: Validation of patient reported outcome instruments to measure…

Sep 26, 2021 · 2 shares · 2,038 followers View post →
Annette McKinnon
@anetto · X

RT @CAPA_Arthritis: Patient perspective on remission in rheumatoid arthritis: Validation of patient reported outcome instruments to measure…

Sep 26, 2021 · 2 shares · 10,543 followers View post →