Post-endoscopy Barrett's neoplasia after a negative index endoscopy: a systematic review and proposal for definitions and performance measures in endoscopy.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Jan 2022 – Sep 2022Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter16 posts
-
Facebook2 posts
-
YouTube1 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
Participants express strong interest in the article’s implications for improving endoscopy quality, with some posts emphasizing the need for standard definitions and practice improvements, using words like 'highly variable practice' and 'high dysplasia/cancer miss rate.' The tone reflects a professional concern for enhancing patient outcomes and advancing clinical standards.
Most posts acknowledge the significance of the systematic review and support efforts to improve endoscopic practices, reflecting moderate agreement.
Discussions show high interest, with repeated mentions of the importance of standardization and quality in detecting Barrett's neoplasia.
Some posts reference specific issues like practice variability and the need for improved definitions, indicating thoughtful engagement.
The collective focus on clinical improvements and research proposals suggests a moderate perceived impact on medical practices.
Abstract in brief
- This systematic review analyzed data from 11 studies to determine the rates of postendoscopy Barrett’s neoplasia (PEBN), finding that most neoplasia cases are detected at or within 6 months of the initial endoscopy, emphasizing the importance of high-quality initial procedures.
- The study classified neoplasia into prevalent (detected at or within 6 months), PEBN (detected after 6 months but before 3 years), and incident (detected after 3 years), with PEBN making up about 3% of all Barrett’s neoplasia cases.
- The findings highlight the need for standardized definitions and quality benchmarks in endoscopy to improve detection and outcomes in Barrett’s esophagus patients.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and BlueskyFrom this month’s issue: “Post-endoscopy Barrett’s neoplasia after a negative index endoscopy: a systematic review and proposal for definitions and performance measures in endoscopy” by Madhav Desai et al. #Infografic Read more here: https://t.co/oOxg6De3HA https://t.co/uvQBuI8Wgt
@OTavabie Highly variable practice + high dysplasia/cancer miss rate = hence the need to do this well #FGDebate https://t.co/nwxdfxrXrR https://t.co/dRz4xSD8p0
#AuthorCommentary Madhav Desai on “Post-endoscopy Barrett’s neoplasia after a negative index endoscopy: a systematic review and proposal for definitions and performance measures...” by Madhav Desai et al. Read here: https://t.co/oOxg6CWsQ2 Watch here: https://t.co/wP9O3q6WOm
RT @endoscopyjrnl: From this month’s issue: “Post-endoscopy Barrett’s neoplasia after a negative index endoscopy: a systematic review and…
RT @Amleto3333:
All mentions
Enhancing Detection of Post-Endoscopy Barrett's Neoplasia in Clinical Practice
This systematic review highlights that most Barrett’s neoplasia cases are detected at or within 6 months of initial endoscopy, underscoring the need for standardized quality measures and definitions to improve detection…
@endoscopyjrnl Get access rather than a paywall: https://t.co/H97QIJV8I5 Add https://t.co/SXSePSX5De to the DOI URL when sharing articles to promote scholarly communication
#AuthorCommentary Madhav Desai on “Post-endoscopy Barrett’s neoplasia after a negative index endoscopy: a systematic review and proposal for definitions and performance measures...” by Madhav Desai et al. Read here: https://t.co/oOxg6CWsQ2 Watch here: https://t.co/wP9O3q6WOm
RT @endoscopyjrnl: From this month’s issue: “Post-endoscopy Barrett’s neoplasia after a negative index endoscopy: a systematic review and…
RT @Amleto3333:
RT @Amleto3333:
RT @Amleto3333:
RT @Amleto3333:
RT @Amleto3333:
RT @Amleto3333:
RT @endoscopyjrnl: From this month’s issue: “Post-endoscopy Barrett’s neoplasia after a negative index endoscopy: a systematic review and…
RT @endoscopyjrnl: From this month’s issue: “Post-endoscopy Barrett’s neoplasia after a negative index endoscopy: a systematic review and…
@endoscopyjrnl Get access rather than a paywall: https://t.co/H97QIJVGxD Add https://t.co/SXSePSXDsM to the DOI URL when sharing articles to promote scholarly communication
From this month’s issue: “Post-endoscopy Barrett’s neoplasia after a negative index endoscopy: a systematic review and proposal for definitions and performance measures in endoscopy” by Madhav Desai et al. #Infografic Read more here: https://t.co/oOxg6De3HA https://t.co/uvQBuI8Wgt
@OTavabie Highly variable practice + high dysplasia/cancer miss rate = hence the need to do this well #FGDebate https://t.co/nwxdfxrXrR https://t.co/dRz4xSD8p0
New article: Post Endoscopy Barrett's Neoplasia (PEBN) After A Negative Index Endoscopy: A Systematic Review & Proposal For Definitions and Performance Measures in Endoscopy https://t.co/FsLJUszBW4 #colorectalcancer #oncology https://t.co/jxSB0uqgKx
PI
EJ
KS
E
S
L
SC
BS
JA
GK
E
JM
BM
PO