Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Discussions revolve around the significance of polyp size, with posts referencing specific success rates, such as a 90% R0 resection for polyps ≤15mm, and debating the limitations for larger polyps over 20mm. The tone and context emphasize professional interest and the potential implications for endoscopic procedures, showing active engagement and recognition of the article's importance.
Most discussions support the findings, emphasizing the importance of polyp size in resection success, aligning with the article's conclusions.
The discussions show high interest, highlighting the clinical relevance and potential impact on treatment decisions.
Posts engage with the data, citing success rates and implications, indicating a moderate to deep level of discussion.
The posts suggest the article could influence clinical practice and decision-making, indicating high impact.
This important study published online in @endoscopyjrnl suggests that eFTR for T1 CRC larger than 15 mm should be weighed against other therapeutic alternatives. R0 resection rate: lesions ≤ 15 mm = 90%; lesions 16-20 mm = 71%; lesions > 20 mm = 11% https://t.co/XjQXz0dRBT
Relevance of polyp size for primary endoscopic full-thickness resection of suspected T1 colorectal cancers by Paul Didden et al. Read more here: https://t.co/D0IHoKXjPn https://t.co/v1F1H0yeE3
#podcast Relevance of polyp size for primary endoscopic full-thickness resection of suspected T1 colorectal cancers by Paul Didden et al. Read more here: https://t.co/D0IHoLeUGV Listen to the Podcast on YouTube: https://t.co/JmXiuhWUj0
New article: Relevance of polyp size for primary endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) of suspected T1CRCs https://t.co/UH1m2Yf9K8 #colorectalcancer #oncology https://t.co/Q9dbM1PSr7
@endoscopyjrnl Access the paywalled article from your library: https://t.co/CyyITBunKI Promote scholarly access to content by simply adding https://t.co/SXSePSX5De to the DOI URL
@endoscopyjrnl Help your colleagues avoid a paywall by accessing the article from their libraries: https://t.co/CyyITBuVAg Simply add https://t.co/SXSePSXDsM to the DOI URL when sharing articles on Twitter and everywhere else!
Relevance of polyp size for primary endoscopic full-thickness resection of suspected T1 colorectal cancers. Smaller polyps (15mm or less) have a high success rate, while larger ones over 20mm often result in incomplete…
@endoscopyjrnl Access the paywalled article from your library: https://t.co/CyyITBunKI Promote scholarly access to content by simply adding https://t.co/SXSePSX5De to the DOI URL
#podcast Relevance of polyp size for primary endoscopic full-thickness resection of suspected T1 colorectal cancers by Paul Didden et al. Read more here: https://t.co/D0IHoLeUGV Listen to the Podcast on YouTube: https://t.co/JmXiuhWUj0
@endoscopyjrnl Help your colleagues avoid a paywall by accessing the article from their libraries: https://t.co/CyyITBuVAg Simply add https://t.co/SXSePSXDsM to the DOI URL when sharing articles on Twitter and everywhere else!
Relevance of polyp size for primary endoscopic full-thickness resection of suspected T1 colorectal cancers by Paul Didden et al. Read more here: https://t.co/D0IHoKXjPn https://t.co/v1F1H0yeE3
RT @MarcoBus1967: This important study published online in @endoscopyjrnl suggests that eFTR for T1 CRC larger than 15 mm should be weighed…
RT @MarcoBus1967: This important study published online in @endoscopyjrnl suggests that eFTR for T1 CRC larger than 15 mm should be weighed…
This important study published online in @endoscopyjrnl suggests that eFTR for T1 CRC larger than 15 mm should be weighed against other therapeutic alternatives. R0 resection rate: lesions ≤ 15 mm = 90%; lesions 16-20 mm = 71%; lesions > 20 mm = 11% https://t.co/XjQXz0dRBT
New article: Relevance of polyp size for primary endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) of suspected T1CRCs https://t.co/UH1m2Yf9K8 #colorectalcancer #oncology https://t.co/Q9dbM1PSr7
MB
EJ
PO
L
JV
AN