Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions emphasize the significance of the study's findings, with posts highlighting data such as the 8.5% risk of advanced adenoma and the 1.2% risk of CRC, indicating high engagement and recognition of potential protocol changes. The tone is analytical and forward-looking, indicating that the study's results could impact future surveillance guidelines.
Most discussions support the idea that extended surveillance intervals are safe for low-risk patients, reflecting consensus with the article's findings.
Posts show high interest by referencing the study, mentioning specific statistics, and discussing implications for clinical practice.
Comments engage with the material through sharing summaries, quoting statistics, and posing questions about surveillance protocols.
The discussions suggest the article could influence clinical guidelines and decision-making in colorectal cancer screening.
As per BSG and ESGE, patients with low risk polyps no longer need colonoscopy surveillance. What are the likelihood of findings if they did had surveillance? Study in @endoscopyjrnl - risk at 5 years: Advanced adenoma: 8.5% CRC: 1.2% In FIT we trust? https://t.co/w8husDwPPV
1/12 Worth. The. Wait.
今日の抄読会
#AuthorCommentary Emma Robins on " Post-polypectomy surveillance interval and advanced neoplasia detection rates: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study" Authors: Amanda J. Cross et al. Read more here: https://t.co/Nl0vdtjgsz Watch the video here: https://t.co/bFRbc2qzzL
2/2 Read our summary and access paper
New article: Post-polypectomy surveillance interval and advanced neoplasia detection rates: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study https://t.co/lDl2w14gmX #colorectalcancer #oncology https://t.co/qIpTJPNEhz
Emma Robins discusses a multicenter study on post-polypectomy surveillance intervals, highlighting that longer intervals are safe for low-risk patients, while high-risk patients benefit from closer monitoring to detect…
2/2 Read our summary and access paper
RT @drkeithsiau: As per BSG and ESGE, patients with low risk polyps no longer need colonoscopy surveillance. What are the likelihood of fin…
RT @endoscopyjrnl: #AuthorCommentary Emma Robins on " Post-polypectomy surveillance interval and advanced neoplasia detection rates: a mul…
#AuthorCommentary Emma Robins on " Post-polypectomy surveillance interval and advanced neoplasia detection rates: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study" Authors: Amanda J. Cross et al. Read more here: https://t.co/Nl0vdtjgsz Watch the video here: https://t.co/bFRbc2qzzL
RT @drkeithsiau: As per BSG and ESGE, patients with low risk polyps no longer need colonoscopy surveillance. What are the likelihood of fin…
As per BSG and ESGE, patients with low risk polyps no longer need colonoscopy surveillance. What are the likelihood of findings if they did had surveillance? Study in @endoscopyjrnl - risk at 5 years: Advanced adenoma: 8.5% CRC: 1.2% In FIT we trust? https://t.co/w8husDwPPV
今日の抄読会
5/7
RT @CSPRG_Imperial: 1/12 Worth. The. Wait.
RT @CSPRG_Imperial: 1/12 Worth. The. Wait.
RT @CSPRG_Imperial: 1/12 Worth. The. Wait.
RT @CSPRG_Imperial: 1/12 Worth. The. Wait.
1/12 Worth. The. Wait.
New article: Post-polypectomy surveillance interval and advanced neoplasia detection rates: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study https://t.co/lDl2w14gmX #colorectalcancer #oncology https://t.co/qIpTJPNEhz
KS
CG
奈代
PO
JM
HV
MK
AD
AC