Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
This collection of social discussions shows that users frequently cite large-scale meta-analyses, such as the one by Ssentongo et al., highlighting that vaccine effectiveness wanes from about 83% initially to around 22% after five months, yet protection against severe illness stays high at approximately 90%. The tone varies from supportive and factual to dismissive or confrontational, but overall, the use of precise data, references to studies, and emphasis on scientific evidence illustrate a strong engagement with the research, emphasizing its significance in ongoing vaccine discussions and public health strategies.
Most discussions acknowledge and support the findings of the article, recognizing that vaccine effectiveness decreases over time but remains high against severe outcomes.
Posts demonstrate considerable interest, referencing detailed statistics, study names, and implications for public health policies.
Many engage deeply by citing multiple meta-analyses, discussing methodology, and debating the nuances of vaccine efficacy data.
The discussions reflect high impact, as they influence public perceptions, inform policymaking, and emphasize the importance of booster doses based on robust scientific evidence.
A quel moment un scientifique pense qu'il a le droit d'approximer la courbe rouge, qui est une moyenne ajustée à partir des études rétrospectives, par une distribution d'Erlang, strictement positive?
@gavleeham @TheCrystalBrian @krebiozen @NewSeasonsSpa @ToBornin @cappsie @iXeno @dann58638436 @Monstercoyliar @TMGFlorida @handmadekathy @ReneeBa41879905 @SkepticalMutant @FrankDElia7 @mcfunny @wjack76995 @TheFrankmanMN @Augusti03401363 @ianfmusgrave @TruthTwt @natedoromal @jayjoseph22 @rightwingblack2 @FUDyou2 @IainMulady @doritmi @JCDeardeuff @Izzitreally2 @Jccalmond2 @TweetOfSteiner @BlueLionBlog @thisisnothappen @Blackcatprowl3 @isa_picard @HawkInATX @VVDeingott @foofdawg @4thEchelon22 @TinFoilAwards @ktibus @F250Roush @Juanita87722370 @MsTrixter @Kathmarval @mrhawkes @BGLTHMND @ChrisJohnsonMD @ThomasHarrigan8 @BigBruce1972 @keithccurtis A recent meta analysis showed these vaccines reduce the mortality risk by almost 85% in older adults and a 90% reduction overall. https://t.co/NYROgtsWAT https://t.co/13FbGFyttg)%20in
@reitschuster Blödsinn https://t.co/J2guKmhee1
Next, a thought provoking talk by Adrian Wildfire on CHIM 9th @ESWInfluenza Conference for proving interruption of transmission. Current vaccines highly effective at reducing severe disease with limit impact on transmission. https://t.co/aJ8YTbHegd https://t.co/suht8XsXYA https://t.co/L9vtioevBg
SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis - BMC Infectious Diseases https://t.co/IrX02DhXgB https://t.co/mKcDs0gvhN
Analisi su circa 7 milioni di individui: l’efficacia contro infezione sintomatica decresce da ~94 % ad ~64 % in 4 mesi, ma la protezione contro COVID‑19 severo resta al ~90 % anche a 5+ mesi https://t.co/XhoTx229lp
This video examines the protection offered by COVID-19 vaccines versus natural infection in the Qatari population. Vaccine effectiveness peaks shortly after vaccination but declines over time, though protection against…
This video discusses the effects of prior infection and vaccination on protection against symptomatic Omicron infections, highlighting how different immunity forms influence COVID-19 severity.
This study systematically reviewed and analyzed data on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness, highlighting high initial protection, decline over time, and sustained protection against severe disease, emphasizing the…
@JordanB4815 @skooterkat @DC_Draino Nope, that was the narrative: The vaxx was "safe and effective" Neither was true, besides, why get vaccinated for a virus that had 95% survivability factor from 8-88? Go to 5 minute mark https://t.co/1CUBjcbhZO
@CalladorDeBocas @elespanolcom Que hay un montón que hablan de que la inmunidad baja en un mes en tres meses al 50 60%. https://t.co/GgMizj6mz4 y esto midiendo como se hace. Engañosamente.
@mattwridley 19/M SARS-CoV-2 vaccines mitigated transmission, despite contrarians committing the nirvana fallacy. https://t.co/4oSfZlS8dY https://t.co/ITs2slzetv https://t.co/Ff0LbzMtAo https://t.co/b9YJLhS0Ih https://t.co/mDEc56FYi9 https://t.co/WYHjhH9wLU https://t.co/EoYPidAn0k
@DieMausOnMars @DarkKnightFfm https://t.co/SGqYgRnAda
@shedwhitelines @grok 感染症を知りもしないバカの「感染症の対策しなくていいです」を信じるバカがこの世にいると思ってんのか？ あ、お前と同じバカは信じるかｗ ほらよ！全部査読付き、新型コロナワクチンの有効性を証明した論文 https://t.co/lv7Su5nq8r https://t.co/2TMTUUwBK5 https://t.co/2TMTUUwBK5
@douchey7 @cb_doge @elonmusk Limitation: Test-negative bias possible. 8. SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2022). Journal: BMC Infectious Diseases. Key Findings: VE against infection waned to negative (-10%
@sucy7462 ならどうぞ。 反論お待ちしますよ☺️ https://t.co/x1O26zEDGw
RT @HajimeMinamiK: @s0ftqbEJBEzhK2S @taigenomega @nagaregumo000 たとえば、これとかどうでしょう。 https://t.co/WXwoaFVlOp
@s0ftqbEJBEzhK2S @taigenomega @nagaregumo000 たとえば、これとかどうでしょう。 https://t.co/WXwoaFVlOp
RT @Eco_Ero_ZZ: YouTube動画をアップしました。 新型コロナワクチン接種事業をやめますと、どれくらいの公的医療費の負担を“削減する”事が出来るのかを考察してみました。 #新型コロナ #新型コロナワクチン #公的医療費負担 #参政党 #参政党には騙され…
YouTube動画をアップしました。 新型コロナワクチン接種事業をやめますと、どれくらいの公的医療費の負担を“削減する”事が出来るのかを考察してみました。 #新型コロナ #新型コロナワクチン #公的医療費負担 #参政党 #参政党には騙されるな #第27回参議院選挙通常選挙 https://t.co/pTGSMl0cXa
@M_Yavuz_Selim_ @tipsiztibbiyeli @dranatomikro @ProfSFindik 18 çalışmanın meta-analizi: Koruma süresi 5+ ayda bile ciddi hastalığa karşı %90 (CI 87–92) kaldı. Kaynak: Feikin DR, et al. Lancet. 2022. https://t.co/6xuCVSOZh5
Analisi su circa 7 milioni di individui: l’efficacia contro infezione sintomatica decresce da ~94 % ad ~64 % in 4 mesi, ma la protezione contro COVID‑19 severo resta al ~90 % anche a 5+ mesi https://t.co/XhoTx229lp
@_nwblacksmith @DrNeilStone Generally, published metanalysis (analysis multiple peer-reviewed articles) are the most relevant. SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis https://t.co/6cm0Jn83dV
@iwillhanabirah1 続) ワクチンの効果ですが、約700万人、18件の研究を対象にしましたメタアナリシスですが、 ◯感染予防効果 ・最初の月…83％ ・5か月後…22％ ◯重症化予防効果 ・5か月後…90％ https://t.co/qMbWF0Eww1 等々がございます。 (了
@KartalI903 @taghaberleri Tabiki 1.) https://t.co/8PyaQdmSch 2.) https://t.co/KwUECIHEqG 3.) https://t.co/mUJYIvGJXY Sana 3 akademik araştırma linki bıraktım aşıların koruyuculuğu ve ölüm oranlarının asilarla nasıl azaldığını gösteren bir AKADEMİK MAKALE
@Ivan_Tourel @SVimaire @Xavierconcept @duckduckd90 @Le_Patoff https://t.co/9tJvOJ16zH… https://t.co/HAOwA7mSEU… https://t.co/WDNneoPp3t… https://t.co/VGaC3FPcsu… https://t.co/3IdHeUXo8A…
RT @Matt08850291: @DavidPolus @StandForSumpin @FactBasedBanter @DrNeilStone Nope. https://t.co/Pg3SLOGuLV
@DavidPolus @StandForSumpin @FactBasedBanter @DrNeilStone No it doesn't. It's not measuring duration or severity. It's measuring viral load in the nose. When they are measured duration and severity are shown in every real world study to be drastically decreased with vaccination. https://t.co/Pg3SLOFWWn
@DavidPolus @StandForSumpin @FactBasedBanter @DrNeilStone Incorrect. Your immune system kicks in far quicker when it knows what to do. https://t.co/Pg3SLOGuLV https://t.co/N4ueQbTYye
@DavidPolus @StandForSumpin @FactBasedBanter @DrNeilStone Nope. https://t.co/Pg3SLOGuLV
@quicksmoke1776 @JDSnicky @Json9024 @AwareofSpirit4u @UnderdogMLB Or this one? https://t.co/6wuqvX9ZRi
@GCGrooter @QuestionE1776 @Dustdrums @Allis_Tweets @GloryRoadJK @GlitterxnCoffee @allenanalysis https://t.co/d4BPhmk0RN
@fgfortin14 @Chamchamat @laurenceide69 https://t.co/1T3ZJiCSxk Une autre metanalyse, alors oui la protection diminue avec le temps mais reste efficace.
@BarryESharp @themuso2008 @IntegralAnswers 2022: https://t.co/XDKCKGYNf5 https://t.co/qIZw7O3iWh
@BelpietroTweet https://t.co/K2WwG9qnTA https://t.co/c73GujiPbZ
@Andrew65174404 @KerstinDuf94219 @gnallspiken1 3.“SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis”
@GattaiGuido @SolaIgieneDelMo 1) questo: https://t.co/kYqZ8JXYxK Ma ce ne sono piú recenti con dati post-omicron che arrivano alle stesse conclusioni. Quando ho tempo metto i link qua
@Unkool_Aid @JasonBeeYorn Vaccines work. Here are some studies: https://t.co/4SeK5nZSqS https://t.co/2R2gg9CKXP
@FrexiT02 @zoeliof @Noteethworld @royalguitou @lonnibesancon @RedPandaPills https://t.co/MciHyYvBxK https://t.co/vZnSMLlOdO https://t.co/awwCK6FvBU https://t.co/1EqA2tLyxr https://t.co/hSAVCAifzf https://t.co/TWfjTR1Jh8 Bon courage.
@Doc_Arwed @schizoswoche Marra et al. (2023) https://t.co/uDwMwwuHX9 Lundberg-Morris et al. (2023) https://t.co/CitAj2D1Lx Wright et al. (2022) https://t.co/prkdgEo8Ch Ssentongo et al. (2022) https://t.co/XK96Yn0KBF Lauring et al. (2022) https://t.co/c1yddP4VMw
@BBarucker @Quo_vadis_BRD
@lavalmxhr @EMD4YOUUUU @BGatesIsaPyscho You’re all ears and no brains. Here, maybe you’ll learn something, but I doubt it. You seem to want to remain ignorant. https://t.co/igzTxHgSeN https://t.co/diI32uYL8e https://t.co/lrWHqJHwIh https://t.co/3FXICjQNGT https://t.co/IOIa1u42Hr https://t.co/SAJQrTIqVU
@Peterschmiz909 @Kotenok50597782 @homeopathy_inh @Gaby06870254 @Karl_Lauterbach Wright et al. (2022) https://t.co/prkdgEnAMJ Ssentongo et al. (2022) https://t.co/XK96Yn0cM7 Lauring et al. (2022) https://t.co/c1yddP4nWY Quiroga et al. (2024) https://t.co/hYZRPXNEBv Und auch sehr gut: Li et al. (2024) https://t.co/G2HSvgeA2j
@VaxxCauseSIDS @SkepticalMutant @PatrickSquirrel @BurgerLab12 @RonMortimer3 @Lorenzo7127 @JonKnudson89269 @iXeno @dirk_fasshauer @mcfunny @Monstercoyliar @ChrisJohnsonMD @lasikeyecenter1 @Roper_Lab @CaryDavid722 @Hanky1844607 @davideyoungmd @Awithonelison @NoGlobalist778 @TorySnyc @EugeneBu @cappsie @trillionofcells @AcampbelTeacher @ktibus @higgsri @EdwardDS15 @FillmoreWhite @VickiCoyle10019 @FUDyou2 @Earthdriver @smith_john55 @TMGFlorida @TheCrystalBrian @ScooterScience @RndmStreetMedic @DebraBr81576310 @JordanA8156 @BlueLionBlog @ScotMAGA24 @vstefans @judysimpson222 @TheFrankmanMN @Apotheosis1974 @FrankDElia7 @krebiozen @Anymous84861064 @shallit43 @natedoromal @FormerAntivax Do you mean the evidence that the majority of patients who died or experienced critical illness were unvaccinated or undervaccinated? Or the epidemiological studies showing this? https://t.co/0DmBczzGvC https:/
@LuvFotos @SabinehazanMD @DrAseemMalhotra There here is another study, I got plenty. What is your next excuse? https://t.co/aNvG0MmD1I
@thereal_truther @AlexBerenson 4. Ssentongo P, Ssentongo AE, Voleti N et al. SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infectious Diseases 2022; 22: 439. https://t.co/45Mdgl22HK Meta analysis of 18 studies with >7 million
@Elohim1235813 @Max_Palmeri Ok, quello era per la malattia sintomatica. Questo ha anche la protezione dal contagio https://t.co/1kthvPlcqA https://t.co/p39xDYJcXq
@BrochandP @ChatSecouriste Au pif, la science ? https://t.co/C7ytNnCQ3F https://t.co/5by09DjSl5 https://t.co/7zC5IG186a https://t.co/C7ytNnCQ3F https://t.co/VovcniTDXM https://t.co/TWfjTR1Jh8 https://t.co/hSAVCAifzf https://t.co/HeCgXMLv7f https://t.co/mTnkYrpFS4
@Freerider4Pow @TheChiefNerd Overwhelming? By what metric? Anyway,. overwhelming evidence is that infections are reduced... https://t.co/vtllOCkWPU https://t.co/5RY8yaBYBy https://t.co/cqugKLlEJ5
@Wim_Ondewheybak @KennyGr61411855 Literally hundreds of studies. Here’s three: - https://t.co/S0KamyOvLJ - https://t.co/eRMUKfdEG7 - https://t.co/YFHUbuHaQG
@David80824268 https://t.co/zHIAshVB6O
@JlsRet51206 @VLSdirect Je veux bien qu'on vérifie ensemble. https://t.co/5by09DkqaD https://t.co/7zC5IG1FVI https://t.co/C7ytNnDnTd https://t.co/VovcniUbNk https://t.co/TWfjTR2h6G https://t.co/hSAVCAiNoN
RT @Madeyoul0o0k: @VoxSpackle @sandypuke @laughingjord @yay_its_james Before the virus mutated it conferred protection against infection. A…
@hank_unlimited @robinmonotti Two second google search https://t.co/RKB6vJPwwO
@1tpecom @LeCovidOfficiel "Science de la tv", excellente vanne. https://t.co/5by09DkqaD https://t.co/7zC5IG1FVI https://t.co/C7ytNnDnTd https://t.co/VovcniUbNk https://t.co/TWfjTR2h6G https://t.co/HeCgXMM2WN https://t.co/1EqA2tM6mZ https://t.co/awwCK6G3rs
RT @Madeyoul0o0k: @VoxSpackle @sandypuke @laughingjord @yay_its_james Before the virus mutated it conferred protection against infection. A…
@Nico_Klus @TonnieWijn64478 @KAFKA_Dev https://t.co/YEPhYZkPta
@cheryljones1312 @Lyndonx Googled ‘effectiveness of Covid vaccine meta analysis’. It’s a neutral term. Top 3 below. 1. https://t.co/YFHUbuGD18 2. https://t.co/S0KamyNXWb 3. https://t.co/eRMUKfd6Qz
@VoxSpackle @sandypuke @laughingjord @yay_its_james Before the virus mutated it conferred protection against infection. After mutations it still is effective at reducing severe disease and death from covid. https://t.co/G5g9BJlRrt https://t.co/FV91ajQfwo And the vaccine doesn’t change your DNA fucktard
@ASchifty @Macj007C @bjurrows @TakethatCt @sduncanhealth @Pouldeau61 @ShaneAKAProp @mcfunny @TheFrankmanMN @AnnLove4All @krebiozen @raoulduke49 @jneill @cellestial1 @Scary7Dr @AphasiaAnomic @shinko_hadoken @Arkout3 @runhack @cappsie @JRNave @BB0941167867205 @taurusg333 @doritmi @RN_MSN_Snark @Kathmarval @Danny459673 @WendyOrent @DaveBla81093404 @MsTrixter @TonyBaduy @Hurriquake @MONTMAN9500 @StuWizzle @Golfergirl2018 @dann58638436 @BigGuy4U86 @encyclopath @1_TMF_ @Fornowago @FUDyou2 @Catheri49917567 @RadioColor @tonymac5 @groin_hammer @CyclopsSeesAll @ScienceMonkey0 @Just4TheCause @ONS You’re incorrect. It does stop infection and transmission, it does not stop it 100%. The vaccine does reduce the number of severe disease cases which is the factor that overwhelms our healthcare system. It’s not all about your personal risk. https://t.co/NYROgtsWAT
@daPersa @YanchMb Verjetnost težjega poteka bolezni zmanjša za okrog 90%. https://t.co/cFgRUA6nfI
@vince8004 @ClaudeSteve6 Ah si : https://t.co/ZsKOyoPjqo https://t.co/5by09DjSl5 https://t.co/7zC5IG186a https://t.co/C7ytNnCQ3F https://t.co/VovcniTDXM https://t.co/TWfjTR1Jh8 https://t.co/HeCgXMLv7f https://t.co/1EqA2tLyxr https://t.co/awwCK6FvBU
@barbouillech 19. 13:23 Sucharid Bhakdis Gefühl von nackten Zahlen Daten Fakten in einer Metaanalyse mit 7 Mio. Menschen widerlegt. ... https://t.co/EDkuvnfaSI
@loindevant @UEFrance @X @ThierryBreton Je les ai vus, t'inquiètes. J'en ai plein moi aussi, regarde : https://t.co/5by09DjSl5 https://t.co/7zC5IG186a https://t.co/C7ytNnCQ3F https://t.co/VovcniTDXM https://t.co/TWfjTR1Jh8 https://t.co/HeCgXMLv7f https://t.co/1EqA2tLyxr https://t.co/awwCK6FvBU
@DogmanStephane @amyrtyweb @skyzonte @f_philippot https://t.co/awwCK6FvBU https://t.co/1EqA2tLyxr https://t.co/HeCgXMLv7f https://t.co/TWfjTR1Jh8 https://t.co/VovcniTDXM Deal with it.
@Trias_Aschezelt "Die Wirksamkeit des Impfstoffs gegen schweres COVID-19 war in allen Altersgruppen insgesamt hoch und lag fünf Monate oder länger nach der vollständigen Impfung bei 90%" Dafür ist die Wissenschaft ja da, solche Fragen zu beantworten. https://t.co/Yi6NdqKpoR
RT @crabb_vicki: @gavleeham @TheCrystalBrian @krebiozen @NewSeasonsSpa @ToBornin @cappsie @iXeno @dann58638436 @Monstercoyliar @TMGFlorida…
RT @crabb_vicki: @gavleeham @TheCrystalBrian @krebiozen @NewSeasonsSpa @ToBornin @cappsie @iXeno @dann58638436 @Monstercoyliar @TMGFlorida…
RT @crabb_vicki: @gavleeham @TheCrystalBrian @krebiozen @NewSeasonsSpa @ToBornin @cappsie @iXeno @dann58638436 @Monstercoyliar @TMGFlorida…
@gavleeham @TheCrystalBrian @krebiozen @NewSeasonsSpa @ToBornin @cappsie @iXeno @dann58638436 @Monstercoyliar @TMGFlorida @handmadekathy @ReneeBa41879905 @SkepticalMutant @FrankDElia7 @mcfunny @wjack76995 @TheFrankmanMN @Augusti03401363 @ianfmusgrave @TruthTwt @natedoromal @jayjoseph22 @rightwingblack2 @FUDyou2 @IainMulady @doritmi @JCDeardeuff @Izzitreally2 @Jccalmond2 @TweetOfSteiner @BlueLionBlog @thisisnothappen @Blackcatprowl3 @isa_picard @HawkInATX @VVDeingott @foofdawg @4thEchelon22 @TinFoilAwards @ktibus @F250Roush @Juanita87722370 @MsTrixter @Kathmarval @mrhawkes @BGLTHMND @ChrisJohnsonMD @ThomasHarrigan8 @BigBruce1972 @keithccurtis A recent meta analysis showed these vaccines reduce the mortality risk by almost 85% in older adults and a 90% reduction overall. https://t.co/NYROgtsWAT https://t.co/13FbGFyttg)%20in
@DaveTCM17 @TennisPuneet @PiersUncensored @piersmorgan @TalkTV Show me in this meta study where it says the vaccine is 100% effective. Take your time. https://t.co/NbSCpDETip
@walton12321 @drdina1 Many anti-vaxxers claimed that was happening while knowing nothing about the process of counting deaths or how to read a study. But meta-analyses like these put all of that to rest. https://t.co/kEPvRZjJ5n
@drdina1 My confusion? This isn’t my field of study but I’ve done plenty of reading on this. Masks and vaccines have been shown to be effective, unless you’re rejecting data as well? The psychological costs are not higher than physical costs of lives lost. https://t.co/kEPvRZjJ5n https://t.co/ppFZwgU1DN
"VE against SARS-CoV-2 infection and symptomatic COVID-19 waned over time but protection remained high against severe COVID-19. These data can be used to inform public health decisions around the need for booster vaccination." Uno de tantos ejemplos: https://t.co/GCNvwX3xeR
@jrseihgstein @winzamax1984 @les_vaxxeuses @wagneregger @MichelJeanDomi1 @idrissaberkane T'as surtout du mal à trouver la moindre source crédible. Pendant ce temps, nous : https://t.co/awwCK6FvBU https://t.co/1EqA2tLyxr https://t.co/HeCgXMLv7f https://t.co/TWfjTR1Jh8 https://t.co/4CRK0AXX5A https://t.co/v2WwViZs0U https://t.co/CkkFJsmVT7
@reitschuster Blödsinn https://t.co/J2guKmhee1
@ShadowMike14 @avalonesome @AvocatduPeuple @BarouniaA @fluidloading Ok. https://t.co/5by09DjSl5 https://t.co/7zC5IG186a https://t.co/VovcniTDXM https://t.co/TWfjTR1Jh8 https://t.co/HeCgXMLv7f https://t.co/1EqA2tLyxr https://t.co/awwCK6FvBU .
@Umbra_Tet No, the data does. But nice try. Vaccine effectiveness https://t.co/gjF3woOvWB https://t.co/gjF3woOvWB https://t.co/Y0Ab2GCP4N
@Widerstand1848 @schweizim ...hier die Metaanalyse von sieben Mio. Menschen. ... https://t.co/EDkuvnfaSI
@Lindax0101 @kanen_clement @guaro_20 @stkirsch You want actual safety profiles and studies on efficacy? Well don’t blame me when they’re above your reading level. https://t.co/VlyW6JhcOr https://t.co/G5g9BJlRrt https://t.co/FV91ajQfwo
@GiggaMAGA @davideyoungmd @19joho It reduced infection rates--the virus changed. that is what coronaviruses do. that is why the entire goal of the vaccine was to reduce risk of disease and death. That is what the vaccine does. https://t.co/RyhOgO0jXu
@UmbertoCruvuk @Arwed1211 @barriere_dr Okay. https://t.co/1EqA2tLyxr https://t.co/awwCK6FvBU https://t.co/HeCgXMLv7f https://t.co/5by09DjSl5 https://t.co/C7ytNnCQ3F https://t.co/7zC5IG186a https://t.co/TWfjTR1Jh8 .
Here's a meta-analysis that looked at 18 of the best studies (covering 6.8 million subjects). It found a similar pattern of VE being high around 85% for the first 75 days or so, then falling to below 50% after 150 days. https://t.co/IIXk792SnU https://t.co/leWepxntFR
@zachattack24 @davisfrankw @TexasLindsay_ @SomeBitchIIKnow LOL..these are paid-for outcomes. You've been punked. Same "Scientist". https://t.co/snSfN2UrcM
RT @sudokuvariante: A quel moment un scientifique pense qu'il a le droit d'approximer la courbe rouge, qui est une moyenne ajustée à partir…
RT @krebiozen: @wakedafckzup @JRNave @BigGuy4U86 @ShaneAKAProp @TheFrankmanMN @taurusg333 @TonyBaduy @TinFoilAwards @1_TMF_ @mcfunny @khoom…
@wakedafckzup @JRNave @BigGuy4U86 @ShaneAKAProp @TheFrankmanMN @taurusg333 @TonyBaduy @TinFoilAwards @1_TMF_ @mcfunny @khoombu @Pouldeau61 @crabb_vicki @Fornowago @NoPropagand @runhack @FUDyou2 @Catheri49917567 @RadioColor @TakethatCt @tonymac5 @groin_hammer @WendyOrent @CyclopsSeesAll @doritmi @ScienceMonkey0 @Just4TheCause @zendogbreath @FormerAntivax @BruceFo43322941 @DK25769559 @BigBopp75348974 @provaxtexan @MarioMoney23 @bayouskeeter @handmadekathy @Kathmarval @arcon_ryan @swedishchf @Redpanda74 @littleLishka @EntrepreneurFg @_mamadeb @SkepticalMutant @MsTrixter @100Dianne @GeoffSchuler @FrankDElia7 @runningrabbit_1 @DeoOmniaVincit I've been interested in vaccines and antivaccine misinformation for over a decade and I've read a lot of studies over that time. What would you like to see evidence of? Do you understand what a systematic review is? https://t.co/WA9eqzNNzG
@taurusg333 @ShaneAKAProp @krebiozen @Perykles_z_Aten @TheFrankmanMN @NoPropagand @JRNave @runhack @TinFoilAwards @mcfunny @FUDyou2 @TonyBaduy @Catheri49917567 @RadioColor @khoombu @TakethatCt @tonymac5 @groin_hammer @1_TMF_ @WendyOrent @CyclopsSeesAll @doritmi @ScienceMonkey0 @Just4TheCause @zendogbreath @FormerAntivax @BruceFo43322941 @DK25769559 @BigBopp75348974 @provaxtexan @MarioMoney23 @bayouskeeter @handmadekathy @Kathmarval @arcon_ryan @swedishchf @Redpanda74 @littleLishka @EntrepreneurFg @_mamadeb @SkepticalMutant @MsTrixter @100Dianne @GeoffSchuler @FrankDElia7 @runningrabbit_1 @DeoOmniaVincit @LandmineLenny @GeneTherapy68 @hauxton A meta-analysis of 18 studies shows the risk of infection is lower in the vaccinated. https://t.co/NYROgtsWAT
@Naitsab97339938 @angioarchitekt @Quo_vadis_BRD @Herzstiftung https://t.co/MH53lYRuoR https://t.co/EoAIkGHRzF https://t.co/jeV1TLAoSY https://t.co/PqMPEW8CGw https://t.co/8GqU1QcfxV https://t.co/jrHKy7hETx https://t.co/FOQEWRWWw2 https://t.co/2fWPr3JIXn Reicht das fürs Erste?
RT @sudokuvariante: A quel moment un scientifique pense qu'il a le droit d'approximer la courbe rouge, qui est une moyenne ajustée à partir…
RT @sudokuvariante: A quel moment un scientifique pense qu'il a le droit d'approximer la courbe rouge, qui est une moyenne ajustée à partir…
RT @sudokuvariante: A quel moment un scientifique pense qu'il a le droit d'approximer la courbe rouge, qui est une moyenne ajustée à partir…
RT @sudokuvariante: A quel moment un scientifique pense qu'il a le droit d'approximer la courbe rouge, qui est une moyenne ajustée à partir…
RT @sudokuvariante: A quel moment un scientifique pense qu'il a le droit d'approximer la courbe rouge, qui est une moyenne ajustée à partir…
RT @sudokuvariante: A quel moment un scientifique pense qu'il a le droit d'approximer la courbe rouge, qui est une moyenne ajustée à partir…
RT @sudokuvariante: A quel moment un scientifique pense qu'il a le droit d'approximer la courbe rouge, qui est une moyenne ajustée à partir…
RT @sudokuvariante: A quel moment un scientifique pense qu'il a le droit d'approximer la courbe rouge, qui est une moyenne ajustée à partir…
RT @sudokuvariante: A quel moment un scientifique pense qu'il a le droit d'approximer la courbe rouge, qui est une moyenne ajustée à partir…
RT @sudokuvariante: A quel moment un scientifique pense qu'il a le droit d'approximer la courbe rouge, qui est une moyenne ajustée à partir…
RT @sudokuvariante: A quel moment un scientifique pense qu'il a le droit d'approximer la courbe rouge, qui est une moyenne ajustée à partir…
A quel moment un scientifique pense qu'il a le droit d'approximer la courbe rouge, qui est une moyenne ajustée à partir des études rétrospectives, par une distribution d'Erlang, strictement positive?
@BenoitPhilipp12 @PharmaMedic95 @Gaethe1 https://t.co/TWfjTR1Jh8 https://t.co/v6M920NIOq https://t.co/CkkFJsmVT7 https://t.co/tuE88LBhfZ https://t.co/fjPBbD1PM7 https://t.co/BhGUAOxxP7 https://t.co/4Nt9uX2ELM https://t.co/GZxbkxYW7i https://t.co/xqBAxLGAac
@BenoitPhilipp12 @PharmaMedic95 @Gaethe1 Toi t'as des articles de presse, moi j'ai des études. Tu vois la différence ? https://t.co/1EqA2tLyxr https://t.co/awwCK6FvBU https://t.co/HeCgXMLv7f https://t.co/VovcniTDXM https://t.co/5by09DjSl5 https://t.co/C7ytNnCQ3F https://t.co/7zC5IG186a https://t.co/TWfjTR1Jh8
@TheYaminashy @UnacceptableN @JudyRennehan @shollins77 https://t.co/neb3nc3cHY
@_John_Reed @time_loves @dr_jon_l Weird. https://t.co/suLgE9TY0R This sure shows a whole lot of prevention.
@beardedcap36 @andrea_caylor @20thMaine1653 @BillOfRight1776 @Baratuty @JDDOppenheimer @atrupar Boom! Here’s another. Why isn’t this as easy for Ivermectin? https://t.co/fYAm2l29lu
RT @MichaelGIsonMD: Next, a thought provoking talk by Adrian Wildfire on CHIM 9th @ESWInfluenza Conference for proving interruption of tran…
RT @MichaelGIsonMD: Next, a thought provoking talk by Adrian Wildfire on CHIM 9th @ESWInfluenza Conference for proving interruption of tran…
RT @MichaelGIsonMD: Next, a thought provoking talk by Adrian Wildfire on CHIM 9th @ESWInfluenza Conference for proving interruption of tran…
Next, a thought provoking talk by Adrian Wildfire on CHIM 9th @ESWInfluenza Conference for proving interruption of transmission. Current vaccines highly effective at reducing severe disease with limit impact on transmission. https://t.co/aJ8YTbHegd https://t.co/suht8XsXYA https://t.co/L9vtioevBg
@RedFaster1 @KristiTalmadge Like you really think Club of Rome is some scientific authority? JFC how did scientific education get so goddamned shitty? Here's what science looks like (this is a meta-study). See how boring/dry the language is? See how sourced and detailed it is? https://t.co/tsW2WDCGZ9
@sleeeepyjoe5798 @MrIndepentdent @Veronica31378 @shellenberger https://t.co/G5g9BJlRrt https://t.co/VlyW6JhcOr https://t.co/FV91ajQfwo https://t.co/L0Dxin40S1 Ignorant fool. The real world disagrees with you. Read and weep moron.
@AlainSobi1 @Joli_Emile @vinceflibustier Tiens, en voici quelques preuves https://t.co/Ypr8koQBo3 https://t.co/NykN1oqQ6g https://t.co/S67HWRfzCN https://t.co/ubdgBLtdJG https://t.co/F1bR1vxTxR
@jasonryanmd https://t.co/19RdESpasJ I’m assuming you’re speaking generally about the vaccines, I am not yet up to date on the literature surrounding boosters and article is relatively old in the context of pandemic era publishing
@miketweetstaken @mpc_xetts @VigilantFox @MakisMD Reality would like to disagree you absolute fucking moron. Wake up
@wr74318240 @OKStormTrax @I98Kev @charliekirk11 https://t.co/BP4nXZC9Dg
@Frances49484055 https://t.co/4Vx5RXMuJx
@AreOhEssEyeEe https://t.co/Z0qWRfEFAQ I have about 30 more papers that show exactly that
@mrcarlosbernal @Fan2La88 @Timcast Haha you don’t possess critical thinking. And no, I have actual data. Which is what the real world uses. And no, not everything is opinion. You have… YouTube and rumble videos an opinion article with no data
@mrcarlosbernal @Fan2La88 @JasonHoltzman71 @Timcast You mean the numerous studies that showed effectiveness? https://t.co/G5g9BJlRrt And once again, not “gene therapy” fucktard.
@TimonFlorence @ChatSecouriste @marseille_jeff Voici des preuves qui prouvent que vous mentez, et elles ne sont pas produites pas l’OMS
@Widerstand1848 @Tofulogie @peterwaech @BAG_OFSP_UFSP ....es wird aufgrund der Impfhistorie..... Hier Zahlen Daten Fakten zusammengetragen. https://t.co/EDkuvnfaSI
I'll also just leave this here for anyone who comes at me with the predictable line, "But vaccines didn't stop people from catching or spreading covid..." https://t.co/Vfhkr4bGyT
@FastenedDude @postvacvoyager @Musician1980 @rki_de @JaSimmank Sie können jetzt irgendwelche politischen Entscheidungen in Deutschland aufführen und diese interpretieren, die Datenlage ist aber eine völlig andere. Die Impfung hat, breit gesprochen, temporär vor Infektion geschützt. https://t.co/A4xLjpI1fp
@Stefano_Chimico @madforfree Ma non ti senti un minimo pirla https://t.co/esaFEmny5I
@bob6429 @RMCInfo @gouvernementFR @wargonm C'est un vaccin, peu importe ton avis dessus ça changera pas ce fait. Et pour l'éfficacité cet argument était déjà faux, sur Delta. https://t.co/ozsU7bh9YP Et sur Omicron, éfficacité moindre, ça fait un an qu'on le rabâche. https://t.co/P6h6AxyQue https://t.co/TkHl1zrhNv
@cryptofever01 @lisasharpcreate @ODoralb @drgetulio @DrLoupis There's plenty of data on maskwearing and distancing if you look. Starting here would help if you're interested: https://t.co/OSq2EtxPGN Vaccines: https://t.co/GBAGROdt0F Long COVID: https://t.co/fH1hKbHrPc
@StereoTypeMario @jodysue23 @goddeketal Really? The key words are "Severe Disease" of course vaccine effectiveness would decline over time (viruses mutate rather quickly) but the protection against severe symptoms prevails. Source: https://t.co/v3KJjUSz15
@CarcanaJohn @DrFranckClarot Je t'ai parlé de 100aines d'études. Je vais pas toutes te les envoyer. Vas voir sur pubmed au lieu de jouer au con. https://t.co/P76InImZ8i
@JasonKe67461142 @Matt_Dillahunty @jordanbpeterson "No evidence" https://t.co/ghYAJdQZNU https://t.co/wYyTVnE5fB https://t.co/ChZcva37Fg
@jneas @jbarro Only if you live in alternative fact land. https://t.co/OdEQ6rj9s0
@rich_dreams_ @Nareto64 @wirchoreal @ConSelfOwns https://t.co/fkJd1XVjb7 Here's a meta-analysis that supports your data in one sense, protection against COVID-19 drops to 22% after 5 months, but the protection against severe infection sticks around 90%. I still call that valuable protection. But I also never got boosted, lol.
@Justinredalen https://t.co/xGPNp3OShh.
@FLFinley314 @CrierCrusader @ToshTalarico @catturd2 @JohnBrennan https://t.co/esaFEmny5I
@MemeWally @feanorel @mariedahaoui18 https://t.co/jzVFvP3k3H
@auroboreal0 @nopasaran31 @ChampoDr 1/ Il commence a y avoir suffisamment de meta analyses regroupant suffisamment d’études sur le sujet par exemple https://t.co/ysIrO80hAA
@jacktown03 @IamBrookJackson @MaryanneDemasi @pfizer @US_FDA @akheriaty @TheJikky @TonyNikolic10 @thevivafrei @KimDotcom @TheFreds @JohnBoweActor @Texas_Kate @JanJekielek @DrJBhattacharya @DrEliDavid @BrianLenzkes https://t.co/nyWGn5oF6B https://t.co/KOvSC0M8Or https://t.co/Gqw9CigYBX https://t.co/jdtp8SyCGg https://t.co/Yq1c4SJa29
@beegarc_ @PeterSweden7 The previous figure was taken from "SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis" by Ssentongo et al. (2022).
@Choco12345789 @caroCDjapris @alainb_paris @jerem1664 @warisevil @AlanAndrieu @libe Liste non-exhaustive (y en a trop pour toutes les citer), je vous invite à compléter par une rapide recherche. https://t.co/vqb92bodwj https://t.co/2lTJCj2JJp https://t.co/M78QYPG0Ar https://t.co/di1bRg7u4O
RT @TomPMarshall: @jorymicah @Avenger1100 The vaccine prevents you from getting seriously ill or dying. 90% effective against getting seri…
@BAbiotti @AbbyMachines Here's the data: 22% effectiveness at 5 months It's worth getting. But I think it's really dangerous to tell people that means they are protected. People want good news & an excuse to take their masks off & current vaccines aren't enough to make that safe. https://t.co/J5rCXNxLE5
@BAbiotti @AbbyMachines https://t.co/J5rCXNyjtD https://t.co/5vXgXxeeRI
@jorymicah @Avenger1100 The vaccine prevents you from getting seriously ill or dying. 90% effective against getting seriously ill. See reference. https://t.co/WLnEMQ3lPI
@vickdimin @poirazis Τουλάχιστον βρίσκομαι στον πραγματικό κόσμο. Στο μέλλον δεν ξέρω πως θα εξελιχθεί η επιστήμη, αλλά προς στιγμήν όλες οι μεταμελέτες κατατείνουν προς τα ίδια συμπεράσματα. Από 05/2022: https://t.co/N0zriPAJto
@StrichasC @AnastasisK8 Μη κουράζεσαι ασκόπως. Έχουν ήδη γίνει μεταμελέτες και όλες καταλήγουν στο ίδιο συμπέρασμα: τα εμβόλια είναι ασφαλή και αποτελεσματικά, με πολύ σπάνιες σοβαρές παρενέργειες.
@Flexing401k @the_viall_inn @jrvayne @_elizabethLIVE @fucku @SBkcrn https://t.co/oceCeliH01 https://t.co/4nWXRd0bRU https://t.co/hCPptPkctO
@palbow_79 @fakenews_pl https://t.co/uFbRxNYBv7
@sandratje1977 @nrc https://t.co/bCEUdcPSxL 18 studies
@Jeffers81315251 @DrJamesOlsson No, we only listen to scientifically proven facts such as this https://t.co/bb02lNWUhS
@jclacio2 @TamanendBull @idrissaberkane https://t.co/Z6x4NpuwRm
@Dalia_Guevara_ @manu_carceles @El_Cid_Owneador @gisbert_ruben ¿Dónde está la curvatura? https://t.co/wtBLPA2wPE… https://t.co/h2Nq1Vj62A… https://t.co/83a0mKknn2… https://t.co/pYQgFmjcAC Es tan sencillo como abrir pubmed.
@BrantChil @MeesterEddy @Els__nadine Ja. Dit is bijvoorbeeld een grote studie die de werking van Vaccins aantoont. https://t.co/GofqqBepS0 Zo zijn er nog honderden te vinden.
@Tankje48 @katje2021 @MasterkeyVera @IkNet Ja. Er zijn letterlijk honderden die dit bevestigen. Dit is een grote: https://t.co/GofqqAWgDS. Daarnaast heb ik zelf op de covidafdelingen als arts gewerkt en de effecten duidelijk gezien.
@Arkout3 @redbonfire @rupasubramanya If you don't respect the CPSO then you aren't going to respect Health Canada, the Who or studies like this meta analysis found on PubMed. https://t.co/XeNu52KH0j.
@FabRobIT @Resistenza1967 https://t.co/1myZyTXZf3
@habaluljaba @PlatOtheophilus @DubyaArgh @HerpADerp_zzzzz @Timcast I mean...here's one done just by Penn State? Like....You're actually serious? Lol "SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis | BMC Infectious Diseases | Full Text" https://t.co/M7GPtQpqIM.
@t_mooon_ @MiyuMotohashi 図1：第7波の感染者数は第6波よりも非常に増えており、今がピークにも見えます 図2：一方、死者数は今のところ第6波並であり、もう少し様子を見ないと分かりません 図3：そもそも寿命じゃね？という噂もあります リンク：メタアナでは（これまでは）効果が評価されています https://t.co/nGbXEF0bGH https://t.co/c1uxVd10uJ
@YeOldeMaurice @goodfoodgal Yeah, so just because you haven't seen it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. https://t.co/obw2rUIH6h
Evidence-Based Medicine, as a new scientific paradigm, modified the approach to diagnosis, treatment and prevention of diseases based on the best available scientific evidence synthesized in systematic reviews since the last decade of the past century-https://t.co/Z3IUBgzfxL
@BerlinerNord @ceeceeclaudia @K_G_Andersen SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis | BMC Infectious Diseases | Full Text https://t.co/1nSosPw7X9 Duration of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Effectiveness against Severe Disease https://t.co/Mi2ev0nS1E
@TakeoYasha @Hosenmaus1 @Karl_Lauterbach SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis | BMC Infectious Diseases | Full Text https://t.co/1nSosPw7X9 Duration of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Effectiveness against Severe Disease https://t.co/Mi2ev0nS1E
@FrauT18 @TidesSilverfal @Ellerbr06014411 @____Jeannette @MarcoBuschmann @Karl_Lauterbach SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis | BMC Infectious Diseases | Full Text https://t.co/1nSosPw7X9 Duration of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Effectiveness against Severe Disease https://t.co/Mi2ev0nS1E
@chr_stg @Hosenmaus1 @Karl_Lauterbach SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis | BMC Infectious Diseases | Full Text https://t.co/1nSosPw7X9 Duration of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Effectiveness against Severe Disease https://t.co/Mi2ev0nS1E
@TidesSilverfal @Risikofamilie @Ellerbr06014411 @____Jeannette @MarcoBuschmann @Karl_Lauterbach @IdiotenD SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis | BMC Infectious Diseases | Full Text https://t.co/1nSosPw7X9 Duration of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Effectiveness against Severe Disease https://t.co/Mi2ev0nS1E
@Risikofamilie @TidesSilverfal @Ellerbr06014411 @____Jeannette @MarcoBuschmann @Karl_Lauterbach @IdiotenD SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis | BMC Infectious Diseases | Full Text https://t.co/1nSosPw7X9 Duration of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Effectiveness against Severe Disease https://t.co/Mi2ev0nS1E
@Tzerberus1 @AnnasBackwelt @____Jeannette @Karl_Lauterbach @MarcoBuschmann SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis | BMC Infectious Diseases | Full Text https://t.co/1nSosPw7X9
@TopDollarYEG @maxfawcett Science facts hurt your mind? "Eighteen studies were included representing nearly 7 million individuals." "SARS-CoV-2 infection and symptomatic COVID-19 waned over time but protection remained high against severe COVID-19" https://t.co/St34ufBdOw
@GuillaumeBarucq Non non pas du tout, on ne s’interroge pas. On sait très bien que le vaccin n’est pas efficace à 100% et que son efficacité diminue avec le temps. Efficace à 83% contre les infections le 1er mois, l’efficacité baisse à 22% après 5 mois. C’est très clair. https://t.co/uqginx6bVO
@Caillaut2N @copperknight @NiusMarco Voilà
@Polityzen @Korvuz2 @funcoleto Y otro... https://t.co/5sj6rnDRN4
RT @baobeitwit: SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis…
SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis | BMC Infectious Diseases | https://t.co/O7G0Hv5mk4
RT @InfeccSoMaMFYC: SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analy…
SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://t.co/rHktauajAO
RT @DrDavidKatz: SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis…
SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis - BMC Infectious Diseases https://t.co/IrX02DhXgB https://t.co/mKcDs0gvhN
RT @LksAse: SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. htt…
SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://t.co/cPy8Dl8d3u
RT @COVID_Evidence: PubMed: SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and m…
RT @COVID_Evidence: PubMed: SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and m…
PubMed: SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis: CONCLUSIONS: VE against SARS-CoV-2 infection and symptomatic COVID-19 waned over time but… https://t.co/Xql4YHYy8T #covid19 #SARSCOV2 #coronavirus
SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis https://t.co/53CNXdLCaV
SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis | BMC Infectious Diseases https://t.co/BrRlEDpmV8
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y 35. Schieszer J. Risk of breakthrough COVID-19 higher for patients with cancer. Cancer Therapy Advisor. Published ...
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y 35. Schieszer J. Risk of breakthrough COVID-19 higher for patients with cancer. Cancer Therapy ...
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y 35. Schieszer J. Risk of breakthrough COVID-19 higher for patients with cancer. Cancer Therapy ...
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y 35. Schieszer J. Risk of breakthrough COVID-19 higher for patients with cancer. Cancer Therapy ...
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y 35. Schieszer J. Risk of breakthrough COVID-19 higher for patients with cancer. Cancer Therapy ...
... 10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.12.22273745v1.full.pdf. 0 0 · BenX 12:51 20.februar 2024. prijavi.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y 35. Schieszer J. Risk of breakthrough COVID-19 higher for patients with cancer. Cancer Therapy ...
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y 35. Schieszer J. Risk of breakthrough COVID-19 higher for patients with cancer. Cancer Therapy ...
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y 35. Schieszer J. Risk of breakthrough COVID-19 higher for patients with cancer. Cancer Therapy ...
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y 35. Schieszer J. Risk of breakthrough COVID-19 higher for patients with cancer. Cancer Therapy ...
BMC Infectious Diseases, 2022. doi:10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y. [10] Stefan Pilz, Verena Theiler-Schwetz, Christian Trummer, et al ...
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y. Type: meta-analysis. Sample size: 6 895 811. Origin / affiliation of researchers: Penn State ...
Covid vaccine is extremely effective at preventing infection. https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y. meta ...
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y 35. Schieszer J. Risk of breakthrough COVID-19 higher for patients with cancer. Cancer Therapy ...
doi:10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y, 10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y. Zheng C, Shao W, Chen X, Zhang B, Wang G, Zhang W. Real-world effectiveness of ...
Original Study DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y. Share This: NEXT STORY: GovExec Daily: Using AI to Predict Weather · President Bill Clinton ...
doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y. Currently rated 5.0 by 3 people. Posted in: Medical Research News | Disease/Infection News. Comments (0).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y 35. Schieszer J. Risk of breakthrough COVID-19 higher for patients with cancer. Cancer Therapy ...
Li Y, Liang M, Gao L, et al. Face masks to prevent transmission ... https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y 35. Schieszer J. Risk of ...
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y 35. Schieszer J. Risk of breakthrough COVID-19 higher for patients with cancer. Cancer Therapy ...
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y 35. Schieszer J. Risk of breakthrough COVID-19 higher for patients with cancer. Cancer Therapy ...
FS
VC
JT
MM
DK
GA
C
AS
JL
O
MF
S
南
D
SG
血エ
B
AE
SS
T
M
T
CC
D
CL
T
SP
Z
O
DR
D
MD
PM
FM
GH
B
C
GH
F
M
PK
SF
N
C
UI
F
E
VG
MK
RM
RB
EM
SL
FE
K
H
B
CD
JA
A
CM
AS
BT
GC
RN
PF
A
C
SA
SM
RM
E
L
Y
A
K
MM
C
CS
K
A
HM
T
CL
O
A
GW
JC
AS
L
PP
Z
SG
ST
E
OS
TM
AΚ
ST
JT
NB
D
OM
TD
A
C
M
M
キ
AH
P
P
L
M
S
W
IS
LA
CE
PP
JW