¿Sabías que entre el 20 y el 30 por ciento de los cánceres #colorrectales poscolonoscopia están probablemente relacionados con una resección incompleta?
Anchoring endoscopic mucosal resection versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Jan 2023 – Feb 2023Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter9 posts
-
Facebook3 posts
-
YouTube2 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The discussions reflect a positive reception of the comparative study, with phrases like 'more effective' and 'better safety profile' demonstrating agreement. Interest is high, evidenced by comments about procedure success rates and safety concerns, while engagement is shown through suggestions to improve access and application in practice. The impact is moderate, as users recognize the potential for AEMR to change standard practices, but some comments remain at an informational level, not fully delving into broader systemic implications.
Most discussions highlight the superiority of AEMR over CEMR, emphasizing improved resection rates and safety, indicating general agreement with the study's findings.
Participants show high interest, often referencing specific procedural benefits, safety concerns, and clinical implications, demonstrating active engagement with the topic.
Discussions include mentions of technical aspects, calls for better access to research, and implications for practice, reflecting thoughtful and moderate engagement.
The conversation suggests awareness of the study's potential to influence clinical procedures and patient outcomes, though some comments are more informational than transformative.
Abstract in brief
- AEMR (Anchoring Endoscopic Mucosal Resection) shows a higher complete resection rate (89.5%) compared to CEMR (74.5%) for large (10-25mm) colorectal polyps, suggesting it is more effective.
- AEMR also results in better en bloc and R0 resection rates, with similar procedure times to CEMR, indicating it can be adopted as a standard method for large polyp removal.
- While AEMR had fewer complications, there was one case of delayed bleeding and one perforation in the CEMR group, highlighting its safety profile.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and BlueskyAnchoring endoscopic mucosal resection versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial by Chang Kyo Oh et al. Read more here: https://t.co/Liljf4CvNK https://t.co/LSrVmmRzl9
Bo-In Lee on "Anchoring endoscopic mucosal resection versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial” Authors: Chang Kyo Oh et al. Read more: https://t.co/Liljf4D3Di Watch here: https://t.co/xSNUviSST3
#podcast Anchoring endoscopic mucosal resection versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial by Chang Kyo Oh et al. Read more here: https://t.co/Liljf4CvNK Listen here: https://t.co/tbTANc5g0v
RT @endoscopyjrnl: Anchoring endoscopic mucosal resection versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large nonpedunculated colore…
@endoscopyjrnl Paywalls are frustrating! Access the article from your library: https://t.co/V4ogsf1iiS Promote scholarly access when tweeting articles by simply adding https://t.co/SXSePSX5De to the DOI URL
All mentions
Anchoring Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs Conventional for Large Colorectal Polyps
BoIn Lee discusses a randomized trial demonstrating that anchoring EMR offers higher resection rates and improved safety over conventional EMR for large colorectal polyps, supporting its adoption as a standard technique.
Anchoring Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Conventional EMR for Large Colorectal Polyps
This randomized controlled trial compares anchoring EMR and conventional EMR for large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps, demonstrating superior en bloc and R0 resection rates with anchoring EMR, suggesting it can be a…
Thieme E-Books & E-Journals - https://t.co/tKWdbGDzeo
¿Sabías que entre el 20 y el 30 por ciento de los cánceres #colorrectales poscolonoscopia están probablemente relacionados con una resección incompleta?
@endoscopyjrnl Paywalls are frustrating! Access the article from your library: https://t.co/V4ogsf1iiS Promote scholarly access when tweeting articles by simply adding https://t.co/SXSePSX5De to the DOI URL
#podcast Anchoring endoscopic mucosal resection versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial by Chang Kyo Oh et al. Read more here: https://t.co/Liljf4CvNK Listen here: https://t.co/tbTANc5g0v
@endoscopyjrnl Help your colleagues avoid a paywall by accessing the article from their libraries: https://t.co/V4ogsf1iiS Simply add https://t.co/SXSePSX5De to the DOI URL when sharing articles on Twitter and everywhere else!
Bo-In Lee on "Anchoring endoscopic mucosal resection versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial” Authors: Chang Kyo Oh et al. Read more: https://t.co/Liljf4D3Di Watch here: https://t.co/xSNUviSST3
Anchoring endoscopic mucosal resection versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial https://t.co/mNtTqSPwyd
RT @endoscopyjrnl: Anchoring endoscopic mucosal resection versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large nonpedunculated colore…
Anchoring endoscopic mucosal resection versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial by Chang Kyo Oh et al. Read more here: https://t.co/Liljf4CvNK https://t.co/LSrVmmRzl9
S
EJ
RN
L
JP
VA