Int J Environ Res Public Health June 2022 PMID 35805214

How Do Family Court Judges Theorize about Parental Alienation? A Qualitative Exploration of the Territory.

Telma M Marques, Isabel Narciso, Luana C Ferreira

Download social card

Mentions

6
Peak: 2 in Dec 2024
across 3 sources since Jun 2022

Extended reach

16,237
potential audience

Total likes

714

Video views

13,224

Mentions per month

Jun 2022 – Dec 2024

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter2 posts
  • YouTube2 videos
  • Facebook2 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The discussions demonstrate a strong interest in how judges interpret parental alienation, with references to themes like strategic behaviors and contextual factors, highlighting the significance of the study's insights. The tone ranges from analytical to curious, emphasizing the topic’s relevance to legal and psychological fields.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most comments acknowledge the importance of understanding how judges perceive parental alienation, reflecting general consensus on its complexity and relevance.

InterestHigh interest

Discussions show high curiosity about the judicial perspective and implications, with many participants expressing intrigue about the topic and the research findings.

EngagementModerate engagement

While some posts delve into analysis of the themes and methodology, overall comments tend to be brief, indicating moderate levels of in-depth discussion.

ImpactModerate impact

Participants recognize the study's potential influence on legal practices and future research, though few comments elaborate on concrete real-world impacts.

Abstract in brief

  • The study explores how family court judges understand and describe parental alienation (PA), revealing a complex view with five key themes including the contexts in which PA occurs, its severity, influencing factors, impacts on individuals, and signs of change.
  • Judges perceive PA as a multifaceted and sometimes strategic process that involves different behaviors, functions, and identification clues, with properties like being adaptable, intentional, and sometimes disguised.
  • The research highlights the importance of considering power imbalances, the multifactorial nature of PA, and its potential destructiveness, offering insights for future studies, legal practice, and how judges think about and address PA in custody cases.

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Jim Bloom
@jimmyroybloom · X

https://t.co/JuyqCtqS1k

Jul 29, 2022 · 2,459 followers View post →
MyJournals
@myjournals · X

IJERPH, Vol. 19, Pages 7555: How Do Family Court Judges Theorize about Parental Alienation? A Qualitative Exploration of the Territory https://t.co/SQzmcDwpKc

Jun 21, 2022 · 555 followers View post →

All mentions

Jim Bloom
@jimmyroybloom · X

https://t.co/JuyqCtqS1k

Jul 29, 2022 · 2,459 followers View post →
MyJournals
@myjournals · X

IJERPH, Vol. 19, Pages 7555: How Do Family Court Judges Theorize about Parental Alienation? A Qualitative Exploration of the Territory https://t.co/SQzmcDwpKc

Jun 21, 2022 · 555 followers View post →