These discussions demonstrate high engagement with scientific literature, with numerous mentions of systematic reviews and meta-analyses like those published in reputable journals, all emphasizing ivermectin's lack of efficacy. The tone is consistently skeptical of unproven claims, and the frequent citations of high-quality evidence highlight the discourse's focus on scientific integrity and impact on public perceptions.
AgreementStrong disagreement
Most discussions strongly support the conclusion that ivermectin is ineffective against COVID-19, citing multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses that show no benefit.
InterestNeutral interest
Participants display neutral to moderate interest, engaging with scientific evidence and clarifications rather than showing excitement or disinterest.
EngagementHigh engagement
Many posts reference detailed studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, indicating deep engagement with the research and scientific methodology.
ImpactHigh impact
The discussions reinforce that the publication has significant influence, as it is frequently cited as authoritative and is used to counter misinformation.
Abstract in brief
This systematic review and meta-analysis examined 25 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate whether ivermectin is effective in treating COVID-19, focusing on outcomes like mortality and need for mechanical ventilation.
The results showed that ivermectin did not significantly reduce death rates or the need for invasive ventilation in COVID-19 patients, and many studies had biases that could affect the reliability of the findings.
The study highlights the importance of high-quality research, as current evidence does not support ivermectin's use for COVID-19 treatment beyond existing standards of care.
Mar 12, 2024 · 13 likes · 3,356 followersView post →
DO
David Oliver
@mancunianmedic · X
@CoralBlob @IAM_Da_Vid @krebiozen @fredwibblington @CatVonDont @TCarraghan @dave_odo @marcpollington @rossmarwood @jneill @silversynergy @BottomleyFiona @BreezerGalway @Adelere @GarySlegg @BaileInis @AdamBlayney @_johnbye @StephenBevan15 @UnjustSociety1 @mcfunny @k_b_lvi @KAS118 @gordonrlove @Takeastepback16 @1ohreally @timbofive @Theonew16516042 @AsItIs13658173 @botvolution @fiski70 @marmite @LucifersTweetz @bbcquestiontime @Covid19Critical @BIRDGroupUK @PierreKory Peer-reviewed systematic review and meta-analysis of 25 peer reviewed RCTs that met inclusion criteria - written by credible experts with transparent methodology and no grifting/self promoting/commercial COI
Zero evidence for Ivermectin Use in Covid-19
https://t.co/8T386mftP8
Jan 27, 2024 · 12 likes · 6 shares · 71,325 followersView post →
FR
Filipe Rafaeli
@filipe_rafaeli · X
Acima, os dados que fizeram para mortalidade. Estimativa pontual de 24% de redução. Tem um IC enorme, mas esse resultado é mais compatível com uma redução de 24% do que com nada. Não dá jeito de baseado nisso excluir um benefício relevante na mortalidade.
https://t.co/dg8kU98gZh
Evidence beyond the hype: #ivermectin for treatment of #COVID19
Our latest systematic review, already cited in
@DynaMed_EBSCO
https://t.co/qYJytXweXP
https://t.co/pd2oTow4Wy
Thanks @epistemonikos @radagabriel @iatsaude
Aug 14, 2022 · 12 likes · 4 shares · 139 followersView post →
?
✨
@ScienceBiscuits · X
@FocuswaveClinic @IanCopeland5 @Earl_R_Robinson Cool blog post that is not unbiasedly peer reviewed, published in any credible journal, nor is it a clinician trial.
That is a blog post. If you want an actual meta analysis, I recommend:
https://t.co/AVnZQGDOsP
This one even found a niche usage:
https://t.co/f4l89DUDBt
@MRobertsQLD Ivermectin doesn’t work for COVID (or any other virus). https://t.co/94CPTL5otb Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype - PMC
Jun 4, 2025 · 11 likes · 1 share · 2,720 followersView post →
This video explains what confidence intervals are and how to interpret them correctly in clinical trials, emphasizing the importance of high-quality evidence in evaluating treatment efficacy, with a focus on COVID-19…
This video reviews a systematic analysis of 25 RCTs on ivermectin for COVID-19, highlighting that current evidence does not support its effectiveness in reducing mortality or ventilation need as high-quality research is…
@th1agotoss @LuisElage87 @blognaointendo Salvou sim, patriota, mas não dá COVID.
Segue link dos diversos estudos que não existem:
https://t.co/rUKFq6d4DQ
https://t.co/bduOoyRJIQ
https://t.co/kHQVaXIqMF
https://t.co/HAzEo0jXf7
https://t.co/NW7zBBgxXv
Agora vai lá cantar o hino nacional para o pneu, vai.
@Fiziscian @Toxoplamosis @WarClandestine No, not really.
https://t.co/7qJEQdXGrT
https://t.co/5h262ASlGo
https://t.co/I3aehlPfGA
https://t.co/LdtZvRl0JM
https://t.co/BCOOW56qqp
https://t.co/G2wf4UCVuX
The evidence for it not being effective far outweighs the evidence to the contrary. Welcome to science.
@Germa0402 @Jansen11951260 @missblauwoog82 @Rijning01 Dames dat jullie nog geloven dat Ivermectine helpt tegen covid bewijst al dat jullie in een fictieve wereld leven‼️
https://t.co/HdEHOJ5Ibt
https://t.co/oYCGuIylna
https://t.co/R0rFegc8Tp
https://t.co/YZMXXCBzVc
@BlairHealt68622 @ianfmusgrave @DownunderUSA01 @onuniversal_ By the way, it actually is. It's just also posted on a website that isn't.
https://t.co/sqIZCZy2hu
@BlairHealt68622 @blob1972453 @newstart_2024 You mean like this? https://t.co/94CPTL5otb Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype - PMC
@blob1972453 @BlairHealt68622 @newstart_2024 There is a lot more now, showing ivermectin does not work for COVID in vivo. https://t.co/94CPTL5otb Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype
https://t.co/Xb4ku1TiJe Ivermectin for COVID-19 in adults in the community
@blob1972453 @BlairHealt68622 @newstart_2024 Or confused (ivermectin turned up late in the piece, but still did nothing for COVID) https://t.co/94CPTL5otb Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype - PMC
@MRobertsQLD Ivermectin doesn’t work for COVID (or any other virus). https://t.co/94CPTL5otb Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype - PMC
Jun 4, 2025 · 11 likes · 1 share · 2,720 followersView post →
RM
Richard Thrasher, MD
@rthrash3 · X
@Mary38355964 @MdBreathe @joerogan ok, well, here's links to legit original data:
1 - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ivermectin for Treatment of COVID-19This review critically appraises randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients treated with ivermectin. It aims to
@craigkellyXXX @Peter_Fitz Mr Kelly, please, You do not seem to understand the peer review process and the balance of evidence. You are the one making ambit claims. The balance of evidence is in the opposite direction. Now sit down and let the adults speak. https://t.co/kEsUJeSbNY.
@Peter_Fitz You are flogging a dead horse Peter. I really believe that this mob don’t understand what peer review actually is and how it works. https://t.co/kEsUJeSbNY. There’s no wrong turn here, poor Craig hasn’t even made it to the road.
@juxtafras @SecKennedy Are you serious?
1 - the study you cite a EBM Level V data to argue Ivermectin. C'mon. Here are significantly more valid EBM level studies (including level I) refuting that garbage:
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ivermectin for Treatment of COVID-19
This review
@SD941161689827 @ScienceBasedMed Ce document est un fake la veritable meta analyse est la et conclue que l ivermectine (un antiparasitaire rappelons le) ne reduit absolument pas les risques COVID
Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype - PMC
Apr 2, 2025 · 1 like · 1 share · 2,606 followersView post →
@_nwblacksmith @MilaLovesJoe In 2020-21, Ivermectin was dismissed as potential COVID-19 treatment prematurely, however the latest systematic reviews aren't showing much efficacy in treating COVID-19. This review includes studies outside of U.S. political influence.
https://t.co/4lndPWWccu
@scubastevePADI @OhRick4 @TheDemocrats @Dr_AnthonyFauci @WHO Meta-analysis of 14 test v placebo trials published in the British Medical Journal.
"Ivermectin does not reduce mortality risk and the risk of mechanical ventilation requirement."
https://t.co/lTo1aVYzgJ
Jan 29, 2025 · 2 likes · 3,356 followersView post →
?
✨
@ScienceBiscuits · X
@FocuswaveClinic @IanCopeland5 @Earl_R_Robinson Cool blog post that is not unbiasedly peer reviewed, published in any credible journal, nor is it a clinician trial.
That is a blog post. If you want an actual meta analysis, I recommend:
https://t.co/AVnZQGDOsP
This one even found a niche usage:
https://t.co/f4l89DUDBt
@axethetax128 @Net_Inquisitor @StanWillenbring @DrNeilStone I can't cite a study *I've* completed as I am not a drug researcher. But there are plenty of peer-reviewed studies out there because, as it turns out, lots of people around the world were trying to figure out how to best treat covid. Here's one
https://t.co/ltXXzg0OuN
@Santino_1964 @DrNeilStone In 2020-21, Ivermectin was dismissed as potential COVID-19 treatment prematurely, however the latest systematic reviews aren't showing much efficacy in treating COVID-19. This review includes studies outside of U.S. political influence.
https://t.co/4lndPWWccu
RT @IntegralAnswers: @DCjusticeseeker Ref: IVM Meta Analyses
https://t.co/WIkdmvxsKe?
https://t.co/GhPkgZuhnl?
https://t.co/ruXqH841ma?
Jan 1, 2025 · 1 share · 1,479 followersView post →
I
IntegralAnswers
@IntegralAnswers · X
@DCjusticeseeker Ref: IVM Meta Analyses
https://t.co/WIkdmvxsKe?
https://t.co/GhPkgZuhnl?
https://t.co/ruXqH841ma?
Dec 31, 2024 · 1 like · 1 share · 8,592 followersView post →
PH
Presumably Humor
@OXHarryH1 · X
@donkerwater @DrNeilStone They weeded out the bogus and retracted papers. Dummy.
https://t.co/dQ4WXmoXvr
https://t.co/omeXonINOy
https://t.co/HwsbV1j7gs
https://t.co/J9bODdgo9e
Kory the fraud.
https://t.co/vxboyLxxqW
Systematic review and meta-analysis of Ivermectin for treatment of Covid-19.
The study says it doesn't reduce mortality, there's no "conclusive evidence" for it being effective, but if other treatments don't work cautious use by practitioners may be considered.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
@ToKnowOrNot @GCSCS_RuG @cwitteveen1 @BorgerPieter @AtomsksSanakan @karelpopper @Natuurmonument @Sovon @vogelnieuws @youtokkietome Voor zover mij bekend heeft Wander Jager nog niet aangegeven wat er niet zou kloppen aan de inhoud van dit artikel. https://t.co/ChNwGituLs.
Zie ook https://t.co/M9EmyL2tEu , tot heden eveneens zonder inhoudelijk weerwoord van Wander.
Wat is hier aan de hand?
Nov 29, 2024 · 1 like · 1,230 followersView post →
AS
Atomsk's Sanakan
@AtomsksSanakan · X
@GCSCS_RuG @karelpopper @cwitteveen1 @BorgerPieter @KlaasvanDijk5 @ToKnowOrNot @Natuurmonument @Sovon @vogelnieuws @youtokkietome I'm not interested in paranoid conspiracy theories to evade evidence, anymore than I'm interested in flat Earther conspiracy theories about 'satellite business' to evade evidence Earth is round.
You were cited meta-analyses.
Feel free to read them.
https://t.co/rUvqCGeoVZ https://t.co/K6rX6C9bx4
Nov 29, 2024 · 2 likes · 3,356 followersView post →
SA
Santhosh Ambika
@RenoHemonc · X
@Bonk_Ultra @VPrasadMDMPH Go with better quality studies https://t.co/UJuazmCBU7
@MulbearA @mind_basic @DrNeilStone Well a later meta analysis and review came to a different conclusion. It certainly didn’t find evidence it was life saving.
https://t.co/RzOXupRL1P
@EqualOpp4All @SenatorRennick Several metaanalyses each containing multiple studies showed ivermectin doesn't work, while the vaccine RCTs and hundreds of subsequent studies showed the vaccines do work.
https://t.co/zRbyt0ow2l
https://t.co/GgcseUTSfx
https://t.co/B6hqzZue6S
https://t.co/wx2lHPQO71
@RickHol7 @mtgreenee @RealAlexJones A few years ago, Ivermectin was dismissed as potential COVID-19 treatment prematurely, however the latest systematic reviews aren't showing much efficacy in treating COVID-19. This review includes studies outside of U.S. political influence.
https://t.co/4lndPWVEmW
@JimmyC1366 Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype
https://t.co/fwWiKZu2lW https://t.co/9CyQxKrVTo
@PatientCV @Support1954 @Sjukskterskeup1 @carina_swe @MarieOlofsson12 @ayiesha_dr @RepMcCormick @ukmfa1 @TiinaKeskimki @anettefri @MikaVauhkala Ivermectin does not work, it does nothing to Covid patience, stop talking rubbish.
https://t.co/geQEKEe3S6
Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype https://t.co/diX0bLgcL2 for education @pillsforca
@jackburton109 @erichhartmann @jordanbpeterson That work was superseded and the low quality evidence they found was later found to be from studies that were more likely to be biased. Later systematic reviews - including placebo controlled trials are below. Sorry.
https://t.co/TgRJYh2AFi
https://t.co/WdMC0WMnbC
Cochrane (which is top of the heap ask any Clinician!) Systematic Review & Meta Analysis, alas, says no. https://t.co/DTh4VF1CRB
Virology Journal Sys Rev & Meta analysis says no https://t.co/F2Qnu9QCNE
BMC Infect. Dis Sys Rev & Meta Analysis says no https://t.co/RqSZZaEMBM https://t.co/1q97b76zBa
@dr_jon_l Mentions a meta review yet do not cite the journal and issue publication…here’s two I found
https://t.co/RqSZZaEeMe
and
https://t.co/F2Qnu9Q4Y6 https://t.co/gXvQhHmtGX
Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype https://t.co/diX0bLgKAA no evidence supports #Ivermectin #FauciForPrison #Covid-19 #SARS-CoV-2 #TrumpDerangementSyndrome
@LoLoWarn @OlivierAgos Allez tiens un peu de lecture
l'HCQ, l'IVM, ... , que ça soit en prophylaxie ou non ca ne marche pas !
https://t.co/qp5TLYriTK
https://t.co/2jYbfTikec
https://t.co/mUGf8AZJIs
https://t.co/QvTPeqWqRe
https://t.co/D8c5bEJsIS
@justtoread456 @Jo_Lynxpoint @DrSuneelDhand Haha no you haven’t.
And no, that’s also not true.
You’re pretty delusional or just straight up lying, which is it?
https://t.co/ZvEymLWra2
@Jo_Lynxpoint @justtoread456 @DrSuneelDhand Except it doesn’t work at all for Covid. Which has been proven time and time again. You are just gullible enough to believe the grifters selling you “video consults” to illegally prescribe ivermectin and sell you their bs “supplements”
https://t.co/ZvEymLWYZA
@NMarbletoe @dclynch07 @akafacehots 3rd.
"The evidence suggests that ivermectin doesn't reduce mortality risk and the risk of mechanical ventilation requirement. Although we did not observe an increase in the risk of adverse effects, the evidence is very uncertain regarding this endpoint." https://t.co/GafFIS350Y
@LcdoCorona Tremenda fuente y repitiendo el mismo disparate semanal. Eso es lo que ustedes consideran libre expresión repetir embustes.
https://t.co/mUbUmQJGMI
@insins31544458 @BruHugues @Inconnukiki2000 @TgdxbBru @abraxas1518 @fr_russie https://t.co/9r9IYyC9Im
Mmmmh...je trouve des meta analyses (donc regroupement d'études pour pouvoir faire une conclusion) qui attestent que non https://t.co/3SgjW8VpXO
@DingleyMarlene @BlaylockMooky @realshocks @EmmaEnnis16 @FFroodle @lopaka101 @HopiNg66966500 Meta-analysis of 14 test v placebo trials published in the British Medical Journal.
"Ivermectin does not reduce mortality risk and the risk of mechanical ventilation requirement."
https://t.co/lTo1aVYzgJ
@PabloFase2 @soyjavijavi @manuelhborbolla @PPmerino @Claudiashein Las revisiones sistemáticas son la mejor evidencia, no inventes. Y me encantan los factores de impacto de tus citas, así como las fechas. Date:
https://t.co/i8zIJmiPfx
https://t.co/ffkpJVvULs
https://t.co/Si0tGq5wXV
https://t.co/xWSe7dAwTY
https://t.co/mTqEIpIFBX
@ER_Korhola @AjanmiesMieti Koska Ivermektiinistä ei ole mitään hyötyä Koronan hoidossa.
Sitä ei kuitenkaan kielletty eikä sitä ole vedetty apteekeista.
Olisit kysynyt eläinlääkäriltä
https://t.co/geQEKEe3S6 https://t.co/XQO95eYF64
@EramosaStone @you_can_die_mad @Lorenzo7127 @jennawrites @PeterHotez @ChrisCuomo @Inquiry_Canada Congrats you found a study without glaring conflicts of interest! Too bad it’s a pretty small shitty study, as they note in their limitations.
Try reading something credible for once.
https://t.co/ZvEymLWra2
@Heritage A couple of years ago, Ivermectin was dismissed as potential COVID-19 treatment prematurely, however the latest systematic reviews aren't showing much efficacy in treating COVID-19. This review includes studies outside of U.S. political influence.
https://t.co/4lndPWVEmW
Acima, os dados que fizeram para mortalidade. Estimativa pontual de 24% de redução. Tem um IC enorme, mas esse resultado é mais compatível com uma redução de 24% do que com nada. Não dá jeito de baseado nisso excluir um benefício relevante na mortalidade.
https://t.co/dg8kU98gZh
@s2_underground The second factor is in research. The research isn't as conclusive as many were led to believe. A Meta analysis published in 2022 points out, that at the time there was not enough evidence yet to support Ivermectin as effective treatment. https://t.co/awVwi2jyaW 2/3
@641011Mies @JacquiDeevoy1 And ivermectin doesn't work. Otherwise, we would use it. You do recognise it's made by Big Pharma too?
Please read these - meta-analyses from creditable journals:
https://t.co/NbhmVxvr0b
https://t.co/ORs9LV8x2O
It would be great if it worked as would give us a great tool to use
@GabyCuevas
Le comparto el DOI de dos metaanálisis de #ivermectina en COVID 19.
Spoiler: no sirve!
Está a tiempo de pedir una disculpa por ignorante y prometer informarse de mejor manera. Ya es ignorante, no sea necia.
https://t.co/yKoiTwVqOs
https://t.co/1LM1H4TVU6
@GabyCuevas @HectorRossete @AdrianaDavilaF Le dejo el DOI de dos meta-analysis sobre ivermectina y COVID 19. Spoiler: No sirve para nada.
Está a tiempo de ofrecer una disculpa por ignorante y prometer informarse de mejor manera.
https://t.co/1LM1H4TVU6
https://t.co/yKoiTwVqOs
Still the subject of research, but benefits of Ivermectin for Covid requires more substantial (less contrafictory) evidence.
Therapeutic benefit perhaps more underwhelming after successes of vaccine & hybrid immunity. https://t.co/ldEYbv989y
https://t.co/zy0lsRgPtX
Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype
“La evidencia sugiere que la ivermectina no reduce el riesgo de mortalidad y el riesgo de ventilación mecánica.”
https://t.co/GOe3LkwPHD https://t.co/SjhcIspZ89
Mar 24, 2024 · 4 likes · 1 share · 12,135 followersView post →
AD
Aristoteles Doukas
@Aristo666Doukas · X
@QuoVadis260 @Terrrieri Älä viitsi puhua paskaa, Ivermektiinistä ei ole mitään hyötyä kuten tutkimukset osoittavat.
https://t.co/geQEKEe3S6
@Mchael21592783M @Crypto13333 @PierreKory lol.
Duke: https://t.co/cAifinRhmf
MORU: https://t.co/NqNzU0qZKu
UKansas: https://t.co/HWWPeW1nGG
UM: https://t.co/7QiR056D58
BBC Roundup: https://t.co/E6LTr4lxbW
BMC: https://t.co/0foEeySM1m
Should I keep going? Theres about 35 studies listed across all of these. No benefit.
@robinshawuk @Sassafrass_84 @MdBreathe @BoydenGrayPLLC @drpaulmarik1 @RobertApter1 @EpochTimes They personally did not release the data, but it’s easy enough to find the clinical trials that show it doesn’t work. Here are a few.
https://t.co/wPMGpZxyhO
https://t.co/SklUWeNrza
https://t.co/63GogKExsc
@TheRealPikayla @leigh_knapp @Sassafrass_84 @MdBreathe @BoydenGrayPLLC @drpaulmarik1 @RobertApter1 @EpochTimes Even a box of just five tablets would run at least $10, and that’s a low dosage. So yes, if millions took it they would make hundreds of millions.
Here are a few of the clinical trials
https://t.co/wPMGpZxyhO
https://t.co/SklUWeNrza
https://t.co/63GogKExsc
@smith_john55 @BreezerGalway @cappsie I already read studies, including competent peer-reviewed meta-analyses, instead of the non-peer-reviewed tripe you peddle.
Ivermectin doesn't work.
When are you going to address your failed claims on veterinary formulations?
https://t.co/rJtLHFsVeF
https://t.co/rUvqCGeoVZ https://t.co/ij7VRcrKiA
Mar 22, 2024 · 2 likes · 3,356 followersView post →
ML
Matías Leonel
@MatiasArlia · X
Si tuvieran idea el valor que tienen las revisiones sistemáticas y los meta-análisis en la literatura científica...
@SolNataMD "RCTs evaluating the effects of ivermectin in adult patients with COVID-19 were searched through June 22, 2022, in four databases... The evidence suggests that ivermectin does not reduce mortality risk and the risk of mechanical ventilation requirement."
https://t.co/kc1DYCp8e1
Mar 12, 2024 · 13 likes · 3,356 followersView post →
FE
Frank D’Elia
@FrankDElia7 · X
RT @IntegralAnswers: @thereal_truther Re: Large Meta Analysis of Ivermectin
Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatmen…
Feb 29, 2024 · 1 share · 2,704 followersView post →
I
IntegralAnswers
@IntegralAnswers · X
@thereal_truther Re: Large Meta Analysis of Ivermectin
Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype
https://t.co/1sg7FeJQlP
Feb 29, 2024 · 4 likes · 1 share · 8,592 followersView post →
DW
Devon Wallace
@DevWallace1 · X
@catturd2 A couple of years ago, Ivermectin was dismissed as potential COVID-19 treatment prematurely due to BS politics, however the latest systematic reviews aren't showing much efficacy treating COVID-19. This review includes studies outside of U.S. influence.
https://t.co/4lndPWVEmW
@kay_kingsbury @3rdEyeWiseguy @DanishScience @floridanow1 @VigilantFox "Nonetheless, for the antiviral effect observed in cell culture to be effective in humans, the dose of ivermectin required would be 17 times higher than the maximum safe dosage allowed per day for patients."
https://t.co/L63dLzUhXK
Feb 18, 2024 · 6 shares · 1,148 followersView post →
M
Madeyoulook
@Madeyoul0o0k · X
@Teale1stcast @Freedommonarch @GuntherEagleman Ah the antivax blog of questionable, retracted, and low quality studies, many of which don’t actually support ivm.
Many dubious low quality papers do not equal a good paper with high levels of evidence.
https://t.co/ZvEymLWra2
@coach28373 @VaxxersAnti There was a big run on feed stores for veterinary ivermectin, and poison control centers were busy as a result. https://t.co/QgilEc6FaX
I save my anger (disgust, really) for cranks who profit off fake cures. https://t.co/xDinTSWq6k
Jan 27, 2024 · 6 shares · 12,682 followersView post →
DO
David Oliver
@mancunianmedic · X
@CoralBlob @IAM_Da_Vid @krebiozen @fredwibblington @CatVonDont @TCarraghan @dave_odo @marcpollington @rossmarwood @jneill @silversynergy @BottomleyFiona @BreezerGalway @Adelere @GarySlegg @BaileInis @AdamBlayney @_johnbye @StephenBevan15 @UnjustSociety1 @mcfunny @k_b_lvi @KAS118 @gordonrlove @Takeastepback16 @1ohreally @timbofive @Theonew16516042 @AsItIs13658173 @botvolution @fiski70 @marmite @LucifersTweetz @bbcquestiontime @Covid19Critical @BIRDGroupUK @PierreKory Peer-reviewed systematic review and meta-analysis of 25 peer reviewed RCTs that met inclusion criteria - written by credible experts with transparent methodology and no grifting/self promoting/commercial COI
Zero evidence for Ivermectin Use in Covid-19
https://t.co/8T386mftP8
Jan 27, 2024 · 12 likes · 6 shares · 71,325 followersView post →
DB
Dr Kit Byatt
@Laconic_doc · X
@DannyCrow @egfalken @First10EM Please can you summarise the key point(s) of why the various RCTs of ivermectin (as evaluated by conventional methods used in medicine) are invalid, in his view?
[ref: https://t.co/ivOz8IGcAj] https://t.co/9EbiTtCcUK
@VigilantFox This SRMA doesn't support a claim ivermectin being effective treatment for COVID.
https://t.co/OVxKg0D55o @MedFactChecks
Can you share any evidence on it being one of the best remedies for vaccine injury?
@freedomyaiyai @Deborah29625572 @UNIFYDTV https://t.co/crL6MlGzMn
Here’s a study of multiple studies disproving that Ivermectin treats or cures covid. Not about facts for you but the evidence is there if you want to open your closed mind. Doctors don’t prescribe it because it doesn’t work
@BJ19791 @Incog5678 @OfficialWickedR @JakeTurpinLUFC @Chr1st1anBale Pfizer is one company, I stated most...
And a Meta analysis study of Ivermectin has said it really doesn't...
https://t.co/0nWFVwMyXl
@mentju4 @yoshkapundrick @MarionKoopmans I'm simply refusing to let you move the goalposts.
You don't have a shred of evidence that ivermectin + hydroxychloroquine helped with SARS-CoV-2.
As on pandemic origins, you just say what you want to be true + ignore published evidence.
https://t.co/rUvqCGeoVZ https://t.co/L9Pvtq6W7y
@HuhtasaariSaara @JoonasDachinger Anteeksi, mitä hoitoja tarkoitat??
Ivermectin ja Hydroxychloroquine ei tehoa, alla linkit tutkimuksiin.
Ivermectin ei tehoa Koronaan
Meta tutkimus
https://t.co/rlsi0Aai1r
@JohannaLeino3 @Kristin22325211 @rapelavi @ileTee Varhaisen vaiheen hoitoa ei ole olemassa.
Ivermectin ei tehoa Koronaan.
Meta tutkimus
https://t.co/rlsi0Aai1r
@Nomoretrust8 @lasikeyecenter1 @crabb_vicki None. The wackadoos think that if they say ivermectin cures Covid enough times, they can make it so. Like a Harry Potter spell: “Covidus remedium!” But the quality of ivermectin RCTs is all over the map, & the more carefully you pick the worse the results. https://t.co/NVuIG8K0ai
@TxUnmask @ChuckMastan @Awithonelison @Bankersbonus1 @SwaledaleMutton @TheChiefNerd @TakeWeightOffMD Ignorant loser it’s not experimental it went through stage 1,2,3 trials and is now safely in use 4 a few years while ur drug doesn’t work. Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype: https://t.co/H1JQVEM15O
@vandersmurf @ChristyDanFan Ummm no. See “ Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of Covid-19: evidence beyond the hype.” BMC 2022 google it.
@LetsBeRealNow3 @DorieBooks @AtlRey @ArbiterofCool "Conclusions: The evidence suggests that ivermectin does not reduce mortality risk and the risk of mechanical ventilation requirement.
https://t.co/tNaGkJdL5O
@thecoastguy It’s not experimental loser been in use 4 a few years now safely and it does nothing to genes. As 4 invermectin doesn’t work. Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype: https://t.co/H1JQVEM15O
@catturd2 Yes, it doesn’t work. Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype: https://t.co/H1JQVEM15O
Efficacy of Ivermectin Treatment for Covid-19: https://t.co/dC9hYwYlzr
@IsZomg @DrNeilStone No it’s fake. Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype: https://t.co/H1JQVEM15O
Efficacy of Ivermectin Treatment on Disease Progression Among Adults With Mild to Moderate COVID-19: https://t.co/dC9hYwYlzr
@thecoastguy You need help. Ur cure doesn’t work. Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype: https://t.co/H1JQVEM15O
Efficacy of Ivermectin Treatment on COVID-19 : https://t.co/dC9hYwYlzr
@hubertrope @handmadekathy @annamerlan It doesn’t work how many more lives will u believe? Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype: https://t.co/H1JQVEM15O
Efficacy of Ivermectin Treatment on Covid-19: https://t.co/dC9hYwYlzr
@PierreKory @AlexBerenson U have mental health issues. Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype: https://t.co/H1JQVEM15O
Efficacy of Ivermectin Treatment on Disease Progression in adults with Mild to Moderate COVID-19 : https://t.co/dC9hYwYlzr
@PierreKory No he hasn’t liar. Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype: https://t.co/8DWLxtDwba
Efficacy of Ivermectin Treatment on Disease Progression Among Adults With Mild to Moderate COVID-19 : https://t.co/fHlFr8IdGS
@VigilantFox @RobertKennedyJr Actually no that’s fake just making up things. The evidence suggests that ivermectin does not reduce mortality risk. Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype: https://t.co/fQQhrePVKt
@goddeketal A year or two ago, Ivermectin was dismissed as potential COVID-19 treatment prematurely, however the latest systematic reviews aren't showing much efficacy in treating COVID-19. This review includes studies outside of U.S. political influence.
https://t.co/4lndPWVEmW
@VigilantFox FDA cites results from trials including those w/conflicting reports. positive results from ivermectin in early trials could not be replicated in large controlled trials.
https://t.co/4HB7Rv2PT4
https://t.co/abSaCyETpe
https://t.co/XhApeLNU4F
https://t.co/AssfiNz8qy
@GromCris @MathieuMolimard @SFPT_fr une étude avec 72 patients...
des qu'on regarde les meta analyse incluant plusieurs milliers de patients, bah tout de suite, ça marche plus
https://t.co/ThU99Sezu4
https://t.co/5kW5pbJeQR
そういう数々のスタディをまとめたメタアナリシスでも有効性は否定されているんだよなぁ..........
参考までにどうぞ
Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Jul 23;22(1):639. https://t.co/HPM4eBIOLy
May 25, 2023 · 2 likes · 1,949 followersView post →
WI
weryfikator informacji
@weryfikatorfejk · X
@Szymon49366484 @pamiechomeblog @AnnaSiarkowska @PiotrWitczak_ @AgnieszkaSzust3 @RzeczPacjenta @SolidarnaPolska @marcinwarchol „The evidence suggests that ivermectin does not reduce mortality risk and the risk of mechanical ventilation requirement.” Niestety badania z PubMed, BMJ, The Lancet twierdza inaczej.
https://t.co/8DCKxwgbxg
https://t.co/tccPzK5fdm
https://t.co/VjJRHLhtwQ
@yanmartel89 @Alex_on_A14 @FormerAntivax Why not publish this in a paper?
Because it's nonsense. Ivermectin does not work for Covid.
https://t.co/U87LIxvbB0
May 13, 2023 · 3 likes · 1,134 followersView post →
JB
Joe Black
@JoeBlac36584026 · X
@dianavegan2021 @GabrielBoric The evidence suggests that ivermectin does not reduce mortality risk and the risk of mechanical ventilation requirement. Although we did not observe an increase in the risk of adverse effects, the evidence is very uncertain regarding this endpoint.
https://t.co/RutUUx5ca6
No os engañeis este solo quiere venderos su mierda de ideas. Le jode ser un don nadie y busca ser la estrella entre magufos.
Os tomara el dinero y la salud.
https://t.co/7I806Nr7tc https://t.co/Ovmkb9OdsO https://t.co/xCge8tRE5v
@CancerIntegral No.
La ivermectina no tiene ninguna utilidad en COVID-19. Se ha probado en otras patologías, parasitosis, pero esa experiencia no sustenta su uso en otras.
Lo único considerable es tu desfachatez.
Otra mentira más.
https://t.co/77F8jtpqKo
@sarnold623 @Intrepid87 @BillboardChris That's the thing, for every study showing it worked there were to more finding no association, and there were health concerns with the use of the drug.
https://t.co/o51QbhWYF4
@MarqFrancois @Chamchamat C'est pas comme ça que ça marche, mais allons-y quand même :
https://t.co/mtErM22faC
https://t.co/LyP0bIP6U6
https://t.co/9VoVxYG33n
https://t.co/wUENo7bq6O
https://t.co/sqIkvlSjPi
https://t.co/3MGju1BnD9
C'est une petite sélection.
À toi.
@DontUseAGunsafe @TheSylvreWolfe @JamesSpiro Ivermectin is an antiviral, but that doesn’t mean it is effective against *all* viruses. Ivermectin is approved for human usage; it’s effectiveness against COVID lacks support src: literally works in pharmacy
2nd: https://t.co/hFzjmCqNpN https://t.co/dhCJAlwQWk
@kevinnbass A year or two ago, Ivermectin was dismissed as potential COVID-19 treatment prematurely, however the latest systematic reviews aren't showing much efficacy in treating COVID-19. This review includes studies outside of U.S. political influence.
https://t.co/4lndPWWccu
@wdg0917 @kevinnbass A year or two ago, Ivermectin was dismissed as potential COVID-19 treatment prematurely, however the latest systematic reviews aren't showing much efficacy in treating COVID-19. This review includes studies outside of U.S. political influence.
https://t.co/4lndPWVEmW
@USBornNRaised @kevinnbass @DrJBhattacharya A year or two ago, Ivermectin was dismissed as potential COVID-19 treatment prematurely, however the latest systematic reviews aren't showing much efficacy in treating COVID-19. This review includes studies outside of U.S. political influence.
https://t.co/4lndPWVEmW
@CKellyUAP Craig.. his comments were in 2021 when a full meta analyis on all the research hadnt been done.. i hope you read this peer reviewed meta analysis https://t.co/SCIuzTNp8E "The evidence suggests that ivermectin does not reduce mortality risk and the risk of mechanical ventilation"
Mar 28, 2023 · 5 likes · 1 share · 25 followersView post →
JL
Jordan Leroy
@JordanL63146451 · X
Étrangement lorsque l'on tente d'étayer un propos le caviardage ou la suppression des Tweets est de mise.
https://t.co/Fdsj8nbrQ0
https://t.co/XPNegS5sGW
https://t.co/bnkLBlH4Zz
https://t.co/YDvoVgghbd
https://t.co/FX4waNWsmB
@insins31544458 @Berty76 @TroncheBiais J'ai répondu point par point notamment à cette prétendue inefficacité de l'ivermectine prise à jeun...
https://t.co/Fdsj8nbrQ0
https://t.co/XPNegS5sGW
https://t.co/bnkLBlH4Zz
https://t.co/YDvoVgghbd
https://t.co/FX4waNWsmB
@t_endian @laura69923509 @DrAseemMalhotra Also: not effective https://t.co/tUCvYiAtN9. Not effective: https://t.co/x9qzXWLYCJ. Claimed efficacy in small trials subject to bias and now published with a warning about research misconduct: https://t.co/umWg0ESyes
@CKellyUAP Might be an idea to look at: BMC Infectious Diseases. Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype.
@atrupar A year or two ago, Ivermectin was dismissed as potential COVID-19 treatment prematurely, however the latest systematic reviews aren't showing much efficacy in treating COVID-19. This review includes studies outside of U.S. political influence.
https://t.co/4lndPWVEmW
@HeyNurseKat @BobbyDickDuck1 @turquoiselau @DrSusanOliver1 I mean, I'll trust a reputable meta-analysis over a propaganda website with a gish gallop list of studies of unknown quality or veracity. But apparently BobbyDickDuck would rather have the propaganda list
Mar 15, 2023 · 2 likes · 3,004 followersView post →
IM
Ishmael Mcgoo
@IshmaelMcgoo · X
@JPhloog @maxfawcett But not for COVID https://t.co/LtYxDR8Ghk There was some low-quality research at the beginning that anybody who understood evidence quality could see right through, and then better studies contradicted them. It was definitely reckless for people to think that it was a solution
@FightnIrishMike @maxfawcett There were some low-quality studies that suggested a possible benefit but they were contradicted by better studies later on https://t.co/LtYxDR8Ghk the evidence doesn't support it and anybody who understood evidence quality knew the hype was based on junk studies.
@D04467246 @maxfawcett There have been some very low-quality studies that made some stupid people think that it was a solution but better quality studies contradicted that. https://t.co/LtYxDR8Ghk Anybody who understands evidence quality knew the hype was silly. So same to you.
@FranceskaAbram1 @RayMorris00 @Timcast Then I realized that the name "cv19ivm" itself sounded shady. So I looked it up and sure enough it's bogus. Full of either fraudulent or non-existent studies that was pretending to be a meta analysis. https://t.co/O9yeSQH046 a real one, food for thought
@TiamatRoar @FoxNews A year or two ago, Ivermectin was dismissed as potential COVID-19 treatment prematurely, however the latest systematic reviews aren't showing much efficacy in treating COVID-19. This review includes studies outside of U.S. political influence.
https://t.co/4lndPWVEmW
@MRJenny8675309 @FreeBlackMan @bablesmith @krassenstein Reputable journals have evaluated the evidence for ivermectin and found it very weak in properly controlled trials. This data, and the possible side-effects, is why its use is only recommended for conditions such as nematode worms.
https://t.co/XPWz0JErc6
@glfjunkie23 @BY1959 @FoxNews I sense this is the first of an overwhelming torrent of disingenuousness to come from you. Studies have been done. Ivermectin just isn't effective (https://t.co/zhNHoddJ47)
@YoureInACult222 @NBCNews Do you know what else is “banned” from being prescribed to treat Covid? Rolaids, Preparation H, and shampoo. Do you know WHY? Want to read a study? Here’s one from the same site you linked - https://t.co/nfzofkKJWO
@PearceEwan @Eddthewordsmith @Mathiso44580013 @JackPosobiec But is the main use against covid? https://t.co/N7BVdme25u Ivermectin is used for other human diseases but Rogan's claims were around covid?
I'll stick with PubMed, thank you very much.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype https://t.co/M7DABw0RpZ https://t.co/u0rmez8sY0 https://t.co/Eqcq4fd65F
@realstewpeters Here is a meta analysis. Not some disgusting meta analysis run by idiots which includes treatments with 10 different drugs concurrent with Ivermectin.
It does not work. Brand is an addled heroin addict and you "Sue" Peters is a "Suedo" Christian
https://t.co/HGSquqQneW
@ElipieMegan @maggiemrs1 @radarthreat @chrismartenson @ScottAdamsSays They're cherry picking data from poor methodological studies, many of which have been since retracted. The meta analyses of blinded, placebo controlled studies consistently show no efficacy in reducing symptoms. https://t.co/yLg0jlkESG
@LittleScreen0 @elonmusk @TheChiefNerd @rustyrockets @billmaher @joerogan Just because it’s impossible to run it again to see the counter factual doesn’t make that untrue! Saying ivermectin is super useful in fighting COVID is simply untrue! https://t.co/9HSOXUYIva
Mar 4, 2023 · 1 like · 38,491 followersView post →
PJ
Peter F. Jackson
@pjackson_nl · X
@ripcityrealist @marksea25 @bennyjohnson Um, meta study here. ⤵️ https://t.co/Wg83QZrG1w https://t.co/hhfGrAmeSe
Mar 4, 2023 · 3 likes · 4,878 followersView post →
CE
Colin Evans
@ColinWEvans · X
@AlarmedSalad @ItsMeKey407 @DavidBakhtiari There really aren’t. There’s an overwhelming majority of evidence that shows there is zero difference between Ivermectin and a Placebo.
https://t.co/Pj7OQXtQXq
@drsimonegold @CodRW2 Ivermectin did not show an effect in reducing mortality (RR = 0.76; 95%CI: 0.52-1.11) or mechanical ventilation (RR = 0.74; 95%CI: 0.48-1.16). https://t.co/j8rNOt2GVA
@weleesewodewick @realMunk_Fu @Castdeath97 @egyptiankinghk @sid8998 https://t.co/g1uavGSVxO
"Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: Evidence beyond the hype"
https://t.co/rUvqCGeoVZ https://t.co/awHnvv8MqC
@f_philippot N'ayant pas accès à la source de l'article c'est compliqué de juger du protocole.
D'un autre côté sur la réduction des descès il ne semble pas y avoir de résultats concluants.
https://t.co/GDfgBdqFTp
@lindytrader @JamesSurowiecki Great. Here's a more recent systematic review with more than double the studies that also removes retracted studies:
https://t.co/vRn29gzVih
We've detected a paper from BMC Infectious Diseases that cites a retracted paper post-retraction.
Citing paper: https://t.co/GQFVMzYdzg
Retracted paper: https://t.co/CtN6rTgwno
@KarinaCardosoM4, docente do @ppgdem, é uma das autoras do artigo "Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype", publicado no periódico BMC Infectious Diseases.
Aug 3, 2022 · 6 likes · 1 share · 584 followersView post →
DM
Dave Muir
@dgmuir · X
@Ghost_ProtocolV @cathynhouston @FoInsight @DashDobrofsky @RepMTG Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype
M Marcolino, et al 2022 BMC Infect Dis 22(1):639
(“The evidence suggests that ivermectin does not reduce mortality risk and the risk of mechanical ventilation requirement”)
PubMed: Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19: evidence beyond the hype: CONCLUSIONS: The evidence suggests that ivermectin does not reduce mortality risk and the risk of mechanical… https://t.co/1R4nCgcc34 #covid19 #SARSCOV2 #coronavirus
Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of [ https://t.co/8mMYU2faKi ] The urgent demand for treatment options for #Covid19 has created the need for randomized clinical trials.Scientists tested several approved drugs https://t.co/sOnOPUiInQ
Systematic review and meta-analysis of ivermectin for treatment of [ https://t.co/8mMYU2faKi ] Full-text articles for the remaining 33 records were retrieved, of which two were excluded for testing the drug for #Covid19 prophylaxis [ 42, https://t.co/sOnOPUiInQ
#preprint : Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ivermectin for Treatment of #COVID19 - Evidence Beyond the Hype
No reduction in mortality risk and MV requirement
@SSRN https://t.co/iJXsjregYm
Feb 4, 2022 · 2 likes · 2 shares · 370 followersView post →
TR
Tom Ribeiro
@tomribeiroecg · X
RT @milenamarc: Our new #preprint : Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ivermectin for Treatment of #COVID19 - Evidence Beyond the Hype…
Our new #preprint : Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ivermectin for Treatment of #COVID19 - Evidence Beyond the Hype
No reduction in mortality risk and MV requirement
@SSRN https://t.co/0aRxQShOuq
Thanks @fapemig @iatsaude @CNPq_Oficial @medicinaufmg
Jan 26, 2022 · 6 likes · 1 share · 139 followersView post →
F
Klinik Zara Raub
Facebook
doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07589-8. PMID: 35870876; PMCID: PMC9308124. 7. Deng J, Zhou F, Ali S, et al. Efficacy and safety of ivermectin for the treatment of ...
com/article/10.1186/s12879-022-07589-8 https://www.merck.com/news/merck-statement-on- ivermectin-use-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/ · Возможно, это изображение ...
Hoaxy - V súvislosti s postrelením premiéra Roberta Fica varujeme ...
Facebook
com/article/10.1186/s12879-022-07589-8 https://www.merck.com/news/merck-statement-on- ivermectin-use-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/ · May be an image of text.
AS
DO
FR
DM
?
I
MF
JB
PH
C
D
DV
BK
S
RM
MM
B
FP
K
S
CP
J
B
JE
DW
TN
D
JS
I
KD
SA
L
JK
JB
AD
JR
EH
AH
HS
RH
N
M
ED
JD
AH
ТR
NM
J
M
AD
TK
TP
H
S
LA
MR
J
D
ML
D
DN
FE
LF
GS
ED
SA
GZ
IT
AW
JN
DB
CB
KM
BY
A
SG
EJ
QW
J
AD
SH
TS
CM
WM
M
JW
RD
DL
S
TB
R
HH
JM
TC
VL
サお
WI
T
JB
JS
MT
EA
GP
JI
VM
M
TB
IB
O
?
A
GL
B
JL
M
LO
IM
GS
JY
T
NC
PH
B
DD
JW
WS
DC
OT
CE
TP
LC
I
DB
TC
PJ
VC
KF
LM
EI
BH
OM
N
TI
SC
E
MM
TR
S
RO
DU
DM
CE
C
AG
RP
S
T