PubHawk
Endoscopy March 2023 PMID 35915956

Wet-suction versus slow-pull technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy: a multicenter, randomized, crossover trial.

Stefano Francesco Crinò, Maria Cristina Conti Bellocchi, Roberto Di Mitri, Frediano Inzani, Mihai Rimbaș, Andrea Lisotti, Guido Manfredi, Anthony Y B Teoh, Benedetto Mangiavillano, Oriol Sendino, Laura Bernardoni, Erminia Manfrin, Daniela Scimeca, Elettra Unti, Angela Carlino

Download social card

Mentions

43
Peak: 35 in Mar 2023
across 3 sources since Aug 2022

Extended reach

136,022
potential audience

Total likes

112

Video views

222

Mentions per month

Aug 2022 – Mar 2023

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter40 posts
  • Facebook2 posts
  • YouTube1 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The discussions exemplify active engagement with the research, including references to the multicenter trial, the comparison of techniques, and mentions of potential clinical implications. Words like 'better,' 'check out,' and phrases emphasizing the study's importance contribute to an overall perception of it being a meaningful contribution to endoscopic procedural knowledge.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most of the posts seem to acknowledge or support the importance of the publication, often referencing its findings or multitopic discussions, indicating a general positive or neutral stance on the study's relevance.

InterestHigh interest

The posts use phrases like 'check out the results' and 'find out more here,' showing active curiosity and engagement with the topic. The mention of specific techniques and methods suggests genuine interest in the research details.

EngagementHigh engagement

Several discussions reference specific techniques ('wet-suction vs slow-pull') and their potential implications, demonstrating a deeper engagement with the methodology and results rather than superficial sharing.

ImpactModerate impact

While some posts highlight the significance of the research through phrases like 'latest multicenter RCT' and emphasizing its clinical relevance, overall perceived impact seems moderate, with some posts encouraging access and integration into practice.

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Mandeep Sawhney
@MSawhneyMD · X

Wet-suction v/s Slow pull for EUS FNB

Mar 4, 2023 · 37 likes · 11 shares · 1,953 followers View post →
Antonio Facciorusso
@AntonioFaccior6 · X

Is wet-suction better than slow-pull technique for EUS-FNB? Check out the results of our latest multicenter RCT just published in Endoscopy! @CrinoStefano https://t.co/DzD8JSykqu

Aug 6, 2022 · 27 likes · 4 shares · 753 followers View post →
Endoscopy Journal
@endoscopyjrnl · X

From this month’s issue: Wet-suction versus slow-pull technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy: a multicenter, randomized, crossover trial by Stefano Francesco Crinò et al. Find out more here: https://t.co/19WaZRcFHI https://t.co/LqKMRjVv0B

Mar 1, 2023 · 19 likes · 4 shares · 11,561 followers View post →
SEED
@SEEDendoscopia · X

Punción histológica por #ecoendoscopia. Resultados multicéntricos de dos técnicas comunes ¿una mejor que otra? Colaboran las doctoras Àngels Ginès y Gloria Fernández-Esparrrach del @hospitalclinic @SEEDendoscopia @endoscopyjrnl

Mar 27, 2023 · 15 likes · 7 shares · 7,963 followers View post →
EUS & ERCP Master
@GIscope_updates · X

Mar 17, 2023 · 6 likes · 2 shares · 5,640 followers View post →
Endoscopy Journal
@endoscopyjrnl · X

#AuthorCommentary Stefano Francesco Crinò on "Wet-suction versus slow-pull technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy: a multicenter..." By Stefano F. Crinò et al. Read more here: https://t.co/19WaZRc7Sa Watch on Youtube: https://t.co/zYJSxLbz3o

Mar 20, 2023 · 3 likes · 11,535 followers View post →

All mentions

Ramiro Carreño Macián #NiHeroesNiMartires
@med020064 · X

RT @SEEDendoscopia: Punción histológica por #ecoendoscopia. Resultados multicéntricos de dos técnicas comunes ¿una mejor que otra? Colabora…

Mar 28, 2023 · 7 shares · 566 followers View post →
Adriana
@Adriana54078164 · X

RT @SEEDendoscopia: Punción histológica por #ecoendoscopia. Resultados multicéntricos de dos técnicas comunes ¿una mejor que otra? Colabora…

Mar 27, 2023 · 7 shares · 69 followers View post →
Fco. Javier Alvarez Higueras
@AlvarezHigueras · X

RT @SEEDendoscopia: Punción histológica por #ecoendoscopia. Resultados multicéntricos de dos técnicas comunes ¿una mejor que otra? Colabora…

Mar 27, 2023 · 7 shares · 365 followers View post →
Adriana B
@Adribottero · X

RT @SEEDendoscopia: Punción histológica por #ecoendoscopia. Resultados multicéntricos de dos técnicas comunes ¿una mejor que otra? Colabora…

Mar 27, 2023 · 7 shares · 727 followers View post →
Cecilia
@Imnotaragdoll · X

RT @SEEDendoscopia: Punción histológica por #ecoendoscopia. Resultados multicéntricos de dos técnicas comunes ¿una mejor que otra? Colabora…

Mar 27, 2023 · 7 shares · 118 followers View post →
Stephanie Tasayco
@tasaycohu · X

RT @SEEDendoscopia: Punción histológica por #ecoendoscopia. Resultados multicéntricos de dos técnicas comunes ¿una mejor que otra? Colabora…

Mar 27, 2023 · 7 shares · 156 followers View post →
Sergio Daniel Chumacero Sánchez
@sergiochuma · X

RT @SEEDendoscopia: Punción histológica por #ecoendoscopia. Resultados multicéntricos de dos técnicas comunes ¿una mejor que otra? Colabora…

Mar 27, 2023 · 7 shares · 182 followers View post →
SEED
@SEEDendoscopia · X

Punción histológica por #ecoendoscopia. Resultados multicéntricos de dos técnicas comunes ¿una mejor que otra? Colaboran las doctoras Àngels Ginès y Gloria Fernández-Esparrrach del @hospitalclinic @SEEDendoscopia @endoscopyjrnl

Mar 27, 2023 · 15 likes · 7 shares · 7,963 followers View post →
LibKey
@libkey_io · X

@endoscopyjrnl Access the paywalled article from your library: https://t.co/EPgWbXbRJ0 Promote scholarly access to content by simply adding https://t.co/SXSePSX5De to the DOI URL

Mar 20, 2023 · 555 followers View post →
Endoscopy Journal
@endoscopyjrnl · X

#AuthorCommentary Stefano Francesco Crinò on "Wet-suction versus slow-pull technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy: a multicenter..." By Stefano F. Crinò et al. Read more here: https://t.co/19WaZRc7Sa Watch on Youtube: https://t.co/zYJSxLbz3o

Mar 20, 2023 · 3 likes · 11,535 followers View post →
OMEGA CLINIC
@vivekgtank · X

RT @GIscope_updates:

Mar 19, 2023 · 2 shares · 314 followers View post →
Henson Ryan Lim
@dockentot · X

RT @GIscope_updates:

Mar 18, 2023 · 2 shares · 25 followers View post →
EUS & ERCP Master
@GIscope_updates · X

Mar 17, 2023 · 6 likes · 2 shares · 5,640 followers View post →
SAMI ALMOMEN
@SALMOMEN · X

RT @endoscopyjrnl: #Podcast Wet-suction versus slow-pull technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy..." by Stefano Fran…

Mar 16, 2023 · 1 share · 617 followers View post →
LibKey
@libkey_io · X

@endoscopyjrnl Access the paywalled article from your library: https://t.co/EPgWbXbRJ0 Promote scholarly access to content by simply adding https://t.co/SXSePSX5De to the DOI URL

Mar 16, 2023 · 555 followers View post →
Endoscopy Journal
@endoscopyjrnl · X

#Podcast Wet-suction versus slow-pull technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy..." by Stefano Francesco Crinò et al. Find out more here: https://t.co/19WaZRcFHI Listen to the Podcast on YouTube: https://t.co/cZfupOfCwV

Mar 16, 2023 · 1 like · 1 share · 11,561 followers View post →
Amitava Dutta
@amitava_gastro · X

RT @MSawhneyMD: Wet-suction v/s Slow pull for EUS FNB

Mar 5, 2023 · 11 shares · 294 followers View post →
Vaibhav Wadhwa
@vaibhav_manu · X

RT @MSawhneyMD: Wet-suction v/s Slow pull for EUS FNB

Mar 5, 2023 · 11 shares · 3,182 followers View post →
Nadeem Tehami
@helpatologist · X

RT @MSawhneyMD: Wet-suction v/s Slow pull for EUS FNB

Mar 5, 2023 · 11 shares · 7,476 followers View post →
Ramiro Carreño Macián #NiHeroesNiMartires
@med020064 · X

RT @MSawhneyMD: Wet-suction v/s Slow pull for EUS FNB

Mar 4, 2023 · 11 shares · 566 followers View post →
pablofdiez
@pablofdiez1 · X

RT @MSawhneyMD: Wet-suction v/s Slow pull for EUS FNB

Mar 4, 2023 · 11 shares · 319 followers View post →
Enrique de-Madaria
@DeMadaria · X

RT @MSawhneyMD: Wet-suction v/s Slow pull for EUS FNB

Mar 4, 2023 · 11 shares · 20,653 followers View post →
Padiwind
@PadiWind · X

RT @MSawhneyMD: Wet-suction v/s Slow pull for EUS FNB

Mar 4, 2023 · 11 shares · 428 followers View post →
Erik Holzwanger, MD, ABOM-D
@HilarHolzy · X

RT @MSawhneyMD: Wet-suction v/s Slow pull for EUS FNB

Mar 4, 2023 · 11 shares · 3,492 followers View post →
Neal Mehta
@NealMehtaMD · X

RT @MSawhneyMD: Wet-suction v/s Slow pull for EUS FNB

Mar 4, 2023 · 11 shares · 1,582 followers View post →
OMEGA CLINIC
@vivekgtank · X

RT @MSawhneyMD: Wet-suction v/s Slow pull for EUS FNB

Mar 4, 2023 · 11 shares · 314 followers View post →
Mohammad Bilal, MD
@BilalMohammadMD · X

RT @MSawhneyMD: Wet-suction v/s Slow pull for EUS FNB

Mar 4, 2023 · 11 shares · 16,635 followers View post →
Mandeep Sawhney
@MSawhneyMD · X

Wet-suction v/s Slow pull for EUS FNB

Mar 4, 2023 · 37 likes · 11 shares · 1,953 followers View post →
Anuraag Jena
@DrAnuraagJ · X

RT @AntonioFaccior6: @Endo_OC @AnandSahaiEUS @endoscopyjrnl You are right....anyways, the bloodiness of the sample is unlikely to impair th…

Mar 3, 2023 · 1 share · 4,467 followers View post →
Antonio Facciorusso
@AntonioFaccior6 · X

@Endo_OC @AnandSahaiEUS @endoscopyjrnl You are right....anyways, the bloodiness of the sample is unlikely to impair the adequacy and accuracy of the FNB sample! https://t.co/DzD8JSykqu

Mar 3, 2023 · 3 likes · 1 share · 753 followers View post →
Shubhra Mishra
@ShubhraMishra91 · X

RT @endoscopyjrnl: From this month’s issue: Wet-suction versus slow-pull technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy: a…

Mar 1, 2023 · 4 shares · 1,689 followers View post →
Antonio Facciorusso
@AntonioFaccior6 · X

RT @endoscopyjrnl: From this month’s issue: Wet-suction versus slow-pull technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy: a…

Mar 1, 2023 · 4 shares · 753 followers View post →
Vasile Daniel Balaban
@_vbalaban · X

RT @endoscopyjrnl: From this month’s issue: Wet-suction versus slow-pull technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy: a…

Mar 1, 2023 · 4 shares · 821 followers View post →
LibKey
@libkey_io · X

@endoscopyjrnl Paywalls are frustrating! Access the article from your library: https://t.co/EPgWbXbRJ0 Promote scholarly access when tweeting articles by simply adding https://t.co/SXSePSX5De to the DOI URL

Mar 1, 2023 · 555 followers View post →
Endoscopy Journal
@endoscopyjrnl · X

From this month’s issue: Wet-suction versus slow-pull technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy: a multicenter, randomized, crossover trial by Stefano Francesco Crinò et al. Find out more here: https://t.co/19WaZRcFHI https://t.co/LqKMRjVv0B

Mar 1, 2023 · 19 likes · 4 shares · 11,561 followers View post →
Vasile Daniel Balaban
@_vbalaban · X

RT @AntonioFaccior6: Is wet-suction better than slow-pull technique for EUS-FNB? Check out the results of our latest multicenter RCT just p…

Aug 7, 2022 · 4 shares · 821 followers View post →
Dr Celestino Gutiérrez González MD
@CelestinoGutirr · X

RT @AntonioFaccior6: Is wet-suction better than slow-pull technique for EUS-FNB? Check out the results of our latest multicenter RCT just p…

Aug 6, 2022 · 4 shares · 11,327 followers View post →
Babu P. Mohan
@BabuPMohan2 · X

RT @AntonioFaccior6: Is wet-suction better than slow-pull technique for EUS-FNB? Check out the results of our latest multicenter RCT just p…

Aug 6, 2022 · 4 shares · 3,045 followers View post →
Stefano Francesco Crinó
@CrinoStefano · X

RT @AntonioFaccior6: Is wet-suction better than slow-pull technique for EUS-FNB? Check out the results of our latest multicenter RCT just p…

Aug 6, 2022 · 4 shares · 945 followers View post →
Antonio Facciorusso
@AntonioFaccior6 · X

Is wet-suction better than slow-pull technique for EUS-FNB? Check out the results of our latest multicenter RCT just published in Endoscopy! @CrinoStefano https://t.co/DzD8JSykqu

Aug 6, 2022 · 27 likes · 4 shares · 753 followers View post →