Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Overall, the discussions demonstrate strong endorsement of the article's findings, with several posts highlighting that switching or dual use significantly reduces potential health risks, using vocabulary like 'scientific consensus' and 'significantly' to emphasize credibility and importance.
Most discussions support the idea that switching to vaping or dual use reduces biomarkers of potential harm, aligning with the article's conclusions.
There is high interest, as many posts cite scientific reviews and emphasize the relevance of the findings for public health.
Posts show deep engagement by referencing specific studies, systematic reviews, and experts, indicating active analysis and discussion.
The discussions reflect a consensus that the research has significant implications for health policies and public perception regarding vaping.
People think vaping nicotine is less harmful than smoking @JoshLTrigg? Might be because: “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicotine electronic cigarettes (ECs), although not risk-free, are considerably lower risk than combustible tobacco” https://t.co/ZCH0fkK0BT https://t.co/WJIlQOeItT https://t.co/3wNTujCS9G
Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinence: secondary analysis of Cochrane systematic review of trials of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation https://t.co/SRYhYoseVj
@NatashaFylesMLA “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicotine electronic cigarettes (ECs), although not risk-free, are considerably lower risk than combustible tobacco” https://t.co/ZCH0fkK0BT
@bengreenfield "However, the studies analysed in this review showed no evidence that biomarkers of potential harm increased in people who continued to smoke combustible tobacco while also using EC [electronic cigarettes]." https://t.co/0N1LX60BTx
@IOL The more recent (2023) secondary analysis of the Cochrane systematic review, consisting of 1299 participants (https://t.co/EGasOlCcOM) would be more beneficial. "Switching from smoking to vaping or dual use appears to reduce levels of biomarkers of potential harm significantly."
@Isabella199003 Odd thing to claim when the actual experts say: “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicotine electronic cigarettes (ECs), although not risk-free, are considerably lower risk than combustible tobacco” https://t.co/ZCH0fkK0BT
One of the most pervasive fear-provoking narratives on vaping is that we dont know the long-term effects. We do however know the long-term effects of smoking. Studies have shown short-term general health improvements in…
Studies show swapping cigarettes for e-cigarettes lowers harmful biomarkers, indicating potential health benefits. This analysis compares biomarkers among smokers, vapers, dual users, and abstainers, highlighting…
@intuitivealy @cremieuxrecueil Strange thing to say considering: “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicotine electronic cigarettes (ECs), although not risk‐free, are considerably lower risk than combustible tobacco” https://t.co/mWSTCQiogj
RT @jkelovuori: @bengreenfield "However, the studies analysed in this review showed no evidence that biomarkers of potential harm increased…
RT @jkelovuori: @bengreenfield "However, the studies analysed in this review showed no evidence that biomarkers of potential harm increased…
RT @jkelovuori: @bengreenfield "However, the studies analysed in this review showed no evidence that biomarkers of potential harm increased…
RT @jkelovuori: @bengreenfield "However, the studies analysed in this review showed no evidence that biomarkers of potential harm increased…
RT @jkelovuori: @bengreenfield "However, the studies analysed in this review showed no evidence that biomarkers of potential harm increased…
RT @jkelovuori: @bengreenfield "However, the studies analysed in this review showed no evidence that biomarkers of potential harm increased…
@bengreenfield "However, the studies analysed in this review showed no evidence that biomarkers of potential harm increased in people who continued to smoke combustible tobacco while also using EC [electronic cigarettes]." https://t.co/0N1LX60BTx
RT @EvertRauwendaal: @JeromeAdamsMD @jeremyfaust @CaulfieldTim @McGillOSS @laurenjyoung617 @meganranney @AliRaja_MD @choo_ek @amyfaithho @j…
RT @EvertRauwendaal: @JeromeAdamsMD @jeremyfaust @CaulfieldTim @McGillOSS @laurenjyoung617 @meganranney @AliRaja_MD @choo_ek @amyfaithho @j…
RT @EvertRauwendaal: @JeromeAdamsMD @jeremyfaust @CaulfieldTim @McGillOSS @laurenjyoung617 @meganranney @AliRaja_MD @choo_ek @amyfaithho @j…
@JeromeAdamsMD @jeremyfaust @CaulfieldTim @McGillOSS @laurenjyoung617 @meganranney @AliRaja_MD @choo_ek @amyfaithho @jamesheathers 1) Youth who initiate with vaping are less likely to become daily smokers & dual users are more likely to quit smoking: https://t.co/5uzpVwMb00 2) “Switching from smoking to vaping or dual use appears to reduce biomarkers of potential harm significantly” https://t.co/mWSTCQiogj https://t.co/BHL4WRm2ju
@Mononokeynes @ChaunceyGardner @maiamindel About 27,000 results and 40 or more papers a week. Vaping must be one of the most studied consumer products that exist. There are huge systematic reviews available from @cochranecollab. Everything says safer, and with much lower serious health risks. https://t.co/NkppoBreG2 https://t.co/0pL04Wt1J4
Olhe esse de 2022 Os riscos são sempre menores. DOI: 10.1111/add.16063 O argumento da proteção de crianças e adolescentes tb não se justifica baseado em evidências. Corrupção e crime são riscos muito maiores. É um absurdo proibir radicalmente com esses argumentos
@abrahamendieta Respecto al uso dual, este estudio sobre biomarcadores de exposición refuta lo que Usted afirma. https://t.co/zuoI6OcFFU
RT @Kurt_Yeo: Then, there is the secondary analysis of the Cochrane systematic review of trials of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation. The…
Then, there is the secondary analysis of the Cochrane systematic review of trials of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation. The Cochrane systematic review is widely considered the gold standard in medical research. Industry claim? .../4 https://t.co/imQIDZ7evj https://t.co/yqzBimw6uH
RT @Kurt_Yeo: @IOL The more recent (2023) secondary analysis of the Cochrane systematic review, consisting of 1299 participants (https://t.…
RT @Kurt_Yeo: @IOL The more recent (2023) secondary analysis of the Cochrane systematic review, consisting of 1299 participants (https://t.…
RT @Kurt_Yeo: @IOL The more recent (2023) secondary analysis of the Cochrane systematic review, consisting of 1299 participants (https://t.…
RT @Kurt_Yeo: @IOL The more recent (2023) secondary analysis of the Cochrane systematic review, consisting of 1299 participants (https://t.…
RT @Kurt_Yeo: @IOL The more recent (2023) secondary analysis of the Cochrane systematic review, consisting of 1299 participants (https://t.…
RT @Kurt_Yeo: @IOL The more recent (2023) secondary analysis of the Cochrane systematic review, consisting of 1299 participants (https://t.…
RT @Kurt_Yeo: @IOL The more recent (2023) secondary analysis of the Cochrane systematic review, consisting of 1299 participants (https://t.…
RT @Kurt_Yeo: @IOL The more recent (2023) secondary analysis of the Cochrane systematic review, consisting of 1299 participants (https://t.…
RT @Kurt_Yeo: @IOL The more recent (2023) secondary analysis of the Cochrane systematic review, consisting of 1299 participants (https://t.…
@IOL The more recent (2023) secondary analysis of the Cochrane systematic review, consisting of 1299 participants (https://t.co/EGasOlCcOM) would be more beneficial. "Switching from smoking to vaping or dual use appears to reduce levels of biomarkers of potential harm significantly."
RT @JuanFacundoTeme: @COESPRISSON Si hablamos de cáncer... Hablamos de biomarcadores: https://t.co/3gdQb8qq8L Podrían darme alguna opini…
RT @JuanFacundoTeme: @COESPRISSON Si hablamos de cáncer... Hablamos de biomarcadores: https://t.co/3gdQb8qq8L Podrían darme alguna opini…
RT @JuanFacundoTeme: @COESPRISSON Si hablamos de cáncer... Hablamos de biomarcadores: https://t.co/3gdQb8qq8L Podrían darme alguna opini…
@COESPRISSON Si hablamos de cáncer... Hablamos de biomarcadores: https://t.co/3gdQb8qq8L Podrían darme alguna opinión sobre este paper?
@ProfGlantz And about "dual use": https://t.co/0N1LX6043Z https://t.co/mujxbqQ7oo ”Of note, all the dual users consistently reduced their daily smoking by at least 80% of their baseline consumption throughout the whole duration of the study” https://t.co/VRie3WGSKG
RT @EvertRauwendaal: @rileyrobyn08 @ToddHarperAUS @quitvic @VicHealth @CancerVic @MaryAnneThomas @SandroDemaio @theheraldsun Why are you ig…
RT @EvertRauwendaal: @rileyrobyn08 @ToddHarperAUS @quitvic @VicHealth @CancerVic @MaryAnneThomas @SandroDemaio @theheraldsun Why are you ig…
RT @EvertRauwendaal: @rileyrobyn08 @ToddHarperAUS @quitvic @VicHealth @CancerVic @MaryAnneThomas @SandroDemaio @theheraldsun Why are you ig…
RT @EvertRauwendaal: “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicotine electronic cigarettes (ECs), although not risk-free, are cons…
RT @EvertRauwendaal: “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicotine electronic cigarettes (ECs), although not risk-free, are cons…
@Bhekisisa_MG This secondary analysis of Cochrane systematic review of trials of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation highlights the difference between smoking and vaping by comparing biomarkers of potential harm. Potential harm reduced significantly. https://t.co/EGasOlBEZe
RT @EvertRauwendaal: People think vaping nicotine is less harmful than smoking @JoshLTrigg? Might be because: “Scientific consensus overwh…
RT @EvertRauwendaal: People think vaping nicotine is less harmful than smoking @JoshLTrigg? Might be because: “Scientific consensus overwh…
RT @EvertRauwendaal: People think vaping nicotine is less harmful than smoking @JoshLTrigg? Might be because: “Scientific consensus overwh…
RT @EvertRauwendaal: People think vaping nicotine is less harmful than smoking @JoshLTrigg? Might be because: “Scientific consensus overwh…
RT @EvertRauwendaal: People think vaping nicotine is less harmful than smoking @JoshLTrigg? Might be because: “Scientific consensus overwh…
RT @EvertRauwendaal: People think vaping nicotine is less harmful than smoking @JoshLTrigg? Might be because: “Scientific consensus overwh…
RT @EvertRauwendaal: People think vaping nicotine is less harmful than smoking @JoshLTrigg? Might be because: “Scientific consensus overwh…
RT @EvertRauwendaal: People think vaping nicotine is less harmful than smoking @JoshLTrigg? Might be because: “Scientific consensus overwh…
RT @EvertRauwendaal: People think vaping nicotine is less harmful than smoking @JoshLTrigg? Might be because: “Scientific consensus overwh…
RT @EvertRauwendaal: People think vaping nicotine is less harmful than smoking @JoshLTrigg? Might be because: “Scientific consensus overwh…
RT @EvertRauwendaal: People think vaping nicotine is less harmful than smoking @JoshLTrigg? Might be because: “Scientific consensus overwh…
RT @EvertRauwendaal: People think vaping nicotine is less harmful than smoking @JoshLTrigg? Might be because: “Scientific consensus overwh…
People think vaping nicotine is less harmful than smoking @JoshLTrigg? Might be because: “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicotine electronic cigarettes (ECs), although not risk-free, are considerably lower risk than combustible tobacco” https://t.co/ZCH0fkK0BT https://t.co/WJIlQOeItT https://t.co/3wNTujCS9G
@invenuslunchbox This is the definition of anecdotal evidence, I can't believe you're telling people to switch to smoking. Wow. There are so many studies about carcinogenic effects of vaping, would you really rather take your chances with smoking? One such study here: https://t.co/cGRnF1N0uI https://t.co/HaEh9PLVrs
RT @EvertRauwendaal: “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicotine electronic cigarettes (ECs), although not risk-free, are cons…
@Westerlywillow @VaperNt @ChrisMinnsMP “Somewhat better”
RT @AsovapeAR: @ContraCancerEs @jose_minones Cambiar de fumar a vapeo parece reducir significativamente los niveles de biomarcadores de dañ…
RT @AsovapeAR: @ContraCancerEs @jose_minones Cambiar de fumar a vapeo parece reducir significativamente los niveles de biomarcadores de dañ…
@ContraCancerEs @NunezFeijoo Cambiar de fumar a vapeo parece reducir significativamente los niveles de biomarcadores de daño potencial: https://t.co/Q6q38EZfiF
@ContraCancerEs @sanchezcastejon Cambiar de fumar a vapeo parece reducir significativamente los niveles de biomarcadores de daño potencial: https://t.co/Q6q38EZfiF
@ContraCancerEs @Yolanda_Diaz_ Cambiar de fumar a vapeo parece reducir significativamente los niveles de biomarcadores de daño potencial: https://t.co/Q6q38EZN8d
@ContraCancerEs @Santi_ABASCAL Cambiar de fumar a vapeo parece reducir significativamente los niveles de biomarcadores de daño potencial: https://t.co/Q6q38EZfiF
@ContraCancerEs @carmenfunezdg Cambiar de fumar a vapeo parece reducir significativamente los niveles de biomarcadores de daño potencial: https://t.co/Q6q38EZfiF
@ContraCancerEs @Evelascomorillo Cambiar de fumar a vapeo parece reducir significativamente los niveles de biomarcadores de daño potencial: https://t.co/Q6q38EZfiF
@ContraCancerEs @anaprietonieto Cambiar de fumar a vapeo parece reducir significativamente los niveles de biomarcadores de daño potencial: https://t.co/Q6q38EZfiF
@ContraCancerEs @jlsteeg Cambiar de fumar a vapeo parece reducir significativamente los niveles de biomarcadores de daño potencial: https://t.co/Q6q38EZfiF
@ContraCancerEs @rcofinof Cambiar de fumar a vapeo parece reducir significativamente los niveles de biomarcadores de daño potencial: https://t.co/Q6q38EZfiF
@ContraCancerEs @jose_minones Cambiar de fumar a vapeo parece reducir significativamente los niveles de biomarcadores de daño potencial: https://t.co/Q6q38EZfiF
@jamecancerdoc @CleClinicMD Consider reading this https://t.co/ZCH0fkK0BT
@ruamused @clojoc @GlennHampson “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicotine electronic cigarettes (ECs), although not risk-free, are considerably lower risk than combustible tobacco, as they provide a means to inhale nicotine without combustion [1, 2].” https://t.co/ZCH0fkK0BT
RT @EvertRauwendaal: @NatashaFylesMLA “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicotine electronic cigarettes (ECs), although not ri…
RT @EvertRauwendaal: @NatashaFylesMLA “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicotine electronic cigarettes (ECs), although not ri…
RT @EvertRauwendaal: @NatashaFylesMLA “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicotine electronic cigarettes (ECs), although not ri…
RT @EvertRauwendaal: @NatashaFylesMLA “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicotine electronic cigarettes (ECs), although not ri…
@NatashaFylesMLA “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicotine electronic cigarettes (ECs), although not risk-free, are considerably lower risk than combustible tobacco” https://t.co/ZCH0fkK0BT
RT @EvertRauwendaal: @Isabella199003 Odd thing to claim when the actual experts say: “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicoti…
RT @EvertRauwendaal: @Isabella199003 Odd thing to claim when the actual experts say: “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicoti…
@RobynMaclarty @RenaldoGouws @PresidencyZA Conclusions: Switching from smoking to vaping or dual use appears to reduce levels of biomarkers of potential harm significantly. https://t.co/EGasOlBEZe
@jordsnax @RenaldoGouws @MostertTheo @PresidencyZA Conclusions: Switching from smoking to vaping or dual use appears to reduce levels of biomarkers of potential harm significantly. https://t.co/EGasOlBEZe
@theprojecttv @SandroDemaio Testing the quality of any black market product is really nothing more than trying to create a hysteria. Here is a scientific study of biomarkers and the relative harms. https://t.co/FU2b4J8avY
RT @EvertRauwendaal: @Isabella199003 Odd thing to claim when the actual experts say: “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicoti…
@rileyrobyn08 @ToddHarperAUS @quitvic @VicHealth @CancerVic @MaryAnneThomas @SandroDemaio @theheraldsun Why are you ignoring the best scientific evidence we have? “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicotine electronic cigarettes (ECs), although not risk-free, are considerably lower risk than combustible tobacco” https://t.co/ZCH0fkK0BT https://t.co/QliQqjeD6U
RT @EvertRauwendaal: @Isabella199003 Odd thing to claim when the actual experts say: “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicoti…
RT @EvertRauwendaal: @Isabella199003 Odd thing to claim when the actual experts say: “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicoti…
RT @EvertRauwendaal: @Isabella199003 Odd thing to claim when the actual experts say: “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicoti…
@Isabella199003 Odd thing to claim when the actual experts say: “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicotine electronic cigarettes (ECs), although not risk-free, are considerably lower risk than combustible tobacco” https://t.co/ZCH0fkK0BT
@DonWeatherburn Vaping is displacing smoking in adolescents. While vaping ‘isn’t harmless’ it’s likely to be a net public health benefit because there is overwhelming scientific consensus that vaping is considerably lower risk than smoking: https://t.co/ZCH0fkK0BT https://t.co/0jugIWyLZz
RT @EvertRauwendaal: @kwest51 @SandroDemaio @Mark_Butler_MP They do it because: “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicotine el…
@kwest51 @SandroDemaio @Mark_Butler_MP They do it because: “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicotine electronic cigarettes (ECs), although not risk-free, are considerably lower risk than combustible tobacco, as they provide a means to inhale nicotine without combustion [1, 2].” https://t.co/ZCH0fkK0BT
@megant2799 @VoltefaceHub “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicotine electronic cigarettes (ECs), although not risk-free, are considerably lower risk than combustible tobacco” https://t.co/ZCH0fkK0BT
@Sandiamandias @kafkaguy Congrats for quitting smoking. If you want to know more about the toxicant exposure from vaping here’s some science: https://t.co/ZCH0fkK0BT https://t.co/lgS60ci1y2 https://t.co/aTZryI4B1V
https://t.co/N6BSzsE3d5 https://t.co/hZXxi6JPuV são links de 2 estudos recentes 2022/2023 publicados na revista de Oxford e outra conceituada do Reino Unido kota, se puder dê uma olhada✌
RT @jkelovuori: @alli_vapes @jimororke Glantz claims dual use is more harmful than exclusive smoking. Cochrane disagrees. I know who I t…
RT @jkelovuori: @alli_vapes @jimororke Glantz claims dual use is more harmful than exclusive smoking. Cochrane disagrees. I know who I t…
RT @jkelovuori: @alli_vapes @jimororke Glantz claims dual use is more harmful than exclusive smoking. Cochrane disagrees. I know who I t…
RT @jkelovuori: @alli_vapes @jimororke Glantz claims dual use is more harmful than exclusive smoking. Cochrane disagrees. I know who I t…
@alli_vapes @jimororke Glantz claims dual use is more harmful than exclusive smoking. Cochrane disagrees. I know who I trust more. https://t.co/0N1LX6043Z
@ProfGlantz @FDATobacco Rubbish. https://t.co/0N1LX6043Z
RT @EvertRauwendaal: @DearPlanA @DrNicoleLee @ConversationEDU @ClancyBrigid “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicotine electr…
@DearPlanA @DrNicoleLee @ConversationEDU @ClancyBrigid “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicotine electronic cigarettes (ECs), although not risk-free, are considerably lower risk than combustible tobacco” https://t.co/ZCH0fkK0BT
RT @EvertRauwendaal: @FionaMJohnson3 @7NewsBrisbane “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicotine electronic cigarettes (ECs), a…
@FionaMJohnson3 @7NewsBrisbane “Scientific consensus overwhelmingly holds that nicotine electronic cigarettes (ECs), although not risk-free, are considerably lower risk than combustible tobacco” https://t.co/ZCH0fkK0BT But that’s just what the worlds top scientists think so feel free to just ignore it.
RT @Kurt_Yeo: Just needs to be clarified @dailymaverick & @GeorginaCrouth vaping is significantly less harmful than smoking. https://t.co/W…
RT @Kurt_Yeo: Just needs to be clarified @dailymaverick & @GeorginaCrouth vaping is significantly less harmful than smoking. https://t.co/W…
RT @Kurt_Yeo: Just needs to be clarified @dailymaverick & @GeorginaCrouth vaping is significantly less harmful than smoking. https://t.co/W…
RT @Kurt_Yeo: Just needs to be clarified @dailymaverick & @GeorginaCrouth vaping is significantly less harmful than smoking. https://t.co/W…
RT @Kurt_Yeo: Just needs to be clarified @dailymaverick & @GeorginaCrouth vaping is significantly less harmful than smoking. https://t.co/W…
RT @Kurt_Yeo: Just needs to be clarified @dailymaverick & @GeorginaCrouth vaping is significantly less harmful than smoking. https://t.co/W…
RT @Kurt_Yeo: Just needs to be clarified @dailymaverick & @GeorginaCrouth vaping is significantly less harmful than smoking. https://t.co/W…
RT @Kurt_Yeo: Just needs to be clarified @dailymaverick & @GeorginaCrouth vaping is significantly less harmful than smoking. https://t.co/W…
@dailymaverick Just needs to be clarified @dailymaverick & @GeorginaCrouth vaping is significantly less harmful than smoking. https://t.co/W8gkx4fdZW https://t.co/imQIDZ7evj https://t.co/a3dxDYx2M0 https://t.co/Jg4xQBOabt ENDS=Vaping https://t.co/gxWIy20jth
Just needs to be clarified @dailymaverick & @GeorginaCrouth vaping is significantly less harmful than smoking. https://t.co/W8gkx4fdZW https://t.co/imQIDZ7evj https://t.co/a3dxDYx2M0 https://t.co/Jg4xQBOabt ENDS=Vaping https://t.co/ZyeJ2lz7su https://t.co/s1Q1BRUvnE
RT @VaporAmerican: To untangle the flawed logic above, we need to establish a few simple facts, which we can do with this recent review by…
RT @VaporAmerican: To untangle the flawed logic above, we need to establish a few simple facts, which we can do with this recent review by…
To untangle the flawed logic above, we need to establish a few simple facts, which we can do with this recent review by @DrChrisBullen and colleagues. https://t.co/b5aHVvMug3
RT @VapinGreek: People switching from smoking to vaping or dual-use reduce the levels of biomarkers of potential harm: evidence from our se…
RT @europethra: "Switching from smoking to vaping or dual use appears to reduce levels of biomarkers of potential harm significantly." htt…
Oh, look at that! There actually IS an advantage to dual use! "Switching from smoking to vaping or dual use appears to reduce levels of biomarkers of potential harm significantly." https://t.co/1IpQyUDx0Y https://t.co/zb3Xfj0wCo
RT @VapinGreek: People switching from smoking to vaping or dual-use reduce the levels of biomarkers of potential harm: evidence from our se…
RT @VapinGreek: People switching from smoking to vaping or dual-use reduce the levels of biomarkers of potential harm: evidence from our se…
RT @VapinGreek: People switching from smoking to vaping or dual-use reduce the levels of biomarkers of potential harm: evidence from our se…
RT @VapinGreek: People switching from smoking to vaping or dual-use reduce the levels of biomarkers of potential harm: evidence from our se…
@bzga_de Achtung Wissenschaft #science https://t.co/akK9e4MLww
RT @VapinGreek: People switching from smoking to vaping or dual-use reduce the levels of biomarkers of potential harm: evidence from our se…
RT @VapinGreek: People switching from smoking to vaping or dual-use reduce the levels of biomarkers of potential harm: evidence from our se…
RT @VapinGreek: People switching from smoking to vaping or dual-use reduce the levels of biomarkers of potential harm: evidence from our se…
RT @VapinGreek: People switching from smoking to vaping or dual-use reduce the levels of biomarkers of potential harm: evidence from our se…
People switching from smoking to vaping or dual-use reduce the levels of biomarkers of potential harm: evidence from our secondary analysis of Cochrane systematic review of trials of e‐cigarettes for smoking cessation https://t.co/1QH276XMqk
"Switching from smoking to vaping or dual use appears to reduce levels of biomarkers of potential harm significantly." https://t.co/A1MxBUTUmU
@TahirTturk https://t.co/EGasOlCcOM https://t.co/wPtIiG9rGh
RT @QuitByVaping: Switching from smoking to vaping or dual use appears to reduce levels of biomarkers of potential harm significantly.- Coc…
RT @NussbaumDr: Inkompletter Umstieg auf
RT @NussbaumDr: Inkompletter Umstieg auf
Inkompletter Umstieg auf
@comforttenyeko @LungaMrhetjha
RT @PublicHealthLit: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstin…
RT @PublicHealthLit: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstin…
RT @PublicHealthLit: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstin…
RT @PublicHealthLit: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstin…
RT @PublicHealthLit: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstin…
RT @PublicHealthLit: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstin…
Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinence: secondary analysis of Cochrane systematic review of trials of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation https://t.co/AhJhfyZqLS
RT @QuitByVaping: Switching from smoking to vaping or dual use appears to reduce levels of biomarkers of potential harm significantly.- Coc…
RT @gbiondizoccai: According to a recent secondary analysis of Cochrane systematic review of trials of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation,…
RT @gbiondizoccai: According to a recent secondary analysis of Cochrane systematic review of trials of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation,…
RT @gbiondizoccai: According to a recent secondary analysis of Cochrane systematic review of trials of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation,…
According to a recent secondary analysis of Cochrane systematic review of trials of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation, "Switching from smoking to vaping or dual use appears to reduce levels of biomarkers of potential harm significantly" https://t.co/NYh7vW4Cx8 https://t.co/yNbmqqFaHF
RT @QuitByVaping: Switching from smoking to vaping or dual use appears to reduce levels of biomarkers of potential harm significantly.- Coc…
RT @QuitByVaping: Switching from smoking to vaping or dual use appears to reduce levels of biomarkers of potential harm significantly.- Coc…
RT @QuitByVaping: Switching from smoking to vaping or dual use appears to reduce levels of biomarkers of potential harm significantly.- Coc…
Switching from smoking to vaping or dual use appears to reduce levels of biomarkers of potential harm significantly.- Cochrane systematic review. https://t.co/meMALHgOtg @CMA_Docs @CMAJ @PMIScience @DocsVsTobacco @rights4vapers
@AddictionsPMC @TahirTturk Indeed. https://t.co/0N1LX6043Z
RT @FBaeyens: “Conclusions: Switching from smoking to vaping or dual use appears to reduce levels of biomarkers of potential harm significa…
RT @RegWatchCanada: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstine…
RT @RegWatchCanada: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstine…
Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinence: secondary analysis of Cochrane systematic review of trials of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation *Curated content by RegWatch https://t.co/CNInLoeTKE https://t.co/sVM9q8C4d0
@RoeeW @zvi_herzig @AvivYogev @JeffaStier @IsraelMOH Would you like to discuss the science? "Switching from smoking to vaping or dual use appears to reduce levels of biomarkers of potential harm significantly." https://t.co/nU2GF0rVps
RT @FConijnGZO: @Wdekanter @Gezondheidsraad het effect van cafeïne veel groter is en langer duurt (3,4). En die (f)ophef geldt voor veel on…
RT @FConijnGZO: @Wdekanter @Gezondheidsraad het effect van cafeïne veel groter is en langer duurt (3,4). En die (f)ophef geldt voor veel on…
RT @FConijnGZO: @Wdekanter @Gezondheidsraad het effect van cafeïne veel groter is en langer duurt (3,4). En die (f)ophef geldt voor veel on…
RT @FConijnGZO: @Wdekanter @Gezondheidsraad het effect van cafeïne veel groter is en langer duurt (3,4). En die (f)ophef geldt voor veel on…
@Wdekanter @Gezondheidsraad het effect van cafeïne veel groter is en langer duurt (3,4). En die (f)ophef geldt voor veel onderzoeken naar componenten van dampvloeistof, zoals een Cochrane review vond. (5) (3/3) 3.https://t.co/r8F3IFbuTX 4.https://t.co/0sSVQhZS70 5.https://t.co/0vJS2DEOML
RT @michelleminton: Finally a study worth paying attention to. The researchers over at Cochrane--which has been doing ongoing analysis of r…
RT @benoit_durand: @SSA_Addiction @AddictionJrnl Finally a study worth paying attention to. The researchers over at Cochrane--which has bee…
RT @alli_vapes: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinence:…
RT @alli_vapes: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinence:…
RT @alli_vapes: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinence:…
RT @alli_vapes: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinence:…
RT @alli_vapes: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinence:…
RT @europethra: "Switching from smoking to vaping or dual use appears to reduce levels of biomarkers of potential harm significantly." htt…
RT @alli_vapes: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinence:…
RT @michelleminton: Finally a study worth paying attention to. The researchers over at Cochrane--which has been doing ongoing analysis of r…
RT @michelleminton: Finally a study worth paying attention to. The researchers over at Cochrane--which has been doing ongoing analysis of r…
RT @alli_vapes: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinence:…
RT @europethra: "Switching from smoking to vaping or dual use appears to reduce levels of biomarkers of potential harm significantly." htt…
RT @alli_vapes: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinence:…
RT @michelleminton: Finally a study worth paying attention to. The researchers over at Cochrane--which has been doing ongoing analysis of r…
RT @alli_vapes: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinence:…
RT @alli_vapes: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinence:…
RT @alli_vapes: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinence:…
RT @michelleminton: Finally a study worth paying attention to. The researchers over at Cochrane--which has been doing ongoing analysis of r…
RT @alli_vapes: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinence:…
"Switching from smoking to vaping or dual use appears to reduce levels of biomarkers of potential harm significantly." https://t.co/CruWEots92
RT @alli_vapes: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinence:…
RT @alli_vapes: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinence:…
RT @alli_vapes: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinence:…
RT @michelleminton: Finally a study worth paying attention to. The researchers over at Cochrane--which has been doing ongoing analysis of r…
RT @alli_vapes: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinence:…
RT @alli_vapes: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinence:…
RT @alli_vapes: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinence:…
Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinence: secondary analysis of Cochrane systematic review of trials of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation https://t.co/SRYhYoseVj
RT @michelleminton: Finally a study worth paying attention to. The researchers over at Cochrane--which has been doing ongoing analysis of r…
RT @michelleminton: Finally a study worth paying attention to. The researchers over at Cochrane--which has been doing ongoing analysis of r…
RT @soymastellari: Conclusiones: Pasar de fumar a vapear parece reducir significativamente los niveles de biomarcadores de daño potencial…
Switching from smoking to vaping or dual use appears to reduce levels of biomarkers of potential harm https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/add.16063
@JohnMashey @SimonChapman6 Cargo cult is a better analogy. TC wouldn't be so voracious for NVP harms if there was any equivalency. Also, appears not to be the case. (Though more significant risk reduction also requires more substantial substitution.) https://t.co/Sg9eoYh7OX
RT @grannylouisa: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinenc…
RT @grannylouisa: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinenc…
RT @grannylouisa: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinenc…
RT @grannylouisa: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinenc…
RT @grannylouisa: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinenc…
RT @grannylouisa: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinenc…
RT @grannylouisa: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinenc…
RT @grannylouisa: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinenc…
RT @grannylouisa: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinenc…
RT @grannylouisa: Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinenc…
Biomarkers of potential harm in people switching from smoking tobacco to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use or abstinence: secondary analysis of Cochrane systematic review of trials of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation - PubMed https://t.co/7trjTiIcy7
RT @NussbaumDr: 3/3 Source 2, original scientific paper by @CochraneTAG
RT @NussbaumDr: 3/3 Source 2, original scientific paper by @CochraneTAG
RT @NussbaumDr: 3/3 Source 2, original scientific paper by @CochraneTAG
RT @NussbaumDr: 3/3 Source 2, original scientific paper by @CochraneTAG
3/3 Source 2, original scientific paper by @CochraneTAG
Conclusiones: Pasar de fumar a vapear parece reducir significativamente los niveles de biomarcadores de daño potencial https://t.co/C4ZjtR0IEw
RT @VdeH_Verband: Ist #DualUse besonders schädlich? Nein, im Gegenteil! Eine aktuelle Studie zeigt: Jede Tabakzigarette, die durch eine #EZ…
RT @VdeH_Verband: Ist #DualUse besonders schädlich? Nein, im Gegenteil! Eine aktuelle Studie zeigt: Jede Tabakzigarette, die durch eine #EZ…
RT @BlogThr: About this #SystematicReview: "Switching from smoking to vaping /or/ dual use appears to reduce levels of biomarkers of poten…
RT @VdeH_Verband: Ist #DualUse besonders schädlich? Nein, im Gegenteil! Eine aktuelle Studie zeigt: Jede Tabakzigarette, die durch eine #EZ…
RT @VdeH_Verband: Ist #DualUse besonders schädlich? Nein, im Gegenteil! Eine aktuelle Studie zeigt: Jede Tabakzigarette, die durch eine #EZ…
Ist #DualUse besonders schädlich? Nein, im Gegenteil! Eine aktuelle Studie zeigt: Jede Tabakzigarette, die durch eine #EZigarette ersetzt wird, ist ein kleiner Erfolg für die individuelle Gesundheit. https://t.co/jiXqQZ5b8J
About this #SystematicReview: "Switching from smoking to vaping /or/ dual use appears to reduce levels of biomarkers of potential harm significantly." .@jhb19, .@DrARButler, .@AnnikaTheod, .@IOnakpoya, Hajek, .@DrChrisBullen, Rigotti, .@DrNLindson 2/2 https://t.co/72xbx0Ds7H
doi: 10.1111/add.16063. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36208090. Hartmann-Boyce J, Lindson N, Butler AR, McRobbie H, Bullen C, Begh R, Theodoulou A, Notley C ...
Immer wieder wird der Konsum von E-Zigaretten als die weniger schädliche Variante des Rauchens und als Möglichkeit des Ausstiegs aus dem Tabakkonsum ...
[DOI: 10.1111/add.16063]; https://theconversation.com/e-cigarettes ... Please add your comment in the box below. Name. Comment. Captcha. Please answer the ...
... 10.1111/add. 16063 Aims: This study aims to compare biomarkers of potential harm between people switching from smoking combustible ...
... 10.1111/add. 16063 Aims: This study aims to compare biomarkers of potential harm between people switching from smoking combustible ...
... 10.1111/add. 16063 Aims: This study aims to compare biomarkers of potential harm between people switching from smoking combustible ...
Received: 5 April 2024 | Revised: 11 June 2024 | Accepted: 28 July 2024. DOI: 10.1111/liv.16063 ... Goodman KE, Lessler J, Harris AD, Milstone AM, ...
doi:10.1111/jfb.16063. Furtado, M. D., Queiroz, J. C., Bentes, B ... Ad Choices Icon Sponsored. Carving up the Cardamoms ...
... 10.1111/add. 16063 Aims: This study aims to compare biomarkers of potential harm between people switching from smoking combustible ...
https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12373 . Gotz et al., 2024. https ... 16,063 likes · gabriel_lazarocruz4. Bioquímica del amor. ✏️ Más ...
... 10.1111/add. 16063 Aims: This study aims to compare biomarkers of potential harm between people switching from smoking combustible ...
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2516.2005.01099.x. 12. Di Paola, J ... 3, 16063. https://doi. org/10.1038/mtm.2016.63. 60. Fong, S ...
... 10.1111/add. 16063 Aims: This study aims to compare biomarkers of potential harm between people switching from smoking combustible ...
Add in what Lees calls “a massive increase in herbicide use” and ... doi:10.1111/gcb.16063. Williams, S. E., & de la Fuente, A. (2021) ...
8, 16063 (2017). Crossref · PubMed · Web of Science · Google Scholar ... add another contributor. Statement of Competing Interests. Competing ...
... 10.1111/add. 16063 Aims: This study aims to compare biomarkers of potential harm between people switching from smoking combustible ...
... 10.1111/add. 16063 Aims: This study aims to compare biomarkers of potential harm between people switching from smoking combustible ...
... 10.1111/add. 16063 Aims: This study aims to compare biomarkers of potential harm between people switching from smoking combustible ...
... 10.1111/add. 16063 Aims: This study aims to compare biomarkers of potential harm between people switching from smoking combustible ...
... 10.1111/add. 16063 Aims: This study aims to compare biomarkers of potential harm between people switching from smoking combustible ...
... 10.1111/add. 16063 Aims: This study aims to compare biomarkers of potential harm between people switching from smoking combustible ...
ER
A
JK
KY
I
SU
AC
CP
DA
RS
C
MR
RP
TG
B
LC
S
GP
H
C
DB
GV
B
AT
JT
EH
TD
HC
TH
V
A
AA
PM
SD
SS
TV
JT
O
A
AA
M
DG
A
H
AM
KK
MG
MP
PK
CP
AM
V
CP
E
PS
B
RN
DS
SS
D
EA
VI
DN
VL
CR
V
DL
B
PL
BS
GZ
TO
PE
Q
JE
AH
RW
FG
CV
JE
D
L
DG
VZ
RC
MC
SC
KC
JT
MM
HI
A
LC
DY
S
LE
L
MA
AB
HW
VV
TB