大腸内視鏡スクリーニングは10年後の大腸がんリスクを低下させたが、大腸がん関連死亡や全死亡は有意差がなかった。大腸がんを1例防ぐためには455(95%CI,270-1429)のスクリーニングが必要。N Engl J Med. 2022; 387:1547. PMID: 36214590.https://t.co/gT0242PkqJ
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Oct 2022 – Nov 2025Where it's discussed
-
News305 articles
-
X / Twitter301 posts
-
Blogs27 articles
-
Facebook9 posts
-
Reddit6 posts
-
YouTube4 videos
-
Bluesky3 posts
AI synopsis
What people are saying
Analyses reflect widespread skepticism about colonoscopy's effectiveness, as evidenced by phrases like 'no significant benefit,' 'surprising and disappointing,' and questions about whether screening saves lives. The tone combines critique of over-reliance on procedures with calls for better evidence and consideration of cost-effectiveness, illustrating a critical but engaged evaluation of the research's impact on public health policies.
Most discussions highlight the limited effectiveness of colonoscopy screening in reducing mortality, showing a skeptical stance towards its benefits.
The debates are highly engaging, with many examining the study details, methodology, and implications, indicating strong curiosity and concern.
Participants reference specific research results, critique study designs, and compare to guidelines, demonstrating thoughtful engagement and analysis.
While some advocate for screening, many point out the minimal actual health benefits, suggesting the findings could influence screening practices and public perception.
Abstract in brief
- Colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer showed a modest reduction in cancer risk but did not significantly affect overall mortality rates.
- Among 84,585 participants, 42% of those invited for screening underwent the procedure, leading to 259 cancer cases in the invited group compared to 622 in the usual-care group.
- The study suggests that inviting 455 people for screening prevents one case of colorectal cancer, indicating that while colonoscopy can be beneficial, its impact on reducing death rates from all causes remains limited.
Top posts
Most liked on X and BlueskyFor more than 10 years, 84,585 patients in Poland, Norway, & Sweden were followed to see if #colonoscopies found polyps & prevented cancer. And those who did vs did not have the tests had equal death rates. https://t.co/G8AwO8ezuW & https://t.co/iwHCZQsdoJ
1/⏰for another #EBGI
大腸内視鏡による大腸がん検診。集団検診としての効果は疑問 https://t.co/Fv7nO1l7Eg
NEJMより。大腸カメラスクリーニングを実施することは通常診療と比べて、10年のフォローアップ期間中の大腸癌発生リスクを18%減らしましたが、大腸癌関連死亡は有意に低下させませんでした。https://t.co/llG7675T0M
RCTs of diagnostic tests need extremely large sample sizes to be powered for strong endpoints. Cardiovascular screening has a much bigger impact on all cause mortality than colonoscopies. https://t.co/QsWxfS5xFG https://t.co/ohYtUdVdYf
All mentions
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Colonoscopies in Preventing Colon Cancer Deaths
My thoughts on the recently released NEJM study NORDICC that questioned the use of screening colonoscopies to prevent colon cancer deaths. The study shows colonoscopy offers a modest reduction in cancer risk but does…
Colon Cancer Prevention and Screening Insights by Dr. McDougall
Join Dr. John McDougall as he discusses colon cancer prevention, screening guidelines, and natural growth of cancer. Learn about the benefits of colonoscopy, diet recommendations, and answers to common questions about…
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal Cancer
Recently the New England Journal of Medicine published an article evaluating Screening Colonoscopy as a besttest modality for colon cancer screening. I discuss the article, break down the results, and provide my…
Evaluation of Chest Pain in Emergency Settings and Screening Impact on Colorectal Cancer Risks
This week, investigate protocols for chest pain assessment in the ED, including recent ACC guidelines, and review the impact of colonoscopy screening on colorectal cancer risk and mortality.
@BUSH_FI @LiranNevetGolan https://t.co/20tc6BPolX מחקר מלפני שלוש שנים שלא הראה ירידה בתמותה בין מי שעשה בדיקת סקר לבין מי שלא. כ90 אלף משתתפים משלוש מדינות.. לא התקבל בחום - ספג המון ביקורת..
@LiranNevetGolan https://t.co/20tc6BPolX מחקר מלפני 3 שנים- קיבל המון ביקורת כמובן - אבל 90 אלף איש 10 שנים- לא הראה ירידה בתמותה של מי שעשה קולונוסקופיה (כסקר!) לעומת מי שלא..
@epochhealth The study can be read at https://t.co/Cp3DvoAvCL Make your own conclusions
@KPujdak @kosik_md Pytanie jak to sie ma do: https://t.co/mhfgKS7FVK i do https://t.co/zec1BJBWvk https://t.co/9kgZXxFafU
@rtbrownjr @realEstateTrent Vast majority of high quality research says the opposite. Sometimes people need to search for info to support their own confirmation biases. Or maybe you’re just afraid of the procedure. Either way, you shouldn’t share. https://t.co/VHTh9UwYHP https://t.co/9UKW7ZQhCm
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/P4yF0xyv8N
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/P4yF0xyv8N
Publication alert! Research in European Journal of Epidemiology used trial data to examine the effect of colonoscopy screening on colorectal cancer & related death incidence. Authors include @joy-shi.bsky.social bsky.social @miguelhernan.org Read now: link.springer.com/article/10.1...
@jones_twj people need to know 15 MILLION people get colonoscopy/yr in the US alone- 150 million/decade, at a cost of at least $3000 each Do the math - that's HALF a TRILLION DOLLARS being spent on a procedure that may be of questionable benefit. Do your homework. https://t.co/NWe0M5kDme
@jones_twj FYI massive colonoscopy study, 85,000 patients >>a decade Read for yourself- colonoscopy was of essentially ZERO benefit in preventing death due to colon cancer (0.28% vs 0.30%) and in preventing death due to any and all causes (11.03% vs 11.04%) https://t.co/NWe0M5kDme
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/K58AVH47EJ
#Colonoscopy Screening referral by your GP in
RT @GlobalPHObserv: Effect of colonoscopy screening on risks of colorectal cancer and related death https://t.co/vXQPKznjmh
RT @GlobalPHObserv: Effect of colonoscopy screening on risks of colorectal cancer and related death https://t.co/vXQPKznjmh
RT @GlobalPHObserv: Effect of colonoscopy screening on risks of colorectal cancer and related death https://t.co/vXQPKznjmh
Effect of colonoscopy screening on risks of colorectal cancer and related death https://t.co/vXQPKznjmh
RT @HarvardEpi: New publication: "Effect of colonoscopy screening on risks of colorectal cancer and related death: instrumental variable es…
Effect of colonoscopy screening on risks of colorectal cancer and related death: instrumental variable estimation of per-protocol effects https://t.co/LaVxkRE9oR
RT @HarvardEpi: New publication: "Effect of colonoscopy screening on risks of colorectal cancer and related death: instrumental variable es…
New publication: "Effect of colonoscopy screening on risks of colorectal cancer and related death: instrumental variable estimation of per-protocol effects" now in the European Journal of Epidemiology ➡️Read here: https://t.co/JWf16lG0DF
New publication: Effect of colonoscopy screening on risks of colorectal cancer and related death: instrumental variable estimation of per-protocol effects now in the European Journal of Epidemiology ➡️ Read here: link.springer.com/article/10.1... #cancer #screening #colorectal
@aitch_bar @cremieuxrecueil The evidence is that colonoscopies don’t accomplish anything, either. There is no evidence they reduce all-cause mortality, and there is a 1-in-200 chance of ending up in the emergency room with an injury. This is why only 4 countries screen with them. https://t.co/ucRLjPZ2OM
"Effect of colonoscopy screening on risks of colorectal cancer and related death: instrumental variable estimation of per-protocol effects" #英語論文千本ノック #その943 https://t.co/NZ2fEldevt
@jerryferrara @MadCity_Brew Because it’s a money maker. https://t.co/Ifl8m4oHmZ
@FritzHandles @jerryferrara Read this first https://t.co/Ifl8m4oHmZ
@Krzyzynski_M @AMichnalewicz @PBasiukiewicz Najciekawszy jest wykres ostatni z podsumowania https://t.co/v41I8ydMkZ , czyli porównanie zgonów z dowolnej przyczyny w obu grupach. Ryzyko jest takie samo. Wnioskuję z tego, że zrobienie 455 kolonoskopii przesiewowych może stwarzać podobne zagrożenie zdrowia jak nieleczony guz.
RT @JuliuszBennich: @MariuszJagora Jest chyba jeszcze gorzej! Otóż kolonoskopia przesiewowa, podobnie jak wiele innych interwencji med., je…
@MariuszJagora Jest chyba jeszcze gorzej! Otóż kolonoskopia przesiewowa, podobnie jak wiele innych interwencji med., jest chyba przereklamowana. Bo *nie wydłuża życia* - jak twierdzi Dr @PBasiukiewicz, powołując się na publik. w prestiżowym NEJM. https://t.co/CYUmZIAoDo https://t.co/8Ap3dQByOt
@KSNNews "Although colonoscopy is widely used as a screening test to detect colorectal cancer, its effect on the risks of colorectal cancer and related death is unclear." https://t.co/QZdaTE1oG9
@VPrasadMDMPH Does routine colon cancer screening improve overall mortality? Grok says it doesn't but it reduces colorectal cancer deaths and offers NEJM "Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death" (Bretthauer et al., 2022) as proof. True?
RT @drfolamay: Better title for this study might have been: “Colonoscopies prevent cancers and deaths only if people do them” Must recogn…
@Humble_Analysis colonoscopy pt's have 10% less risk death from colon cancer 10 years later & less risk of cancer https://t.co/Owm9xcNCy2
@xtasyshortie @cooltechtipz Why are you arguing with me? Read it yourself and argue with the researchers. I'm just the messenger. Here: https://t.co/2mmtcIVYVG
RT @lcoopcooperl: @Media1master @cooltechtipz https://t.co/2mmtcIVYVG
@glockman__23 @cooltechtipz https://t.co/2mmtcIVYVG
@Media1master @cooltechtipz https://t.co/2mmtcIVYVG
https://t.co/Xe7LziwJMz
@farid__jalali How often do you tell patients this beforehand? Colonoscopies are extremely over recommended and are getting recommended for people younger and younger because it is a cash cow. https://t.co/x5FYumUNSe
@nunottav MMM baseia-se em que evidencia para fazer a recomendaçao? O NordICC RCT mostrou uma pequena reduçao do risco do cancro coloretal e uma nao significativa reduçao do risco de morte naqueles a quem foi oferecia a realizaçao de colonoscopia. https://t.co/VFY0zt85B7
RT @nnago: 大腸内視鏡による大腸がん検診。集団検診としての効果は疑問 https://t.co/Fv7nO1l7Eg
RT @nnago: 大腸内視鏡による大腸がん検診。集団検診としての効果は疑問 https://t.co/Fv7nO1l7Eg
RT @nnago: 大腸内視鏡による大腸がん検診。集団検診としての効果は疑問 https://t.co/Fv7nO1l7Eg
RT @nnago: 大腸内視鏡による大腸がん検診。集団検診としての効果は疑問 https://t.co/Fv7nO1l7Eg
RT @nnago: 大腸内視鏡による大腸がん検診。集団検診としての効果は疑問 https://t.co/Fv7nO1l7Eg
大腸内視鏡による大腸がん検診。集団検診としての効果は疑問 https://t.co/Fv7nO1l7Eg
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | Hacker News https://t.co/T5S6VAkkLm
@tomaskafka @dan_prokop Data z robustních randomizovaných a dlouhodobých studií říkají něco jiného. Chápu, že intuice nám říká, že z individuálních případů můžeme odvodit prospěšnost plošné intervence. Ale tvrdá data nemůžeme ignorovat jenom proto, že říkají opak. https://t.co/CSfc0UDBRR
@dan_prokop @marian_hajduch @konvalinka_jan @RastiMadar Jediný dlouhodobý randomizovaný test kolonoskopie jako plošného screeningu rakoviny neprokázal žádné zachr. životy ze všech příčin, Dokonce ani nijak nepřesvědčil o záchraně života z důvodu rakoviny. Proč chcete utrácet veřejné peníze za neúčinné opatření? https://t.co/CSfc0UDBRR
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/kBoo9eiSop
RT @RomanatoM: @bastacosi15 @MarcoDabizzi Il punto in discussione è se ha senso fare una colonscopia senza motivo, solo perché hai compiuto…
@MarRina73 @MarcoDabizzi Dici che fare una colonscopia ti rende immune o ti guarisce dal cancro al colon? https://t.co/O92L9ZwJcx
@bastacosi15 @MarcoDabizzi Il punto in discussione è se ha senso fare una colonscopia senza motivo, solo perché hai compiuto 50 o 60 anni. Se hai dolori, sanguinamenti o altro, ha un senso farla. https://t.co/O92L9ZwJcx
@BenClement_MD @EM_RESUS Only RCT I’m aware of and the stats don’t look terribly impressive: https://t.co/t4H1totC18 Sigmoidoscopy seems to have more significant decrease in colon ca mortality and all cause mortality. Obv, I know what the guidelines recommend. But given the above, why do you recommend
@AdanBecerraPhD Can you post the link so I make sure I have the right one? Is it this one? https://t.co/gQiQNFqJGl
RT @Dermatopoullos: @docdu16 @DDupagne Non : https://t.co/CahAUIrTap
@docdu16 @DDupagne Non : https://t.co/CahAUIrTap
@Clarksterh https://t.co/SCyGEqvH9X
Enjoying @PeterAttiaMD "Outlive"-- but cannot get on board w c-scope at 40! Would love a hot take from @VPrasadMDMPH @ZDoggMD @drjohnm on this one. I do love that he references the NORDIC trial! https://t.co/nSajx6TgRT https://t.co/DnyqjS5wo6
@jsvalenti1 @khadijakamala Considering it takes 455 colonoscopies to prevent 1 case of colon cancer, a noninvasive method has a place. https://t.co/JwAhhptvP4
@VPrasadMDMPH To all those questioning why colonoscoph would be a bad thing, please see the randomized control trial of colonoscopy that showed no survival benefit. https://t.co/zMyDiPNahp
@Kitsune_in_VA According to this study colonoscopy does little if any good. https://t.co/WukqPYRf1Y
@myersbradley If you're referring to this: https://t.co/weDz7WaHsO They still estimated a "50% decrease in colorectal cancer–related death" among people who got the colonoscopy when invited to. Lower than anticipated. Still worth doing IMO. Not here to argue about this. Just talk to your MD.
@ylecun @qikka2886 For example, colorectal cancer screening causes more cancers to be detected but shows no improvement in mortality https://t.co/YnUXfJXrWa
McDougall's Medicine: Cancer in the News https://t.co/wgP0A4GJHr via @YouTube
RT @a_klofat: Eine sehr große und gut gemachte Studie zu Darmkrebsvorsorge (Darmspiegelung) zeigt, dass die Vorsorge wenig bringt und Morta…
RT @a_klofat: Eine sehr große und gut gemachte Studie zu Darmkrebsvorsorge (Darmspiegelung) zeigt, dass die Vorsorge wenig bringt und Morta…
Eine sehr große und gut gemachte Studie zu Darmkrebsvorsorge (Darmspiegelung) zeigt, dass die Vorsorge wenig bringt und Mortalität wenig senkt: "The risk of death from colorectal cancer was 0.28% in the invited group and 0.31% in the usual-care group" https://t.co/TNOcEoNDa6
@bimal2378 @IMAIndiaOrg Thanks. Adenoma detection was 31%, cancer detection was 0.5%. 10 year follow up not long enough to show mortality differences, as adenomas take 10-15 years to become cancer, still longer to cause death. Usual care group will have fewer CRC diagnosis as
@VictorFromDE Plus, there's a study that shows colonoscopy makes no statistically significant difference https://t.co/vrJc5dszDH
@cremieuxrecueil https://t.co/cHQKLqyzzU
@DrSchindler @lamebaron @dok_torin https://t.co/fWZxWfulJW
@sweatystartup @alexmacgregor__ I wouldn’t unless you enjoy butt stuff. No mortality benefit. https://t.co/MGQvEPQmD2
https://t.co/eN6Gk4Z4MT what do yo think about this results of colonoscopy screening and its effect on all cause mortality rate ?
@JakubHlavka @dan_prokop Mohou zachránit život, ale s velkou pravděpodobností nezachrání. Plošný screening je velmi neefektivní metoda veřejného zdravotnictví. NordiCC nezaznamenal snížení úmrtnosti v testu trvajícím 10 let. Selektivní screening je mnohem vhodnější. https://t.co/CSfc0UDBRR
@kosik_md @KrzJakubiak @MichalGrzelak Kolonoskopia to chyba też tak średnio jako przesiewowe: https://t.co/jDAkLFFO5A
@nntaleb Another important concept that I learnt from Prof. @nntaleb is that many doctors don’t get conditional probability. Example: below study. We can’t use this type of study for individual decision making. What if I painful persistent constipation/bloating https://t.co/lrtBeQ2Szv
@UmaMahadevanIBD @BenClement_MD @AasmaShaukatMD @GuildConference Education, incentives and risk sharing (in non-screened). But I am still amazed how much better the US is doing c/w other European countries where screening is free and participation 42%. Finding the drivers for the 17% may provide clues https://t.co/hLlo1fA5tq
@PeterAttiaMD Any thoughts on on this RCT, all caused mortality was only reduced from 11.04%-> 11.03, probably slightly bigger difference if PP compared instead of IT-analysis. "Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death" https://t.co/ruCApYUoZE
RT @RahulBanerjeeMD: 1/ As the intent-to-treat analysis debate is reborn (again) on Twitter, it's important to remember the folly of relyin…
RT @RahulBanerjeeMD: 1/ As the intent-to-treat analysis debate is reborn (again) on Twitter, it's important to remember the folly of relyin…
RT @RahulBanerjeeMD: 1/ As the intent-to-treat analysis debate is reborn (again) on Twitter, it's important to remember the folly of relyin…
RT @RahulBanerjeeMD: 1/ As the intent-to-treat analysis debate is reborn (again) on Twitter, it's important to remember the folly of relyin…
1/ As the intent-to-treat analysis debate is reborn (again) on Twitter, it's important to remember the folly of relying too carefully on ITT without reviewing methods. Example: NordICC study showing that colonoscopy did "not" reduce cancer mortality
@dramerica88 https://t.co/OWEoHzpc82 横から申し訳ありません。大腸内視鏡検査は集団レベル(検診)において、「大腸癌による死亡」減少効果は十分ではありませんでした。今後の検証がまだ必要そうです。ドックは内視鏡、検診はまだ便潜血でしょうか。
RT @_MiguelHernan: 1/ Six years ago we emulated a #TargetTrial of screening colonoscopy for colorectal #cancer using observational #Medicar…
@radicbozo81 Poštovanje, zanima me ako imate vremena komentirati ovu studiju: https://t.co/NyZh49p10c
@pash22 @Foreman1David @stevensenior @sib313 @BigRedBrexitBus @Daniel_Urologia @VickersBiostats @susan_bewley @MTimC1 @MichaelBaum11 @ilyaval @SteveLaitner @BBCr4today @mgtmccartney @SteveBarclay @paulpharoah @VPrasadMDMPH @angelaraffle @muirgray @RichardLehman1 @DHSCgovuk @NHSEngland @NHSEnglandNMD @DrMarianneLea @emcahan @bobkocher @MrJohnMBennett @NICEComms @TheBMA @JointRegistry @ProstateUK @bmj_latest @KariTikkinen @OtisBrawley @Freddie_Hamdy @Cambridge_Uni @imperialcollege @UKLabour @thetimes @jameskirkup @instituteforgov @bronwenmaddox @ChathamHouse @JimDunton @USPSTF @JAMAInternalMed @medpagetoday @mbrettha Nor in this other paper of his you also linked: https://t.co/QM2tzr709l. Would really like to cite it; it's great. Could it be from a sci com piece on one of these? Because of the way it's written. Maybe I should just Google the text (duh)...
@Dr_Doc_ מכירה את זה? https://t.co/Q9QL8SeYfb
@DrSuneelDhand The evidence: https://t.co/hxjhfrwHaI TY Suneel for being honest
@DrSuneelDhand The evidence: https://t.co/hxjhfrwHaI
@SapperHsehold6 @VPrasadMDMPH https://t.co/7uRj9S3wHP
@Jason @friedberg Cancer screening is a tricky subject. Even mammograms and colonoscopies show no mortality benefit. Colonoscopy: https://t.co/y7uNJtgglT Mammography: https://t.co/EoDCMzGiaW
@EKing719 Colonoscopy screening is not the magic panacea that people seem to think it is. All cause mortality was the same in screened and unscreened groups. You should really do better than citing anecdotes. https://t.co/daIDI6MsJ4
RT @RMakhoul: Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/WLJtrOTSaO #screening #co…
RT @JuanGrvas: Cribado cáncer colon con colonoscopia. Sin impacto en mortalidad por cáncer de colon, tampoco en la mortalidad general. Inút…
@RaceBeardie Nope! https://t.co/6mi6Uc14Tt https://t.co/zbrp14Rf5O
@enf_intensiva Embora a colonoscopia seja amplamente utilizada como um teste de triagem para detectar o câncer colorretal, seu efeito sobre os riscos de câncer colorretal e morte relacionada é menos efetivo do que o esperado. https://t.co/a1ZwS1w3gH
@ScaltritiLab C'è comunque da dire che lo screening con colonscopia ha un'efficacia piuttosto limitata, con una riduzione del 18% del rischio di cancro e del 10% del rischio di morte per cancro del colon-retto, a 10 anni. https://t.co/4TwSZ3y9A7 Si spera che la ricerca scientifica identifichi
@PloederlM @susan_bewley @ProfLAppleby @HealthSenseUK @CanSG_org I think it's important not to see the large sample required as a valid excuse to avoid a trial. They randomized more than 80K in this colonoscopy trial only to find a null result, and colonoscopies are expensive! Should be able to do it for ADs too. https://t.co/iku5jj0Jge
@KS44357117 https://t.co/pP58tz1ayM
https://t.co/2Za0lyMTk7
RT @_MiguelHernan: 1/ Six years ago we emulated a #TargetTrial of screening colonoscopy for colorectal #cancer using observational #Medicar…
RT @Jess_Riedel: @robinhanson I think the evidence points to it saving lives, it’s just not worth the cost. Cancers were prevented, and the…
RCTs of diagnostic tests need extremely large sample sizes to be powered for strong endpoints. Cardiovascular screening has a much bigger impact on all cause mortality than colonoscopies. https://t.co/QsWxfS5xFG https://t.co/ohYtUdVdYf
@matunos @Horganism Here’s the paper they are likely referring to: https://t.co/94yFMoMMkM
@robinhanson I think the evidence points to it saving lives, it’s just not worth the cost. Cancers were prevented, and the study just didn’t have the numbers to reach 95% CL on deaths (but it trended as expected). https://t.co/PjeujyLfST https://t.co/SVqGeHVPBu
Effect of #Colonoscopy #Screening on Risks of #Colorectal #Cancer and Related Death https://t.co/i9jse5GlYy https://t.co/XtsdZxZDjK
@Themislv_vls @domi_1703 Personne n’aime aller chez le médecin
@JuanGrvas @diegourgeles The risk of death from any cause was 11.03% in the invited group and 11.04% in the usual-care group (risk ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.04). https://t.co/yrjfSYGq7L
@DCharabaty @NeenaSAbrahamMD @AmyOxentenkoMD @MarkPochapin @DrSamirAShah1 @RomyChamoun @Jessica_Halabi @BalissMichelle @MItaniMD @aileenbui @JosephHabibi_MD No everywhere is so nice weather
5/n Das geht weit über klinische Studien hinaus und verlangt nach inter- und transdisziplinärer Forschung unter Einbezug von Sozial-, Medizin- und Naturwischenschaftern. Richtige #PublicHealth-Forschung halt. Zum Paper: https://t.co/SsEgBrIOPk
@EcoDefiance @jasmith_yorku Studies of "mask recommendations" are not the same thing as studies of actually wearing a mask. That's the same mistake reporters made with this study of colonoscopies, when they said "Colonoscopies Don't Work": https://t.co/oV6gttTF4X
@DrHarryThomas https://t.co/fdFjhQBkHT
@oelsparer @CiesekSandra
@Cr1st14nM3s14n0 La riduzione del rischio di morte associata allo screening con colonscopia è circa del 10%: https://t.co/vBC90JSTG9
RT @PBasiukiewicz: Przepraszam, ale to nieprawda jest - wyniki dotyczą głośnego badania w Polsce, Norwegii, Szwecji i Holandii - screeningo…
RT @PBasiukiewicz: Przepraszam, ale to nieprawda jest - wyniki dotyczą głośnego badania w Polsce, Norwegii, Szwecji i Holandii - screeningo…
RT @PBasiukiewicz: Przepraszam, ale to nieprawda jest - wyniki dotyczą głośnego badania w Polsce, Norwegii, Szwecji i Holandii - screeningo…
RT @PBasiukiewicz: Przepraszam, ale to nieprawda jest - wyniki dotyczą głośnego badania w Polsce, Norwegii, Szwecji i Holandii - screeningo…
@StamfordHosp No mortality benefit. https://t.co/xudH9zl1ia
RT @PBasiukiewicz: Przepraszam, ale to nieprawda jest - wyniki dotyczą głośnego badania w Polsce, Norwegii, Szwecji i Holandii - screeningo…
RT @PBasiukiewicz: Przepraszam, ale to nieprawda jest - wyniki dotyczą głośnego badania w Polsce, Norwegii, Szwecji i Holandii - screeningo…
RT @PBasiukiewicz: Przepraszam, ale to nieprawda jest - wyniki dotyczą głośnego badania w Polsce, Norwegii, Szwecji i Holandii - screeningo…
@BBattmer @DocOnco Genau: In der Altersklasse 55-64 Jahre müssen knapp 500 Personen zur Untersuchung eingeladen werden, um ein Kolonkarzinom in den folgenden 10 Jahren zu verhindern.
/WATCH/ Nuance & going beyond the headlines is still important in #medicine!
The risk of #colorectalcancer at 10 years was #lower among participants who were invited to undergo #screening #colonoscopy than among those who were assigned to no screening. | NEJM https://t.co/RBJx1suG9T
RT @CochraneJapan: NEJMより。大腸カメラスクリーニングを実施することは通常診療と比べて、10年のフォローアップ期間中の大腸癌発生リスクを18%減らしましたが、大腸癌関連死亡は有意に低下させませんでした。https://t.co/llG7675T0M
RT @CochraneJapan: NEJMより。大腸カメラスクリーニングを実施することは通常診療と比べて、10年のフォローアップ期間中の大腸癌発生リスクを18%減らしましたが、大腸癌関連死亡は有意に低下させませんでした。https://t.co/llG7675T0M
RT @CochraneJapan: NEJMより。大腸カメラスクリーニングを実施することは通常診療と比べて、10年のフォローアップ期間中の大腸癌発生リスクを18%減らしましたが、大腸癌関連死亡は有意に低下させませんでした。https://t.co/llG7675T0M
RT @CochraneJapan: NEJMより。大腸カメラスクリーニングを実施することは通常診療と比べて、10年のフォローアップ期間中の大腸癌発生リスクを18%減らしましたが、大腸癌関連死亡は有意に低下させませんでした。https://t.co/llG7675T0M
NEJMより。大腸カメラスクリーニングを実施することは通常診療と比べて、10年のフォローアップ期間中の大腸癌発生リスクを18%減らしましたが、大腸癌関連死亡は有意に低下させませんでした。https://t.co/llG7675T0M
大腸癌のスクリーニングとして大腸内視鏡検査を勧められた集団は大腸がんの発症リスクが18%低下したという論文がNEJMで掲載されました。 エビデンスのあるスクリーニング検査を行う事は予防医学ではとても重要な事です。 https://t.co/CPBxBG1pwf
@tresfeux @MelnykAndrij https://t.co/Q24LGpAVL0
Este ECA multinacional indaga sobre un programa de cribado do cancro colorectal con colonoscopias https://t.co/qCStzjNjCL https://t.co/yigxNy72To
Paper 2: Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death Presenter: Michael Bretthauer Discussant: Rodrigo Jover Martínez Register: https://t.co/P8lCKRvotD
RT @AmCollegeGastro: 1/⏰for another #EBGI
RT @AmCollegeGastro: 1/⏰for another #EBGI
RT @AmCollegeGastro: 1/⏰for another #EBGI
RT @AmCollegeGastro: 1/⏰for another #EBGI
RT @AmCollegeGastro: 1/⏰for another #EBGI
RT @AmCollegeGastro: 1/⏰for another #EBGI
1/⏰for another #EBGI
RT @UCDsmj: First up, Jaclyn Croyle will be presenting on the Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Dea…
First up, Jaclyn Croyle will be presenting on the Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death, NEJM. Secondly, Peter Clinton will be discussing Postoperative Packing of Perianal Abscess Cavities (PPAC2): randomized clinical trial, BJS
RT @37phoenix: 大腸内視鏡スクリーニングは10年後の大腸がんリスクを低下させたが、大腸がん関連死亡や全死亡は有意差がなかった。大腸がんを1例防ぐためには455(95%CI,270-1429)のスクリーニングが必要。N Engl J Med. 2022; 387:1…
RT @37phoenix: 大腸内視鏡スクリーニングは10年後の大腸がんリスクを低下させたが、大腸がん関連死亡や全死亡は有意差がなかった。大腸がんを1例防ぐためには455(95%CI,270-1429)のスクリーニングが必要。N Engl J Med. 2022; 387:1…
RT @37phoenix: 大腸内視鏡スクリーニングは10年後の大腸がんリスクを低下させたが、大腸がん関連死亡や全死亡は有意差がなかった。大腸がんを1例防ぐためには455(95%CI,270-1429)のスクリーニングが必要。N Engl J Med. 2022; 387:1…
RT @37phoenix: 大腸内視鏡スクリーニングは10年後の大腸がんリスクを低下させたが、大腸がん関連死亡や全死亡は有意差がなかった。大腸がんを1例防ぐためには455(95%CI,270-1429)のスクリーニングが必要。N Engl J Med. 2022; 387:1…
RT @37phoenix: 大腸内視鏡スクリーニングは10年後の大腸がんリスクを低下させたが、大腸がん関連死亡や全死亡は有意差がなかった。大腸がんを1例防ぐためには455(95%CI,270-1429)のスクリーニングが必要。N Engl J Med. 2022; 387:1…
RT @37phoenix: 大腸内視鏡スクリーニングは10年後の大腸がんリスクを低下させたが、大腸がん関連死亡や全死亡は有意差がなかった。大腸がんを1例防ぐためには455(95%CI,270-1429)のスクリーニングが必要。N Engl J Med. 2022; 387:1…
RT @37phoenix: 大腸内視鏡スクリーニングは10年後の大腸がんリスクを低下させたが、大腸がん関連死亡や全死亡は有意差がなかった。大腸がんを1例防ぐためには455(95%CI,270-1429)のスクリーニングが必要。N Engl J Med. 2022; 387:1…
RT @37phoenix: 大腸内視鏡スクリーニングは10年後の大腸がんリスクを低下させたが、大腸がん関連死亡や全死亡は有意差がなかった。大腸がんを1例防ぐためには455(95%CI,270-1429)のスクリーニングが必要。N Engl J Med. 2022; 387:1…
RT @37phoenix: 大腸内視鏡スクリーニングは10年後の大腸がんリスクを低下させたが、大腸がん関連死亡や全死亡は有意差がなかった。大腸がんを1例防ぐためには455(95%CI,270-1429)のスクリーニングが必要。N Engl J Med. 2022; 387:1…
RT @37phoenix: 大腸内視鏡スクリーニングは10年後の大腸がんリスクを低下させたが、大腸がん関連死亡や全死亡は有意差がなかった。大腸がんを1例防ぐためには455(95%CI,270-1429)のスクリーニングが必要。N Engl J Med. 2022; 387:1…
RT @37phoenix: 大腸内視鏡スクリーニングは10年後の大腸がんリスクを低下させたが、大腸がん関連死亡や全死亡は有意差がなかった。大腸がんを1例防ぐためには455(95%CI,270-1429)のスクリーニングが必要。N Engl J Med. 2022; 387:1…
RT @37phoenix: 大腸内視鏡スクリーニングは10年後の大腸がんリスクを低下させたが、大腸がん関連死亡や全死亡は有意差がなかった。大腸がんを1例防ぐためには455(95%CI,270-1429)のスクリーニングが必要。N Engl J Med. 2022; 387:1…
RT @37phoenix: 大腸内視鏡スクリーニングは10年後の大腸がんリスクを低下させたが、大腸がん関連死亡や全死亡は有意差がなかった。大腸がんを1例防ぐためには455(95%CI,270-1429)のスクリーニングが必要。N Engl J Med. 2022; 387:1…
RT @37phoenix: 大腸内視鏡スクリーニングは10年後の大腸がんリスクを低下させたが、大腸がん関連死亡や全死亡は有意差がなかった。大腸がんを1例防ぐためには455(95%CI,270-1429)のスクリーニングが必要。N Engl J Med. 2022; 387:1…
RT @37phoenix: 大腸内視鏡スクリーニングは10年後の大腸がんリスクを低下させたが、大腸がん関連死亡や全死亡は有意差がなかった。大腸がんを1例防ぐためには455(95%CI,270-1429)のスクリーニングが必要。N Engl J Med. 2022; 387:1…
大腸内視鏡スクリーニングは10年後の大腸がんリスクを低下させたが、大腸がん関連死亡や全死亡は有意差がなかった。大腸がんを1例防ぐためには455(95%CI,270-1429)のスクリーニングが必要。N Engl J Med. 2022; 387:1547. PMID: 36214590.https://t.co/gT0242PkqJ
El cribado del Cáncer Colorrectal con Colonoscopia disminuye el riesgo de padecerlo, pero se necesitan cribar 455 sujetos para obtener beneficio en uno. Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/UUDZOWpy8T
RT @RevistaMFSamfyc: Efecto del cribado colonoscópico sobre los riesgos de cáncer colorrectal y muertes relacionadas https://t.co/eHHvm0gtl…
RT @SSMCAbuDhabi: #SSMC in partnership with Mayo Clinic is hosting a lecture, titled ‘Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorecta…
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM - https://t.co/AXFKfsdbCz https://t.co/W6EdMPWMr2
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/Z2jTADoqOC
Effect van screeningscoloscopie lijkt positief, zelfs met een lage participatiegraad (42%) in de groep die uitgenodigd werd voor screening. Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/SupE5XrVmx
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death Se necesitan 455 colonoscopias para prevenir un caso de Cáncer colorrectal. N Engl J Med 2022; 387:1547-1556 https://t.co/cRi7IXIiIj
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death https://t.co/PQheaNUKIx
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/GPu83Ys11d https://t.co/EHJTM8b0pH
Lo de siempre. Cribado colonoscopia: reduce riesgo de cáncer colorrectal a 10 años (0.98% invited group vs. 1.20% usual-care group, risk reduction of 18% (risk ratio, 0.82[CI95 0.70-0.93]), pero no el riesgo de muerte (risk ratio, 0.90; 95CI, 0.64-1.16). https://t.co/nUX5pav4Al
#SSMC in partnership with Mayo Clinic is hosting a lecture, titled ‘Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death’, on Oct. 27 from noon to 1 p.m. Please use this link to join the session: https://t.co/LbNOICiV1o https://t.co/9n2jbMNdkF
Efecto del cribado colonoscópico sobre los riesgos de cáncer colorrectal y muertes relacionadas https://t.co/eHHvm0gtlU PMID 36214590
RT @club_gut: 'Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death' “This relatively small reduction in the ris…
RT @club_gut: 'Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death' “This relatively small reduction in the ris…
'Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death' “This relatively small reduction in the risk of colorectal cancer and the nonsignificant reduction in the risk of death are both surprising and disappointing,” @NEJM https://t.co/ezKrpdehOv
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/rmsdxsIEyg
RT @JohnHRandall1: Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/Y0hKWPFNIg
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/Y0hKWPFNIg
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death via @NEJM https://t.co/TOHagS4RQS
@lenard_jakub @damian_patecki @kosik_md „Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death” A jakie było Twoje tłumaczenie? cośtam cośtam brak wpływu cośtam cośtam kolonoskopii
#Colonoscopy is the most comprehensive screening for #colorectalcancer, despite flawed interpretations of a new study @ConversationEDU @nejm https://t.co/wVg8xeaXiL https://t.co/dNoLU87uGN
RT @MLPOncoData: Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death: risk of death from colorectal cancer was…
RT @medical_xpress: Colonoscopy-#screening does not prevent #colorectalcancer as well as previously assumed @nejm https://t.co/mNbqCrYt80 h…
RT @SorenBentzen: The NordICC RCT (N=84,585) of colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer show a ↓death from CRC: 0.28% in the invited gr…
not an attractive target: cost of screening 455 vs cost of treating one CRC cost of changing food habits of 455 vs cost of treating one CRC precancerous detection decreases cancerous conversion maybe prebiotic-probiotic-synbiotic decreases CRC @GutBugs2 https://t.co/2KSa4Ns66Y
RT @PeterRaubs: For my #Medical registrars a seminal paper: Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death…
For my #Medical registrars a seminal paper: Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/21YpweirPX
RT @SorenBentzen: The NordICC RCT (N=84,585) of colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer show a ↓death from CRC: 0.28% in the invited gr…
RT @SorenBentzen: The NordICC RCT (N=84,585) of colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer show a ↓death from CRC: 0.28% in the invited gr…
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/QC87wXW16a
RT @SorenBentzen: The NordICC RCT (N=84,585) of colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer show a ↓death from CRC: 0.28% in the invited gr…
The NordICC RCT (N=84,585) of colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer show a ↓death from CRC: 0.28% in the invited group vs. 0.31% in controls. Unsurprisingly, screening believers argue for relative effect measures (!!) & per-protocol analysis
@AaronGoodman33 RCT entered the discussion: Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/duT0dNp3RT
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/6AzH69u2yB
Pragmatic,Randomized Trial 84,585
RT @daniel_corcos: Attentes irrationnelles face aux dépistages des cancers. À propos de l'essai NordICC sur le cancer colo-rectal. https://…
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/1UaZGEwojW
Attentes irrationnelles face aux dépistages des cancers. À propos de l'essai NordICC sur le cancer colo-rectal. https://t.co/KiqNPRV5qa @docdu16 @MartinFierro769 @barriere_dr https://t.co/GJJc18OJ1l
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/M3F2kP8U0D
@futurism Stop spreading misinfo. https://t.co/bMdVtTpa8X
RT @joakirodriguez: Súper interesante los resultados del ECA publicado este mes en @NEJM Aquí lo tienes, aunque te hago un miniresumen a co…
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death https://t.co/jcKGQcGX7m
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death @NEJM https://t.co/xrMpAd3SNm
RT @medical_xpress: 'No one should cancel their colonoscopies': Addressing controversy from a recent clinical trial @nejm https://t.co/mNbq…
RT @medical_xpress: 'No one should cancel their colonoscopies': Addressing controversy from a recent clinical trial @nejm https://t.co/mNbq…
'No one should cancel their colonoscopies': Addressing controversy from a recent clinical trial @nejm https://t.co/mNbqCrYt80 https://t.co/PbTKPkL1G2
RT @thierrysouccar: 1/2 La coloscopie, qui est conseillée pour le dépistage du cancer du côlon, ne réduit ni la mortalité par cancer ni la…
RT @thierrysouccar: 1/2 La coloscopie, qui est conseillée pour le dépistage du cancer du côlon, ne réduit ni la mortalité par cancer ni la…
Benefits of screening colonoscopy are minuscule at best. Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/5mfvKao0mL
1/2 La coloscopie, qui est conseillée pour le dépistage du cancer du côlon, ne réduit ni la mortalité par cancer ni la mortalité toutes causes selon le premier essai randomisé et contrôlé sur cette procédure. https://t.co/6exWV1D4nf
RT @ProfDMThomas: Important & surprising result for current common practice: Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer…
RT @ProfDMThomas: Important & surprising result for current common practice: Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer…
RT @ProfDMThomas: Important & surprising result for current common practice: Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer…
Important & surprising result for current common practice: Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/LkXeDI5nks
RT @medical_xpress: Colonoscopy-#screening does not prevent #colorectalcancer as well as previously assumed @nejm https://t.co/mNbqCrYt80 h…
RT @GlobalPHObserv: Effect of #Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/BcYpuA1tQu
RT @GlobalPHObserv: Effect of #Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/BcYpuA1tQu
RT @GlobalPHObserv: Effect of #Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/BcYpuA1tQu
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/zv2spdv4GJ
The question when and who to scope to reduce CRC becomes even more evident... Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/4jR3si2k1g
@GKochharMD @NEJM I don’t think they did? “Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death” for me they did exactly what it says on the tin. Even in the title it didn’t provide a bias one way or another
RT @IntegratedGIC:
RT @IntegratedGIC:
RT @IntegratedGIC:
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death https://t.co/zj77Mo4bfu
https://t.co/pHVVNC9NcK › doi › pdf Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death https://t.co/fAugla49yg
(2/9) Hace unos días se publicó el primer ECA robusto que evalúa la efectividad del tamizaje con colonoscopía (https://t.co/r2h6qIZcVL). ¿Qué encontró?
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/uIAcxFU3Cr
0.98% でした。調査期間の10年間に、内視鏡検査を受けたかどうかに関係なく、1,000人中3人しか大腸がんで死亡しませんでした。検査の有無で死亡率に有意な減少はありませんでした。New England Journal of Medicine誌https://t.co/MEvknQfngJ
RT @Laurie_Garrett: For more than 10 years, 84,585 patients in Poland, Norway, & Sweden were followed to see if #colonoscopies found polyps…
Wegen dieser Koloskopie -Studie: "Zur Kolo eingeladen" ist nicht gleich "Kolo bekommen". Unterm Strich zeigt sich die Effektivität dieser screeningmethode. @schmidt_doc zeigt das hier sehr schön https://t.co/uDlPsFPlKI
@adil_rashidk @NEJM the title is literally “Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death.” This is misleading and creates uncertainty when there should be none. we should be focusing on improving CRC screening, not debating if colonoscopies decrease mortality.
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/uiL231IxMe
RT @Laurie_Garrett: For more than 10 years, 84,585 patients in Poland, Norway, & Sweden were followed to see if #colonoscopies found polyps…
RT @JohnRTMonsonMD: Read this really important study - Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NE…
RT @LyellJ: @ColinWestMDPhD @NEJM Thanks for this Colin, agreed. Simple neurologist’s take, but it seems badly mis-titled: “Effect of Colon…
@monykalyn They’re not focusing on that aspect b/c the discussion centers around this study which has caused a lot of fuss
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death https://t.co/hF7GyPnjVo
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death #death #risks #colorectal https://t.co/L5NK1VonpT
#colonoscopy OK by "per-protocol" analysis. https://t.co/aVS8pjuO2G via @NEJM But there are reasons we don't do "per-protocol" analyses. https://t.co/WmKIMTDtLz via @JAMA_current #epdiemiology #medicine #evidence #ColonCancer https://t.co/NaYNg53jeJ
RT @Laurie_Garrett: For more than 10 years, 84,585 patients in Poland, Norway, & Sweden were followed to see if #colonoscopies found polyps…
RT @Laurie_Garrett: For more than 10 years, 84,585 patients in Poland, Norway, & Sweden were followed to see if #colonoscopies found polyps…
RT @the_paper_link: Trend top+1: Bretthauer M, ..., NordICC Study Group (N Engl J Med) __Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Color…
RT @Laurie_Garrett: For more than 10 years, 84,585 patients in Poland, Norway, & Sweden were followed to see if #colonoscopies found polyps…
RT @Laurie_Garrett: For more than 10 years, 84,585 patients in Poland, Norway, & Sweden were followed to see if #colonoscopies found polyps…
RT @Laurie_Garrett: For more than 10 years, 84,585 patients in Poland, Norway, & Sweden were followed to see if #colonoscopies found polyps…
RT @Laurie_Garrett: For more than 10 years, 84,585 patients in Poland, Norway, & Sweden were followed to see if #colonoscopies found polyps…
RT @Laurie_Garrett: For more than 10 years, 84,585 patients in Poland, Norway, & Sweden were followed to see if #colonoscopies found polyps…
RT @Laurie_Garrett: For more than 10 years, 84,585 patients in Poland, Norway, & Sweden were followed to see if #colonoscopies found polyps…
RT @Laurie_Garrett: For more than 10 years, 84,585 patients in Poland, Norway, & Sweden were followed to see if #colonoscopies found polyps…
RT @drnic1: ❗️Study does *NOT* invalidate colonoscopies 4screening
❗️Study does *NOT* invalidate colonoscopies 4screening
RT @Laurie_Garrett: For more than 10 years, 84,585 patients in Poland, Norway, & Sweden were followed to see if #colonoscopies found polyps…
RT @Laurie_Garrett: For more than 10 years, 84,585 patients in Poland, Norway, & Sweden were followed to see if #colonoscopies found polyps…
RT @Laurie_Garrett: For more than 10 years, 84,585 patients in Poland, Norway, & Sweden were followed to see if #colonoscopies found polyps…
RT @Laurie_Garrett: For more than 10 years, 84,585 patients in Poland, Norway, & Sweden were followed to see if #colonoscopies found polyps…
For more than 10 years, 84,585 patients in Poland, Norway, & Sweden were followed to see if #colonoscopies found polyps & prevented cancer. And those who did vs did not have the tests had equal death rates. https://t.co/G8AwO8ezuW & https://t.co/iwHCZQsdoJ
@RyanMarino Is this what prompted your tweet? https://t.co/KGWhzzQujD
RT @joakirodriguez: Súper interesante los resultados del ECA publicado este mes en @NEJM Aquí lo tienes, aunque te hago un miniresumen a co…
Trend top+1: Bretthauer M, ..., NordICC Study Group (N Engl J Med) __Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death__ https://t.co/C21NbfRauZ
Screening colonoscopies saves lives! “Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/cYrEoxY6m5”
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/dlVSREP6Ru
https://t.co/aIQUG7QTUY
RT @VivekSubbiah: Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death @NEJM https://t.co/lRPh6xzstT
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/dG1SeV2Ff8
RCT | Effect of colonoscopy screening on risks of colorectal cancer and related death. – via @NEJM https://t.co/jLjaPAICHc Commentary: https://t.co/UOopHKHxl5
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/cTxmhwXtr8
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/spyCKTqxjt Enlightening : somewhat surprisingly, no impact on survival
RT @medical_xpress: Colonoscopy-#screening does not prevent #colorectalcancer as well as previously assumed @nejm https://t.co/mNbqCrYt80 h…
RT @JohnRTMonsonMD: Read this really important study - Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NE…
RT @JohnRTMonsonMD: Read this really important study - Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NE…
RT @JohnRTMonsonMD: Read this really important study - Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NE…
RT @JohnRTMonsonMD: Read this really important study - Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NE…
Colonoscopy-screening does not prevent colorectal cancer as well as previously assumed https://t.co/T7mqTZinku https://t.co/SAdHqUkXQS https://t.co/X7bgomXFZA
Expecting a lot of hot takes on this. Read it for yourself: Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/qVym4pHLo8
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/T1G1Twp65C
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/RAY0rADY43
RT @JohnRTMonsonMD: Read this really important study - Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NE…
RT @joakirodriguez: Súper interesante los resultados del ECA publicado este mes en @NEJM Aquí lo tienes, aunque te hago un miniresumen a co…
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death https://t.co/iYUfgcDEsp comm: https://t.co/I18JOVJmWY
RT @JuanGrvas: Cribado cáncer colon con colonoscopia. Sin impacto en mortalidad por cáncer de colon, tampoco en la mortalidad general. Inút…
RT @joakirodriguez: Súper interesante los resultados del ECA publicado este mes en @NEJM Aquí lo tienes, aunque te hago un miniresumen a co…
RT @joakirodriguez: Súper interesante los resultados del ECA publicado este mes en @NEJM Aquí lo tienes, aunque te hago un miniresumen a co…
RT @JuanGrvas: Cribado cáncer colon con colonoscopia. Sin impacto en mortalidad por cáncer de colon, tampoco en la mortalidad general. Inút…
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death | NEJM https://t.co/WppkOSFBDF
RT @joakirodriguez: Súper interesante los resultados del ECA publicado este mes en @NEJM Aquí lo tienes, aunque te hago un miniresumen a co…
RT @VivekSubbiah: Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death @NEJM https://t.co/lRPh6xzstT
RT @VivekSubbiah: Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death @NEJM https://t.co/lRPh6xzstT
RT @joakirodriguez: Súper interesante los resultados del ECA publicado este mes en @NEJM Aquí lo tienes, aunque te hago un miniresumen a co…
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2208375
RT @joakirodriguez: Súper interesante los resultados del ECA publicado este mes en @NEJM Aquí lo tienes, aunque te hago un miniresumen a co…
Súper interesante los resultados del ECA publicado este mes en @NEJM Aquí lo tienes, aunque te hago un miniresumen a continuación
RT @medical_xpress: Colonoscopy-#screening does not prevent #colorectalcancer as well as previously assumed @nejm https://t.co/mNbqCrYt80 h…
New article: Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death https://t.co/Pw1FsDQtzQ #colorectalcancer #oncology https://t.co/GFK4H7Xk0K
RT @medical_xpress: Colonoscopy-#screening does not prevent #colorectalcancer as well as previously assumed @nejm https://t.co/mNbqCrYt80 h…
RT @medical_xpress: Colonoscopy-#screening does not prevent #colorectalcancer as well as previously assumed @nejm https://t.co/mNbqCrYt80 h…
RT @medical_xpress: Colonoscopy-#screening does not prevent #colorectalcancer as well as previously assumed @nejm https://t.co/mNbqCrYt80 h…
RT @medical_xpress: Colonoscopy-#screening does not prevent #colorectalcancer as well as previously assumed @nejm https://t.co/mNbqCrYt80 h…
RT @medical_xpress: Colonoscopy-#screening does not prevent #colorectalcancer as well as previously assumed @nejm https://t.co/mNbqCrYt80 h…
RT @medical_xpress: Colonoscopy-#screening does not prevent #colorectalcancer as well as previously assumed @nejm https://t.co/mNbqCrYt80 h…
RT @medical_xpress: Colonoscopy-#screening does not prevent #colorectalcancer as well as previously assumed @nejm https://t.co/mNbqCrYt80 h…
RT @medical_xpress: Colonoscopy-#screening does not prevent #colorectalcancer as well as previously assumed @nejm https://t.co/mNbqCrYt80 h…
Colonoscopy-#screening does not prevent #colorectalcancer as well as previously assumed @nejm https://t.co/mNbqCrYt80 https://t.co/4TZM7JcWLX
W
AG
CU