Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions highlight awareness of the publication's citation history, such as noting that a paper citing the retracted article was itself retracted, which indicates a cautious or dismissive stance. The tone is neutral, emphasizing procedural aspects rather than interpreting scientific significance, resulting in a balanced but shallow engagement.
The discussions show little consensus, with some posts referencing the paper but also mentioning the retraction, leading to neutral agreement levels.
Overall curiosity appears moderate; participants are aware of the publication but do not express strong excitement or disapproval.
The tone suggests minimal deep analysis, with a focus on reporting the citation and retraction status rather than detailed discussion.
The potential influence of the publication is unclear—some note the retraction, which diminishes perceived impact.
We've detected a paper from Nano-Micro Letters that cites a retracted paper post-retraction. Citing paper: https://t.co/p0fPU2kBXi Retracted paper: https://t.co/AJWBSGDYgA
224. Significantly Enhanced Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Performances of Epoxy Nanocomposites with Long-Range Aligned Lamellar Structures https://t.co/P3m7iqhBwp https://t.co/0WGTH7PJLT
This video discusses the improved electromagnetic interference shielding performances of epoxy nanocomposites with long-range aligned lamellar structures, highlighting innovative design and material properties.
We've detected a paper from Nano-Micro Letters that cites a retracted paper post-retraction. Citing paper: https://t.co/p0fPU2kBXi Retracted paper: https://t.co/AJWBSGDYgA
224. Significantly Enhanced Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Performances of Epoxy Nanocomposites with Long-Range Aligned Lamellar Structures https://t.co/P3m7iqhBwp https://t.co/0WGTH7PJLT