PLOS Glob Public Health April 2022 PMID 36962242

Measurement tools and indicators for assessing nurturing care for early childhood development: A scoping review.

Joshua Jeong, Lilia Bliznashka, Eileen Sullivan, Elizabeth Hentschel, Youngkwang Jeon, Kathleen L Strong, Bernadette Daelmans

Download social card

Mentions

Peak: 9 in May 2022

across 4 sources since Apr 2022

Extended reach

30,846

potential audience

Total likes

Video views

Mentions per month

Apr 2022 – Jun 2023

Where it's discussed

News12 articles
X / Twitter10 posts
Facebook2 posts
YouTube1 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

Several posts demonstrate strong support for the article, describing it as 'comprehensive' and 'important,' with phrases like 'thrilled' and 'provides a thorough review.' The tone highlights enthusiasm and acknowledgment of the study's value, reflecting high interest and optimism about its potential influence in the field of early childhood development research.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions express strong support and enthusiasm for the article, emphasizing its comprehensive nature and importance.

InterestHigh interest

Posts show high curiosity and engagement with the topic, highlighting the relevance of measuring nurturing care for early childhood development.

EngagementModerate engagement

Discussions reflect a moderate level of detailed engagement, such as referencing the scope and significance of the review but lacking deep analytical critique.

ImpactModerate impact

The shared posts suggest that the article is perceived as impactful for advancing research and policy in early childhood development, though broader implications are implied rather than explicitly discussed.

Abstract in brief

The scoping review focused on measuring nurturing care for early childhood development in low- and middle-income countries, covering five key components: health, nutrition, early learning, responsive caregiving, and safety and security, but found more emphasis on health and nutrition than on early learning, caregiving, or safety.
A total of 239 studies from over 50 LMICs were analyzed, revealing that most studies assessed nutrition, early learning, and health, with fewer focusing on responsive caregiving and safety and security, indicating gaps in measurement for the latter components.
The review identified various constructs and indicators within each component—such as anthropometry for nutrition, stimulation practices for early learning, and parent-child interactions for responsive caregiving—highlighting the complexity of measuring all aspects of nurturing care comprehensively.]

Read the full abstract

All mentions

Assessment Tools for Nurturing Care in Early Childhood Development

This scoping review examines measurement tools for nurturing care in early childhood development in low- and middle-income countries, focusing on health, nutrition, early learning, responsive caregiving, and safety…

Medicine RTCL TV · Jun 27, 2023 12 views

schooht

@schooht · X