Aunque #ChatGPT resulta prometedor como ayuda para #RevisionesSistemáticas aún no es fiable Are ChatGPT and large language models "the answer" to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? Syst Rev. 2023 doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02243-z #medlibs
Are ChatGPT and large language models "the answer" to bringing us closer to systematic review automation?
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Apr 2023 – Aug 2023Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter34 posts
-
Blogs3 articles
-
News2 articles
-
YouTube1 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The discussions reflect a cautious optimism about the prospects of large language models in systematic review automation. For example, comments like 'promising but not reliable' and 'still in its infancy' highlight the recognition of technological potential alongside current limitations. The tone varies from hopeful to reserved, emphasizing the importance of ongoing development to achieve impactful automation tools.
The discussions show mixed opinions, with some posts acknowledging the promise of LLMs like ChatGPT, while others emphasize its current limitations and the need for further development.
Most comments express at least moderate curiosity, especially with references to the potential and challenges of applying these models to systematic reviews.
There is some engagement with the topic, as posters reference specific articles and mention the infancy stage of the technology, indicating a moderate level of critical reflection.
The discussions suggest that the current state of LLMs might offer some helpful assistance but is unlikely to revolutionize systematic review processes in the immediate future, making the perceived impact moderate.
Abstract in brief
- ChatGPT and large language models (LLMs) like OpenAI's are being looked at as potential tools to help automate systematic reviews (SRs), which are time-consuming and resource-intensive research processes.
- Right now, these AI tools can provide some useful assistance with SR tasks, but they are still in early development stages and require significant improvement before they can be reliably integrated into scientific research.
- The authors caution that non-experts should be careful when using ChatGPT for SRs because, although some responses seem valid, many contain errors and need careful review and validation.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and BlueskyAre ChatGPT and large language models “the answer” to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? https://t.co/DIfaeQT5gr
Are ChatGPT and large language models “the answer” to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? Via @BioMedCentral CC @carrieprice78 https://t.co/q4ewD35WwA
Are ChatGPT and large language models “the answer” to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? https://t.co/WOV9TpFhOh
Qureshi R….Are ChatGPT and large language models "the answer" to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 29;12(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02243-z. https://t.co/sz7PWyEy7Z
All mentions
Evaluating ChatGPT and Large Language Models for Systematic Review Automation
ChatGPT and large language models are being explored as tools to automate systematic reviews, which are currently resource-intensive. While promising, these AI tools are still in early stages and require careful…
(2/2) ...A related commentary covers this topic and is worth adding to your reading list
RT @biblioGetafe: Aunque #ChatGPT resulta prometedor como ayuda para #RevisionesSistemáticas aún no es fiable Are ChatGPT and large languag…
RT @tomroper: Qureshi R….Are ChatGPT and large language models "the answer" to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? Syst Rev…
RT @tomroper: Qureshi R….Are ChatGPT and large language models "the answer" to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? Syst Rev…
RT @tomroper: Qureshi R….Are ChatGPT and large language models "the answer" to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? Syst Rev…
Are #ChatGPT and large language models “the answer” to bringing us closer to #systematicreview automation? Nice read to start a Tuesday
RT @biblioGetafe: Aunque #ChatGPT resulta prometedor como ayuda para #RevisionesSistemáticas aún no es fiable Are ChatGPT and large languag…
RT @biblioGetafe: Aunque #ChatGPT resulta prometedor como ayuda para #RevisionesSistemáticas aún no es fiable Are ChatGPT and large languag…
RT @biblioGetafe: Aunque #ChatGPT resulta prometedor como ayuda para #RevisionesSistemáticas aún no es fiable Are ChatGPT and large languag…
RT @biblioGetafe: Aunque #ChatGPT resulta prometedor como ayuda para #RevisionesSistemáticas aún no es fiable Are ChatGPT and large languag…
RT @biblioGetafe: Aunque #ChatGPT resulta prometedor como ayuda para #RevisionesSistemáticas aún no es fiable Are ChatGPT and large languag…
RT @biblioGetafe: Aunque #ChatGPT resulta prometedor como ayuda para #RevisionesSistemáticas aún no es fiable Are ChatGPT and large languag…
RT @biblioGetafe: Aunque #ChatGPT resulta prometedor como ayuda para #RevisionesSistemáticas aún no es fiable Are ChatGPT and large languag…
Aunque #ChatGPT resulta prometedor como ayuda para #RevisionesSistemáticas aún no es fiable Are ChatGPT and large language models "the answer" to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? Syst Rev. 2023 doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02243-z #medlibs
RT @GlobalPHObserv: Are ChatGPT and large language models “the answer” to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? https://t.co…
https://t.co/NWlnF7rWtr
RT @GlobalPHObserv: Are ChatGPT and large language models “the answer” to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? https://t.co…
Are ChatGPT and large language models “the answer” to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? https://t.co/WOV9TpFhOh
RT @tomroper: Qureshi R….Are ChatGPT and large language models "the answer" to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? Syst Rev…
RT @tomroper: Qureshi R….Are ChatGPT and large language models "the answer" to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? Syst Rev…
RT @tomroper: Qureshi R….Are ChatGPT and large language models "the answer" to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? Syst Rev…
Qureshi R….Are ChatGPT and large language models "the answer" to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 29;12(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02243-z. https://t.co/sz7PWyEy7Z
'While ChatGPT and large language models show some promise for aiding in systematic review-related tasks, the technology is in its infancy and needs much development for such applications' https://t.co/WEfHupBf09 #ChatGPT @OpenAI https://t.co/BwGTJamOym
Are ChatGPT and large language models "the answer" to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? https://t.co/mtasKxVZKA
Are ChatGPT and large language models "the answer" to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? https://t.co/zq4j7KgX0e
RT @FarhadShokrane: Are ChatGPT and large language models “the answer” to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? https://t.co…
Are ChatGPT and large language models "the answer" to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? https://t.co/rWus34H6Zs
RT @FarhadShokrane: Are ChatGPT and large language models “the answer” to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? https://t.co…
RT @FarhadShokrane: Are ChatGPT and large language models “the answer” to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? https://t.co…
RT @FarhadShokrane: Are ChatGPT and large language models “the answer” to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? https://t.co…
RT @FarhadShokrane: Are ChatGPT and large language models “the answer” to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? https://t.co…
Are ChatGPT and large language models “the answer” to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? Via @BioMedCentral CC @carrieprice78 https://t.co/q4ewD35WwA
Are ChatGPT and large language models “the answer” to bringing us closer to systematic review automation? https://t.co/DIfaeQT5gr