Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The overall discussion reflects strong agreement and interest, with language emphasizing the seriousness of automation bias and its effects, such as phrases like 'worrisome,' 'immediate concern,' and 'significant issue.' Comments referencing different user experiences highlight the depth of engagement, and numerous posts underscore the impact of AI on diagnostics, emphasizing the need for caution and further research.
Most social discussions acknowledge the validity and importance of the findings, with many emphasizing the risks of automation bias in medical contexts.
Posts show high interest, as evidenced by commentary on the implications for medical practice and concerns about AI accuracy and bias.
Several comments delve into specific aspects such as the influence of experience level on susceptibility to AI errors and debates on medical decision-making.
Users widely recognize the article's significance, citing potential harm, necessity for vigilance, and the broader influence on AI use in healthcare.
Incorrect AI decision support impaired the performance of radiologists with varying levels of expertise when they read mammograms. https://t.co/ASP0H05QyJ https://t.co/dTkf0VPt8N
So not only is it wildly inaccurate, but AI mistakes not only weren’t caught by humans but resulted in a decreased accuracy in human decision making in: Dratsch et al. 2023. Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance
3/ Speaking of #AutomationBias, here’s a @radiology_rsna article just published yesterday highlighting why this is so important. "Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance" https://t.co/h0sS4lYdHF #RadAIchat https://t.co/joIv3jcJlY
@RadRudie @Radiology_AI 1/2 Same here! An important lesson in 2023 was that bias could be hiding behind all stages of AI development #RadAIchat E.g. automation bias - Have a look at https://t.co/Z84rGLqlgG
This video explores how radiology AI products undergo regulatory approval and discusses automation bias in mammography, highlighting how AI suggestions influence radiologist performance, especially among less…
Interview about our recent paper on automation bias in mammography, examining how AI BI-RADS suggestions influence radiologist accuracy, especially across experience levels. Dr. Daniel Pinto dos Santos provides detailed…
This video explores how reliance on AI can influence radiologists' accuracy, especially among less experienced practitioners, highlighting risks associated with automation bias in medicine.
This interview with Dr. Daniel Pinto dos Santos discusses a recent study exploring how AI suggestions influence radiologists' accuracy, emphasizing differences across experience levels and highlighting risks of…
This study explores how automation bias affects radiologists' accuracy in reading mammograms when aided by AI, highlighting increased risks for less experienced practitioners.
So not only is it wildly inaccurate, but AI mistakes not only weren’t caught by humans but resulted in a decreased accuracy in human decision making in: Dratsch et al. 2023. Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance
@docteur_TJ Bonjour. Cette étude semble aller dans votre sens mais pourrait même être comprise comme démontrant que l’usage d’IA impacte négativement la qualité des diagnostiques - y compris chez les experts. Qu’en pensez vous ?merci. https://t.co/bzuD0h4Fms
@UristInFurs https://t.co/T1WXqJXaEs other studies for lung cancer too. i have not seen one that definitively proves it benefits physicians. would not want a pattern matching machine to make medical decisions. If doctors accept this, it will be used by insurance to deny care in turn.
@ylecun @lessig These kind of things are not ‘devastating’, but they are worrisome: https://t.co/NZZAnYI1Wd
This “automation bias” Is a much more real and much more immediate concern of AI than any Frankenstein scares. https://t.co/NZZAnYI1Wd
@marketswithmay In this experiment in Germany, radiologists trusted “recommendations of AI” (faked and sometimes purposely wrong) over their own knowledge and experience when reviewing mammograms. https://t.co/NZZAnYI1Wd
RT @ProfLHunter: Looks like LLMs can cause real harm in medicine, even with human expert review. Quite troubling... https://t.co/DG6Mrn…
RT @ProfLHunter: Looks like LLMs can cause real harm in medicine, even with human expert review. Quite troubling... https://t.co/DG6Mrn…
RT @ProfLHunter: Looks like LLMs can cause real harm in medicine, even with human expert review. Quite troubling... https://t.co/DG6Mrn…
RT @ProfLHunter: Looks like LLMs can cause real harm in medicine, even with human expert review. Quite troubling... https://t.co/DG6Mrn…
RT @ProfLHunter: Looks like LLMs can cause real harm in medicine, even with human expert review. Quite troubling... https://t.co/DG6Mrn…
RT @mhatta: Automation Bias in Mammography https://t.co/b5EeqHdydU
Looks like LLMs can cause real harm in medicine, even with human expert review. Quite troubling... https://t.co/DG6MrnDdnQ
Automation Bias in Mammography https://t.co/b5EeqHdydU
@JessHealyWalton see this re automation bias: just having an AI in the loop erodes the accuracy of experienced experts. https://t.co/Keb3xYrHdG
Very interesting read on automation and ML and how delicate the use of ML is even in apparently "solved" problems: Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance | Radiology https://t.co/yTU7nQNxCs
@_gradinko @histoftech According to the cited paper, the percentages of correct rates were 79.7% , 81.3% and 82.3% for inexperienced, moderately experienced, and very experienced ones. So the experienced ones have a higher rate, but all of them are close to 80%. https://t.co/TcaL8lZMce
@florian_georg @Mystic_Lawyer @fchollet Another study: https://t.co/xPZL7Z4IyM
Vigilance against this bias is essential. https://t.co/TyxnXQfidh https://t.co/K0XmowRuR1
RT @Klonmich: @RadRudie @Radiology_AI 1/2 Same here! An important lesson in 2023 was that bias could be hiding behind all stages of AI deve…
RT @Klonmich: @RadRudie @Radiology_AI 1/2 Same here! An important lesson in 2023 was that bias could be hiding behind all stages of AI deve…
RT @Klonmich: @RadRudie @Radiology_AI 1/2 Same here! An important lesson in 2023 was that bias could be hiding behind all stages of AI deve…
@RadRudie @Radiology_AI 1/2 Same here! An important lesson in 2023 was that bias could be hiding behind all stages of AI development #RadAIchat E.g. automation bias - Have a look at https://t.co/Z84rGLqlgG
You can find the original article here:
@pranavrajpurkar @HarvardDBMI @MITEcon Great work, I think highlights the need much more human-ai team research. Why do you think different parameters yield different levels of “trust” with any model? See: https://t.co/p1dgmWNWlA
RT @curtlanglotz: "Radiologists reading mammograms are prone to automation bias when supported by AI. Inexperienced radiologists were more…
RT @EUSOBIyc: ✅ Daniel is the vice president of the European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics (EuSoMII) ✅ @pintodrad is the deputy ed…
RT @EUSOBIyc:
RT @EUSOBIyc:
✅ Daniel is the vice president of the European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics (EuSoMII) ✅ @pintodrad is the deputy editor for AI in European Radiology
@ShaunLintern @wesstreeting Wes is talking rubbish IMO. This is NOT the way to reform @NHSEngland Just published "Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of AI BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance" https://t.co/qDWLpblspd via @tmdratsch et al ... 1/n
RT @EUSOBIyc:
RT @EUSOBIyc:
RT @EUSOBIyc:
Similar to evidence found for #mammography in @radiology_rsna: https://t.co/3ah4EeGIfD @tmdratsch @Baessler_Rad @EuSoMII
Automation Bias in #Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance @radiology_rsna https://t.co/P6Un0wFIeY
RT @EricTopol: Automation bias, whereby the physician believes the #AI interpretation too readily, is a significant issue. Here quantified…
RT @medical_xpress: #AI bias may impair radiologist accuracy on mammogram @rsna https://t.co/JYXxG8U31G https://t.co/CcDUzV7Uto
RT @medical_xpress: #AI bias may impair radiologist accuracy on mammogram @rsna https://t.co/JYXxG8U31G https://t.co/CcDUzV7Uto
@Spin_Echoes https://t.co/8Rq8DP2QlI Here’s the link
RT @DoctorSebastian: Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance https…
RT @DoctorSebastian: Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance https…
Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance https://t.co/7REKD1GKjF
RT @radiology_rsna: Incorrect AI decision support impaired the performance of radiologists with varying levels of expertise when they read…
RT @radiology_rsna: Incorrect AI decision support impaired the performance of radiologists with varying levels of expertise when they read…
RT @radiology_rsna: Incorrect AI decision support impaired the performance of radiologists with varying levels of expertise when they read…
Incorrect AI decision support impaired the performance of radiologists with varying levels of expertise when they read mammograms. https://t.co/ASP0H05QyJ https://t.co/dTkf0VPt8N
RT @mmahesh1: "Incorrect advice by a purported artificial intelligence–based decision support system impaired the performance of radiologis…
"Incorrect advice by a purported artificial intelligence–based decision support system impaired the performance of radiologists w varying levels of expertise, ranging from inexperienced to very experienced, when reading mammograms" https://t.co/ZqQo5kxBxK @aapmHQ @RadiologyACR https://t.co/BIlaJdUhpY
RT @salvasapedraza: Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance https:/…
Just a friendly reminder that providers of all experience levels are susceptible to "automation bias". Basically, we tend to just accept the answers provided by, say, and AI-powered tool for interpreting imaging studies, even if...(1/x) https://t.co/4RZol8yaWL
RT @EricTopol: Automation bias, whereby the physician believes the #AI interpretation too readily, is a significant issue. Here quantified…
RT @EUSOBIyc:
RT @EUSOBIyc:
RT @EUSOBIyc:
RT @EricTopol: Automation bias, whereby the physician believes the #AI interpretation too readily, is a significant issue. Here quantified…
RT @EricTopol: Automation bias, whereby the physician believes the #AI interpretation too readily, is a significant issue. Here quantified…
実際に当院でソフト導入後に起こってます。ほとんどの人はAIの出力を見なくなった。 https://t.co/1IorJ4u8Qu
RT @salvasapedraza: Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance https:/…
RT @EricTopol: Automation bias, whereby the physician believes the #AI interpretation too readily, is a significant issue. Here quantified…
RT @salvasapedraza: Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance https:/…
RT @salvasapedraza: Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance https:/…
RT @curtlanglotz: "Radiologists reading mammograms are prone to automation bias when supported by AI. Inexperienced radiologists were more…
RT @curtlanglotz: "Radiologists reading mammograms are prone to automation bias when supported by AI. Inexperienced radiologists were more…
RT @GlobalPHObserv: Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance https:/…
RT @GlobalPHObserv: Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance https:/…
RT @EricTopol: Automation bias, whereby the physician believes the #AI interpretation too readily, is a significant issue. Here quantified…
RT @curtlanglotz: "Radiologists reading mammograms are prone to automation bias when supported by AI. Inexperienced radiologists were more…
Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance https://t.co/8nkyX2dhv8
RT @EricTopol: Automation bias, whereby the physician believes the #AI interpretation too readily, is a significant issue. Here quantified…
RT @merelhuisman: One of the first human-machine interaction in #AI for #radiology, with mock-results!
RT @merelhuisman: One of the first human-machine interaction in #AI for #radiology, with mock-results!
RT @curtlanglotz: "Radiologists reading mammograms are prone to automation bias when supported by AI. Inexperienced radiologists were more…
RT @curtlanglotz: "Radiologists reading mammograms are prone to automation bias when supported by AI. Inexperienced radiologists were more…
RT @EricTopol: Automation bias, whereby the physician believes the #AI interpretation too readily, is a significant issue. Here quantified…
RT @EricTopol: Automation bias, whereby the physician believes the #AI interpretation too readily, is a significant issue. Here quantified…
RT @EricTopol: Automation bias, whereby the physician believes the #AI interpretation too readily, is a significant issue. Here quantified…
RT @salvasapedraza: Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance https:/…
RT @merelhuisman: One of the first human-machine interaction in #AI for #radiology, with mock-results!
RT @woojinrad: 3/ Speaking of #AutomationBias, here’s a @radiology_rsna article just published yesterday highlighting why this is so impor…
RT @woojinrad: 3/ Speaking of #AutomationBias, here’s a @radiology_rsna article just published yesterday highlighting why this is so impor…
RT @woojinrad: 3/ Speaking of #AutomationBias, here’s a @radiology_rsna article just published yesterday highlighting why this is so impor…
RT @woojinrad: 3/ Speaking of #AutomationBias, here’s a @radiology_rsna article just published yesterday highlighting why this is so impor…
3/ Speaking of #AutomationBias, here’s a @radiology_rsna article just published yesterday highlighting why this is so important. "Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance" https://t.co/h0sS4lYdHF #RadAIchat https://t.co/joIv3jcJlY
RT @CeoImed: ｢マンモグラフィにおける自動化バイアス｣ Radiology ･ 自動化バイアスは、自動決定システムからの提案を人間が好む傾向のこと ･ 放射線医師は、AIによってマンモグラフィの評価が大きく影響を受けた（未経験者の方がその傾向が強かった) →自動化…
RT @EricTopol: Automation bias, whereby the physician believes the #AI interpretation too readily, is a significant issue. Here quantified…
RT @curtlanglotz: "Radiologists reading mammograms are prone to automation bias when supported by AI. Inexperienced radiologists were more…
RT @curtlanglotz: "Radiologists reading mammograms are prone to automation bias when supported by AI. Inexperienced radiologists were more…
RT @CeoImed: ｢マンモグラフィにおける自動化バイアス｣ Radiology ･ 自動化バイアスは、自動決定システムからの提案を人間が好む傾向のこと ･ 放射線医師は、AIによってマンモグラフィの評価が大きく影響を受けた（未経験者の方がその傾向が強かった) →自動化…