Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The focus on the citation of a retracted paper indicates a basic level of engagement that is predominantly observational, with some posts noting the post-retraction state without delving into details, which reflects a cautious or superficial interest in the research's credibility.
Discussions are neutral, mentioning the citation of a retracted paper without clear endorsement or rejection of the research's validity.
There's some interest in the citation issue, but overall engagement is limited, indicating curiosity without deep analysis.
Comments show minimal discussion beyond noting the citation, with little elaboration or critique.
The conversations suggest modest recognition of the article's significance, but no consensus on its broader impact.
We've detected a paper from Cell Death Discovery that cites a retracted paper post-retraction. Citing paper: https://t.co/C5UyehmCyS Retracted paper: https://t.co/gNBNffMfLT
We've detected a paper from Cell Death Discovery that cites a retracted paper post-retraction. Citing paper: https://t.co/C5UyehmCyS Retracted paper: https://t.co/w07sA9JZsK
Hsa_circ_0060467 promotes breast cancer liver metastasis by forming complexes with eIF4A3 and sponging miR-1205, highlighting potential targets for therapeutic intervention in metastatic breast cancer.
We've detected a paper from Cell Death Discovery that cites a retracted paper post-retraction. Citing paper: https://t.co/C5UyehmCyS Retracted paper: https://t.co/gNBNffMfLT
We've detected a paper from Cell Death Discovery that cites a retracted paper post-retraction. Citing paper: https://t.co/C5UyehmCyS Retracted paper: https://t.co/w07sA9JZsK