BMC Cancer May 2023 PMID 37208717

Multi-vendor evaluation of artificial intelligence as an independent reader for double reading in breast cancer screening on 275,900 mammograms.

Nisha Sharma, Annie Y Ng, Jonathan J James, Galvin Khara, Éva Ambrózay, Christopher C Austin, Gábor Forrai, Georgia Fox, Ben Glocker, Andreas Heindl, Edit Karpati, Tobias M Rijken, Vignesh Venkataraman, Joseph E Yearsley, Peter D Kecskemethy

Download social card

Mentions

8
Peak: 4 in May 2023
across 3 sources since May 2023

Extended reach

29,817
potential audience

Total likes

2

Video views

15

Mentions per month

May 2023 – Aug 2024

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter6 posts
  • YouTube1 videos
  • News1 articles

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The statements reflect enthusiasm for the research, with phrases like 'potential of AI' and 'could provide a solution,' indicating optimism and acknowledgment of the study’s importance. The tone mixes technical appreciation with forward-looking statements about healthcare improvements, demonstrating deep engagement with the topic and its large-scale implications.

AgreementStrong agreement

Most discussions strongly support the positive potential of AI in breast cancer screening, highlighting its performance and benefits.

InterestHigh interest

The posts demonstrate high curiosity about the research findings and implications for medical screening practices.

EngagementModerate engagement

Many participants reference specific aspects of the study, such as performance metrics and workforce challenges, showing active involvement.

ImpactHigh impact

The discussions emphasize the transformative potential of AI in healthcare, suggesting significant practical and policy implications.

Abstract in brief

  • The study evaluates the use of artificial intelligence (AI) as an independent reader in double reading mammograms for breast cancer screening, aiming to address workforce shortages and improve efficiency.
  • Results showed that AI performed at least as well as human readers in key screening metrics like recall rate, cancer detection, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value, with some measures even surpassing human performance across various vendors and sites.
  • While AI could increase arbitration rates, it has the potential to significantly reduce human workload by up to 44.8%, suggesting it can maintain or improve care standards while making screening processes more sustainable across different populations and equipment.]

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Kheiron
@KheironMedical · X

@josheac @stevejarrett @stefihane @nytimes Just in case you are interested, here is the second peer reviewed paper about our large-scale study which was just published: https://t.co/hVmkKGMSVl

May 21, 2023 · 1 like · 2,093 followers View post →
Mary
@readaloudbooks · X

Multi-vendor evaluation of artificial intelligence as an independent reader for double reading in breast cancer screening on 275,900 mammograms https://t.co/TXeOiQvHYk

May 20, 2023 · 1 like · 1,621 followers View post →
BMC Series
@BMC_series · X

A study in #BMCCancer shows the potential of AI as an independent reader in double-reading mammography. With workforce shortages presenting sustainability challenges, AI could provide a solution to improve screening performance. Find out more at: https://t.co/quDUe7jkuf https://t.co/wte4nwFnyz

Jun 13, 2023 · 21,321 followers View post →
ISRCTN: the UK's Clinical Study Registry
@ISRCTN · X

Multi-vendor evaluation of artificial intelligence as an independent reader for double reading in breast cancer screening on 275,900 mammograms Read the results in #BMCCancer @BMC_series #ISRCTN: https://t.co/mlOOKe8yt1 https://t.co/nf8NxNl9b9

May 23, 2023 · 4,146 followers View post →
Joe Yearsley
@joeyearsley_ · X

@suchisaria https://t.co/a5jc5kRydx https://t.co/j32PkGhQk9

Jun 13, 2023 · 398 followers View post →
Oncology & Machine Learning
@MlOncology · X

Multi-vendor evaluation of artificial intelligence as an independent reader for double reading in breast cancer screening on 275,900 mammograms https://t.co/1PyvlfgERA

May 20, 2023 · 213 followers View post →

All mentions

Joe Yearsley
@joeyearsley_ · X

@suchisaria https://t.co/a5jc5kRydx https://t.co/j32PkGhQk9

Jun 13, 2023 · 398 followers View post →
BMC Series
@BMC_series · X

A study in #BMCCancer shows the potential of AI as an independent reader in double-reading mammography. With workforce shortages presenting sustainability challenges, AI could provide a solution to improve screening performance. Find out more at: https://t.co/quDUe7jkuf https://t.co/wte4nwFnyz

Jun 13, 2023 · 21,321 followers View post →
ISRCTN: the UK's Clinical Study Registry
@ISRCTN · X

Multi-vendor evaluation of artificial intelligence as an independent reader for double reading in breast cancer screening on 275,900 mammograms Read the results in #BMCCancer @BMC_series #ISRCTN: https://t.co/mlOOKe8yt1 https://t.co/nf8NxNl9b9

May 23, 2023 · 4,146 followers View post →
Kheiron
@KheironMedical · X

@josheac @stevejarrett @stefihane @nytimes Just in case you are interested, here is the second peer reviewed paper about our large-scale study which was just published: https://t.co/hVmkKGMSVl

May 21, 2023 · 1 like · 2,093 followers View post →
Mary
@readaloudbooks · X

Multi-vendor evaluation of artificial intelligence as an independent reader for double reading in breast cancer screening on 275,900 mammograms https://t.co/TXeOiQvHYk

May 20, 2023 · 1 like · 1,621 followers View post →
Oncology & Machine Learning
@MlOncology · X

Multi-vendor evaluation of artificial intelligence as an independent reader for double reading in breast cancer screening on 275,900 mammograms https://t.co/1PyvlfgERA

May 20, 2023 · 213 followers View post →
6530-Article Text-43502-1-10-20240811 | PDF | Mammography ...
News

in breast cancer screening on 275,900 mammograms. BMC Cancer, 23(1), 460. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10890-7. Siegel, R. L. ...

Aug 11, 2024 View →