Just published: "Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects" - some claims pro 1-stage approach are misleading - 2-stage will often suffice unless data sparse - here we provide guidance for a broad audience https://t.co/XkmAWCRAqN
Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Aug 2023 – Dec 2024Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter67 posts
-
Bluesky3 posts
-
YouTube1 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
Several discussions highlight practical aspects of the article, such as the importance of context in choosing between one-stage and two-stage approaches. For instance, a user noted that the one-stage weights are not yet automated in R packages, indicating a clear engagement with the technical nuances. Phrases like 'clearer guidance for a broad audience' and 'often debated' reflect the tone of curiosity and anticipation around the potential implications of the article. This choice of words suggests an active discourse, indicating that the subject matter is both relevant and impactful in the research community.
The majority of discussions show a general alignment with the article's insights and recommendations.
Participants express significant curiosity regarding the methodologies discussed.
While some posts engage with the content, others only summarize or reference it.
There is a strong belief that the publication can significantly influence future research priorities and methodologies.
Abstract in brief
- Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis (IPDMA) involves collecting and analyzing raw data from various studies, using either a two-stage or one-stage approach.
- In a two-stage approach, studies are analyzed separately before combining the results, while in a one-stage approach, all data is analyzed simultaneously to account for clustering and variability.
- The choice of approach depends on the study size and context, with the one-stage approach being preferable for smaller studies, but both methods have their merits and limitations, and previous claims favoring only one method can be misleading.
Top posts
Most liked on X and Bluesky*NEW PAPER* "Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects" https://t.co/XkmAWCRAqN The best approach is often debated, so here we provide clearer guidance for a broad audience with @joie_ensor @MiriamHattle @KPapadimitro @tmorris_mrc
Fab annual conference in Amsterdam this week for Society of Research Synthesis Methods https://t.co/hSNZhhTpKZ - thanks to organisers
ICYMI: "Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects" https://t.co/XkmAWCRAqN
Christmas 2024 Gift no. 4 NEW VIDEO: "IPD Meta-Analysis: Two-stage or Not Two-Stage? That is the question..." https://t.co/7sUfvdzwfD - guidance for when to choose a one-stage rather than a two-stage approach, & vice versa - ideas showcased with real examples (no equations)
Christmas 2024 Gift no. 4 NEW VIDEO: "IPD Meta-Analysis: Two-stage or Not Two-Stage? That is the question..." youtu.be/WFSAfouhB-8 - guidance for when to choose a one-stage rather than a two-stage approach, & vice versa. - ideas showcased using real examples (no equations) I hope useful!
All mentions
Choosing Between One-Stage and Two-Stage in IPD Meta-Analysis
Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis must decide between a two-stage or one-stage approach to statistical analysis. This talk provides guidance on choosing one method over the other, highlighting examples and…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Christmas 2024 Gift no. 4 NEW VIDEO: "IPD Meta-Analysis: Two-stage or Not Two-Stage? That is the question..." http…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Christmas 2024 Gift no. 4 NEW VIDEO: "IPD Meta-Analysis: Two-stage or Not Two-Stage? That is the question..." http…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Christmas 2024 Gift no. 4 NEW VIDEO: "IPD Meta-Analysis: Two-stage or Not Two-Stage? That is the question..." http…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Christmas 2024 Gift no. 4 NEW VIDEO: "IPD Meta-Analysis: Two-stage or Not Two-Stage? That is the question..." http…
Christmas 2024 Gift no. 4 NEW VIDEO: "IPD Meta-Analysis: Two-stage or Not Two-Stage? That is the question..." https://t.co/7sUfvdzwfD - guidance for when to choose a one-stage rather than a two-stage approach, & vice versa - ideas showcased with real examples (no equations)
Christmas 2024 Gift no. 4 NEW VIDEO: "IPD Meta-Analysis: Two-stage or Not Two-Stage? That is the question..." youtu.be/WFSAfouhB-8 - guidance for when to choose a one-stage rather than a two-stage approach, & vice versa. - ideas showcased using real examples (no equations) I hope useful!
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Fab annual conference in Amsterdam this week for Society of Research Synthesis Methods https://t.co/hSNZhhTpKZ - thank…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Fab annual conference in Amsterdam this week for Society of Research Synthesis Methods https://t.co/hSNZhhTpKZ - thank…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Fab annual conference in Amsterdam this week for Society of Research Synthesis Methods https://t.co/hSNZhhTpKZ - thank…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Fab annual conference in Amsterdam this week for Society of Research Synthesis Methods https://t.co/hSNZhhTpKZ - thank…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Fab annual conference in Amsterdam this week for Society of Research Synthesis Methods https://t.co/hSNZhhTpKZ - thank…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Fab annual conference in Amsterdam this week for Society of Research Synthesis Methods https://t.co/hSNZhhTpKZ - thank…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Fab annual conference in Amsterdam this week for Society of Research Synthesis Methods https://t.co/hSNZhhTpKZ - thank…
Fab annual conference in Amsterdam this week for Society of Research Synthesis Methods https://t.co/hSNZhhTpKZ - thanks to organisers
RT @Richard_D_Riley: ICYMI: "Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects" https://t.co/XkmAWCRAqN
RT @Richard_D_Riley: ICYMI: "Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects" https://t.co/XkmAWCRAqN
RT @Richard_D_Riley: ICYMI: "Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects" https://t.co/XkmAWCRAqN
RT @Richard_D_Riley: ICYMI: "Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects" https://t.co/XkmAWCRAqN
RT @Richard_D_Riley: ICYMI: "Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects" https://t.co/XkmAWCRAqN
RT @Richard_D_Riley: ICYMI: "Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects" https://t.co/XkmAWCRAqN
RT @Richard_D_Riley: ICYMI: "Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects" https://t.co/XkmAWCRAqN
ICYMI: "Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects" onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...
ICYMI: "Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects" https://t.co/XkmAWCRAqN
@nik_tzoumas @wviechtb @MatthewBJane But i don’t think the correct one stage weights are automated in any R package yet In most situations one and two stages should give similar results and so using two stage weights will often suffice anyway https://t.co/QqjNS5b24u
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Just published: "Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects" - some claims pro…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Just published: "Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects" - some claims pro…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Just published: "Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects" - some claims pro…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Just published: "Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects" - some claims pro…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Just published: "Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects" - some claims pro…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Just published: "Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects" - some claims pro…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Just published: "Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects" - some claims pro…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Just published: "Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects" - some claims pro…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Just published: "Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects" - some claims pro…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Just published: "Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects" - some claims pro…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Just published: "Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects" - some claims pro…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Just published: "Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects" - some claims pro…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Just published: "Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects" - some claims pro…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Just published: "Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects" - some claims pro…
Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects https://t.co/guHyNVUZCG via @Richard_D_Riley et al
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Just published: "Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects" - some claims pro…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Just published: "Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects" - some claims pro…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Just published: "Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects" - some claims pro…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Just published: "Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects" - some claims pro…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Just published: "Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects" - some claims pro…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Just published: "Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects" - some claims pro…
Just published: "Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects" - some claims pro 1-stage approach are misleading - 2-stage will often suffice unless data sparse - here we provide guidance for a broad audience Hope helpful! onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...
RT @Richard_D_Riley: Just published: "Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects" - some claims pro…
Just published: "Two‐stage or not two‐stage? That is the question for IPD meta‐analysis projects" - some claims pro 1-stage approach are misleading - 2-stage will often suffice unless data sparse - here we provide guidance for a broad audience https://t.co/XkmAWCRAqN
RT @SofiaCividini: Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects Richard D. Riley, Joie Ensor, Miriam Hat…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: *NEW PAPER* "Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects" https://t.co/XkmAWCRAq…
@nik_tzoumas @tmorris_mrc I^2 ... not so natural in 1-stage models (especially not for continuous outcomes) But 1-stage & 2-stage often closely agree, so just use the I^2 from 2-stage (if you need it at all) https://t.co/QqjNS5b24u
RT @SofiaCividini: Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects Richard D. Riley, Joie Ensor, Miriam Hat…
RT @SofiaCividini: Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects Richard D. Riley, Joie Ensor, Miriam Hat…
RT @SofiaCividini: Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects Richard D. Riley, Joie Ensor, Miriam Hat…
RT @SofiaCividini: Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects Richard D. Riley, Joie Ensor, Miriam Hat…
Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects Richard D. Riley, Joie Ensor, Miriam Hattle, Katerina Papadimitropoulou, Tim P. Morris https://t.co/itdcRZUQgs
Open Access UCL Research: Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects https://t.co/DCcqsuzUQ6
RT @Richard_D_Riley: *NEW PAPER* "Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects" https://t.co/XkmAWCRAq…
Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects https://t.co/guHyNVUZCG via @Richard_D_Riley et al
RT @Richard_D_Riley: *NEW PAPER* "Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects" https://t.co/XkmAWCRAq…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: *NEW PAPER* "Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects" https://t.co/XkmAWCRAq…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: *NEW PAPER* "Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects" https://t.co/XkmAWCRAq…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: *NEW PAPER* "Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects" https://t.co/XkmAWCRAq…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: *NEW PAPER* "Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects" https://t.co/XkmAWCRAq…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: *NEW PAPER* "Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects" https://t.co/XkmAWCRAq…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: *NEW PAPER* "Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects" https://t.co/XkmAWCRAq…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: *NEW PAPER* "Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects" https://t.co/XkmAWCRAq…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: *NEW PAPER* "Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects" https://t.co/XkmAWCRAq…
RT @Richard_D_Riley: *NEW PAPER* "Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects" https://t.co/XkmAWCRAq…
*NEW PAPER* "Two-stage or not two-stage? That is the question for IPD meta-analysis projects" https://t.co/XkmAWCRAqN The best approach is often debated, so here we provide clearer guidance for a broad audience with @joie_ensor @MiriamHattle @KPapadimitro @tmorris_mrc