Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first intercourse to substance use habits – partners were more likely than not to be similar.” https://t.co/83leRl6fNW Original Article: https://t.co/U1spkR158r https://t.co/8lOeg3HD54
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of 22 traits and UK Biobank analysis of 133 traits.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Sep 2023 – Nov 2025Where it's discussed
-
News177 articles
-
X / Twitter119 posts
-
Blogs14 articles
-
Facebook4 posts
-
Bluesky3 posts
-
YouTube3 videos
-
Reddit2 posts
AI synopsis
What people are saying
Several discussions highlight that the study provides strong evidence for partner similarities in traits such as ideology and values, with phrases like 'partner are more likely to be similar' and 'evidence of correlations' conveying both support and curiosity about the findings. The tone is analytical and somewhat skeptical, with users examining the implications for longstanding beliefs about attraction and relationships, demonstrating both high interest and engagement.
Most discussions agree that the research clearly shows partners tend to be similar across various traits, emphasizing shared values and compatibility.
Posts demonstrate high interest, especially in how the findings challenge the myth that opposites attract, showing enthusiasm for the implications.
Many comments reference specific details like the correlation coefficients and methodological aspects, reflecting deep engagement.
The potential influence on understanding romantic relationships and social dynamics is recognized, though some discussions remain theoretical rather than immediate practical changes.
Abstract in brief
- This study investigates the positive correlations between traits of male-female partners, showing how these correlations can influence trait variation and estimates in genetic research.
- It conducted systematic reviews and meta-analyses on 22 different traits, analyzing data from 199 studies and the UK Biobank involving over 79,000 couples.
- The results indicated a range of correlation strengths, from lower correlations in psychological traits to higher correlations in political and religious beliefs, with notable variability across different populations.
Top posts
Most liked on X and Blueskyとくに相関が強い特性としては年齢、政治的や宗教的イデオロギー、学歴やIQなどが挙げられるそう。 一方では長と体重、性格特性などは相関がそれほど強くないようだ。 表面的には正反対でも、本質的には似たもの同士のカップルが多いのかもしれない。 Nat Hum Behav (2023). https://t.co/QZ3XsPqB4N
配偶パートナーの類似性について,複数カテゴリの形質についてのメタ分析+UKバイオバンクの約8万組カップルデータを使って分析したよという研究。/ Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of 22 traits… https://t.co/Gjg6emgrjN
“Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of 22 traits and UK Biobank analysis of 133 traits” by Tanya Horwitz et al. Nature Human Behavior https://t.co/dTcTXCUoEP 2/2
NEW VIDEO Opposites No Longer Attract: How Narcissism Corrupts Mate Selection https://t.co/SHPJIHgD24 https://t.co/BqbPfE8SYn
No birds of feather? Partner's personality similarity seems quite modest. But for reasons I explained in another tweet it's likely underestimated by half. (Even identical partners' traits should not correlate higher than about .5 in single-method studies) https://t.co/22JVHn1y0a
All mentions
How Narcissism Disrupts Traditional Mate Selection Strategies
Opposites attract is the only rational mating strategy. But narcissism corrupted it now people team up only with similar partners who serve as extensions mirrors and an audience. This study investigates trait…
Potential of Metabolic Therapy to Restore Learning and Behavior in Obesity
This video explores how metabolic signals, particularly GLP1, influence learning processes related to sensory cues and behaviors. It highlights that GLP1 receptor agonist liraglutide can restore impaired associative…
The Impact of Similar Traits on Romantic Compatibility and Genetic Research
RT @ringdingkirari: Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of 22 traits and UK Bioba…
You would deemed mentally ill by adjudicating, observing your impact on other people. Your adverse impacts on other people. So it's relational. It's not about individual. It's about individual's functioning when embedded in social settings.
We have mountain of evidence that many mental health issues emerge from adverse childhood experiences and in contagious settings – when you are exposed to other people with mental health issues.
Having a psychological need is in itself by definition a vulnerability. And when this need is frustrated, what we have is stress. Whereas current mainstream stress model regards vulnerabilities as mostly hereditary.
@Julio_Carlos_ @allie__voss Meta-analysis = statistical aggregation of many independent studies on the same question. This one pooled 199 peer-reviewed studies in Nature Human Behaviour DOI: 10.1038/s41562-023-01672-z That’s how the scientific method checks patterns across data.The data is freely available
@Julio_Carlos_ @allie__voss No the research is clear Meta Analysis doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01672-z https://t.co/DhyTN3ivpX The strongest similarities between partners are ideological&educational.People choose each other far more on shared values&compatibility. Looks matter, but they arent the primary factor
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of 22 traits and UK Biobank analysis of 133 traits | Nature Human Behaviour https://t.co/3YeXDmK1KX
Opposites No Longer Attract: How Narcissism Corrupts Mate Selection https://t.co/kEKQBHKJrs via @YouTube
@marketasetinova V britské biobance zkoumali 133 charakteristik lidí a jen ve třech existovaly signifikantně negativní korelace mezi partnery. https://t.co/wwEPRsdGq4 Jednou jsem i psal článek o mýtu "protiklady se přitahují": https://t.co/QJg8kXXIgA
https://t.co/hOPOBqipWQ
RT @samvaknin: NEW VIDEO Opposites No Longer Attract: How Narcissism Corrupts Mate Selection https://t.co/SHPJIHgD24 https://t.co/BqbPfE8…
RT @samvaknin: NEW VIDEO Opposites No Longer Attract: How Narcissism Corrupts Mate Selection https://t.co/SHPJIHgD24 https://t.co/BqbPfE8…
NEW VIDEO Opposites No Longer Attract: How Narcissism Corrupts Mate Selection https://t.co/SHPJIHgD24 https://t.co/BqbPfE8SYn
RT @renemottus: No birds of feather? Partner's personality similarity seems quite modest. But for reasons I explained in another tweet it's…
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of 22 traits and UK Biobank analysis of 133 traits https://t.co/69I1a8GPWI
The Study: ‘Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of 22 traits and UK Biobank analysis of 133 traits’, Tanya B. Horwitz et al. (2023) https://t.co/rVDLZNdEJr
RT @renemottus: No birds of feather? Partner's personality similarity seems quite modest. But for reasons I explained in another tweet it's…
No birds of feather? Partner's personality similarity seems quite modest. But for reasons I explained in another tweet it's likely underestimated by half. (Even identical partners' traits should not correlate higher than about .5 in single-method studies) https://t.co/22JVHn1y0a
@asdf2596 간사할 정도까진 아니라고 생각해요 원래 유사하면 끌리거든요 …그러니 아마 그 표현은, 숨겨진 감정이 있는 게 아닌가 생각해요. 참고할 만한 최신 레퍼런스는 아래에 달께요: https://t.co/mrGUa6XxeW …아 이런 싸이허브에 없네 ㅠㅠ
Opposites No Longer Attract: How Narcissism Corrupts Mate Selection https://t.co/OMlXGn3dUy via @YouTube
@geechugalu » one-too-many MALE-m0nkeys
Opposites No Longer Attract: How Narcissism Corrupts Mate Selection https://t.co/BNepYJjsVP via @YouTube amen
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of 22 traits and UK Biobank analysis of 133 traits Source:https://t.co/TfbYMSnzQ7 https://t.co/ffGhFFqEwf
A partner correlation of 0.65 is higher than that of any measured trait and nearly as high as assortment on age/year of birth [Horwitz et al; https://t.co/kcK4GurkZF] https://t.co/SL2rueG1OC
#Partnerwahl Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of 22 traits and UK Biobank analysis of 133 traits - https://t.co/ukE43SRXYa
RT @ChrisStringer65: Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of 22 traits and UK Biob…
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of 22 traits and UK Biobank analysis of 133 traits | Nature Human Behaviour https://t.co/OCs8rBHtHo
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of 22 traits and UK Biobank analysis of 133 traits https://t.co/KByXuHvcXr
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
同士を結びつける何らかの未知のメカニズムが働いている可能性を示唆します。Nature Human Behaviour誌https://t.co/e0UwMsiF2l
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of 22 traits and UK Biobank analysis of 133 traits | Nature Human Behaviour https://t.co/U0hxvaCCRP
RT @NeuroscienceNew: “Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of 22 traits and UK Bio…
Parece que no sólo los polos opuestos se atraen. Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of 22 traits and UK Biobank analysis of 133 traits | Nature Human Behaviour https://t.co/KrA0xFREaE
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
“Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of 22 traits and UK Biobank analysis of 133 traits” by Tanya Horwitz et al. Nature Human Behavior https://t.co/dTcTXCUoEP 2/2
Study Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of 22 traits and UK Biobank analysis of 133 traits https://t.co/3Rb8qDo8Oi https://t.co/S8MN8OwIwK
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @myuuko: 配偶パートナーの類似性について,複数カテゴリの形質についてのメタ分析+UKバイオバンクの約8万組カップルデータを使って分析したよという研究。/ Evidence of correlations between human partners based o…
RT @myuuko: 配偶パートナーの類似性について,複数カテゴリの形質についてのメタ分析+UKバイオバンクの約8万組カップルデータを使って分析したよという研究。/ Evidence of correlations between human partners based o…
配偶パートナーの類似性について,複数カテゴリの形質についてのメタ分析+UKバイオバンクの約8万組カップルデータを使って分析したよという研究。/ Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of 22 traits… https://t.co/Gjg6emgrjN
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of 22 traits and UK Biobank analysis of 133 traits https://t.co/ZPabcRrvay
RT @ichiipsy: とくに相関が強い特性としては年齢、政治的や宗教的イデオロギー、学歴やIQなどが挙げられるそう。 一方では長と体重、性格特性などは相関がそれほど強くないようだ。 表面的には正反対でも、本質的には似たもの同士のカップルが多いのかもしれない。 Nat Hu…
RT @ichiipsy: とくに相関が強い特性としては年齢、政治的や宗教的イデオロギー、学歴やIQなどが挙げられるそう。 一方では長と体重、性格特性などは相関がそれほど強くないようだ。 表面的には正反対でも、本質的には似たもの同士のカップルが多いのかもしれない。 Nat Hu…
RT @ichiipsy: とくに相関が強い特性としては年齢、政治的や宗教的イデオロギー、学歴やIQなどが挙げられるそう。 一方では長と体重、性格特性などは相関がそれほど強くないようだ。 表面的には正反対でも、本質的には似たもの同士のカップルが多いのかもしれない。 Nat Hu…
RT @ichiipsy: とくに相関が強い特性としては年齢、政治的や宗教的イデオロギー、学歴やIQなどが挙げられるそう。 一方では長と体重、性格特性などは相関がそれほど強くないようだ。 表面的には正反対でも、本質的には似たもの同士のカップルが多いのかもしれない。 Nat Hu…
RT @ichiipsy: とくに相関が強い特性としては年齢、政治的や宗教的イデオロギー、学歴やIQなどが挙げられるそう。 一方では長と体重、性格特性などは相関がそれほど強くないようだ。 表面的には正反対でも、本質的には似たもの同士のカップルが多いのかもしれない。 Nat Hu…
RT @ichiipsy: とくに相関が強い特性としては年齢、政治的や宗教的イデオロギー、学歴やIQなどが挙げられるそう。 一方では長と体重、性格特性などは相関がそれほど強くないようだ。 表面的には正反対でも、本質的には似たもの同士のカップルが多いのかもしれない。 Nat Hu…
RT @ichiipsy: とくに相関が強い特性としては年齢、政治的や宗教的イデオロギー、学歴やIQなどが挙げられるそう。 一方では長と体重、性格特性などは相関がそれほど強くないようだ。 表面的には正反対でも、本質的には似たもの同士のカップルが多いのかもしれない。 Nat Hu…
RT @ichiipsy: とくに相関が強い特性としては年齢、政治的や宗教的イデオロギー、学歴やIQなどが挙げられるそう。 一方では長と体重、性格特性などは相関がそれほど強くないようだ。 表面的には正反対でも、本質的には似たもの同士のカップルが多いのかもしれない。 Nat Hu…
RT @ichiipsy: とくに相関が強い特性としては年齢、政治的や宗教的イデオロギー、学歴やIQなどが挙げられるそう。 一方では長と体重、性格特性などは相関がそれほど強くないようだ。 表面的には正反対でも、本質的には似たもの同士のカップルが多いのかもしれない。 Nat Hu…
RT @ichiipsy: とくに相関が強い特性としては年齢、政治的や宗教的イデオロギー、学歴やIQなどが挙げられるそう。 一方では長と体重、性格特性などは相関がそれほど強くないようだ。 表面的には正反対でも、本質的には似たもの同士のカップルが多いのかもしれない。 Nat Hu…
RT @ichiipsy: とくに相関が強い特性としては年齢、政治的や宗教的イデオロギー、学歴やIQなどが挙げられるそう。 一方では長と体重、性格特性などは相関がそれほど強くないようだ。 表面的には正反対でも、本質的には似たもの同士のカップルが多いのかもしれない。 Nat Hu…
RT @ichiipsy: とくに相関が強い特性としては年齢、政治的や宗教的イデオロギー、学歴やIQなどが挙げられるそう。 一方では長と体重、性格特性などは相関がそれほど強くないようだ。 表面的には正反対でも、本質的には似たもの同士のカップルが多いのかもしれない。 Nat Hu…
RT @ichiipsy: とくに相関が強い特性としては年齢、政治的や宗教的イデオロギー、学歴やIQなどが挙げられるそう。 一方では長と体重、性格特性などは相関がそれほど強くないようだ。 表面的には正反対でも、本質的には似たもの同士のカップルが多いのかもしれない。 Nat Hu…
RT @ichiipsy: とくに相関が強い特性としては年齢、政治的や宗教的イデオロギー、学歴やIQなどが挙げられるそう。 一方では長と体重、性格特性などは相関がそれほど強くないようだ。 表面的には正反対でも、本質的には似たもの同士のカップルが多いのかもしれない。 Nat Hu…
RT @ichiipsy: とくに相関が強い特性としては年齢、政治的や宗教的イデオロギー、学歴やIQなどが挙げられるそう。 一方では長と体重、性格特性などは相関がそれほど強くないようだ。 表面的には正反対でも、本質的には似たもの同士のカップルが多いのかもしれない。 Nat Hu…
RT @ichiipsy: とくに相関が強い特性としては年齢、政治的や宗教的イデオロギー、学歴やIQなどが挙げられるそう。 一方では長と体重、性格特性などは相関がそれほど強くないようだ。 表面的には正反対でも、本質的には似たもの同士のカップルが多いのかもしれない。 Nat Hu…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @ichiipsy: とくに相関が強い特性としては年齢、政治的や宗教的イデオロギー、学歴やIQなどが挙げられるそう。 一方では長と体重、性格特性などは相関がそれほど強くないようだ。 表面的には正反対でも、本質的には似たもの同士のカップルが多いのかもしれない。 Nat Hu…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @ichiipsy: とくに相関が強い特性としては年齢、政治的や宗教的イデオロギー、学歴やIQなどが挙げられるそう。 一方では長と体重、性格特性などは相関がそれほど強くないようだ。 表面的には正反対でも、本質的には似たもの同士のカップルが多いのかもしれない。 Nat Hu…
RT @ichiipsy: とくに相関が強い特性としては年齢、政治的や宗教的イデオロギー、学歴やIQなどが挙げられるそう。 一方では長と体重、性格特性などは相関がそれほど強くないようだ。 表面的には正反対でも、本質的には似たもの同士のカップルが多いのかもしれない。 Nat Hu…
RT @ichiipsy: とくに相関が強い特性としては年齢、政治的や宗教的イデオロギー、学歴やIQなどが挙げられるそう。 一方では長と体重、性格特性などは相関がそれほど強くないようだ。 表面的には正反対でも、本質的には似たもの同士のカップルが多いのかもしれない。 Nat Hu…
RT @ichiipsy: とくに相関が強い特性としては年齢、政治的や宗教的イデオロギー、学歴やIQなどが挙げられるそう。 一方では長と体重、性格特性などは相関がそれほど強くないようだ。 表面的には正反対でも、本質的には似たもの同士のカップルが多いのかもしれない。 Nat Hu…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @ichiipsy: とくに相関が強い特性としては年齢、政治的や宗教的イデオロギー、学歴やIQなどが挙げられるそう。 一方では長と体重、性格特性などは相関がそれほど強くないようだ。 表面的には正反対でも、本質的には似たもの同士のカップルが多いのかもしれない。 Nat Hu…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @ichiipsy: とくに相関が強い特性としては年齢、政治的や宗教的イデオロギー、学歴やIQなどが挙げられるそう。 一方では長と体重、性格特性などは相関がそれほど強くないようだ。 表面的には正反対でも、本質的には似たもの同士のカップルが多いのかもしれない。 Nat Hu…
RT @ichiipsy: とくに相関が強い特性としては年齢、政治的や宗教的イデオロギー、学歴やIQなどが挙げられるそう。 一方では長と体重、性格特性などは相関がそれほど強くないようだ。 表面的には正反対でも、本質的には似たもの同士のカップルが多いのかもしれない。 Nat Hu…
とくに相関が強い特性としては年齢、政治的や宗教的イデオロギー、学歴やIQなどが挙げられるそう。 一方では長と体重、性格特性などは相関がそれほど強くないようだ。 表面的には正反対でも、本質的には似たもの同士のカップルが多いのかもしれない。 Nat Hum Behav (2023). https://t.co/QZ3XsPqB4N
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
RT @SteveStuWill: Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first in…
Opposites don't attract: “For between 82% and 89% of traits analyzed – ranging from political leanings to age of first intercourse to substance use habits – partners were more likely than not to be similar.” https://t.co/83leRl6fNW Original Article: https://t.co/U1spkR158r https://t.co/8lOeg3HD54
R
C
ぱ