Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The overall sentiment is highly positive and engaged, with posts celebrating the new dating methods used to establish the age of footprints, such as references to radiocarbon dating and new findings that push back human presence in North America. The tone is enthusiastic, underscoring the significance of resolving longstanding debates about early human migration, which indicates a deep interest and recognition of the study's impact.
Most discussions support the findings, emphasizing the significance of the new dating evidence that confirms humans inhabited North America over 20,000 years ago.
Posts show high curiosity and enthusiasm about the new research, highlighting its importance for understanding human migration and history.
Many discussions delve into scientific methods, implications for archaeology and anthropology, and debates about human presence timeline, demonstrating deep engagement.
The widespread sharing, acknowledgment of the study's importance, and positive tone suggest this research has a substantial influence on the field and public understanding of human history.
NEWS: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands; yes they’re 21-23,000 years old! Amazing! https://t.co/3yNTXJaj4g https://t.co/yGZBppo7G9
New, independent ages have confirmed the controversial antiquity of ancient human footprints discovered in White Sands National Park, showing that humans were present in North America during the Last Glacial Maximum. Learn more: https://t.co/7vpEqxLMVO https://t.co/ohGyAYlzZL
Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/qVVhFONGmJ
This neatly correlated with the disappearance of much of the American megafauna, in the next couple of thousand years. The problem is, human footprints have now been found in N.America, that are 21-23,000 years old. https://t.co/krpd6YwGNO 20/
‘Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands’ It seems we were everywhere. https://t.co/4r8EQBYuVW https://t.co/PqapxsyTCZ
This study uses high-resolution CT scanning to reevaluate Scleromochlus taylori, revealing new details of its skull, limbs, and tail. These findings improve understanding of its anatomy and evolutionary links to…
This video discusses the discovery of 14 well-dated stemmed projectile points at the Coopers Ferry site in Idaho, dating back around 16,000 years, highlighting advanced tool use and possible links to the Pacific Rim…
Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/USDAD7RmhR
@AncientEpoch Stop talking. https://t.co/09DIaNMN9X
RT @SoilManDan: Columbus discovered nothing. Learn archaeology, not propaganda. https://t.co/Gc6EwBlt1Y
Columbus discovered nothing. Learn archaeology, not propaganda. https://t.co/Gc6EwBlt1Y
https://t.co/yZgKxa1Cwa
@speaktruthtoyou @alkimosn @amvetsupport Indigenous were in North America AT LEAST 20 -22,000 Years Ago. https://t.co/yJPTEYPvFq
@CarotteBrulante You aren't up to date on the new findings. Population migration during the ice age in the Americas was dynamic. Humans have been in the Americas for as long as humans have existed. Example.https://t.co/TiUqLUIMf6
@AiG If people had to feel shame for every stupid, false idea that they believed we'd ALL be feeling shame continuously. That said, 6 day creation is dopey af. Reality: Humans were in New Mexico ~20,000 years ago. https://t.co/E5Ye8LDPWA
@DanBruley69 @TheOnlyDSC @grok Perhaps u r ignorant of the migrational history of the region. Ancient man has been found 2 have existed as far back as 23,000 years ago in New Mexico. Thousands of years BEFORE the Aztecs ever existed. https://t.co/3m8bLFsIjS.
@MonkeeSage @MattbLimitless @DrDavidMiano Yeah, you're kinda behind the times. There was a second paper published in October 2023 with new dates which avoided the aquatic plants issue. https://t.co/Gc6EwBlt1Y
@Ornery84 @4biddntruth @BrightInsight6 Hi, The Americas aren’t mentioned in the Bible. Were the writers not aware of it? or did it not exist? https://t.co/WjO19YnstS
@Phillip05166897 To be clear I don't have answers to these questions. But I suspect humans arrived in the Americas WAY earlier than recently accepted Fossilized footprints in NM definitely push it back to 23kya. Those arguing for earlier dates shouldn't be mocked anymore https://t.co/UdNHVfpWwM
@BraxtonMcCormck @androidorb424 @archeohistories https://t.co/jPVmmczSvJ
@KohzKah And we have the footprints to prove it! https://t.co/kscZt41AMU
@hereforthepast Here’s the full dating study, it also covers the controversy and previous studies. https://t.co/Gc6EwBlt1Y
@NPC012345678910 @oodhamboi https://t.co/ssbfDhWGil The fact you said spawned shows me you must be under the age of possessing a fully developed human brain that most adults have by age 21. And that you dont know the evolution of the different human species. Its actually closer to 20,000 years.
@PunchAmino @WAlpharius33777 @YouKnowImChewie @DissidentSoaps Still not even close to the first
@CW_codesterz @ShinjiGroyp @MikeMarcheseAF @DelGroyp When and how long ago? When did Ireland become occupied by the first people? During the very first migrations of humans access the planet we were gifted the land by your god and you can’t handle the fact you don’t belong here and had to “manifest destiny” https://t.co/1v6fyVc8s2
@papasnoke @linaposting turns out that debate I was remembering did exist but got resolved when the ran a second set of tests on different pollen samples without the potential issues for a false date. I stand corrected. https://t.co/wL0cHFHiPe
Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science #yyc @randallwcarlson @Graham__Hancock @SnkBrs @joerogan @GeologyNick https://t.co/XwvwkfG8PG
https://t.co/J17G116jEo
@Charlieleduff This raging xenophobia of yers charlotte, quite unflattering. Yer guests here. This is our land. Ya seem to forget that. https://t.co/mV585c8m0i
@BalconyGuy1 @BlackLabel789 @MaximeBernier No. They just genocided the people/culture they found here before anyone else did. https://t.co/qkLLda33ev
https://t.co/8d4KdVg0kw
ニューメキシコ州の人類の足跡は 23,000～20,000年前と判明。これまで人類が北米に到達したのは約1万6000～1万3000年前と考えられていた(数字は出典論文概要より) https://t.co/MrlSIuwKjZ (メールマガジンを訊くポップアップ有。不要の場合は左dismissをクリック) https://t.co/o10Ep5DOSg (有料論文)
RT @BurnEr92976227:
RT @BurnEr92976227:
RT @BurnEr92976227:
RT @BurnEr92976227:
RT @BurnEr92976227:
@leroyb756 Sibley botched the analysis, which is unsurprising given that he's not a scientist. 1. There's no "secular narrative" to protect because it's just current consensus on data. 2. The original claim has also been confirmed. https://t.co/4zSNB4kGQx Explainer: https://t.co/0Az9XVZ2Ad
RT @DonC_athing: @archeohistories "Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands" "...Pigati…
@archeohistories "Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands" "...Pigati et al. returned to the White Sands footprints and obtained new dates from multiple, highly reliable sources...They, too, resolved dates of 20,000 to 23,000 years ago,
Plus, a major plank of the "overkill hypothesis" was the correlation that Native Americans, arrived just before the extinctions. Except we now know, that humans were in N.America, at least 10,000 years before these extinctions. https://t.co/krpd6YwGNO 14/
@markwilderness @OurSacredGrove @AnnieLeymarie @JCSvenning Then of course, there are the White Sands human footprints, which inconveniently suggest humans had been present for over 10,000 years before these extinctions happened - knocking down the supposed correlation evidence. More holes than Swiss cheese. https://t.co/krpd6YwGNO
RT @SteB777: This neatly correlated with the disappearance of much of the American megafauna, in the next couple of thousand years. The pr…
This neatly correlated with the disappearance of much of the American megafauna, in the next couple of thousand years. The problem is, human footprints have now been found in N.America, that are 21-23,000 years old. https://t.co/krpd6YwGNO 20/
@ibathedaily @nils_gilman legit? https://t.co/lUsp19l0yK
https://t.co/sGplMIVvAN https://t.co/oZh0V3zmXK
Take that doubters. https://t.co/9J5yadAysO https://t.co/sYz3pa4RZ2
RT @razibkhan: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands https://t.co/xvT6OFBDA8
RT @razibkhan: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands https://t.co/xvT6OFBDA8
Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands https://t.co/xvT6OFBDA8
Homo sapiens était bien présent en Amérique du Nord pendant le dernier maximum glaciaire lorsqu’une épaisse couche de glace recouvrait le continent. Ce qui prouve hors de tout doute que l'homme est bien responsable du Réchauffement Climatique
@_CDRC_ Duhhhh it goes back further … you never heard the migration patterns?? Now let’s see yours
@HaykPark71566 @omeganutsack @timecaptales @fasc1nate https://t.co/45jMQStLx2
✍️ Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/TKtfpInPsL
"researchers believed that humans arrived in North America around 16,000 to 13,000 years ago. In 2021, fossilized footprints ... in New Mexico were dated to between 20,000 and 23,000 years ago, providing key evidence for earlier occupation,.." https://t.co/QbWvUG3SOe
Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands, New Mexico, confirming human presence in North America 23,000 to 21,000 years ago https://t.co/UeKBeAS5GW
RT @ScienceMagazine: New, independent ages have confirmed the controversial antiquity of ancient human footprints discovered in White Sands…
RT @ScienceMagazine: New, independent ages have confirmed the controversial antiquity of ancient human footprints discovered in White Sands…
RT @ScienceMagazine: New, independent ages have confirmed the controversial antiquity of ancient human footprints discovered in White Sands…
RT @ScienceMagazine: New, independent ages have confirmed the controversial antiquity of ancient human footprints discovered in White Sands…
RT @ScienceMagazine: New, independent ages have confirmed the controversial antiquity of ancient human footprints discovered in White Sands…
RT @ScienceMagazine: New, independent ages have confirmed the controversial antiquity of ancient human footprints discovered in White Sands…
RT @ScienceMagazine: New, independent ages have confirmed the controversial antiquity of ancient human footprints discovered in White Sands…
RT @ScienceMagazine: New, independent ages have confirmed the controversial antiquity of ancient human footprints discovered in White Sands…
RT @ScienceMagazine: New, independent ages have confirmed the controversial antiquity of ancient human footprints discovered in White Sands…
RT @ScienceMagazine: New, independent ages have confirmed the controversial antiquity of ancient human footprints discovered in White Sands…
RT @ScienceMagazine: New, independent ages have confirmed the controversial antiquity of ancient human footprints discovered in White Sands…
RT @ScienceMagazine: New, independent ages have confirmed the controversial antiquity of ancient human footprints discovered in White Sands…
RT @ScienceMagazine: New, independent ages have confirmed the controversial antiquity of ancient human footprints discovered in White Sands…
RT @ScienceMagazine: New, independent ages have confirmed the controversial antiquity of ancient human footprints discovered in White Sands…
New, independent ages have confirmed the controversial antiquity of ancient human footprints discovered in White Sands National Park, showing that humans were present in North America during the Last Glacial Maximum. Learn more: https://t.co/7vpEqxLMVO https://t.co/ohGyAYlzZL
New Mexico'da bulunan insan ayak izi fosilleri 3 farklı yöntemle tarihlenmiş. İnsanların Amerika kıtasına inmeleri sanıldığından eski, en az 21 - 23 000 yıl önce. https://t.co/kqHcsxhGrQ
How many fingers do you see? @ScienceMagazine https://t.co/LvzdIzTRQE https://t.co/wrSMHguEOs https://t.co/7d1RpdEH5h
RT @CharlesCMann: Extremely interesting news: researchers who last year announced evidence that footprints in White Sands, N.M., were 19-23…
RT @biog3500: (1/2) #CUSciStory Using radiocarbon dating, human footprints found in the White Sands National Park in NM were dated back to…
(1/2) #CUSciStory Using radiocarbon dating, human footprints found in the White Sands National Park in NM were dated back to between 21,000 and 23,000 years ago. https://t.co/lo7YPdzDH6
Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands
Before 2021, researchers believed that humans arrived in North America ≈15,000 years ago. But fossilized footprints from White Sands Park in New Mexico were recently dated about 21,500 years ago, providing key evidence for earlier occupation More: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007
Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/3LjoXI0Fiy
Fact: People are Planetary for >20K years. Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands, NM. #Anthropocene www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
RT @MattSibson: NEWS: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands; yes they’re 21-23,000 y…
RT @MattSibson: NEWS: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands; yes they’re 21-23,000 y…
BREAKING: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands - Science https://t.co/kqoblRHicw #news #breakingnews #latestnews https://t.co/d3qLIxmHOv
RT @MattSibson: NEWS: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands; yes they’re 21-23,000 y…
RT @MattSibson: NEWS: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands; yes they’re 21-23,000 y…
RT @MattSibson: NEWS: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands; yes they’re 21-23,000 y…
RT @MattSibson: NEWS: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands; yes they’re 21-23,000 y…
RT @MattSibson: NEWS: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands; yes they’re 21-23,000 y…
RT @TheZignal: ‘Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands’ It seems we were everywhere.…
RT @MattSibson: NEWS: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands; yes they’re 21-23,000 y…
RT @OyatsuMaster: #考古学のおやつ 3/3 ▶ Jeffrey S. Pigati
RT @emulenews: #ScienceMag Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands https://t.co/MnNz6x…
RT @MattSibson: NEWS: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands; yes they’re 21-23,000 y…
Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/z8ozU1bMJW
RT @TheZignal: ‘Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands’ It seems we were everywhere.…
‘Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands’ It seems we were everywhere. https://t.co/4r8EQBYuVW https://t.co/PqapxsyTCZ
RT @MattSibson: NEWS: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands; yes they’re 21-23,000 y…
RT @MattSibson: NEWS: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands; yes they’re 21-23,000 y…
RT @MattSibson: NEWS: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands; yes they’re 21-23,000 y…
RT @MattSibson: NEWS: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands; yes they’re 21-23,000 y…
RT @MattSibson: NEWS: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands; yes they’re 21-23,000 y…
RT @MattSibson: NEWS: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands; yes they’re 21-23,000 y…
RT @antonioperezba: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/9Mv…
RT @MattSibson: NEWS: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands; yes they’re 21-23,000 y…
RT @MattSibson: NEWS: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands; yes they’re 21-23,000 y…
Original study: J. S. Pigati et al., Independent #age estimates resolve the #controversy of ancient human #footprints at #WhiteSands, Science 382(6666), 2023.
Original study: J. S. Pigati et al., Independent #age estimates resolve the #controversy of ancient human #footprints at #WhiteSands, @ScienceMagazine 382(6666), 2023.
Original study: J. S. Pigati et al., Independent #age estimates resolve the #controversy of ancient human #footprints at #WhiteSands, @ScienceMagazine 382(6666), 2023.
#ScienceMag Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands https://t.co/MnNz6xTUwu A debate about the age of ancient footprints continues https://t.co/UFvxUSMjVh cc @cienciabrujula https://t.co/wLa6HxnDar
RT @MattSibson: NEWS: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands; yes they’re 21-23,000 y…
NEWS: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands; yes they’re 21-23,000 years old! Amazing! https://t.co/3yNTXJaj4g https://t.co/yGZBppo7G9
RT @ChrisStringer65: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/qV…
RT @ChrisStringer65: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/qV…
RT @OyatsuMaster: #考古学のおやつ 3/3 ▶ Jeffrey S. Pigati
RT @ChrisStringer65: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/qV…
RT @ticiaverveer: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands https://t.co/kUaMvkrgZd
Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands https://t.co/kUaMvkrgZd
#考古学のおやつ 3/3 ▶ Jeffrey S. Pigati
ARTÍCULO REFERENCIA (resumen) Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands https://t.co/isnbJ89A7F vía @ScienceMagazine
RT @ChrisStringer65: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/qV…
RT @ChrisStringer65: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/qV…
RT @ChrisStringer65: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/qV…
RT @antonioperezba: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/9Mv…
RT @ChrisStringer65: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/qV…
RT @ChrisStringer65: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/qV…
RT @ChrisStringer65: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/qV…
RT @ChrisStringer65: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/qV…
RT @ChrisStringer65: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/qV…
RT @ChrisStringer65: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/qV…
RT @ChrisStringer65: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/qV…
RT @SallyR_ISLHE: Announcement time!! Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Scien…
Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/K4wXqN7Ykn
RT @BioAnthEvolving: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints >21,000 years old at White Sands, New Me…
RT @BioAnthEvolving: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints >21,000 years old at White Sands, New Me…
Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints >21,000 years old at White Sands, New Mexico https://t.co/0wuYKQEa0U
Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/66r2wLpfF6
Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/kzTse7X53O
RT @ChrisStringer65: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/qV…
RT @ChrisStringer65: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/qV…
RT @TomHoltzPaleo: Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/23oE…
Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/qVVhFONGmJ
Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/9MvCJoy4ML
RT @SallyR_ISLHE: Announcement time!! Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Scien…
Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/23oEgr38A6
RT @SallyR_ISLHE: Announcement time!! Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Scien…
Announcement time!! Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands | Science https://t.co/KGTta7DhNo Huge congrats to the whole team!!
Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands
Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands
https://www.science. org/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007. science.org. Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of. 5 mos. Gerry Colverson. Geoffrey Sea ...
” Science 382: 73–75. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh5007] provide new age. KEYWORDS estimates for human footprints found at White Sands Locality 2, New ...
Science. 5 Oct 2023. Vol 382, Issue 6666. pp. 73-75. DOI: 10.1126/science.adh5007 · PREVIOUS ARTICLE. Transonic dislocation propagation in diamond. Previous ...
” Science, Vol 382, Issue 6666, Oct 5, 2023. https://www.science. org/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007 Pitulko, Vladimir & Pavlova, Elena.
... -23kya, several thousand years before Rimrock Draw. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007 · LurkersUniteAgain. • 6d ago.
” Science, Vol 382, Issue 6666, Oct 5, 2023. https://www.science. org/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007 Pitulko, Vladimir & Pavlova, Elena.
We are a bunch of bald old men who refuse to entertain anything new. Oh wait. https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.adh5007 · https ...
Science doi: 10.1126/science.adh5007. / fair use. Nos trasladamos al presente, a octubre de 2025, para encontrarnos con un inquietante ...
https://www.science. org/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007. science.org. Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of. 3 mos · Pam Taylor.
(https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007). Science. 382 ca,_Cum_Ventorum_Propria_Natura_et_Operatione.jpg) from the (6666): 73 ...
—Sacha Vignieri" https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007? Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human ...
—Sacha Vignieri" https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007? Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human ...
That scientists cannot tell if this mural was made by Denisovans ... —Sacha Vignieri" https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007?
Observations White Sands National Park , New Mexico USA https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007.
—Sacha Vignieri" https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007? Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human ...
—Sacha Vignieri" https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007? Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human ...
—Sacha Vignieri" https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007? Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human ...
... sciences as archaeological dating and genetic age estimation. ... —Sacha Vignieri" https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007?
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh5007 Geggel, L. (2025, junio 18) ... org/10.1126/science.abm4678 Praetorius, S. K., Alder, J. R. ...
https: //www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007.
... science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007? Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands. SCIENCE.
https://www.science. org/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007 The real world is incredible and I would love to see the Grand Canyon. Maybe one day ...
... Science, Cilt 382, Sayı 6666, s. 73, Ekim 2023 https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007 ; Kristina Killgrove, "İnsanlar En Az ...
... Science, том 382, выпуск 6666, стр. 73, октябрь 2023 г. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007 ; Кристина Киллгроув, "Люди были ...
... Science, Vol 382, Isu 6666, ms 73, Oktober 2023 https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007 ; Kristina Killgrove, "Humans Were in ...
... science yet, so at the end of the day within modern science they ... 10.1126/science.adh5007; Kristina Killgrove, "Humans Were in South ...
... re wrong … https://www.science. org/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007. science.org. Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of · 8 mos · 1.
... science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007? Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands. SCIENCE.
org/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007 Not youtube nor tiktok, but Nature and Science. I can't find the third though. Do two out of three satisfy your ...
I believe the debate is about the age of the footprints and not as to if they are made by humans (10.1126/science.adh5007). •••. More options.
... scientists rare insight into the everyday lives of early humans. ... —Sacha Vignieri" https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007?
Christine Anderson science doesn't make things up.https://www.science. org/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007. science.org. Independent age estimates ...
” Science, Vol 382, Issue 6666, Oct 5, 2023. https://www.science. org/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007 Pitulko, Vladimir & Pavlova, Elena.
” Science, Vol 382, Issue 6666, Oct 5, 2023. https://www.science. org/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007 Pitulko, Vladimir & Pavlova, Elena.
https://www.science. org/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007. science.org. Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of. 1 yr. 3. Profile photo ...
—Sacha Vignieri" https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007? Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human ...
—Sacha Vignieri" https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007? Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human ...
... science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007? Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands. SCIENCE.
—Sacha Vignieri" https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007? Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human ...
“ While Hancock is a nobody in science, the scientific claim that ... org/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007. science.org. Independent age ...
” Science, Vol 382, Issue 6666, Oct 5, 2023. https://www.science. org/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007 Pitulko, Vladimir & Pavlova, Elena.
—Sacha Vignieri" https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007? Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human ...
... of years older than when it was thought humans came to North America. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007. [deleted]. • 2y ago.
Ancient footprints at White Sands National Park https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007 Ancient footprints discovered at White ...
... science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007? Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands. SCIENCE.
—Sacha Vignieri" https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007? Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human ...
—Sacha Vignieri" https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007? Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human ...
... the 21-23k dates making the case much stronger to most folks at this point https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007 · rkmvca. • 2y ...
... science stories that captivated the world's attention. Read the ... https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007?adobe_mc=MCMID ...
Observations White Sands National Park , New Mexico USA https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007.
USGS araştırma coğrafyacısı ve güncel Science makalesinin ortak yazarı David Wahl konu hakkında şöyle söylüyor: ... 10.1126/science.adh5007 ...
Science. 2023;382(6666):73-75. doi: 10.1126/science.adh5007. This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: material ...
Original Study DOI: 10.1126/science.adh5007. Related. Humans may have set foot in North America way earlier than thought. Rocky clues suggest ...
... Science. Esto significa que los humanos ya estaban en el sur de ... DOI: doi/10.1126/science.adh5007. TEMAS. investigación · tendencias ...
... science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007? Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands. SCIENCE.
science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007 · No photo description available. Osiris Jacob and 226 others ·
... Science, 2023. DOI: 10.1126/science.adh5007. Sammendrag · Philippsens kommentar. Annonse. LES OGSÅ: Historien om hester i Amerika er feil ...
... scientists still debate exactly when humans arrived on the ... —Sacha Vignieri" https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007?
Science. DOI: 10.1126/science.adh5007. Picks for you. Chicken Or Dinosaur? New fossil link in bird evolution · Scientists discovered a tube ...
Scientists respond to critics of revolutionary finding by ... —Sacha Vignieri" https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007?
https: //www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007.
Science, 2023 DOI: 10.1126/science.adh5007. Cite This Page: MLA; APA; Chicago. U.S. Geological Survey. "Oldest fossil human footprints in North ...
... (Science, 2023; doi: 10.1126/science.adh5007). Quelle: Science, U.S. Geological Survey. 6. Oktober 2023 - Nadja Podbregar. Tags:Amerika ...
10.1126/scisignal.add1845. BIOCHEMISTRY. Radical at the heart. To ... Science, adh5007, this issue p. 73; see also adk3075, p. 36.
—Sacha Vignieri" https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007? Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human ...
—Sacha Vignieri" https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007? Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human ...
... Science (2023). DOI: 10.1126/science.adh5007. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007. Journal information: Science. © 2023 The Associated ...
Science, adh5007, this issue p. 73; see also ... Copy the article link. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adl1575. Copy Link.
doi: 10.1126/science.adh5007. B. Philippsen. Dating the arrival of humans in the Americas. Science. Vol. 382, October 6, 2023, p. 36. doi ...
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). Journal: Science; DOI: 10.1126/science.adh5007. Keywords. /Social sciences/ ...
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). Journal: Science; DOI: 10.1126/science.adh5007. Keywords. /Social sciences/ ...
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). Journal: Science; DOI: 10.1126/science.adh5007. Keywords. /Social sciences/ ...
... science. The First Americans – a story of wonderful, uncertain ... —Sacha Vignieri" https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007?
” Science, Vol 382, Issue 6666, Oct 5, 2023. https://www.science. org/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007 Pitulko, Vladimir & Pavlova, Elena.
—Sacha Vignieri" https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007? Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human ...
That scientists cannot tell if this mural was made by Denisovans ... —Sacha Vignieri" https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007?
—Sacha Vignieri" https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007? Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human ...
/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007 · Abstract. Alisha Gauvreau,; Daryl Fedje,; Angela Dyck,; Quentin Mackie,; Christopher F.G. Hebda,; Keith Holmes ...
/doi/10.1126/science.adh5007 · Abstract. Manuel Domínguez-Rodrigo,; Enrique Baquedano,. Human Agency in the Modification of Lestodon Bones at ...
Observations White Sands National Park , New Mexico USA https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007 ... Adrian McEvilly ▻ CSUEB Earth & ...
... Science (2023). DOI: 10.1126/science. adh5007. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. adh5007 https://upto.site/3ac12. Further evidence points ...
MS
SM
CS
SB
DZ
TA
LM
RU
RM
DF
K
A
BC
NH
M
WJ
YN
MM
VC
J
A
C
SS
MG
MM
BP
CA
埠N
D
CS
PM
L
RM
CV
Q
D
T
MH
KS
SR
FP
DB
RK
CT
N
A
DW
ZA
PK
JC
MD
MB
SM
J
AS
B
S
A
Sシ
N
S
P
B
AA
СШ
SP
C
A
KB
WW
LW
B
DK
A
AR
G
A
J
GO
MΕ
AA
DT
MM
DG
B
W
HA
R
BF
RB
A
C
A
JN
FV
IB
GC
D
メ
CC
BW
TV
お考
C
PS
RA
DW
MV
C
IG
AB
BM
AM
MA
JP
BS
RH
ES
C
BF
AK
DS
DF
AB
AL
TJ
MF