Cognition February 2024 PMID 38016227

Beat processing in newborn infants cannot be explained by statistical learning based on transition probabilities.

Gábor P Háden, Fleur L Bouwer, Henkjan Honing, István Winkler

Download social card

Mentions

43
Peak: 3 in Dec 2022
across 7 sources since Dec 2022

Extended reach

225,981
potential audience

Total likes

16

Video views

131

Mentions per month

Dec 2022 – Jan 2024

Where it's discussed

  • News27 articles
  • Blogs5 articles
  • X / Twitter4 posts
  • YouTube2 videos
  • Facebook2 posts
  • Reddit2 posts
  • Bluesky1 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The social discussions reflect a balanced mix of curiosity and support, with expressions like 'cannot be explained by statistical learning' and calls for further reading of the primary study exemplifying interest. The tone is professional and contemplative, emphasizing potential impacts on theories of infant cognition and neural processing.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions agree that the research question challenges existing assumptions about how infants learn about rhythms, suggesting a general consensus in support of the study's significance.

InterestModerate interest

Participants show moderate interest, with some referencing the implications for understanding cognitive development, but few delve deeply into methodological critiques.

EngagementModerate engagement

The discussions include mentions of key concepts like statistical learning and beat processing, indicating active engagement, though mostly at a surface level.

ImpactModerate impact

The recurring emphasis on the limitations of statistical learning models in explaining infant behavior suggests this research could influence future studies in developmental neuroscience.

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
MU-Peter Shimon
@mu-peter.bsky.social · Bluesky

Beat processing in newborn infants cannot be explained by statistical learning based on transition probabilities

Jan 12, 2024 · 12 likes · 5 shares View post →
bioRxiv Neuroscience
@biorxiv_neursci · X

Beat processing in newborn infants cannot be explained by statistical learning based on transition probabilities https://t.co/phgfTB3xkg #biorxiv_neursci

Dec 21, 2022 · 2 likes · 60,034 followers View post →
bioRxiv
@biorxivpreprint · X

Beat processing in newborn infants cannot be explained by statistical learning based on transition probabilities https://t.co/Znnll1KFTh #bioRxiv

Dec 21, 2022 · 1 like · 137,334 followers View post →
Elsevier Psychology
@ELSpsychology · X

Beat processing in newborn infants cannot be explained by statistical learning based on transition probabilities Read the Cognition study: https://t.co/XCWXyeTpgY Read the news story: https://t.co/QTF8K5qjk8 https://t.co/xPl7aAbH1z

Nov 29, 2023 · 1 like · 28,434 followers View post →

All mentions

MU-Peter Shimon
@mu-peter.bsky.social · Bluesky

Beat processing in newborn infants cannot be explained by statistical learning based on transition probabilities

Jan 12, 2024 · 12 likes · 5 shares View post →
Elsevier Psychology
@ELSpsychology · X

Beat processing in newborn infants cannot be explained by statistical learning based on transition probabilities Read the Cognition study: https://t.co/XCWXyeTpgY Read the news story: https://t.co/QTF8K5qjk8 https://t.co/xPl7aAbH1z

Nov 29, 2023 · 1 like · 28,434 followers View post →
Biorxiv Reddit
@BiorxivReddit · X

Beat processing in newborn infants cannot be explained by statistical learning based on transition probabilities https://t.co/o39RF8VpJr

Dec 21, 2022 · 39 followers View post →
bioRxiv Neuroscience
@biorxiv_neursci · X

Beat processing in newborn infants cannot be explained by statistical learning based on transition probabilities https://t.co/phgfTB3xkg #biorxiv_neursci

Dec 21, 2022 · 2 likes · 60,034 followers View post →
bioRxiv
@biorxivpreprint · X

Beat processing in newborn infants cannot be explained by statistical learning based on transition probabilities https://t.co/Znnll1KFTh #bioRxiv

Dec 21, 2022 · 1 like · 137,334 followers View post →