RCTs on EUS- vs ERCP-guided drainage of inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction – systematic review and meta-analysis Find the article at: https://t.co/Z0qNm9zcCG Tawfik Khoury et al. https://t.co/gSXDvleyrE
Endoscopic ultrasound- versus ERCP-guided primary drainage of inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
Mentions per month
Sep 2024 – Dec 2024Where it's discussed
-
X / Twitter11 posts
-
YouTube1 videos
AI synopsis
What people are saying
The discussions highlight the comparative success rates and procedural benefits of EUS-guided drainage, with phrases like 'better in technical success' and 'shorter procedure times,' demonstrating curiosity and recognition of clinical relevance. The tone remains informative but optimistic about adopting newer methods, aligning with the interest and moderate engagement scores.
Most discussions recognize the study's findings that EUS-guided drainage is comparable or superior to ERCP, reflecting agreement with its conclusions.
The posts show high interest, with references to specific aspects like technique comparisons and clinical implications.
Discussants briefly summarize the study and comment on its significance, indicating moderate engagement rather than deep debate.
The posts suggest the research could influence clinical practice, indicating a modest to moderate impact with mentions of improved procedures.
Abstract in brief
- This review compares endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUSBD) with the traditional ERCP method for treating inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction, finding that EUSBD has similar success rates but fewer reinterventions and shorter procedure times.
- The study analyzed five randomized trials with over 500 patients and concluded that EUSBD, especially when using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS), performs better in technical success and procedure efficiency, with comparable safety and long-term outcomes.
- Overall, EUSBD with LAMS may be a superior first-line approach to ERCP for this condition, offering effective drainage with fewer complications and quicker procedures.]
Top posts
Most liked on X and Bluesky#AuthorCommentary: Tawfik Khoury on "EUS- versus ERCP-guided primary drainage of inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" Watch here: https://t.co/OgMNTjPNsV Read: https://t.co/Z0qNm9yEN8
Paper 2, with Tawfik Khoury & Ulrike Denzer Endoscopic ultrasound- versus ERCP-guided primary drainage of inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. From @endoscopyjrnl https://t.co/7RzXU8AO1W
RT @endoscopyjrnl: RCTs on EUS- vs ERCP-guided drainage of inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction – systematic review and meta-…
RT @endoscopyjrnl: RCTs on EUS- vs ERCP-guided drainage of inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction – systematic review and meta-…
RT @endoscopyjrnl: RCTs on EUS- vs ERCP-guided drainage of inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction – systematic review and meta-…
All mentions
Comparison of EUS- and ERCP-Guided Drainage in Malignant Biliary Obstruction
This systematic review compares endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage with ERCP, showing similar success rates but fewer reinterventions with EUS, especially using lumen-apposing metal stents, making it a…
RT @endoscopyjrnl: RCTs on EUS- vs ERCP-guided drainage of inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction – systematic review and meta-…
#AuthorCommentary: Tawfik Khoury on "EUS- versus ERCP-guided primary drainage of inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" Watch here: https://t.co/OgMNTjPNsV Read: https://t.co/Z0qNm9yEN8
RT @endoscopyjrnl: RCTs on EUS- vs ERCP-guided drainage of inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction – systematic review and meta-…
RT @endoscopyjrnl: RCTs on EUS- vs ERCP-guided drainage of inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction – systematic review and meta-…
RT @endoscopyjrnl: RCTs on EUS- vs ERCP-guided drainage of inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction – systematic review and meta-…
RT @endoscopyjrnl: RCTs on EUS- vs ERCP-guided drainage of inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction – systematic review and meta-…
RT @endoscopyjrnl: RCTs on EUS- vs ERCP-guided drainage of inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction – systematic review and meta-…
RT @endoscopyjrnl: RCTs on EUS- vs ERCP-guided drainage of inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction – systematic review and meta-…
RT @endoscopyjrnl: RCTs on EUS- vs ERCP-guided drainage of inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction – systematic review and meta-…
RCTs on EUS- vs ERCP-guided drainage of inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction – systematic review and meta-analysis Find the article at: https://t.co/Z0qNm9zcCG Tawfik Khoury et al. https://t.co/gSXDvleyrE
Paper 2, with Tawfik Khoury & Ulrike Denzer Endoscopic ultrasound- versus ERCP-guided primary drainage of inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. From @endoscopyjrnl https://t.co/7RzXU8AO1W
EJ
E
EM
Aق
CF
TE
MR
AR
OD
CJ