Endoscopy January 2025 PMID 39227020

Adenoma detection rate by colonoscopy in real-world population-based studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Carlos Fernandes, Manuela Estevinho, Manuel Marques Cruz, Leonardo Frazzoni, Pedro Pereira Rodrigues, Lorenzo Fuccio, Mário Dinis-Ribeiro

Full text PDF Download social card

Mentions

Peak: 4 in Jan 2025

across 3 sources since Dec 2024

Extended reach

23,579

potential audience

Total likes

Video views

Mentions per month

Dec 2024 – Jan 2025

Where it's discussed

X / Twitter4 posts
Facebook2 posts
YouTube1 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The discussions focus on the study’s confirmation of ADR benchmarks and their implications, with language like 'supports the European standards' and 'important for practice,' showing balanced recognition and moderate engagement without deep technical analysis.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the credibility and importance of the systematic review, with mentions of the article's findings supporting existing guidelines.

InterestModerate interest

Participants show moderate interest, primarily through references to key figures like ADR benchmarks and the significance of the study for clinical practice.

EngagementModerate engagement

Comments include brief endorsements and calls to consider the findings, indicating a moderate level of engagement rather than deep debate.

ImpactModerate impact

The discussions highlight the article’s relevance for clinical guidelines and practice adjustments, suggesting a meaningful but not revolutionary impact.

Abstract in brief

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined adenoma detection rates (ADR) during colonoscopies in real-world settings, finding that the pooled ADR was around 26.5%, which supports the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy's benchmark of at least 25%.
The study analyzed data from 31 studies with over 3.6 million patients, showing high-quality procedures with low complication rates, and found variations in ADR based on the reason for the colonoscopy, such as screening, surveillance, or diagnostic purposes.
Factors like male sex, older age, and specific indications were associated with higher ADRs, suggesting that benchmarks might need to be adjusted based on patient characteristics and reasons for colonoscopy.]

Read the full abstract

All mentions

Real-World Adenoma Detection Rates in Colonoscopy Practice

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined adenoma detection rates during colonoscopies in real-world settings, supporting current guideline benchmarks and highlighting factors influencing detection rates.

endoscopythieme · Dec 19, 2024 69 views

Chirurgien Jeune

@cliffmwita · X

RT @endoscopyjrnl: #AuthorCommentary: Carlos Fernandes on "Adenoma detection rate by colonoscopy in real-world population-based studies: a…

Jan 19, 2025 · 1 share · 368 followers View post →

Endoscopy Journal

@endoscopyjrnl · X

Jan 19, 2025 · 7 likes · 1 share · 11,536 followers View post →

SOVED

@soved_oficial · X

RT @endoscopyjrnl: Editor's Choice: ADR by colonoscopy in real-world population-based studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis Find…

Jan 17, 2025 · 1 share · 44 followers View post →