Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Several posts highlight the interesting physics behind paper cuts, especially pointing out why a specific thickness (around 65 micrometers) is particularly dangerous. The tone is analytical yet accessible, with some commenters showing genuine curiosity about the factors influencing paper's behavior during cuts. The frequent reference to concepts like buckling, slicing, and elasticity, along with the use of terms like 'competition' and 'hazardous,' reflects a shared interest in understanding the scientific principles at play and indicates a moderate level of engagement with the publication's insights.
Most discussions seem to support the findings, with many recognizing the explanation of the physical mechanics involved in paper cuts as logical and credible.
Many posts express curiosity, especially about the specific thickness (65 μm) being most hazardous, and the general fascination with the physics behind everyday phenomena.
Posts show moderate engagement by referencing specific concepts like slicing, buckling, and elasticity, and some mention related scientific studies and models.
Overall, the discussions suggest some awareness of the study's relevance to understanding paper injuries, though their focus remains mostly on technical details rather than broad implications.
Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic nature of paper cuts, Sif Fink Arnbjerg-Nielsen, Matthew D. Biviano, and Kaare H. Jensen #Buckling #Elasticity @jensenresearch https://t.co/vs1cGmMMIL https://t.co/JItW6HNyEl
手を切りやすい紙の厚さは65 μm。厚みが50 μm以下と100 μm以上の紙が皮膚に傷をつける可能性は低い。 Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic nature of paper cuts https://t.co/rtO22FZVGu
Ever wonder why some kinds of paper are more likely to cause paper cuts? A study in @PhysRevE found that paper around 65 micrometers thick — like in newspapers and scientific journals — is the most dangerous.
指を切りやすい紙質ランキング。 https://t.co/9lAZlpbLgx https://t.co/801nNSKYib
#PhysRevE Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic nature of paper cuts https://t.co/2H7WpXbjhx explaining why paper with a specific thickness is most hazardous (65 µm) and suggesting a probabilistic interpretation of irregular occurrence of paper cuts. https://t.co/8RJTRhZLso
紙で指を怪我してしまうやつ、65ミクロンくらいの薄さの紙が1番やらかしやすいらしいよ、という論文 https://t.co/BGdk7sxFdY
This week is a mixture of promising clinical developments, including a potential treatment for a severe form of brain cancer using an approved antidepressant, which may delay glioblastoma progression. Additionally…
Hosts Max and Issy discuss research on non-deceptive placebos and their effectiveness in alleviating COVID-related stress, anxiety, and depression. They also cover findings on various scientific topics, including rats'…
RT @sugargroove: 手を切りやすい紙の厚さは65 μm。厚みが50 μm以下と100 μm以上の紙が皮膚に傷をつける可能性は低い。 Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic na…
RT @sugargroove: 手を切りやすい紙の厚さは65 μm。厚みが50 μm以下と100 μm以上の紙が皮膚に傷をつける可能性は低い。 Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic na…
RT @sugargroove: 手を切りやすい紙の厚さは65 μm。厚みが50 μm以下と100 μm以上の紙が皮膚に傷をつける可能性は低い。 Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic na…
RT @sugargroove: 手を切りやすい紙の厚さは65 μm。厚みが50 μm以下と100 μm以上の紙が皮膚に傷をつける可能性は低い。 Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic na…
RT @sugargroove: 手を切りやすい紙の厚さは65 μm。厚みが50 μm以下と100 μm以上の紙が皮膚に傷をつける可能性は低い。 Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic na…
RT @sugargroove: 手を切りやすい紙の厚さは65 μm。厚みが50 μm以下と100 μm以上の紙が皮膚に傷をつける可能性は低い。 Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic na…
RT @sugargroove: 手を切りやすい紙の厚さは65 μm。厚みが50 μm以下と100 μm以上の紙が皮膚に傷をつける可能性は低い。 Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic na…
RT @sugargroove: 手を切りやすい紙の厚さは65 μm。厚みが50 μm以下と100 μm以上の紙が皮膚に傷をつける可能性は低い。 Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic na…
RT @sugargroove: 手を切りやすい紙の厚さは65 μm。厚みが50 μm以下と100 μm以上の紙が皮膚に傷をつける可能性は低い。 Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic na…
RT @sugargroove: 手を切りやすい紙の厚さは65 μm。厚みが50 μm以下と100 μm以上の紙が皮膚に傷をつける可能性は低い。 Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic na…
RT @sugargroove: 手を切りやすい紙の厚さは65 μm。厚みが50 μm以下と100 μm以上の紙が皮膚に傷をつける可能性は低い。 Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic na…
RT @sugargroove: 手を切りやすい紙の厚さは65 μm。厚みが50 μm以下と100 μm以上の紙が皮膚に傷をつける可能性は低い。 Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic na…
手を切りやすい紙の厚さは65 μm。厚みが50 μm以下と100 μm以上の紙が皮膚に傷をつける可能性は低い。 Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic nature of paper cuts https://t.co/rtO22FZVGu
元論文↓ https://t.co/JNdOQANOEc
RT @tmiyatake1: 指を切りやすい紙質ランキング。 https://t.co/9lAZlpbLgx https://t.co/801nNSKYib
指を切りやすい紙質ランキング。 https://t.co/9lAZlpbLgx https://t.co/801nNSKYib
I love biophysics Phys. Rev. E 110, 025003 (2024) - Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic nature of paper cuts https://t.co/GgaClzrHpM
RT @emulenews: #PhysRevE Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic nature of paper cuts https://t.co/2H7WpXbjhx explai…
RT @emulenews: #PhysRevE Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic nature of paper cuts https://t.co/2H7WpXbjhx explai…
#PhysRevE Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic nature of paper cuts https://t.co/2H7WpXbjhx explaining why paper with a specific thickness is most hazardous (65 µm) and suggesting a probabilistic interpretation of irregular occurrence of paper cuts. https://t.co/8RJTRhZLso
紙で指を怪我してしまうやつ、65ミクロンくらいの薄さの紙が1番やらかしやすいらしいよ、という論文 https://t.co/BGdk7sxFdY
RT @APSphysics: Ever wonder why some kinds of paper are more likely to cause paper cuts? A study in @PhysRevE found that paper around 65 mi…
RT @tarokotani: 「指に切り傷を作りやすい紙の研究」が Physical Review E に載っちゃった。一番はドット・プリンタ用紙だったそうです。今年のイグ・ノーベル物理学賞かな。 → Competition between slicing and buckl…
RT @APSphysics: Ever wonder why some kinds of paper are more likely to cause paper cuts? A study in @PhysRevE found that paper around 65 mi…
RT @tarokotani: 「指に切り傷を作りやすい紙の研究」が Physical Review E に載っちゃった。一番はドット・プリンタ用紙だったそうです。今年のイグ・ノーベル物理学賞かな。 → Competition between slicing and buckl…
RT @tarokotani: 「指に切り傷を作りやすい紙の研究」が Physical Review E に載っちゃった。一番はドット・プリンタ用紙だったそうです。今年のイグ・ノーベル物理学賞かな。 → Competition between slicing and buckl…
「指に切り傷を作りやすい紙の研究」が Physical Review E に載っちゃった。一番はドット・プリンタ用紙だったそうです。今年のイグ・ノーベル物理学賞かな。 → Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic nature of paper cuts https://t.co/mR0P8NhC3V
RT @APSphysics: Ever wonder why some kinds of paper are more likely to cause paper cuts? A study in @PhysRevE found that paper around 65 mi…
RT @APSphysics: Ever wonder why some kinds of paper are more likely to cause paper cuts? A study in @PhysRevE found that paper around 65 mi…
RT @APSphysics: Ever wonder why some kinds of paper are more likely to cause paper cuts? A study in @PhysRevE found that paper around 65 mi…
Ever wonder why some kinds of paper are more likely to cause paper cuts? A study in @PhysRevE found that paper around 65 micrometers thick — like in newspapers and scientific journals — is the most dangerous.
とはいえ、NatureやScienceを紙で読んだのはいつのことやら、というくらいご無沙汰なので実感が持てないなあ。元の論文はこちら。最後には紙を使って野菜や果物を切ってます。え、そのパート必要？ https://t.co/CMll5oFQAC
RT @PhysRevE: Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic nature of paper cuts, Sif Fink Arnbjerg-Nielsen, Matthew D. Bi…
RT @PhysRevE: Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic nature of paper cuts, Sif Fink Arnbjerg-Nielsen, Matthew D. Bi…
RT @PhysRevE: Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic nature of paper cuts, Sif Fink Arnbjerg-Nielsen, Matthew D. Bi…
RT @PhysRevE: Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic nature of paper cuts, Sif Fink Arnbjerg-Nielsen, Matthew D. Bi…
RT @PhysRevE: Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic nature of paper cuts, Sif Fink Arnbjerg-Nielsen, Matthew D. Bi…
RT @PhysRevE: Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic nature of paper cuts, Sif Fink Arnbjerg-Nielsen, Matthew D. Bi…
RT @PhysRevE: Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic nature of paper cuts, Sif Fink Arnbjerg-Nielsen, Matthew D. Bi…
Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic nature of paper cuts, Sif Fink Arnbjerg-Nielsen, Matthew D. Biviano, and Kaare H. Jensen #Buckling #Elasticity @jensenresearch https://t.co/vs1cGmMMIL https://t.co/JItW6HNyEl
どうやら学術雑誌は精神攻撃だけではなく、物理攻撃も与える() Source and Image Credits: Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic nature of paper cuts Phys. Rev. E Sif Fink Arnbjerg-Nielsen, Matthew D. Biviano, and Kaare H. Jensen https://t.co/QTow9VTdAM
Physical Review E - Accepted Paper: Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic nature of paper cuts https://t.co/pWmh5CYw2Z
Accepted Paper: Competition between slicing and buckling underlies the erratic nature of paper cuts - Physical Review E https://t.co/WifFYtUvI7 Accepted 19 June 2024
PE
SF
AS
TM
FV
DO
圧圧
パ
YA
な
N
大
さ
仏
ト
A
N
KN
斉文
し
VP
EL
JM
JS
み
MB
藤ご
ち
小
VØ
GW
SB
EC
EP
BG
EM
S
RA
A
R
M