PubHawk
Endoscopy May 2025 PMID 39424357

Prospective randomized trial comparing conventional and underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial colorectal neoplasms.

Mitsuru Nagata, Masayuki Namiki, Tomoaki Fujikawa, Hiromi Munakata

Full text PDF Download social card

Mentions

12
Peak: 9 in May 2025
across 2 sources since Feb 2025

Extended reach

38,596
potential audience

Total likes

43

Video views

1,031

Mentions per month

Feb 2025 – May 2025

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter10 posts
  • YouTube2 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The overall tone reflects a balanced view, with comments like 'UED did not expedite dissection speed,' and notes on its situational use, indicating a moderate level of interest and engagement. The mention of lesion location and gravity hints at practical implications without overstating the innovation's impact.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions acknowledge the findings, noting that underwater ESD does not necessarily accelerate dissection speed overall but may have situational benefits.

InterestModerate interest

The group shows moderate curiosity, with comments highlighting the relevance of lesion positioning and the potential for combining techniques.

EngagementModerate engagement

Participants reference specific aspects of the study, such as the role of gravity and the comparative effectiveness, indicating moderate thoughtful engagement.

ImpactNeutral impact

The discussions suggest some importance for clinical practice, but mainly reinforce existing knowledge rather than indicating a groundbreaking shift.

Abstract in brief

  • This study compared traditional (conventional) and underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) techniques for treating superficial colorectal neoplasms and found no significant difference in dissection speed between the two methods.
  • The success rate for removing the lesions in one piece without perforation was high in both groups, and the occurrence of post-procedure complications was similar for both techniques.
  • The study also noted that the effectiveness of the dissection speed depends on how the lesion's position relates to gravity, suggesting that conventional and underwater ESD might be used complementarily based on the lesion’s location.
Read the full abstract

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Jan Král
@KralJan · X

May 20, 2025 · 17 likes · 7 shares · 3,446 followers View post →
Endoscopy Journal
@endoscopyjrnl · X

Prospective randomized trial: conventional and underwater ESD for superficial colorectal neoplasms Find the article at: https://t.co/5daBRWyVlO Mitsuru Nagata et al. https://t.co/NcNpknSVRX

May 12, 2025 · 12 likes · 2 shares · 11,548 followers View post →
Endoscopy Journal
@endoscopyjrnl · X

#AuthorCommentary: Mitsuru Nagata on "Prospective randomized trial comparing conventional and underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial colorectal neoplasms" Watch: https://t.co/YkLZbVVfqu Read: https://t.co/5daBRWyVlO Mitsuru Nagata et al.

May 13, 2025 · 9 likes · 11,533 followers View post →
Dalbir Sandhu, MD, FACG, FASGE
@drdalbir · X

RT @KralJan:

May 20, 2025 · 7 shares · 4,627 followers View post →
Scot Michael Lewey
@EUSandEndoscopy · X

RT @endoscopyjrnl: Prospective randomized trial: conventional and underwater ESD for superficial colorectal neoplasms Find the article at:…

May 13, 2025 · 2 shares · 2,927 followers View post →
Lumír Kunovský
@LumirKunovsky · X

RT @KralJan:

May 20, 2025 · 7 shares · 2,712 followers View post →

All mentions

Tony Tham
@ttham1 · X

RT @KralJan:

May 20, 2025 · 7 shares · 404 followers View post →
Dalbir Sandhu, MD, FACG, FASGE
@drdalbir · X

RT @KralJan:

May 20, 2025 · 7 shares · 4,627 followers View post →
Ahmed Mohamed Abdelgalel
@AhmadShaaban92 · X

RT @KralJan:

May 20, 2025 · 7 shares · 205 followers View post →
Lumír Kunovský
@LumirKunovsky · X

RT @KralJan:

May 20, 2025 · 7 shares · 2,712 followers View post →
Jan Král
@KralJan · X

May 20, 2025 · 17 likes · 7 shares · 3,446 followers View post →
Scot Michael Lewey
@EUSandEndoscopy · X

RT @endoscopyjrnl: Prospective randomized trial: conventional and underwater ESD for superficial colorectal neoplasms Find the article at:…

May 13, 2025 · 2 shares · 2,927 followers View post →
jaime bonfante
@jaimebom · X

RT @endoscopyjrnl: Prospective randomized trial: conventional and underwater ESD for superficial colorectal neoplasms Find the article at:…

May 13, 2025 · 2 shares · 55 followers View post →
Endoscopy Journal
@endoscopyjrnl · X

#AuthorCommentary: Mitsuru Nagata on "Prospective randomized trial comparing conventional and underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial colorectal neoplasms" Watch: https://t.co/YkLZbVVfqu Read: https://t.co/5daBRWyVlO Mitsuru Nagata et al.

May 13, 2025 · 9 likes · 11,533 followers View post →
Endoscopy Journal
@endoscopyjrnl · X

Prospective randomized trial: conventional and underwater ESD for superficial colorectal neoplasms Find the article at: https://t.co/5daBRWyVlO Mitsuru Nagata et al. https://t.co/NcNpknSVRX

May 12, 2025 · 12 likes · 2 shares · 11,548 followers View post →
EndoNews
@EndoNews2014 · X

Relative to CESD, UESD did not expedite dissection speed in the overall patient population. CESD and UESD may be complementary in the colorectum depending on the positional relationship between the lesion and the direction of gravity. Read more: https://t.co/0H1YIq8hGv https://t.co/SsZNWlEwXd

Feb 20, 2025 · 27 followers View post →