PubHawk
January 1969 PMID 5762760

New concepts of kingdoms or organisms. Evolutionary relations are better represented by new classifications than by the traditional two kingdoms.

R H Whittaker

Download social card

Mentions

9
Peak: 4 in Oct 2020
across 2 sources since Oct 2020

Extended reach

13,417
potential audience

Total likes

35

Video views

356

Mentions per month

Oct 2020 – Nov 2025

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter7 posts
  • YouTube2 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The assessments reflect that many participants acknowledge the importance of updated classification systems, with discussions highlighting examples like Whittaker's 1969 work, and comments showing deep interest through technical references and debates about groups like fungi and plants, demonstrating both curiosity and recognition of scientific evolution.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most discussions support the idea that modern classifications better represent evolutionary relationships, aligning with the article's premise.

InterestHigh interest

Several social discussions show curiosity about historical classifications and scientific debates, indicating high interest.

EngagementModerate engagement

Comments reference specific concepts like polyphyletic groups and changes over time, showing meaningful engagement.

ImpactModerate impact

The conversations suggest an awareness of how rethinking classification systems could influence scientific understanding, hinting at some impact.

Abstract in brief

  • The text discusses updates in how scientists classify living organisms, moving away from the traditional two-kingdom system.
  • It emphasizes that newer classifications better reflect the evolutionary relationships among organisms.
  • The idea is that current understanding of evolution has led to more complex and accurate grouping of different forms of life.]
Read the full abstract

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Biologia In Situ
@bioinsitu · X

Disponível em: https://t.co/CFoiMtdiz0 #ParaTodasVerem: Imagem composta de dois quadros lado a lado. A figura é lida da esquerda para a direita. No primeiro quadro (a esquerda), encontramos o título “chegando na biologia para aprender os reinos” acima de uma foto, na qual uma(+)

Aug 14, 2021 · 6 likes · 366 followers View post →
カイセキリュウ
@kaisekiriu · X

@GdNt_ONM3_Ru はい。たとえばWhittaker (1969)は動物界・植物界・菌界について「多系統（polyphyletic）」であると明記しています。 https://t.co/51obQkU3W4

Oct 14, 2020 · 5 likes · 3 shares · 434 followers View post →
Jun
@ni075 · X

RT @kaisekiriu: @GdNt_ONM3_Ru はい。たとえばWhittaker (1969)は動物界・植物界・菌界について「多系統（polyphyletic）」であると明記しています。 https://t.co/51obQkU3W4

Oct 14, 2020 · 3 shares · 6,143 followers View post →
原　拓史
@haltaq · X

RT @kaisekiriu: @GdNt_ONM3_Ru はい。たとえばWhittaker (1969)は動物界・植物界・菌界について「多系統（polyphyletic）」であると明記しています。 https://t.co/51obQkU3W4

Oct 14, 2020 · 3 shares · 3,557 followers View post →
IV-7
@IV757975026 · X

RT @kaisekiriu: @GdNt_ONM3_Ru はい。たとえばWhittaker (1969)は動物界・植物界・菌界について「多系統（polyphyletic）」であると明記しています。 https://t.co/51obQkU3W4

Oct 14, 2020 · 3 shares · 1,685 followers View post →
カイセキリュウ
@kaisekiriu · X

④ホイッタカー（1969年） 五界説の人その2。Whittaker (1969)では、後生植物（陸上植物）のほかに緑藻、車軸藻、紅藻、そして褐藻を植物に含めている。つまり、この“植物”はアーケプラスチダとは異なるグループ。 https://t.co/8XkkyBIR3s

Nov 25, 2025 · 434 followers View post →

All mentions

カイセキリュウ
@kaisekiriu · X

④ホイッタカー（1969年） 五界説の人その2。Whittaker (1969)では、後生植物（陸上植物）のほかに緑藻、車軸藻、紅藻、そして褐藻を植物に含めている。つまり、この“植物”はアーケプラスチダとは異なるグループ。 https://t.co/8XkkyBIR3s

Nov 25, 2025 · 434 followers View post →
GreenFuse group
@greenfusegroup · X

and a reminder that until not so long ago, fungi were considered to be plants. https://t.co/hVmYYT9HD5

Oct 19, 2021 · 419 followers View post →
Biologia In Situ
@bioinsitu · X

Disponível em: https://t.co/CFoiMtdiz0 #ParaTodasVerem: Imagem composta de dois quadros lado a lado. A figura é lida da esquerda para a direita. No primeiro quadro (a esquerda), encontramos o título “chegando na biologia para aprender os reinos” acima de uma foto, na qual uma(+)

Aug 14, 2021 · 6 likes · 366 followers View post →
IV-7
@IV757975026 · X

RT @kaisekiriu: @GdNt_ONM3_Ru はい。たとえばWhittaker (1969)は動物界・植物界・菌界について「多系統（polyphyletic）」であると明記しています。 https://t.co/51obQkU3W4

Oct 14, 2020 · 3 shares · 1,685 followers View post →
原　拓史
@haltaq · X

RT @kaisekiriu: @GdNt_ONM3_Ru はい。たとえばWhittaker (1969)は動物界・植物界・菌界について「多系統（polyphyletic）」であると明記しています。 https://t.co/51obQkU3W4

Oct 14, 2020 · 3 shares · 3,557 followers View post →
Jun
@ni075 · X

RT @kaisekiriu: @GdNt_ONM3_Ru はい。たとえばWhittaker (1969)は動物界・植物界・菌界について「多系統（polyphyletic）」であると明記しています。 https://t.co/51obQkU3W4

Oct 14, 2020 · 3 shares · 6,143 followers View post →
カイセキリュウ
@kaisekiriu · X

@GdNt_ONM3_Ru はい。たとえばWhittaker (1969)は動物界・植物界・菌界について「多系統（polyphyletic）」であると明記しています。 https://t.co/51obQkU3W4

Oct 14, 2020 · 5 likes · 3 shares · 434 followers View post →