PubHawk
Ann Intern Med September 1994 PMID 8042825

Limitations of angiography for analyzing coronary atherosclerosis progression or regression.

M K Hong, G S Mintz, J J Popma, K M Kent, A D Pichard, L F Satler, M B Leon

Download social card

Mentions

9
Peak: 2 in Sep 2020
across 2 sources since Sep 2020

Extended reach

78,001
potential audience

Total likes

2,012

Video views

67,436

Mentions per month

Sep 2020 – Aug 2025

Where it's discussed

  • X / Twitter7 posts
  • YouTube2 videos

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The overall tone reflects agreement with the publication's critical stance on coronary angiography's limitations, demonstrated by comments like 'not a satisfactory means' and calls for education. The tone is informative but somewhat confrontational, emphasizing the importance of proper understanding and discouraging unsupported claims about reversing heart disease, which underscores the article's impact on clinical and public perceptions.

AgreementStrong agreement

Most discussions agree that coronary angiography is limited in assessing atherosclerosis progression or regression, aligning with the article's conclusions.

InterestModerate interest

While there is some curiosity about the implications, the overall interest is moderate, mainly focused on clarifying misconceptions and the reliability of the method.

EngagementModerate engagement

Participants actively debate and correct misinformation, showing a fair level of engagement through clarifications and challenging assertions.

ImpactHigh impact

The discussions highlight significant implications for clinical practices and public understanding, especially around the limitations of angiography and misconceptions about heart disease reversal.

Abstract in brief

  • Serial coronary angiography has limited ability to accurately measure the progression or regression of atherosclerosis, often detecting only small changes over long periods.
  • It cannot assess the actual composition or extent of atherosclerotic lesions, often underestimating disease presence, especially in areas that appear normal on the images.
  • Due to measurement variability and the inability to directly visualize plaque characteristics, angiography is not currently a reliable method for tracking atherosclerosis changes.
Read the full abstract

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Nick
@upRootNutrition · X

@kitchenconserv @Tellit007 They were never shown to reverse heart disease to begin with. https://t.co/01JzE1EjzM

Mar 10, 2023 · 1 like · 9,493 followers View post →
Aravind V
@Appoota · X

@Dannymash37 @upRootNutrition @Foundring Have you ever come across this video? https://t.co/OxB5xqa8Nq

Feb 5, 2025 · 1 like · 302 followers View post →
NotYourAverageLayman
@ParadymRap · X

@tristin69 @ThisIDKMyDude @AviBittMD You're basically willfully ignoring the content by OP which directly addresses your concerns. https://t.co/YHG4VN8M6J https://t.co/B57L8tub0s https://t.co/zTC6yDGhYG https://t.co/c4QlKgvzni https://t.co/bKBDFkICOS https://t.co/CW9Wj1tHlf https://t.co/YHG4VN8M6J Educate yourself

Jul 12, 2021 · 320 followers View post →
Aravind V
@Appoota · X

@RealmSquire @KingScrubba https://t.co/LvH0SIHZVU

Feb 2, 2024 · 302 followers View post →
anonemus349832
@anonemus349832 · X

@jimmy_muthami @shivadas29 @Drlipid @grok Here let me make it easy for you https://t.co/p6mq41J4yr "coronary angiography is not a satisfactory means of detecting atherosclerosis progression or regression.

Aug 24, 2025 · 57 followers View post →
anonemus349832
@anonemus349832 · X

@qanhje @raphaels7 Sirtoli is trying to claim plaque regression appears on an angiogram. https://t.co/p6mq41J4yr "coronary angiography is not a satisfactory means of detecting atherosclerosis progression or regression." See the problem? People who don't know what they are doing making bold claim

Aug 24, 2025 · 57 followers View post →

All mentions

anonemus349832
@anonemus349832 · X

@qanhje @raphaels7 Sirtoli is trying to claim plaque regression appears on an angiogram. https://t.co/p6mq41J4yr "coronary angiography is not a satisfactory means of detecting atherosclerosis progression or regression." See the problem? People who don't know what they are doing making bold claim

Aug 24, 2025 · 57 followers View post →
anonemus349832
@anonemus349832 · X

@jimmy_muthami @shivadas29 @Drlipid @grok Here let me make it easy for you https://t.co/p6mq41J4yr "coronary angiography is not a satisfactory means of detecting atherosclerosis progression or regression.

Aug 24, 2025 · 57 followers View post →
Aravind V
@Appoota · X

@Dannymash37 @upRootNutrition @Foundring Have you ever come across this video? https://t.co/OxB5xqa8Nq

Feb 5, 2025 · 1 like · 302 followers View post →
Aravind V
@Appoota · X

@RealmSquire @KingScrubba https://t.co/LvH0SIHZVU

Feb 2, 2024 · 302 followers View post →
Nick
@upRootNutrition · X

@kitchenconserv @Tellit007 They were never shown to reverse heart disease to begin with. https://t.co/01JzE1EjzM

Mar 10, 2023 · 1 like · 9,493 followers View post →
NotYourAverageLayman
@ParadymRap · X

@tristin69 @ThisIDKMyDude @AviBittMD You're basically willfully ignoring the content by OP which directly addresses your concerns. https://t.co/YHG4VN8M6J https://t.co/B57L8tub0s https://t.co/zTC6yDGhYG https://t.co/c4QlKgvzni https://t.co/bKBDFkICOS https://t.co/CW9Wj1tHlf https://t.co/YHG4VN8M6J Educate yourself

Jul 12, 2021 · 320 followers View post →
Schadenfreude
@b3excellent · X

We can't claim heart disease reversal https://t.co/gFoNxi81gp via @YouTube @DrEsselstyn @nutrition_facts @PlantBasedNews

Sep 7, 2020 · 35 followers View post →