April 1994 PMID 8127329

The effect of vitamin E and beta carotene on the incidence of lung cancer and other cancers in male smokers.

Download social card

Mentions

152
Peak: 5 in Dec 2019
across 5 sources since Nov 2019

Extended reach

415,326
potential audience

Total likes

1,417

Video views

75,128

Mentions per month

Nov 2019 – Dec 2025

Where it's discussed

  • News78 articles
  • X / Twitter30 posts
  • Blogs30 articles
  • YouTube8 videos
  • Facebook6 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

The collective discussions strongly reflect opposition to the use of vitamin E and beta carotene supplements in smokers, highlighting large clinical trials that revealed harmful or null effects, such as the mention of the 1994 Finnish study that linked beta-carotene to increased lung cancer risk. The tone is serious and evidence-based, with references to scientific studies and calls for caution, which underscore the perceived importance and high impact of the research findings in guiding public health decisions.

AgreementStrong agreement

Most discussions concur that the reported research shows no benefits from taking vitamin E and beta carotene supplements for smokers, with several explicitly mentioning the trial results indicating potential harm.

InterestHigh interest

The posts demonstrate high curiosity by referencing specific studies, such as the large-scale trials from the 1990s and recent experiments, and emphasize the ongoing relevance of these findings.

EngagementHigh engagement

Many users deeply analyze the implications, citing detailed trial data, discussing possible biological mechanisms, and contrasting supplement use with dietary intake, indicating a comprehensive engagement with the research.

ImpactHigh impact

The discussions suggest a consensus that these findings have major health implications, warning against supplement use among smokers and emphasizing the potential risks, thus underscoring the high perceived impact of the publication.

Abstract in brief

  • The study tested whether daily supplements of vitamin E (alphatocopherol), beta carotene, both, or a placebo could reduce lung and other cancers in male smokers, but found no benefit; in fact, beta carotene was associated with a higher lung cancer incidence.
  • Vitamin E supplementation slightly lowered prostate cancer cases but did not significantly affect overall mortality, although it was linked to an increased risk of death from hemorrhagic stroke.
  • Overall, the findings suggest that taking vitamin E or beta carotene as supplements does not reduce lung cancer risk and may have potential health risks, especially with beta carotene increasing lung cancer risk.]

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Edo Kon
@Edo_Kon · X

@DMTomayko @_atanas_ I think that the hypothesis is that cancer cells benefit more from antioxidants compared to healthy cells. Two well known examples (one of them is recent, the other is not): https://t.co/VIVr6Wtbgs https://t.co/TblvQrPbRj

Dec 25, 2019 · 9 likes · 4 shares · 103 followers View post →
Joseph Everett (WIL)
@JEverettLearned · X

Also, if you're a normal person, don't eat 310g of carrots a day. (Actually the amount you're *not* supposed to eat is somewhere below 310g...) Re: smokers, look up "The Effect of Vitamin E and Beta Carotene on the Incidence of Lung Cancer and Other Cancers in Male Smokers" https://t.co/okMul0JkJd https://t.co/eZUq5eUc0m

Nov 3, 2019 · 7 likes · 1 share · 25,234 followers View post →
森 勇一
@ymori117 · X

なお、このコホートの元々の研究は、アルファトコフェロールとベータカロチンのがん予防効果には否定的な結果で、むしろ後者は男性の肺がんリスクを増やす可能性が示唆された。 https://t.co/rwT53j2RDW

Feb 26, 2022 · 4 likes · 3 shares · 7,259 followers View post →
Santhosh Ambika
@RenoHemonc · X

@Prof_Nick_James stop causing harm by giving Vit E Prostate SELECT trial and NSCLC trial shows detriment https://t.co/g30Q2doKrp https://t.co/KXpeIvuVnk

Oct 18, 2023 · 4 likes · 2 shares · 4,021 followers View post →
L. Amber O'Hearn
@KetoCarnivore · X

@EatmeatN @siobhan_huggins @SteakAndIron @LogicalLynx Yeah, that would be based on this: https://t.co/CfpoH83EXc

Feb 11, 2020 · 2 likes · 60,019 followers View post →
左巻健男(サマキタケオ)
@samakikaku · X

@CR_ZENZENDEN @samaki_ta 次を見てください。 N Engl J Med. 1994 Apr 14;330(15):1029-35. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199404143301501. The effect of vitamin E and beta carotene on the incidence of lung cancer and other cancers in male smokers https://t.co/T8UjrrH5JC

Oct 15, 2022 · 1 like · 12,201 followers View post →

All mentions

Andrew Vickers
@VickersBiostats · X

@AAMortazavi @DrNeilStone see https://t.co/JNjPFyKnq3 and https://t.co/wuw9hSxBtk and https://t.co/zpZKfLqk9M and https://t.co/0jCn1wWNFj

Oct 8, 2025 · 5,610 followers View post →
Flo
@Florianx29 · X

Sep 26, 2025 · 1 followers View post →
鶴田展大@鶴田クリニック理事長
@tsurutacl · X

喫煙者におけるβカロテン摂取は肺癌を増やす可能性がある。 https://t.co/OW7g1VZTa6 https://t.co/srh1XsHncA

Jul 9, 2025 · 920 followers View post →
JM Moran
@jmmorang · X

Fuentes:

Dec 16, 2024 · 5,131 followers View post →
Jasmin
@Jas_LohPY · X

RT @RenoHemonc: @Prof_Nick_James stop causing harm by giving Vit E Prostate SELECT trial and NSCLC trial shows detriment https://t.co/g30…

Oct 19, 2023 · 2 shares · 39 followers View post →
Nick James also on @Prof-Nick-James.bsky.social
@Prof_Nick_James · X

RT @RenoHemonc: @Prof_Nick_James stop causing harm by giving Vit E Prostate SELECT trial and NSCLC trial shows detriment https://t.co/g30…

Oct 18, 2023 · 2 shares · 5,642 followers View post →
Santhosh Ambika
@RenoHemonc · X

@Prof_Nick_James stop causing harm by giving Vit E Prostate SELECT trial and NSCLC trial shows detriment https://t.co/g30Q2doKrp https://t.co/KXpeIvuVnk

Oct 18, 2023 · 4 likes · 2 shares · 4,021 followers View post →
george davey smith
@mendel_random · X

@igoreckert 2/2 for the RCTs that were done. These were large, some of long duration and ruled out meaningful benefit (indeed hinted at harm) eg https://t.co/cSz0Ijgbx3 https://t.co/MxY9kJmBLk and https://t.co/3SGewDSBTJ (Peto last author)

Apr 23, 2023 · 1 like · 9,303 followers View post →
Donna Mueller, D.O.
@DOLifeMed · X

One thing authors did not consider, especially w/extracted compounds (i.e. supplements): “the possibility that these supplements may actually have harmful as well as beneficial effects…” That’s why BEST to eat a variety of #WFPB foods! https://t.co/WF4if37Oar

Dec 13, 2022 · 1 like · 154 followers View post →
左巻健男(サマキタケオ)
@samakikaku · X

@CR_ZENZENDEN @samaki_ta 次を見てください。 N Engl J Med. 1994 Apr 14;330(15):1029-35. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199404143301501. The effect of vitamin E and beta carotene on the incidence of lung cancer and other cancers in male smokers https://t.co/T8UjrrH5JC

Oct 15, 2022 · 1 like · 12,201 followers View post →
Matt Wong
@EM_phile · X

@nickmmark Don’t forget about the ATBC and SELECT trials. https://t.co/pmuPDTu5WZ

Jun 21, 2022 · 1 like · 721 followers View post →
徹宵
@tesshou · X

RT @ymori117: なお、このコホートの元々の研究は、アルファトコフェロールとベータカロチンのがん予防効果には否定的な結果で、むしろ後者は男性の肺がんリスクを増やす可能性が示唆された。 https://t.co/rwT53j2RDW

Feb 26, 2022 · 3 shares · 250 followers View post →
taka(維新はいらない)
@smoketree1 · X

RT @ymori117: なお、このコホートの元々の研究は、アルファトコフェロールとベータカロチンのがん予防効果には否定的な結果で、むしろ後者は男性の肺がんリスクを増やす可能性が示唆された。 https://t.co/rwT53j2RDW

Feb 26, 2022 · 3 shares · 5,056 followers View post →
まーや @PPPMPMPMP
@allIdoisenjoy · X

RT @ymori117: なお、このコホートの元々の研究は、アルファトコフェロールとベータカロチンのがん予防効果には否定的な結果で、むしろ後者は男性の肺がんリスクを増やす可能性が示唆された。 https://t.co/rwT53j2RDW

Feb 26, 2022 · 3 shares · 2,278 followers View post →
森 勇一
@ymori117 · X

なお、このコホートの元々の研究は、アルファトコフェロールとベータカロチンのがん予防効果には否定的な結果で、むしろ後者は男性の肺がんリスクを増やす可能性が示唆された。 https://t.co/rwT53j2RDW

Feb 26, 2022 · 4 likes · 3 shares · 7,259 followers View post →
Kevin Stock, DDS
@kevinstock12 · X

In 1994, a trial followed 29,133 Finish people in their 50s. All smoked, but only some were given beta-carotene supplements. Within this group, the incidence of lung cancer increased by 16%. https://t.co/bByRRpNGEm

Dec 18, 2021 · 21,479 followers View post →
Padraig Dixon
@PadraigDixon · X

@deevybee Many, many examples with Vitamin E. Also beta carotene associated with reduced risk of lung cancer and heart disease, encouraged consumption of vitamin supplements, but no effect in RCTs eg https://t.co/5yljRLP9Lg and https://t.co/GaRTKjuARq

Jul 27, 2021 · 404 followers View post →
Stephan van Vliet
@vanvlietphd · X

@ConorKerley @TyRBeal @The_Nutrivore @MattMadore576 @dylanarmbruste3 And several more papers suggesting the ineffectiveness or even increased associative risk of certain cancers with b-carotene supplementation: https://t.co/7JzDohGWVh https://t.co/OquoNOYMeH https://t.co/KpilxNmw1r 2/2

Jul 8, 2021 · 1 like · 3,410 followers View post →
David Lee, MD
@DaveLeeERMD · X

@DanOfAmerica The antioxidant vitamins for smokers. Great in theory. But when you look at the data from this very large RCT, maybe not so wonderful. https://t.co/KNPsQZsYtT

Jun 26, 2021 · 8,821 followers View post →
Avi Bitterman, MD
@AviBittMD · X

@The_Nutrivore Sure, this is always possible, but what do you think the odds are that it just so happens to be that every RCT that tests this it just so happens to be that the participants had enough baseline antioxidants to counteract the smoking? https://t.co/jfWTLoOXVD

Oct 22, 2020 · 25,313 followers View post →
Daniel Zbarski
@Pcyryl · X

@Rafalovich_ @DMTomayko @bryan_belanger @Mangan150 We shouldn't but high dose antioxidants (Vit E & beta catotene) failed human trials spectacularly too: " this trial raises the possibility that these supplements may actually have harmful as well as beneficial effects." https://t.co/qX4PJyDrAc

Oct 7, 2020 · 452 followers View post →
刺繍好きの糸ちゃん
@go_go_shubunkin · X

Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta Carotene Cancer Prevention Study Group. The effect of vitamin E and beta carotene on the incidence of lung cancer and other cancers in male smokers. The New England journal of medicine. 1994;330(15):1029-35. 8127329

May 21, 2020 · 1 like · 262 followers View post →
L. Amber O'Hearn
@KetoCarnivore · X

@EatmeatN @siobhan_huggins @SteakAndIron @LogicalLynx Yeah, that would be based on this: https://t.co/CfpoH83EXc

Feb 11, 2020 · 2 likes · 60,019 followers View post →
Elliot Siemon
@sci_tek · X

RT @Edo_Kon: @DMTomayko @_atanas_ I think that the hypothesis is that cancer cells benefit more from antioxidants compared to healthy cells…

Dec 26, 2019 · 4 shares · 753 followers View post →
Membe S K
@membe_stephen · X

RT @Edo_Kon: @DMTomayko @_atanas_ I think that the hypothesis is that cancer cells benefit more from antioxidants compared to healthy cells…

Dec 26, 2019 · 4 shares · 749 followers View post →
International Natural Product Sciences Taskforce
@_INPST · X

RT @Edo_Kon: @DMTomayko @_atanas_ I think that the hypothesis is that cancer cells benefit more from antioxidants compared to healthy cells…

Dec 26, 2019 · 4 shares · 10,288 followers View post →
Atanas G. Atanasov
@_atanas_ · X

RT @Edo_Kon: @DMTomayko @_atanas_ I think that the hypothesis is that cancer cells benefit more from antioxidants compared to healthy cells…

Dec 25, 2019 · 4 shares · 123,887 followers View post →
Edo Kon
@Edo_Kon · X

@DMTomayko @_atanas_ I think that the hypothesis is that cancer cells benefit more from antioxidants compared to healthy cells. Two well known examples (one of them is recent, the other is not): https://t.co/VIVr6Wtbgs https://t.co/TblvQrPbRj

Dec 25, 2019 · 9 likes · 4 shares · 103 followers View post →
Nick
@NMaterazzo · X

RT @JEverettLearned: Also, if you're a normal person, don't eat 310g of carrots a day. (Actually the amount you're *not* supposed to eat is…

Nov 8, 2019 · 1 share · 360 followers View post →
Joseph Everett (WIL)
@JEverettLearned · X

Also, if you're a normal person, don't eat 310g of carrots a day. (Actually the amount you're *not* supposed to eat is somewhere below 310g...) Re: smokers, look up "The Effect of Vitamin E and Beta Carotene on the Incidence of Lung Cancer and Other Cancers in Male Smokers" https://t.co/okMul0JkJd https://t.co/eZUq5eUc0m

Nov 3, 2019 · 7 likes · 1 share · 25,234 followers View post →