Discussions focus on validating the study’s conclusion that manipulation does not alter sacroiliac joint position, with posts emphasizing that clinical improvements are not due to joint movement. The tone and word choices such as 'fact' and 'confirmed' reflect strong agreement and a scientific attitude, indicating a consensus on the study's significance.
AgreementStrong agreement
Most discussions agree with the study, emphasizing that manipulation does not change joint position, as shown by references to the research findings.
InterestModerate interest
Posts show moderate interest, primarily focusing on confirming the study’s results and discussing their implications.
EngagementHigh engagement
Several posts delve into the methodology and practical implications, indicating thoughtful engagement.
ImpactModerate impact
While some recognize the study’s significance in debunking common beliefs, the overall impact on practice seems acknowledged but not transformative for all users.
Abstract in brief
Manipulation of the sacroiliac joint does not change its actual position, as shown by roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis, even though clinical tests may appear to improve afterward.
The study found that while positional clinical tests for sacroiliac joint dysfunction often normalized after manipulation, these tests are not valid indicators of real joint position changes since no actual movement was detected.
The findings suggest that the perceived benefits of sacroiliac joint manipulation may not stem from correcting joint subluxation, indicating a need for further research into how manipulation affects soft tissues rather than joint position itself.]
"Manipulation of the SIJ normalized different types of clinical test results but was not accompanied by altered position of the sacroiliac joint, according to roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Therefore, the positional test results were not valid."
https://t.co/e4XrfoeOQ9
We say that manual therapy (HVLA, mobilisations) does not alter joint positions. I can only find evidence from SI-joint: https://t.co/Q9Lev9aEb3 - do we have research regarding columna? @Retlouping @PaulBliton @JoelBialosky
Ob Osteopathie Chiropraktik oder Massagetechniken Das Ertasten und beheben von Strungen mit den Hnden ist extrem verbreitet. Dieses Video erklärt, ob diese Techniken tatsächlich langfristige Besserung bei…
"Manipulation of the SIJ normalized different types of clinical test results but was not accompanied by altered position of the sacroiliac joint, according to roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Therefore, the positional test results were not valid."
https://t.co/e4XrfoeOQ9
We say that manual therapy (HVLA, mobilisations) does not alter joint positions. I can only find evidence from SI-joint: https://t.co/Q9Lev9aEb3 - do we have research regarding columna? @Retlouping @PaulBliton @JoelBialosky
Manipulation does not alter the position of the sacroiliac joint.
https://t.co/uRxkgxsBLw
Mar 21, 2019 · 1 like · 1 share · 74 followersView post →
F
Lydia Pichler | Leonding
Facebook
doi: 10.1097/00007632-199805150-00010 [Titel anhand dieser DOI in Citavi-Projekt übernehmen] . PMID: 9615363 [Titel anhand dieser Pubmed-ID in Citavi ...
doi: 10.1097/00007632-199805150-00010 [Titel anhand dieser DOI in Citavi-Projekt übernehmen] . PMID: 9615363 [Titel anhand dieser Pubmed-ID in Citavi ...
doi: 10.1097/00007632-199805150-00010 [Titel anhand dieser DOI in Citavi-Projekt übernehmen] . PMID: 9615363 [Titel anhand dieser Pubmed-ID in Citavi ...