Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The discussions reflect high agreement with the article's assertion that attractiveness is largely based on genetics and universally recognized, supported by phrases like 'people generally tend to agree about who is attractive' and references to scientific meta-analyses. The tone often emphasizes the social importance of beauty, with comments on how attractiveness affects treatment and perceptions, indicating deep cognitive engagement and awareness of societal impacts.
Most posts agree that attractiveness is largely influenced by genetics and that there is a consensus on who is seen as attractive across cultures, reflecting agreement with the research's findings.
Discussions consistently show high interest in the topic, referencing scientific studies and debates about social biases, indicating strong engagement with the subject.
Various users critically analyze the implications of the research, cite specific studies, and discuss how societal perceptions of beauty influence behavior and treatment, demonstrating deep engagement.
The prominence of scientific references and the discussion of beauty's social effects suggest that these discussions recognize the findings’ potential to challenge stereotypes and influence social norms.
19| Quellen (Forts.) Q10: https://t.co/5MvtCccy3Z Q11: https://t.co/F8Mv2GPJjw Q12: https://t.co/NQ4pNCNys1 Q13: https://t.co/JaDTmpo6Q0 Hinweis, falls Ihnen der Thread bekannt vorkommt: Eine frühere Version hatte ich 2020 hier schon einmal veröffentlicht.
https://t.co/q9iPpg4eRM
"Maxims or Myths of Beauty? A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review" What a fascinating analysis https://t.co/3yqzAG5LI5
3/3 Estos hallazgos cuestionan los dichos comunes sobre la irrelevancia de la belleza y respaldan tanto teorías evolutivas como sociales en su influencia sobre el desarrollo y la interacción humana. https://t.co/8jcBObawAf
@1Deneme44271 @kiyashaber11 Güzellik denilen şeyin neredeyse hepsi genetk, kültürden kültüre pek değişen bir şey de değil https://t.co/uK5Yx7teZl
@inferus_v @DasaMarkova @dedoezh_o Харашо давай аргументирую ссылочкой https://t.co/Tzf465EllP Первая официальная о том как к привлекательным людям относятся лучше https://t.co/tqhWWWFZnA. А вот почему красота это социальный конструкт
The science shows that attractiveness influences social treatment, wages, and justice outcomes, with attractive individuals often receiving advantages. This review underscores the consistent societal bias toward beauty…
@MattWalshBlog Beauty is almost all about genetics https://t.co/Di94GSiV3W
@a8237238542374 @ziamatapiyor @Aslanefem6 Herkes tarafından kabul edilen güzellik algısı vardır, boş insan, kafan pek çalışmıyor givi senin. Alıp oku: https://t.co/7LkfOq9rGD
@lozengeluv @ShoodTheDude @vanhaley_yt Well you mean subjective, and a little bit but not really. People generally tend to agree about who is attractive and unattractive, even across cultures. This is all to say: when someone is a bombshell, people know that https://t.co/fyy6ZKt9nA https://t.co/wuuzl6Us4h
@1Deneme44271 @kiyashaber11 Güzellik denilen şeyin neredeyse hepsi genetk, kültürden kültüre pek değişen bir şey de değil https://t.co/uK5Yx7teZl
@pumpkycat @soupedefaire Non c'est multi factoriel mdr. Voici déjà un DOI scientifique démontrant le "beauty privilège" : https://t.co/8ih6SRUbWN ; les autistes sont jugés négativement avant complètement problématique : DOI: 10.1038/srep40700. Et voir un pro ne résout pas les biais sociaux tu t'en doutes
Эта левацкая догма легко опровергается исследованиями. Стандарты красоты довольно объективны - большинство людей оценивают красоту примерно одинаково https://t.co/fLAklXJdsh https://t.co/zfUgE8OklA
@nada9sa Langlois, J. H., et al. (2000). “Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review.” Psychological Bulletin.
youtu.be/87cL_oVrkFk?...
3/3 Estos hallazgos cuestionan los dichos comunes sobre la irrelevancia de la belleza y respaldan tanto teorías evolutivas como sociales en su influencia sobre el desarrollo y la interacción humana. https://t.co/8jcBObawAf
[2] Maxims or myths of beauty?: https://t.co/U92NEAxoHd
RT @Oliver_S_Curry: https://t.co/q9iPpg4eRM
https://t.co/q9iPpg4eRM
@nickixxhendrix @IanMalcolm84 @thegenesisbl0ck There's a high degree of consensus on who is attractive. On the other hand, if you take two people at random and ask them to rate a face for attractiveness, the correlation between their ratings will be lower. https://t.co/lr4l5DoXnx
Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. PDF https://t.co/7HoI1cHIdF
容姿の美醜の影響についてのメタ分析の論文が興味深く、要約したLLMと途中から議論になり、話題にしにくいテーマなので非常に意義深かった／Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. https://t.co/IcmBt6Aqpl
【外見の良さは全てにおいて肯定的をされる】 美貌が有利なのは感覚的にもわかるが、相手の悪い性格を知っていたとしても肯定的に判断されやすくなる メタ分析 https://t.co/N6HwPikYbW
Referencias: Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A.J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390-423.
@NickArellanoo @SebichinQl @ZowlOficial El pensar que el insultar "resta" a mi opinión ardida es una completa estupidez, el rebajar un argumento por la simple manera que se expresa es de niño de párvulos o de señor de 60 años, no estamos en un debate formar para tomarte enserio y https://t.co/TqXuWoAJ3E
@inferus_v @DasaMarkova @dedoezh_o Харашо давай аргументирую ссылочкой https://t.co/Tzf465EllP Первая официальная о том как к привлекательным людям относятся лучше https://t.co/tqhWWWFZnA. А вот почему красота это социальный конструкт
References: Langlois JH, Kalakanis L, Rubenstein AJ, Larson A, Haiam M, Smoot M. 2000. Maxims or Myths of Beauty? A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review. Psychological Bulletin. 126(3): 390-423.
RT @titiatscriptor: 19| Quellen (Forts.) Q10: https://t.co/5MvtCccy3Z Q11: https://t.co/F8Mv2GPJjw Q12: https://t.co/NQ4pNCNys1 Q13: https…
RT @titiatscriptor: 19| Quellen (Forts.) Q10: https://t.co/5MvtCccy3Z Q11: https://t.co/F8Mv2GPJjw Q12: https://t.co/NQ4pNCNys1 Q13: https…
19| Quellen (Forts.) Q10: https://t.co/5MvtCccy3Z Q11: https://t.co/F8Mv2GPJjw Q12: https://t.co/NQ4pNCNys1 Q13: https://t.co/JaDTmpo6Q0 Hinweis, falls Ihnen der Thread bekannt vorkommt: Eine frühere Version hatte ich 2020 hier schon einmal veröffentlicht.
@MarcelaSaebL @AjoloteVagando Y más de lo que conscientemente creemos. Un meta analysis que me gusta mucho -aunque hay evidencia y estudios más sofisticados- es: 10.1037//0033-2909.126.3.390
@OxytocinLau A nivel discursivo tienes razón, siendo objetivos no. cfr: DOI 10.1037//0033-2909.126.3.390
RT @kushal_mehra: "Maxims or Myths of Beauty? A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review" What a fascinating analysis https://t.co/3yqzAG5LI5
"Maxims or Myths of Beauty? A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review" What a fascinating analysis https://t.co/3yqzAG5LI5
Tapi, kalian tau nggak sih terkadang penerima beauty privilege itu merasa dirugikan karena stereotip itu, lho. Sumber: Langlois, J. H. et al. (2000). Maxims or Myths of Beauty? A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review. Psychological Bulletin. 126(3): 390-423.
@weganinka @taxposting @yrizona_ https://t.co/GXSiATLcY8 Ale to przecież nie tak, że ktokolwiek z was to przeczyta (a nawet jeśli, to będzie w stanie zrozumieć co czyta i pomyśleć o tym samodzielnie).
large effects of attractiveness on how someone is treated and judged. https://t.co/5EsJm0HzmL https://t.co/4xc85lupxe
TS
OC
कह
JC
W
ЕЛ
H
BT
?
ДХ
A
D
JC
HS
E準
落
DC
J
IW
S
G
P
A
LB
N
C