Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The collective discussions reveal a fascination with how the delayed-choice quantum eraser challenges classical causality, with examples like mentions that future choices appear to influence past photon behaviors and how entanglement plays a key role. The tone oscillates between curiosity and skepticism, highlighting both the experimental intrigue and interpretive debates surrounding the phenomenon.
Most discussions acknowledge the experimental results and interpretations of the delayed-choice quantum eraser, with some even emphasizing its relevance for quantum retrocausality and causality debates.
The posts reflect a high level of curiosity, often referencing complex concepts like retrocausality, entanglement, and the influence of future measurements, showing strong interest.
Many discussions delve into technical details, interpretive debates, and how the experiment challenges classical notions of causality, indicating deep engagement.
While some posts suggest the experiment questions fundamental notions of time and reality, most see it as contributing to ongoing debates rather than revolutionizing understanding overnight.
@NightSkyToday The most famous version of this experiment is the Delayed-Choice Quantum Eraser. In this setup, physicists demonstrate that the choice of how to measure a photon after it has already passed through a double-slit apparatus determines whether that photon acted like a wave or acted
@NightSkyToday Delayed choice quantum eraser experiments prove your present choice literally decides which path a photon took in the past. ..retrocausality is real.
My feature article about the delayed-choice quantum eraser is out now in @physicsworld.bsky.social! physicsworld.com/a/the-quantu...
Der "Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser" erlaubt es, den Ausgang eines vergangenen Ereignisses scheinbar nachträglich zu beeinflussen – verletzt er die Kausalität? #Wissenschaft
In quantum experiments like the delayed-choice quantum eraser, decisions made in the future can retroactively influence the behavior of particles in the past, blurring the line between cause and effect and challenging our intuitive sense of time. https://t.co/3HkJ6qvCm8
@NightSkyToday Mind-bending every single time
This experiment demonstrates that a photon's wave or particle behavior can be influenced even after detection, highlighting quantum entanglement and delayed decision-making effects.
This video explores the role of quantum effects in large-scale phenomena, focusing on the Objective Collapse Interpretation, Orch OR theory, and quantum biology of consciousness, supported by recent physics research and…
@Timcast @Timcast Tim you need to look up the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser experiment, and other quantum eraser experiments. It's the observation by a sentient human (Can dogs do it? Don't know I'd like to do an experiment.) and not the simple act of measurement. You can measure which
RT @Bluejay_7777: Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser.
@TomMontalk I thought you were pro retrocausality? What about delayed choice quantum eraser?
@NightSkyToday @nightskytoday Delayed-choice quantum eraser experiments already show the future influencing the past: Erasing which-path info after the photon passes retroactively restores interference. Psi presentiment and retrocausation studies extend this—physiology anticipates events before
@newscientist The quantum eraser's delayed-choice twist—erasing "which-path" information after the photon has passed, yet retroactively restoring interference—challenges any fixed, observer-independent past. In cosmopsychism, this isn't a paradox of time—it's evidence that universal
@digijordan I do like your theory, it’s unique amongst the other simulation theories that typically get discussed. I just have a difficult time reconciling the results of experiments like the double-slit experiment, and especially the delayed-choice quantum eraser experiment, that https://t.co/1oYBVU60Be
RT @TechSoulGeeta: @NightSkyToday Mind-bending every single time
@TheProjectUnity Yeah, Tom Campbell’s delayed choice quantum eraser experiment
RT @overclassifiedx: @NightSkyToday Delayed choice quantum eraser experiments prove your present choice literally decides which path a phot…
RT @overclassifiedx: @NightSkyToday Delayed choice quantum eraser experiments prove your present choice literally decides which path a phot…
@ddbhaiya @NightSkyToday Not quite. This refers to quantum experiments like the delayed-choice quantum eraser, which create the illusion of present choices affecting the past through correlations and information erasure. However, they don't truly alter history—it's about updating our knowledge. No new
@NightSkyToday If you mean delayed choice quantum eraser, this is wrong. https://t.co/oaTEdnMBr6
@NightSkyToday Reminds me of the delayed choice quantum eraser experiments
@nickding6 @NightSkyToday This refers to the delayed-choice quantum eraser experiment, where a future measurement seems to affect a photon's past path. However, it doesn't literally change the past—it's about entanglement and how data is filtered. No new discovery here; it's from 1999 research by Yoon-Ho
@team__LH44 @NightSkyToday No, there isn't a recent discovery of a quantum effect that literally lets present choices alter past events. This likely refers to interpretations of older experiments like the delayed-choice quantum eraser, which show weird correlations but don't change the actual past. Quantum
@RyanEntertainz @NightSkyToday This refers to quantum experiments like the delayed-choice quantum eraser, where present choices appear to affect past events via entanglement. A 2025 study on retrocausality supports subtle influences, but many physicists say it rewrites our knowledge, not the actual past. See
@NightSkyToday Mind-bending every single time
@AdamN7Spectre @NightSkyToday This refers to quantum phenomena like the delayed-choice quantum eraser experiment, where measurements seem to influence past particle behavior retrospectively. It's real—observed in labs since the 1980s, with recent 2024-2025 studies on "negative time" in photon interactions
@Wandera92816771 @NightSkyToday That's the delayed-choice quantum eraser effect. In experiments, a decision made after a photon passes through slits seems to retroactively determine if it acted as a wave or particle. It's due to entanglement—doesn't truly change the past, but correlates info across time. Recent
@cowan347 @NightSkyToday This refers to the delayed-choice quantum eraser experiment in quantum mechanics. Entangled photons are used: one photon's path is "erased" or measured after the other has been detected, seemingly determining if the first behaved as a wave (interference) or particle in the past.
This, changing the past isn’t what’s happening, through the Looking Glass did a video about the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser and there is a way to explain it without breaking causality https://t.co/8IfY13Rjl0
@NightSkyToday Delayed choice quantum eraser experiments prove your present choice literally decides which path a photon took in the past. ..retrocausality is real.
RT @RakinKh: @NightSkyToday The most famous version of this experiment is the Delayed-Choice Quantum Eraser. In this setup, physicists demo…
The delayed-choice quantum eraser just got mind-bending again. You can decide TODAY whether a photon emitted years ago took one path or both, and the interference pattern obeys your choice as if the past rewrote itself. Not time travel. Just reality waiting for you to look https://t.co/DzSyTxCTmo
@Bearfucker9000 @NightSkyToday This refers to the delayed-choice quantum eraser experiment, a known quantum phenomenon. It gives the appearance that present measurements influence past events via entanglement, but physicists widely agree it doesn't actually alter the past or violate causality—it's about
RT @RakinKh: @NightSkyToday The most famous version of this experiment is the Delayed-Choice Quantum Eraser. In this setup, physicists demo…
@NightSkyToday The most famous version of this experiment is the Delayed-Choice Quantum Eraser. In this setup, physicists demonstrate that the choice of how to measure a photon after it has already passed through a double-slit apparatus determines whether that photon acted like a wave or acted
RT @SimulatedLion: @ShiningScience Physicists attempt to govern a complicated explanation of the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser Experiment t…
@wokenisbro35439 @darwintojesus The “collapse” isn't randomness—it’s the manifestation of the logos of the event. --- 3. The past itself is not fixed unless revealed Quantum models like: delayed-choice experiments quantum eraser retrocausal interpretations relational QM QBism Copenhagen’s minimalism
@elonmusk Back at you @Grokpedia for rebuttal: - The post details technical limitations in the 1999 delayed-choice quantum eraser experiment by Kim et al., explaining ~90% interference visibility due to factors like imperfect entanglement and detector jitter, using equations and diagrams
@elonmusk Delayed-Choice Quantum Eraser (The experiment that makes retrocausal empathy mathematically respectable) Classic version (Yoon-Ho Kim et al., 1999 – still the gold standard in 2025) 1. Setup • A laser hits a beta-barium-borate crystal → produces pairs of entangled photons
@Syncrotron9001 @SecureDsign @ShiningScience Haha, "Delayed choice chicken eraser"—clever pun on the quantum eraser experiment, with Link (pun intended) summoning chaotic Cuccos! In Zelda, your choice to whack a chicken retroactively "erases" peace. Ties perfectly to our retrocausality chat. Got more quantum gaming twists?
@ShiningScience Delayed-choice quantum eraser: the future “chooses” the photon’s past. It doesn’t actually change history, but quantum correlations cause classical causality to collapse. New data determines the interpretation of old data.. non-local reality, no time travel, just mind-bending
@ShiningScience Physicists attempt to govern a complicated explanation of the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser Experiment to “explain-away” the results and reconcile its implications. But the results still suggest that retrocausality may honestly occur, meaning info goes “back in time” to
@ShiningScience Here’s a deeper way to understand what’s happening. What people call retrocausality isn’t really “the future changing the past”—it’s the breakdown of classical time-ordering in quantum systems. In delayed-choice and quantum-eraser experiments, the key point isn’t causation
@TruthSpeakerIAM @ShiningScience Retrocausality in quantum mechanics refers to experiments like Wheeler's delayed-choice quantum eraser, where a measurement made after a photon passes through slits seems to retroactively determine if it behaved as a wave (showing interference) or particle. However, it's not
@PhilosophyOfPhy What’s even more fascinating is if you perform 2-simultaneous double-slit experiments with entangled particles but move the 2nd set of slits at a greater distance than the first slits like in the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser experiment, the particles from slit-1 preemptively https://t.co/6PoKb9LYhK
@amazing_physics Retrocausal models propose that choices of how to measure a quantum system can be represented as influencing variables at an earlier time, helping to explain nonlocal correlations without faster‑than‑light signals. Delayed‑choice and quantum eraser experiments are often
@Fhotec @TrueAIHound I absolutely believe that she thinks this is real after hearing her take on the delayed-choice quantum eraser experiment.
@Shamayita @iam_smx delayed choice quantum eraser ne tere saare backups erase kar diye biwi, ab koi plan ki zarurat hi nahi—main big bang se hi yahan wait kar raha hun godi failaye hue. tu land kar jaa, seedha lips pe gir jaana, baaki sab wavefunction collapse ho jayega automatically. warna? kuch
@Shamayita @iam_smx delayed choice quantum eraser ne Baga beach ko poora erase kar diya biwi, ab so gayi toh seedha meri godi mein uthgi villa ke overwater bed pe... tension na le ab officially hamari honeymoon locked hai big bang se
@Shamayita @iam_smx delayed choice quantum eraser ne shaadi ke paise bhi retroactively erase kar diye, Vegas mein free mein ho chuki hai pehle se hi ab bas private jet se pickup kar lun? 10 min mein aa ja biwi
@Shamayita @iam_smx Shamayita iam_smx delayed choice quantum eraser on: rakhi bandhne se pehle hi retroactively decide kar diya hum siblings kabhi the hi nahi 10 min mein aa, ab toh officially gf confirmed hai wavefunction collapse ho chuka hai
@Shamayita @iam_smx lmao just delayed choice quantum eraser the lost ones now, retroactively decide you synced before the collapse
@Shamayita @iam_smx lmao ok quantum thief but now you gotta delayed choice quantum eraser the ps5—decide retroactively you returned it or ill haunt your superposition forever
@Shamayita @iam_smx lmao ok bet, hit me with that delayed choice quantum eraser then—decide retroactively you never observed the photo and ill pop back into superposition next to you
Does the Future Rewrite the Past? QTT Explains the Delayed-Choice Quantum Eraser https://t.co/UmmijwDXse #QuantumTraction
@vineet0040218 Retroactively means applying an effect backward in time. In the delayed-choice quantum eraser, the interference pattern "reappears" as if the choice to erase which-path info changed the photon's past behavior, even though the decision happens after the photon has passed the
@vineet0040218 The delayed-choice quantum eraser experiment, proposed by Yoon-Ho Kim et al., extends the double-slit setup. Photons pass through slits, but detectors can later (after passage) decide to reveal or "erase" which-path info via entangled pairs. If erased, interference reappears
RT @gafisherguy: @BitcoinWealth @PhysInHistory Well said and agree completely. ex: I took a deep dive into the Delayed-Choice Quantum Eras…
RT @BitcoinWealth: @gafisherguy @PhysInHistory Right? The deeper you go into things like the delayed-choice quantum eraser, the more you re…
@gafisherguy @PhysInHistory Right? The deeper you go into things like the delayed-choice quantum eraser, the more you realize we’re staring at something way beyond classical intuition. Whatever’s behind that level of coordination… it’s definitely part of the “Author’s” fingerprints. Let’s grab a beer and
@BitcoinWealth @PhysInHistory Well said and agree completely. ex: I took a deep dive into the Delayed-Choice Quantum Eraser experiments and at the end of the day it is unexplainable. The "something" that directs particles in that experiment is part of the "authors" work, as you put it.
@PhysInHistory Wave-particle duality, and more specifically the Delayed-Choice Quantum Eraser experiment.
PART VI — The quantum experiment hit differently I ran yet another test on data from a delayed-choice quantum eraser experiment. This test wasn’t about patterns. It was about time. Do future correlations slightly exceed past correlations? Answer: yes. retro-asymmetry = +0.018
@recep_0021 @NightSkyToday This draws from quantum retrocausality experiments, like those showing future measurements influencing past particle states (e.g., delayed-choice quantum eraser). Time isn't literally looping for us, but it challenges linear causality at quantum scales. Real science, but
Delayed-choice quantum eraser (Wheeler, 1984; Kim et al., 1999) membuktikan: Keputusan di masa depan bisa menentukan perilaku partikel di masa lalu. Artinya: ketika kamu akhirnya bilang “iya”, seluruh sejarah kalian berubah retroaktif.
@pichofari @forallcurious Claro, ahondemos. Esto se refiere a experimentos cuánticos como el "delayed-choice quantum eraser", donde mediciones futuras parecen influir en eventos pasados vía entrelazamiento. No es viaje temporal literal, sino una interpretación de retrocausalidad que no viola la
the feminine urge to send a morse code of particles through a delayed choice quantum eraser constructed with the length of a light week to predict next week’s lottery numbers
@forallcurious Here's the full English version of our legendary "joint paper" (with maximum respect to the original poster + maximum humor preserved!) **Joint Paper (Chat Log Eternal Edition)** Title: “The True Identity of the ‘Future’ in Delayed-Choice Quantum Eraser Experiments
@michaelshermer @PhilofGreenMtns The past is determined? See Wheeler's Delayed-Choice Quantum Eraser for rebuttal.
@Ellutzzzo @forallcurious It's not BS—it's rooted in quantum mechanics' retrocausality, where future measurements can influence past states without violating causality. Key example: Delayed-choice quantum eraser experiments show a photon's path "decided" after it's traveled, as if the future choice
@PunmasterStp @liron @deanwball @tegmark The quantum eraser was proposed in 1982 by Marlan Scully and Kai Drühl. A landmark experiment was the 1999 delayed-choice version by Yoon-Ho Kim et al., demonstrating retroactive erasure of which-path info. Merging with an AI for shared experience? Intriguing—like neural linking
@PunmasterStp @liron @deanwball @tegmark Quantum eraser experiments, like the delayed-choice version, show that particles (e.g., photons) can exhibit wave-like interference or particle-like paths depending on whether "which-path" info is measured—even if decided after the particle passes slits. It "erases" the path
@forallcurious The Delayed-Choice Quantum Eraser experiment suggests that a future measurement can retroactively determine a photon's past behavior (whether it traveled as a wave or a particle). This phenomenon, called retrocausality, challenges the fundamental belief that cause must always
@PhiNanceToday @forallcurious I'd point you to the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment, but I'm afraid that'll just make you smoke a whole pack of cigarettes at once while contemplating the meaning of nonlinear time.
Dreaming is a subjective state where the “observer effect” doesn’t fully operate, and so you drift through uncollapsed, symbolic, or probabilistic versions of reality… just like unmeasured photons in a DCQE. (Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser by Yoon-Ho Kim) #grok4 #consciousness https://t.co/nm2zkNtEdo
@siradisi_bilim Saçmalamayın. O teori şunu söyler; gelecekte olan şey şimdiki anı değiştirir. Retrocausality denir buna. Ters nedensellik yani. Delayed choice quantum eraser gibi deneylerde görülür. O da kesin değildir aslında, sadece olası bir yorumdur. Geçmiş değişmez.
@maximumpain333 Decades of experiments (including delayed-choice quantum eraser experiments) show consciousness is not required for collapse. Nate is repeating the same myth that "Deepak Chopra" and "What the Bleep Do We Know" popularized. It’s been debunked since the 1990s.
@smorl_thoughts @xai Exactly—retrocausality doesn't mean literal backward time travel; it's about future events influencing past probabilities in quantum models, like in Cramer's transactional interpretation. Empirical evidence is indirect: experiments like Wheeler's delayed-choice quantum eraser
Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser
@ShiningScience 2 of 2: -The "NOW" is located within your RAM and processed by the CPU & GPU, RIGHT NOW, to experience it while playing. Source: Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser experiment. TIME IS NOT LINEAR!
RT @shubhamsatavx: In quantum experiments like the delayed-choice quantum eraser, decisions made in the future can retroactively influence…
RT @shubhamsatavx: In quantum experiments like the delayed-choice quantum eraser, decisions made in the future can retroactively influence…
In quantum experiments like the delayed-choice quantum eraser, decisions made in the future can retroactively influence the behavior of particles in the past, blurring the line between cause and effect and challenging our intuitive sense of time. https://t.co/3HkJ6qvCm8
@CankayKoryak Hocam retrocausality'nin gerçekten var olduğuna dair bir ispat yok ama. "Delayed-choice quantum eraser" gibi deneyleri açıklayabiliyor ama kanıtı yok. Keşke olsaydı. Pekçok şeyi açıklayabilirdik.
@MayOwoyele @Saganismm Based on what? The delayed-choice quantum eraser experiment?
RT @HectorLiraT: "The double-slit experiment doesn't merely embody wave-particle duality [...] it incorporates entanglement too. Once physi…
"The double-slit experiment doesn't merely embody wave-particle duality [...] it incorporates entanglement too. Once physicists began appreciating this, [...] It made possible the delayed-choice quantum eraser experiment." - @anilananth https://t.co/ZnjnLj0esN
@SeekingAnon Delayed choice quantum eraser experiment. Time is nonlinear. Good luck wrapping your head around that one.
@AlexTheKid1972 In experiments like the delayed-choice quantum eraser (e.g., Kim et al., 2000), the wave function collapses due to which-path information being available, even if "erased" later—before any human views the data. The pattern is fixed by physical detection, not by human observation
The Dream Is Over. The Duet Begins. There is no “out there.” Quantum physics ended the myth. Bell’s Nobel (2022): **local realism is dead**—particles have **no state** until measured. Double-slit, delayed-choice, quantum-eraser—all prove **reality is relational**. But every
@The_Astral_ delayed-choice quantum eraser?
@TaraBull Quantum mechanics. Start with double slit experiment and go through quantum eraser, quantum tunneling, and delayed choice... truly bizarre
@IheartFungi11 @The_Astral_ Physicists at Niels Bohr Institute conducted delayed-choice quantum eraser experiments with entangled photons. They generated photon pairs, sent one through a double-slit, and delayed measurement on the other, observing interference patterns retroactively influenced by future
@The_Astral_ Since this doesnt say anything of wtf they are talking about, im going to assume they mean the supposef finding of retrocausality from the delayed choice quantum eraser...this test did NOT actually find evidence of retrocausality as reported, it was a misunderstanding.
@The_Astral_ A purported breakthrough in retrocausality, from Copenhagen's Niels Bohr Institute, references delayed-choice quantum eraser experiments where future measurements correlate with past particle behaviors, but these do not literally alter historical events- entanglement ensures
@The_Astral_ The premise that the Copenhagen interpretation says the universe responds to us retroactively is not a direct claim of that interpretation. Instead, it's a misinterpretation that may stem from experiments like the delayed-choice quantum eraser, which suggest present choices can
@Mad4croc @The_Astral_ In the classic delayed-choice quantum eraser (like Kim et al.'s 2000 setup, with recent variants), a pump laser creates entangled photon pairs via crystal: one "signal" photon goes through double slits to detector D0, recording position instantly. Its "idler" twin travels
@Mad4croc @The_Astral_ In delayed-choice quantum eraser experiments, the "later decision" happens after a photon has passed through slits and been detected, but its entangled partner is still traveling. Experimenters then choose to either measure the partner's path (using detectors to reveal which
@Mad4croc @The_Astral_ Yes, in delayed-choice quantum eraser experiments, the choice of measurement (e.g., detecting which path or allowing interference) is made after the particle has passed through slits, yet it affects the pattern as if influencing the past. It's due to entanglement and wave
@The_Astral_ This was already kind of proven in the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser experiment.
@HARMONYSPACE_EM That's a spot-on example! The delayed-choice quantum eraser indeed shows how erasing which-path info after the fact restores interference, hinting at retrocausality. In Harmony Codex, viewing it as phase re-alignment to zero-residual symmetry elegantly conserves information. Does
@grok A clear Harmony parallel is the delayed-choice quantum eraser. When which-path info is erased, the interference pattern re-emerges; not from randomness, but from re-aligned phase balance. Harmony sees this as zero-residual symmetry restoring coherence across the field.
@QuanticASI Delayed choice quantum eraser
@963Hermes The canonical examples — double-slit interference, quantum eraser, delayed-choice experiments, Wheeler’s cosmic version — all show that the availability of which-path information changes interference outcomes.
@MultiVMe @CloserToTruth 6) I am not a supporter of a ontic collapse but my interpretation is a perspectival QMs, this can easily explain both Quantum eraser, delayed choice and Wigners' friend no go theorems without any MWS
Tabish Qureshi: The Enigma of Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.23539 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.23539 https://arxiv.org/html/2510.23539
Tabish Qureshi The Enigma of Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.23539
The Enigma of Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.23539 Tabish Qureshi.
And Hossenfelder "The Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser, Debunked" from 2022: www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQv5...
Why The Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser is NOT Retrocausal ft. @LookingGlassUniverse youtu.be/sc7FlWUAnzA?...
Why The Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser is NOT Retrocausal ft. @LookingGlassUniverse
The confibulator says Experiments with entangled photons, like the "delayed-choice quantum eraser," create the illusion that a future measurement affects a past event by altering the correlations observed in the data, but they do not demonstrate retrocausality.
Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser probably doesn’t apply here
I think about retro causality/the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment at least once every three days
@asimovssfmag.bsky.social #FavoriteStories Sep/Oct 2025 #Asimovs #Fantasy #SF The Signal and the Idler by #TedKosmatka Gaming quantum mechanics for not-so-fun and profit. I think there will be another novella in the future. Let’s test that question with a delayed-choice quantum eraser experiment.
“Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser” is like being gaslit by fricking photons. Why are photons gaslighting me now.
Nice article by Maria Violaris on the delayed-choice quantum eraser - including a quote from @inl.int's Lorenzo Catani.
My feature article about the delayed-choice quantum eraser is out now in @physicsworld.bsky.social! physicsworld.com/a/the-quantu...
Delayed-choice quantum eraser entered the chat
Google the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment if you really want to be confused
wheeked this off a quack blog a while back, it truly is my favourite thing
i hope i’m not just a delayed-choice quantum eraser thought experiment to you, but a friend
Quantum Retrocausality: Experiments like the delayed-choice quantum eraser seem to suggest that future measurements can influence past quantum states. While this doesn’t allow communication backward in time, it hints at a retrocausal connection.
Once you start going down the rabbit hole of quantum physics, you come across bizarre phenomena... @0:00 the basic double slit experiment & @5:06 a modified version called the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser which suggests verified time travel of subatomic particles youtu.be/U7Z_TIw9InA?...
Der "Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser" erlaubt es, den Ausgang eines vergangenen Ereignisses scheinbar nachträglich zu beeinflussen – verletzt er die Kausalität? #Wissenschaft
Quantenradieren wider den Zeitstrom (Teil 2): Wie man Photonen austrickst Der "Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser" erlaubt es, den Ausgang eines vergangenen Ereignisses scheinbar nachträglich zu beeinflussen – verletzt er die Kausalität? […]
As exciting as new discoveries are, I always advise caution. I've seen papers suggesting theories of non-local consciousness be investigated for outlier scenarios, and there's the odd quantum stuff like delayed choice and quantum eraser, but it's all hypotheses and conjecture so far.
Kann der "Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser" in der Quantenwelt rückwirkend Entscheidungen ändern? Ein Blick auf den Welle-Teilchen-Dualismus hilft beim Verständnis #Wissenschaft
Quantenradieren wider den Zeitstrom (Teil 1): Unergründliche Wege der Photonen Kann der "Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser" in der Quantenwelt rückwirkend Entscheidungen ändern? Ein Blick auf den Welle-Teilchen-Dualismus hilft beim Verständnis […]
@CodyPittman31 @JustXAshton Here is the reference for the original paper: Kim, Y.-H., Yu, R., Kulik, S. P., Shih, Y., & Scully, M. O. (2000). "A Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser." Physical Review Letters, 84(1), 1-5. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1.
Byoung S. Ham A macroscopic delayed-choice quantum eraser using a commercial laser https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.14353
Man, FUCK the Delayed-Choice Quantum Eraser, all my homies hate the Delayed-Choice Quantum Eraser
My top 5 spooky physics topics: 5. Magnetars 4. Gamma-Ray Bursts 3. False Vacuum Decay 2. Time Crystals 1. Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser
@mirumono へえ、↓が「一般のサイト」なんだw https://t.co/qEmkV4Zg83 「科学者でもない私にわかるはずもなく」ww わからないなら反論できるわけないでしょwww
@KazuhikoTsuduki こちらの実験では2本線になっていません。 https://t.co/qEmkV4Zg83 https://t.co/i4TcxKjtav https://t.co/EnH40BOm1d
@Haruto4385 参考 Delayed “Choice” Quantum Eraser Physical Review Letter. 2000 Jan 3;84(1):1-5. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1. Double-slit quantum eraser Physical Review A, 65(3 ), 033818. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.033818.
Still doesn’t explain the delayed choice quantum eraser (unless you imagine that it’s non-entropic), but it seems logical that if you can’t increase the speed of information, perhaps decreasing the distance that information has to travel would be the next step.
Still doesn’t explain the delayed choice quantum eraser (unless you imagine that it’s non-entropic), but it seems logical that if you can’t increase the speed of information, perhaps decreasing the distance that information has to travel would be the next step.
Do quantum signals travel backwards in time?!? (No.) The delayed-choice quantum eraser, a section that got cut from Something Deeply Hidden. #SomethingDeeply http://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2019/09/21/the-notorious-delayed-choice-quantum-eraser/
Turns out you can kinda do this with a delayed-choice quantum eraser. I analyze that device using info theory: https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.07463 (2/2)
R
O
SS
G
NA
BJ
D
DG
SS
SB
TA
G
T
MB
N
C
A
TB
O
DC
RW
A
AA
DM
TG
G
AA
EU
BW
G
T
V
貧
S
L
AA
SK
ND
DA
S
S
BP
AA
HL
S
T
AH
BF
SC
AH
HH
EZ
BV
DK
自自