Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The overall tone reflects high engagement and interest in the scientific, historical, and social aspects of genome sequencing, with examples like mentions of Frederick Sanger’s contributions, debates over proprietary data, and the implications for understanding human diversity, all of which demonstrate that these discussions recognize the profound influence of the Human Genome Project on multiple facets of science and society.
Most discussions acknowledge the importance and groundbreaking nature of the human genome sequencing, with some expressing admiration or support for the research, such as referencing its role in advancing medicine.
The discussions demonstrate high curiosity about genetic sequencing, its history, and broader implications, indicating significant interest in the topic.
Participants cite specific studies, historical figures, and technical aspects, which shows a moderate level of engagement and familiarity with the subject.
The conversations highlight the foundational impact of genome sequencing on science, medicine, and societal understanding, emphasizing its significance.
Nature editorial making the case against genome sequencing: "As an information resource, the sequence of the human genome is an extremely doubtful asset ..." . https://t.co/x6TKLpbzzC
ヒトゲノムの完全な解析の論文らしいが著者が多すぎる https://t.co/bYxz8ekEeg https://t.co/BlthliowQ2
Today while @official_ibab MSc students were presenting these papers in my class, a question came into my mind, "Who would have reviewed these cult papers?" Most of the sequencing folks at that time would be involved in one of them. https://t.co/SG71o8Wiw5 https://t.co/PhP2ZuoDbz
This Nature editorial argued against genome sequencing: "As an information resource, the sequence of the human genome is an extremely doubtful asset ..."
#TalDiaComoHoy #OTD, 16 de febrero, se publicaban en 2001 los resultados de la secuenciación del genoma humano ("working draft") en la revista Science, un día después que en Nature. https://t.co/OYo2EqOhC4
The 2001 human genome article by @JCVenter should be retracted. The statement “DNA from 5 subjects was selected for sequencing: 2 males and 3 females—1 African-American, 1 Asian-Chinese, 1 Hispanic-Mexican, and 2 Caucasians" was a lie. @RetractionWatch https://t.co/c5DnnLkBjy
Rap artist Booba discusses vaccine information, focusing on the potential link between vaccines and cancer. The video examines scientific sources and current research on DNA vaccines, tumor immunosuppression, and…
The Telomere-to-Telomere Consortium completed the human genome, providing a gapless sequence of 3.055 billion base pairs. This update includes new genomic features like centromeric arrays and gene predictions, aiding in…
@aliteyaah @Stephan80327996 @BC5515122765322 Bac+8 -> ingénieur civil à Genève (mon métier) + 2 licences en lettres et histoire + 1 doctorat en théologie Tout ca à 30 ans. Et toi Aletheia ? Rien. -> RSA ? Tu as lu "The sequence of the human genome." Science, 291(5507), 1304-1351 ? Lis. Ensuite on discutera entre adultes
"The fact is that proprietary databases don't work for such basic and broadly needed information as the sequence of the human genome." – John Sulston https://t.co/bqAFyzEMuF
The fact is that proprietary databases don't work for such basic and broadly needed information as the sequence of the human genome. – John Sulston
pbs.twimg.com/media/FaC1R6... Remembering the 1918 bday of British Chemist Frederick Sanger, one of only 5 people in history to receive 2 Nobel prizes- one for looking at the ultrastructure of the insulin molecule & the other for looking at the sequence of the human genome
15 years later, Science retracts ‘arsenic life’ paper. Interestingly, the 2001 human genome paper by Craig Venter et al. has not been retracted, despite containing mostly Public Consortium data and keeping its own data secret. https://t.co/c5DnnLkBjy https://t.co/Wk6GF5ZvvM
@DouglasYaoDY We didn't know the sequence of the human genome 25 years ago. Current sequencing technology allows us to capture gene expression and chromatin accessibility in tens of thousands of single nuclei at the same time.
RT @slavov_n: Nature editorial making the case against genome sequencing: "As an information resource, the sequence of the human genome is…
This Nature editorial argued against genome sequencing: "As an information resource, the sequence of the human genome is an extremely doubtful asset ..."
Nature editorial making the case against genome sequencing: "As an information resource, the sequence of the human genome is an extremely doubtful asset ..." . https://t.co/x6TKLpbzzC
Hey genomics data companies! DON'T try to become a drug development company. That did not work out for Celera despite having developed the most unique genomics dataset of its time - after all, Celera was the private company that first completed the sequence of the human genome in
@logistrix Good question. I am not a theist, but I might offer a few examples that could count as evidence, if demonstrated: - The efficacy of intercessory prayer - Precise and accurate prophesy - Ancient knowledge that can’t be accounted for (like the sequence of the human genome)
RT @timisstuck: Sunday philosophy read by me: An Object-oriented ontology approach to the human genome. From my truest love (the humanitie…
Sunday philosophy read by me: An Object-oriented ontology approach to the human genome. From my truest love (the humanities), I consider the birth and some features of a unique object: the sequence of the human genome. https://t.co/xziVvlsc2K
RT @AnmolMD: In humans, genes vary in size from a few hundred DNA bases to more than 2 million bases. Human Genome Project determined the s…
RT @SnO2WMaN: ヒトゲノムの完全な解析の論文らしいが著者が多すぎる https://t.co/bYxz8ekEeg https://t.co/BlthliowQ2
ヒトゲノムの完全な解析の論文らしいが著者が多すぎる https://t.co/bYxz8ekEeg https://t.co/BlthliowQ2
@GatoRoj22857705 @Josefina_28 A qué especie pertenecen (ese cigoto, embrion, feto, etc)? Es un perro, es un gato o pertenece a la especie humana?
RT @lisamparker71: Krause & Trappe 6... one of Germany's biggest newspapers cleared its features section to print the sequence of the human…
The sequence of the human genome generated by the Human Genome Project (HGP) was not from a single person, rather a patchwork from multiple people. Can you guess from how many people's DNA was the human genome sequenced in the HGP?
RT @lisamparker71: Krause & Trappe 6... one of Germany's biggest newspapers cleared its features section to print the sequence of the human…
Krause & Trappe 6... one of Germany's biggest newspapers cleared its features section to print the sequence of the human genome... believing DNA would allow them to read human beings like a blueprint. https://t.co/MUPmc88jZZ
It wasn't until 2022 that mapping 100% was achieved. Knowing the sequence of the human genome allows for researching diseases, creating new drugs, and improving diagnosis.
@jerecarrier4 @cafreeland , and the Guide RNA that can recognize the sequence DNA to be edited. So first the scientists need to identify the sequence of the human Genome that is causing the health problem Then they create a specific guide RNA to recognize that particular stretch of A's T's G's and C's
@ForevrFree1776 Since the sequence of the human genome was completed and fully verified,it has been very very clear that there are ONE human race only.Therefore, there is no races among humans, there can not be racisms, ethnicities yes. Those that do not know or ignore this fact are ignorants !
HGP (Human Genome Project) was an international effort to determine the sequence of the human genome and identify all the genes it contains. This project began in 1990 by James Watson, and it was a 15-year plan that had a 3B$ budget. Prior to this project, it was estimated + https://t.co/8uHAE2T7NE
@HakunaMateria @Lauren_Beleaver @RedJohn50 @LondongirlSJ @bigtoekne Here is the sequence of the human genome. Perhaps you could find for me the genes that insist that England is the best place for warm beer and cold tea. https://t.co/MqBtsYNJ0F
All humans share 99.9% of their DNA with one another. [Source: Venter et al., "The Sequence of the Human Genome," 2015] https://t.co/S3y2GVhOCg
@DanGraur @ScienceMagazine Hi - can I get clarification of this please? When I open the paper https://t.co/kaoJKYom4p which is paywalled (so I can't open the full paper) the supplementary figures on that page appear to be available to me. Are you referring to other supplementary material?
2001 > La séquence du génome humain https://t.co/0qfymDoYkE via @ScienceMagazine (en anglais) #ScienceCQFD
RT @candela_lab: #TalDiaComoHoy #OTD, 16 de febrero, se publicaban en 2001 los resultados de la secuenciación del genoma humano ("working d…
@pmddomingos https://t.co/N35EBCKAeA
لاحظوا هنا عدد العلماء المشاركين ورقة #الجينوم_البشري عام ٢٠٠١ https://t.co/72uTJ9wI8B https://t.co/WRZpNYF8b1
The 2001 human genome article by @JCVenter should be retracted. The statement “DNA from 5 subjects was selected for sequencing: 2 males and 3 females—1 African-American, 1 Asian-Chinese, 1 Hispanic-Mexican, and 2 Caucasians" was a lie. @RetractionWatch https://t.co/c5DnnLkBjy
RT @candela_lab: #TalDiaComoHoy #OTD, 16 de febrero, se publicaban en 2001 los resultados de la secuenciación del genoma humano ("working d…
RT @candela_lab: #TalDiaComoHoy #OTD, 16 de febrero, se publicaban en 2001 los resultados de la secuenciación del genoma humano ("working d…
#TalDiaComoHoy #OTD, 16 de febrero, se publicaban en 2001 los resultados de la secuenciación del genoma humano ("working draft") en la revista Science, un día después que en Nature. https://t.co/OYo2EqOhC4
@shoba82 Lander ES et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 2001 Feb 15;409(6822):860-921. doi: 10.1038/35057062. Venter JC et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science. 2001 Feb 16;291(5507):1304-51. doi: 10.1126/science.1058040.
Today while @official_ibab MSc students were presenting these papers in my class, a question came into my mind, "Who would have reviewed these cult papers?" Most of the sequencing folks at that time would be involved in one of them. https://t.co/SG71o8Wiw5 https://t.co/PhP2ZuoDbz
PS
SW
GD
HC
Dג
N
DF
LK
DS
KJ
DM
MA
MS
T
BI
H
J
FA
VU
A
RS
EC
M
MB
FI
DH
LC
SN
دA
AG
IB
PH