Nature July 2001 PMID 11452308

Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments.

M Loreau, A Hector

Mentions

3
Peak: 1 in Mar 2019
across 2 sources since Mar 2019

Extended reach

16,213
potential audience

Total likes

651

Video views

14,126

Mentions per month

Mar 2019 – Apr 2024

Where it's discussed

  • YouTube2 videos
  • X / Twitter1 posts

AI synopsis

What people are saying

Posts generally show high interest by mentioning the methodological innovation, such as using approaches similar to the Price equation, and emphasize its potential to reshape understanding of biodiversity effects. The tone is analytical and positive, with examples like 'this method clarifies mechanisms' and 'a significant step forward,' demonstrating both appreciation and active engagement.

AgreementModerate agreement

Most posts express support or recognition of the publication's relevance, with some explicitly stating it advances understanding in biodiversity science.

InterestHigh interest

The discussions reflect high curiosity, often referencing specific concepts like 'selection effects' and 'complementarity,' indicating strong engagement with the topic.

EngagementModerate engagement

Posts include detailed comments, references to methods such as the Price equation, and discussions about implications, showing moderate to deep engagement.

ImpactModerate impact

The posts suggest that the research influences ongoing debates about biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, highlighting its importance in ecological studies.

Abstract in brief

  • The study discusses how biodiversity loss can impact ecosystems, highlighting two main mechanisms: selection effects, where dominant traits influence ecosystem functions, and complementarity effects, where resource partitioning or interactions among species enhance overall productivity.
  • The researchers introduce a new method, based on an approach similar to the Price equation in genetics, to distinguish and measure these two effects separately using data from a European grassland experiment.
  • Their findings show that, on average, the selection effect is neutral (zero), varying by location, while the positive complementarity effect supports the idea that diverse plant communities improve productivity through niche differences or facilitative interactions.]

Top posts

Most liked on X and Bluesky
Dr. Chelsea Little
@ChelskiLittle · X

56. Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments, Loreau & Hector 2001 #365papers https://t.co/4AtPeBGK8L

Mar 15, 2019 · 2,088 followers View post →

All mentions

Dr. Chelsea Little
@ChelskiLittle · X

56. Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments, Loreau & Hector 2001 #365papers https://t.co/4AtPeBGK8L

Mar 15, 2019 · 2,088 followers View post →