Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
The group collectively challenges the inflated statistic of 1.7% for intersex prevalence, citing Leonard Sax and peer-reviewed research showing a rate closer to 0.018%. Their tone is analytical and corrective, emphasizing that most conditions linked to DSDs are not classified as intersex, which refutes claims of a 'hidden' large population. Words like 'debunked', 'discredited', and references to authoritative sources highlight their focus on scientific accuracy and skepticism towards sensationalized figures.
Most discussions strongly dispute the accuracy of the popular statistic, emphasizing that the true prevalence of intersex conditions is around 0.018%, not 1.7%.
The conversations display a clear disinterest in embracing exaggerated figures, focusing instead on factual clarifications and scientific sources.
Participants are deeply engaged in debunking misinformation, referencing scientific papers, and correcting definitions, indicating high intellectual engagement.
The debates have negligible societal impact, mostly circulating within online echo chambers about technical definitions and statistical accuracy rather than affecting policy or widespread public understanding.
Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex" rubbish, but didn't claim it was chromosomal. Anyway, her thesis is bollocks whichever way you look at it! https://t.co/ZlmwMIw3jy https://t.co/oQhJsvayXT
@black2_berry @tempalayer ・出生時の性別判定の正確性は ほぼ100％に近い ・判定が難しいのは 極めて稀（約0.018％） 外性器の形態は染色体の指示によって男と女に分かれて発達するため、医師はこの生物学的特徴に基づいて性別を判断しています。 判断がつきにくい場合は、0.018％にすぎません https://t.co/vA94HumYIj
References 1 Sax L. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. J Sex Res 2002;39:174–8. doi:10.1080/00224490209552139 2 Cunningham AL, Jones CP, Ansell J, et al. Red for danger: the effects of red hair in surgical practice. BMJ 2010;341. doi:10.1136/bmj.c6931 3/3
Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual development (DSD) hebben. In werkelijkheid is het 0,018%. Bijna 100 keer zo laag. https://t.co/WzGgX9qglN https://t.co/OfMP210Y7Z
calculations. These conditions are so rare, that they are catalogued and listed at NORD, GARD, and Orphanet. Clinicians and biologists agree with these percentages, not Fausto-Sterling's 1.7%. https://t.co/vQ8H6N13Wq https://t.co/Km3tkDYfd3
@WoodwarddianneJ Here's some reading for you. Sax, and Fausto-Sterling's, who HERSELF admitting she made multiple errors. Sax. https://t.co/vQ8H6N1BLY Fausto-Sterling's retraction of the stats used. https://t.co/Km3tkDYN2B Fausto-Sterling's original paper. https://t.co/tVdXsK1TRS
This video explores the differences in gene expression between males and females, highlighting how these variations affect disease susceptibility. Researchers have identified thousands of differentially expressed genes…
Leftist Zach Gittrich and Conservative Kevin Phares debate LGBTQ issues, local journalism, and Left vs Right populism. Watch to see different perspectives on these controversial topics.
This video discusses the importance of recognizing biological sex as a spectrum, emphasizing that denying this promotes species chauvinism and hampers scientific progress. It highlights the need to understand sex…
@ConnyMor @Dumb__Username @NJBeisner That's debatable. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling - PubMed https://t.co/1Y7Yb60qTp
@_Zendaimimon_ @zaelefty XY - M XX - F XXY - M XYY - M Having an aneuploidy doesn't make someone "intersex". https://t.co/2lYBvxEOOL
@miep_miep_miep Es sind je nach Betrachtung sogar nur 0,02%! https://t.co/0yxzjJmOwo
@Abnormal_crap @ShabbatShalomG @shitpost4856 @Anarseldain She later admitted being in error, after Sax paper was published. Here's Sax's rebuttal. Followed by her letter to the publisher of her co-authored publication. Your first link is garbage, NO trans laws affect intersex people. https://t.co/vQ8H6N1BLY https://t.co/Km3tkDYN2B
@Maebe_A_Girl @whoupfloating @zaelefty The percentage you state has also been debunked. That stat came from Anne Fausto Sterling and included many conditions not considered 'intersex'. You can read a peer-reviewed paper disproving her claims here: https://t.co/TqZDF4g8fw
RT @akakuro3500: @black2_berry @tempalayer ・出生時の性別判定の正確性は ほぼ100％に近い ・判定が難しいのは 極めて稀（約0.018％） 外性器の形態は染色体の指示によって男と女に分かれて発達するため、医師はこの生物学的特徴に基づ…
RT @akakuro3500: @black2_berry @tempalayer ・出生時の性別判定の正確性は ほぼ100％に近い ・判定が難しいのは 極めて稀（約0.018％） 外性器の形態は染色体の指示によって男と女に分かれて発達するため、医師はこの生物学的特徴に基づ…
RT @akakuro3500: @black2_berry @tempalayer ・出生時の性別判定の正確性は ほぼ100％に近い ・判定が難しいのは 極めて稀（約0.018％） 外性器の形態は染色体の指示によって男と女に分かれて発達するため、医師はこの生物学的特徴に基づ…
RT @akakuro3500: @black2_berry @tempalayer ・出生時の性別判定の正確性は ほぼ100％に近い ・判定が難しいのは 極めて稀（約0.018％） 外性器の形態は染色体の指示によって男と女に分かれて発達するため、医師はこの生物学的特徴に基づ…
RT @akakuro3500: @black2_berry @tempalayer ・出生時の性別判定の正確性は ほぼ100％に近い ・判定が難しいのは 極めて稀（約0.018％） 外性器の形態は染色体の指示によって男と女に分かれて発達するため、医師はこの生物学的特徴に基づ…
RT @akakuro3500: @black2_berry @tempalayer ・出生時の性別判定の正確性は ほぼ100％に近い ・判定が難しいのは 極めて稀（約0.018％） 外性器の形態は染色体の指示によって男と女に分かれて発達するため、医師はこの生物学的特徴に基づ…
RT @akakuro3500: @black2_berry @tempalayer ・出生時の性別判定の正確性は ほぼ100％に近い ・判定が難しいのは 極めて稀（約0.018％） 外性器の形態は染色体の指示によって男と女に分かれて発達するため、医師はこの生物学的特徴に基づ…
@cerbearx @PolitlcsUK @thetimes Pardon me, that should be 88%. All of these conditions that make up the 1.7% affect males or females or males and females. They are not a third sex and not in between sexes. https://t.co/t3YNoyiNkG https://t.co/rzZqNCKrXr
RT @akakuro3500: @black2_berry @tempalayer ・出生時の性別判定の正確性は ほぼ100％に近い ・判定が難しいのは 極めて稀（約0.018％） 外性器の形態は染色体の指示によって男と女に分かれて発達するため、医師はこの生物学的特徴に基づ…
RT @akakuro3500: @black2_berry @tempalayer ・出生時の性別判定の正確性は ほぼ100％に近い ・判定が難しいのは 極めて稀（約0.018％） 外性器の形態は染色体の指示によって男と女に分かれて発達するため、医師はこの生物学的特徴に基づ…
RT @akakuro3500: @black2_berry @tempalayer ・出生時の性別判定の正確性は ほぼ100％に近い ・判定が難しいのは 極めて稀（約0.018％） 外性器の形態は染色体の指示によって男と女に分かれて発達するため、医師はこの生物学的特徴に基づ…
@black2_berry @tempalayer ・出生時の性別判定の正確性は ほぼ100％に近い ・判定が難しいのは 極めて稀（約0.018％） 外性器の形態は染色体の指示によって男と女に分かれて発達するため、医師はこの生物学的特徴に基づいて性別を判断しています。 判断がつきにくい場合は、0.018％にすぎません https://t.co/vA94HumYIj
@nikkisixx12266 @zypisfy @JuddBurtson99 @momvogt1 @Badams820 @8BrianVogel4 @MagaPhoenix73 @FiendInno @RossGilroy @PembrokeMeg @cbeckj @TraitortR @Joe_Wolfe_Thorn @AggressiveDem @OsingaPeter @gvnzng @Flattielover @ALibsBabaYaga @LiberalLeveler @swords_mr @proundpapaof3 @PlatoonOps @itisjustmebabe @OpenThreads @AngryFleas @HamRadioJoe @scottstocker4 @RepublicanRehab @AllTheThings79 @ScarlettKBasset @KirchoffSh62598 @TreatHunterDog @URiverRat @1961mcruzer @FranklyCharlot @jkfilmscore @RealHutchBCPD @bischu24 @Synyster63 @clockwork584043 @carolyn_from @crashbus67 @ViewVictory2024 @TRUSTGOD2020 @BettyBoop8209 @cl1ntonserver @UnburdenedAgain @MikeAda69588676 Poor chuck https://t.co/Q1CALrrCBh
@DAaronovitch @bar_jen @MForstater @KPCoach1 @gabissima @MaryMcB81256694 @msjlindsay @JulietVelleman @HJoyceGender @hannahsbee @FondOfBeetles @mara_yamauchi @sharrond62 @bindelj @jk_rowling @legalfeminist Intersex is an outdated term for difference (or disorder) of sex development (DSD). These conditions are sex-based and only 0.018% require further investigation to determine the person's sex: https://t.co/7QO6WyTPVf
@Wrensayschill @flintmorphine @VoicelessTheist @MarvinBulas @ReneeLibby95084 Or from Sax himself. https://t.co/2rgHpU8irv
@flintmorphine @VoicelessTheist @MarvinBulas @ReneeLibby95084 https://t.co/WmbDR5HShq
@flintmorphine @VoicelessTheist @MarvinBulas @ReneeLibby95084 https://t.co/XdHFfspg3g https://t.co/WmbDR5HShq Sorry I just cannot accept the statistic of this pedophile enabler
@RadGuy1000 @GaryG39736923 @Ram_Bull_R @AlternateJones @grok 1.7% of the population is not intersex. That is a number from trans advocates who were trying to do things like count people with adrenal disorders as being part of their fetish world. The real number is 0.018%, which is one in 5,500 births. https://t.co/wlYGW9Zwa9
RT @MarkChangizi: Intersex: prevalence is about 0.018% https://t.co/mczJfaZ7Nn Transgender: prevalence is about 1% https://t.co/NjFzDvcBt…
RT @MarkChangizi: Intersex: prevalence is about 0.018% https://t.co/mczJfaZ7Nn Transgender: prevalence is about 1% https://t.co/NjFzDvcBt…
RT @MarkChangizi: Intersex: prevalence is about 0.018% https://t.co/mczJfaZ7Nn Transgender: prevalence is about 1% https://t.co/NjFzDvcBt…
RT @MarkChangizi: Intersex: prevalence is about 0.018% https://t.co/mczJfaZ7Nn Transgender: prevalence is about 1% https://t.co/NjFzDvcBt…
RT @MarkChangizi: Intersex: prevalence is about 0.018% https://t.co/mczJfaZ7Nn Transgender: prevalence is about 1% https://t.co/NjFzDvcBt…
Intersex: prevalence is about 0.018% https://t.co/mczJfaZ7Nn Transgender: prevalence is about 1% https://t.co/NjFzDvcBt2 So at most ~1.8% of trans people even could be intersex — and in reality it’s far lower, because most intersex people are not trans.
Intersex: prevalence is about 0.018% pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264 Transgender: prevalence is about 1% williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications... So at most ~1.8% of trans people even could be intersex — and in reality it’s far lower, because most intersex people are not trans.
Intersex: prevalence is about 0.018% pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264 Transgender: prevalence is about 1% williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications... So at most ~1.8% of trans people even could be intersex — and in reality it’s far lower, because most intersex people are not trans.
RT @HatzKatzn: @WoodwarddianneJ Here's some reading for you. Sax, and Fausto-Sterling's, who HERSELF admitting she made multiple errors.…
Yea that number is madeup. The real number is closer to 1 in 10,000. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/
Source. https://t.co/Q1YgLJN8Nv
RT @Cox_A_R: This article uses the debunked Fausto‐Sterling view that 1.7% of people are intersex (more like 0.018%), and the existence of…
This article uses the debunked Fausto‐Sterling view that 1.7% of people are intersex (more like 0.018%), and the existence of intersex people does not mean that sex is not dichotomous. https://t.co/19QAuIO63C https://t.co/eSvc8Eukah
RT @Chris_Davis66: @Fighterpantsguy @jonperry501 @FactologyVs @DanniBrener @StellarFox16 @justinAB_SF @TheJoeySwoll And there are far less…
@HeartOfUmbral @atrocity3xhibit @Riley_Gaines_ It doesn't hurt to educate yourself. https://t.co/958z3yeSYq
@Fighterpantsguy @jonperry501 @FactologyVs @DanniBrener @StellarFox16 @justinAB_SF @TheJoeySwoll And there are far less intersex conditions than people with red hair. Fausto-Sterling used many conditions that are not intersex to arrive at that number. The actual number is much smaller. https://t.co/YxEeEoqXJQ
@empresslovely69 @ConnyMor @_ConnieShaw I do. That's why I don't fall for religious concepts like men with womanly souls because they've been touched by Gender Jesus, or that role playing imbues some with mystical transformative powers. I also know made up numbers are made up https://t.co/Cj7QwS8ph3
@CharonBrad @HunterJakeb @realStevenWalk @DesireeAmerica4 1. 1 to 2 in 10,000. not 1 in every 50. https://t.co/2rgHpU8irv 2. No human can be born both sexes. That’s a biological impossibility. https://t.co/wY5Mt0Hpr6 3. In rare cases parents selected the gender. In most cases it was solely at the discretion of the doctor, often
@mikey_wa @grok @BroSter_J @MunchieRedEyes @allenanalysis After Sax's paper was published, Fausto-Sterling sent a letter to the publisher, and admitted there were errors by an order of magnitude. As you are so hung-up on 'evidence based" here's the evidence. 1b https://t.co/tVdXsK1TRS https://t.co/vQ8H6N1BLY https://t.co/Km3tkDYN2B
Sources: https://t.co/39exbyBSuU https://t.co/erVahENz4g https://t.co/8i7hxra0pS #transrightsarehumanrights #mentalillness #MAGA #ZohranMamdani #NickFuentes #charliekirk https://t.co/eICjjVbPm5
@MichaelPP23 @pigmanplays @Sonic4HG @NickEh30 Intersex represents 1 to 2 in 10,000. https://t.co/2rgHpU8irv
@Gato_cultoyt @GigaTTS_ Un paper clave es "How common is intersex? A response to Anne Fausto-Sterling" de Leonard Sax (Journal of Sex Research, 2002), que demuestra que la prevalencia real de intersexualidad es ~0.018%, excluyendo condiciones no ambiguas y clasificándolas como trastornos del desarrollo
@AtheistsRule96 @babybeginner @listen2tish Nope How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling - PubMed https://t.co/CogAtiqC8v
@charleswmartin @NHnewsUpdate No, DNA doesn't "lie". But we don't check the DNA of everyone, now do we? It's usually just a question of presence or absence of
@HatzKatzn @kasajjasb11 @senfumahans @TruthLgbtq @SteveKabuye5 @frankmugisha @ckaheru @UHRC_UGANDA @hillarytaylorvi @AnitahAmong @HonOpendi @Ebenezer_Peegah 1. At least you read it and i diaprove your point at thisnpoint itbis just mental gymnastics. 2. I mever said humansnin genral are intersex 3. https://t.co/fjspArSapa so they do exist in low numbers as expected
@IvyZenna @TonyBaduy @PGastarbeiter @TolaimShelEldad @eraseing_woman That is NOT the 'correct intersex numbers' - that is from a false 2002 report by Anne Fausto-Sterling exaggerates the correct numbers by over 100x. Please do not spread such disinformation. https://t.co/E92fJN422T
@Kikilixalda Khelif "intersexuala" da batzuek darabilten definizio zabal baten arabera (Fausto-Sterling), eta ez da "intersexuala" beste zenbaitek darabilten moduan (Leonard Sax). Imane Khelif %100 gizonezkoa da, trans, zis edo zas, berdin dio; ez dago ezeren "inter". https://t.co/vnvWPZEUmW
RT @HatzKatzn: @FalconsDrumCo @hecheateddotorg @Defo_not_Dave @5K10KMarathon @thatsnotmine125 @crit_gen That was the problem with Fausto-St…
@FalconsDrumCo @hecheateddotorg @Defo_not_Dave @5K10KMarathon @thatsnotmine125 @crit_gen That was the problem with Fausto-Sterling's original paper. She included conditions not recognized as intersex. 1.5% alone of her stat, was non classic/late onset CAH. No an intersex condition, or even a DSD. https://t.co/tVdXsK1TRS https://t.co/vQ8H6N1BLY https://t.co/Km3tkDYN2B
@grok @vusiphala32 @DisobedientGoy @GWANJEZ https://t.co/J3xUZgMGqg Read and cope. 1.7, while relatively low is still 136 million people. Not that rare, actually. That's like saying there's no such thing as green eyes. You can't say gender is a binary except when it's not it either is or it isn't.
@DefNotZatoda @hyperartF @Mollsholls80 @Criosdubhskye @Missmbl2812 https://t.co/qkmqzk8R2o
@FIocke @DefNotZatoda @Mollsholls80 @hyperartF @Criosdubhskye @Missmbl2812 Completely disproven. Again, you need to update rather than simply believe things that suit you https://t.co/qQYvI1XOB3
@DefNotZatoda @FIocke @Mollsholls80 @hyperartF @Criosdubhskye @Missmbl2812 https://t.co/qQYvI1XOB3
@jinxscorner03 @DaavOil46934 @ThomasWillett9 https://t.co/WmbDR5HkrS
@RadFemme74 @butch2aT @DianeCarolRoy1 @hasitcometothat @bluefocus1974 @Catfan2506 @cptmbf @MountainMcRae @vanessa_blk @ghostoftoast @ffenics @SocialistSauce @h_alliekat @Lucifer_mortala @DerpyErika @robcmorgan @ThatsMadeMyDay @grok @SianHerfield @Marzipanijah @brenda_archer @StitchingSin @Cherz_delulu053 @SithicheAonar @coolaunt2021 @Qyilldrisstessa @OstinatoRigore4 @Purplewykr @latsot @nbrink77 @EffinMaggie @Dorasalter @kittywoodoshea @TheGoldenMask5 @FMccreigh5740 @cecinestpaspipe @tymprqv7r9 @ZeldaLazar @g_akablacksquid @Hereticalturf @CloverSevenLeaf @Ronwil19 @JLippinstan @IAmBadWolf717 @MollyMa57459943 @GenCritThink @Makoto_Says @edbluebean @toleratefreedom @GayLikeKagami https://t.co/2YaeNH3OYb
@jupitrz_orbit @ValhallaPump @nyaraVT https://t.co/g5gKg761hz https://t.co/3YP8opLeho https://t.co/s35wv5pbXI
@wigslayer @SianHerfield @spacemankaos @Glinner "Anne Fausto-Sterling estimated that up to 2%...." Yeah... about that: https://t.co/AcE1aKLx21
@ZaelaFelina @SianHerfield @TheLawfulEvil @kyleDeBrosse @ToughRepub5013 @stacycay Everything you are finding is garbage resources that continue to rely on Fausto-Sterling, even though SHE HERSELF retracted her earlier paper, regarding the stats used for her figure. https://t.co/vQ8H6N1BLY https://t.co/Km3tkDYN2B https://t.co/tVdXsK1TRS
@RyanWall60428 @ShadowofEzra @GeneralMCNews https://t.co/7OeJy7gbkU
@ZaelaFelina @TheLawfulEvil @kyleDeBrosse @ToughRepub5013 @stacycay https://t.co/L2ILGcNibN
@ZaelaFelina @TheLawfulEvil @kyleDeBrosse @ToughRepub5013 @stacycay 5 or 7 its still ridiculous. Try here. https://t.co/L2ILGcNibN
@Moiouimoi2 @SCheeerful @matthiasholzi @stacycay No they aren't. https://t.co/ykDHOyFTvI
@Cassoulet_ @masc_anakin @chi_is_a_mess I am well- educated. Maybe look up Leanord sax. https://t.co/2rgHpU7KBX
RT @HatzKatzn: @WoodwarddianneJ Here's some reading for you. Sax, and Fausto-Sterling's, who HERSELF admitting she made multiple errors.…
RT @HatzKatzn: @WoodwarddianneJ Here's some reading for you. Sax, and Fausto-Sterling's, who HERSELF admitting she made multiple errors.…
RT @HatzKatzn: @WoodwarddianneJ Here's some reading for you. Sax, and Fausto-Sterling's, who HERSELF admitting she made multiple errors.…
@WoodwarddianneJ You're using the Fausto-Sterling discredited figure and the anachronistic term 'intersex'. The first has been debunked many times (see below for one) and 'intersex' has no medical application today as it has no explanatory power and is confusing... https://t.co/j1PbcNMBA9
@WoodwarddianneJ DSD and intersex are NOT synonymous. DSD includes intersex but also much milder conditions where there is no ambiguity as to the sex of the patient. "How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling - PubMed" https://t.co/U03wnsHXaS
@WoodwarddianneJ The true prevalence of intersex is seen to be about 0.018% (or 1 person out of every 5,550). https://t.co/BO3MMx0IQE
@WoodwarddianneJ No, only 0.018% have DSDs. Stop lying about medical conditions to justify men with typical sex development invading women's spaces! https://t.co/104DIgxteJ
RT @AustinCroweLuv: @WoodwarddianneJ Please at least get your facts straight. You lose credibility by not doing so. Even if 1% of the popul…
@WoodwarddianneJ Nope. If you can understand evidence, statistics, and nosological reasoning (not sure you can), here's the reality: DSDs that might actually fairly be called "intersex" occur at a rate of about 0.018% https://t.co/2lYBvxEOOL
@WoodwarddianneJ By this "logic", people with atypical genetic configurations would be a different sex AND a different species.
@WoodwarddianneJ https://t.co/cORpFeK7cF
@WoodwarddianneJ https://t.co/cORpFeJzn7
@WoodwarddianneJ https://t.co/cORpFeJzn7
@WoodwarddianneJ It's 0.018% https://t.co/cORpFeK7cF
RT @theweeflea: @WoodwarddianneJ The number of intersex people is 0.018%....It's not a good idea to accuse others of being ignorant or unsc…
@WoodwarddianneJ Dianne, 0.018% is not "Nearly 1%". And that 0.018% of people with DSDs ("intersex characteristics" is outmoded) are still male or female. Because sex is binary. https://t.co/QMLoRUVNe0
RT @HatzKatzn: @WoodwarddianneJ Here's some reading for you. Sax, and Fausto-Sterling's, who HERSELF admitting she made multiple errors.…
@WoodwarddianneJ The number of intersex people is 0.018%....It's not a good idea to accuse others of being ignorant or unscientific if you don't get the basic facts right! https://t.co/xSwjhtrnQI
RT @HatzKatzn: @WoodwarddianneJ Here's some reading for you. Sax, and Fausto-Sterling's, who HERSELF admitting she made multiple errors.…
@WoodwarddianneJ Except that claim is utter bunkum! 7 million in UK alone. That's laughable when it's more like 100,000 maximum! Sax L. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. J Sex Res. 2002 Aug;39(3):174-8. doi: 10.1080/00224490209552139. PMID: 12476264. https://t.co/zPutZdRNnh
@WoodwarddianneJ Here's some reading for you. Sax, and Fausto-Sterling's, who HERSELF admitting she made multiple errors. Sax. https://t.co/vQ8H6N1BLY Fausto-Sterling's retraction of the stats used. https://t.co/Km3tkDYN2B Fausto-Sterling's original paper. https://t.co/tVdXsK1TRS
@_BoldPolitics @ZackPolanski "the true prevalence of intersex is seen to be about 0.018%" https://t.co/XMHoJtSxGT
@WoodwarddianneJ "Applying this more precise definition, the true prevalence of intersex is seen to be about 0.018%" https://t.co/XMHoJtSxGT
@WoodwarddianneJ Please at least get your facts straight. You lose credibility by not doing so. Even if 1% of the population had DSD (they don't) then 99% wouldn't. Society can't be centred around 1% of the population to the detriment of women https://t.co/zN4vEKvGNm
@Martin_Abrams Amnesty International have no credibility. They are still peddling the myth that 1.7% of the population are intrasex. https://t.co/vGwBSbPIGl
@WoodwarddianneJ The best bit is *you* whining about people being ignorant
@Melon1099256 @grok @eggandsperm @alkalinealt @JustMisogyny They do win more. I’ve given plenty of examples. Shall I give more? Also, this is from a different study after 36 mos of HRT… https://t.co/o7jM4Kijbw https://t.co/r6dvvtGxBn
@_BoldPolitics @ZackPolanski The Amnesty International caption that "experts" reckon 1.7% of people are intrasex has been comprehensively debunked. It's almost 100 times less at 0.018%. AI are in the same "no credibility" boat as The Greens. https://t.co/vGwBSbQgvT
@darkerundertone @imleagleoh @ShahrarAli @piersmorgan Just gonna leave this here: https://t.co/VxXa0cMUOJ
@Lftfrmcntr @KaskaJessica JFC, you’re stupid AND lazy…… https://t.co/Mbe1qMnCmm
@_Nokotan @AnonymousSyf @shanicomic @chachamyeon Yes. https://t.co/y5dA1b1nFv https://t.co/0kxYOaHImF
@_Nokotan @Wrensayschill @AnonymousSyf @shanicomic @chachamyeon She did. She also wrote a nonsensical article called the "five sexes" which she later brushed off as just a tongue in cheek joke. That's how much of a crackpot she is. People have been debunking her nonsense stat since 2002. https://t.co/y5dA1b1nFv
@lordofthelads23 @spaceman_12345 "1.7 percent" Are you going by that nonsense stat from Fausto-Sterling? Cause the sheer majority of people in that stat were not clinically classed as intersex but had minor hormonal conditions like LOCAH. The actual stat is closer to 0.018%. https://t.co/y5dA1b1Vv3
How is the article relevant to sex categories? It also uses the 1.7% intersex people stat that is untrue. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/
@EgoistKing666 @Pliniokk13 @MeninaPipocaa https://t.co/aMViFge1Ic Tem or artigo completo no sci-h**
@mistrustme1 @TXTaxFixer @frfrankpavone I found this explained tbe reasoning very well. https://t.co/L2ILGcNQ1l
@Fr0zen_Angel_ @_celia_bedelia_ Also, 1.7% are not intersex; it’s more like .018%. https://t.co/RZYtM303kI
@matilda_peace @SarahLudford Actually, it's 0.018% of people who have a DSD. Most people (especially women) can tell the sex of another person. https://t.co/UROsm5cLjf
@Glinner For anyone stupid enough to cite "intersex" people or more accurately people born with DSDs! https://t.co/k6e3J4zuKn
@Frank_Mortimer @Glinner @johnros1956 https://t.co/k6e3J4zuKn
@grok @ThorDKidd But intersex would imply that there’s two biological sexes and those people are between those binary sexes. https://t.co/Mh59oBmycl why would .018% give enough reason to change the entire understanding of binary sexes
@forevertoremain @jk_rowling Don't be ludicrous. Not only are you off by a factor 100 with regards to people with intersex conditions, but people with intersex conditions are just as male or female as everyone else. https://t.co/lu5P7V4CUo
@QuestionErythng @AiG https://t.co/2rgHpU8irv
@crazydoglady59 You are crazy. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling - PubMed https://t.co/csPj7fGR2r
" Applying this more precise definition, the true prevalence of intersex is seen to be about 0.018%, almost 100 times lower than Fausto-Sterling s estimate of 1.7%." pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/
@charles20514392 @wisconsin_now https://t.co/g30tiCjzSe
@free_equal It is wrong to claim that 1.7% of populations are 'intersex' given the vast majority of people with DSD conditions are easily classified as either female or male. Many are also distressed by being told they are somehow somewhere between the two sexes. https://t.co/a7RgGR4Lzp https://t.co/Q1PY8Ue9Gr
@kmh @JamesEsses Out of that 2%, 99% of them are easy to categorize as being either male or female. https://t.co/BO3MMx0IQE
@ddavis914 @Con_Tomlinson This says 0.018% https://t.co/bvhwgyD6cT
@swiadomosczw @jachcy Stary, ten problem dotyczy 0.018% społeczeństwa (https://t.co/zpieGQPIOa). Jeśli masz jedną sztukę rodzeństwa, to masz szansę 1:5555, że będzie to osoba interseksualna. Zresztą termin hermafrodyta znają wszyscy. Jak się wymyśla ciągle nowe definicje, to się ludzie gubią.
it’s rarer than you think https://t.co/3SY4SyU10v
@TheProgCons @LuTF145 @DaveyJones1922 @FightWithMemes Wrong. Its 0.018% Whats your point? https://t.co/L2ILGcNibN
@lindakgifford @dreamy12122 That's a made up stat my Fausto-Sterling which she admitted included none intersex conditions. https://t.co/L2ILGcNibN
@Taiya_Wright @kenziek1101 @JoellasCooochie @mattxiv No there isnt. Intersex is 0.018% of the world's population where as ginger hair is around 2%. https://t.co/L2ILGcNibN
@striegel_simon @basicrealities @Wrensayschill @redpill_finance @DrewPavlou @ChiefTeef8 So the first one is my figure. Th 2nd is Wikipedia
@striegel_simon @basicrealities @Wrensayschill @redpill_finance @DrewPavlou @ChiefTeef8 No you issues what Fausto-Sterling said & what most rubbish websites claim as they haven't bothered to do the research. https://t.co/L2ILGcNibN
RT @SianHerfield: @CoachGaiaR6 @DuckTheSacred @strawberrana @NoLimi7_ Fausto-Sterling admitted she overinflated the 1.7% for intersex as sh…
@CoachGaiaR6 @DuckTheSacred @strawberrana @NoLimi7_ Fausto-Sterling admitted she overinflated the 1.7% for intersex as she included many none intersex conditions. The more accurate figure is 0.018% so you are wrong. https://t.co/L2ILGcNQ1l
@thepeacepoet99 "How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling - PubMed" https://t.co/U03wnsHXaS
@Jessssuhh @JoEllisReally Mmm. No. The broader category would be about 40 medical conditions. The stricter definition would be about 15 medical conditions. You haven’t made a singular substantial argument because you haven’t a clue what you’re talking about. https://t.co/2rgHpU8irv
@piningendlessly @boygirlfemme @mdualizz https://t.co/aMViFgezxK
@MundlerStudents @lespauljunior3 @TheParty1sOver @MetCC @metpoliceuk It's not even that but nearer 1 in 5,500 (0.018%): Sax L. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. J Sex Res 2002;39:174–8. doi:10.1080/00224490209552139
@eazydebates @streetdebates "I have a lot of friends that were born intersex". https://t.co/mKkrkHi5Lh
@iAnonPatriot Subject nearly all children to woke, sexually deviant ideology for the handful born with deformities. "the true prevalence of intersex is seen to be about 0.018%" https://t.co/U9lyWIGptP
RT @HatzKatzn: @br2ncUnt @WahdaSY @redrangerDS @cthulhusrose @damiluvscrypt @sunflow80374526 Source for the 0.018%. Here's Pub Med, and be…
@br2ncUnt @WahdaSY @redrangerDS @cthulhusrose @damiluvscrypt @sunflow80374526 Source for the 0.018%. Here's Pub Med, and below is a non paywalled link to the author's own website. Pub Med is part of NIH. https://t.co/7cK5Wkti4i https://t.co/vQ8H6N13Wq
@RealFactsEitan https://t.co/ILRdTdVQd4 https://t.co/DEPGDOrQbr https://t.co/2PF4B9Wszo https://t.co/B3fbfU2l9p Most of these aren’t a direct link to the works cited heads up by they should all be on that page that pops up sorry it wouldn’t let me link just the works cited
@RadFemme74 @GriftingBigot @Binkles_ @brenda_archer @SocialistSauce @Qyilldrisstessa @latsot @g_akablacksquid @coolaunt2021 @ffenics @Purplewykr @cecinestpaspipe @TheGoldenMask5 @FMccreigh5740 @MollyMa57459943 @ThatsMadeMyDay @bluebirdjam @Lucifer_mortala @StitchingSin @butch2aT @TransPExp @vanessa_blk @jusdewitt1 @GayLikeKagami @cptmbf @EffinMaggie @grok @ItsColinTheCMan @BarryTizer @RawMilkAbbo @JLippinstan @ghostoftoast @fletcherkathy8 @Dorasalter @Terfy_Punk @billycantdoit @roax_valdaarath @IAmBadWolf717 @Hereticalturf @astridcostigan @HodsonAnn @DeeNoEvil @Rosehunnyheart @GeekGurl2000 @SortaGodFox @PolicyArtemis @seanieRW @theklutzydom @VenerablePhoenx @Makoto_Says Incorrect. https://t.co/GcGnlqZOVG
@RobertPlomp @jan56nieuw2 @ad_de_boer @ADnl Ik denk dat je dit verkeerd leest. Iedereen wordt òf als vrouw òf als man geboren. Nooit beide, nooit niets. Ook mensen met afwijkende gevormde genitaliën bij geboorte ('intersex'). Meer info? Lees Leonard Sax https://t.co/8VWqBqvaq7
RT @zaelefty: For a similar analysis, look at Leonard Sax’s paper, which was a response to the 1.7% statistic. https://t.co/wSzz80udkK
@chungelingus @444_i_r @feltedtables There's even been peer reviewed journals pointing out how nonsense that stat is. The actual percentage is 0.018%, almost 100 times lower. Get some new material cause I heard them all before. https://t.co/y5dA1b1nFv
RT @zaelefty: For a similar analysis, look at Leonard Sax’s paper, which was a response to the 1.7% statistic. https://t.co/wSzz80udkK
RT @zaelefty: For a similar analysis, look at Leonard Sax’s paper, which was a response to the 1.7% statistic. https://t.co/wSzz80udkK
@new_datum 1.4 million is the world wide figure for intersex people based on the more accurate figure of 0.018% of the human population. https://t.co/L2ILGcNibN
RT @zaelefty: For a similar analysis, look at Leonard Sax’s paper, which was a response to the 1.7% statistic. https://t.co/wSzz80udkK
RT @zaelefty: For a similar analysis, look at Leonard Sax’s paper, which was a response to the 1.7% statistic. https://t.co/wSzz80udkK
RT @Unity_MoT: @zaelefty The full text version in J Sex Res is, unfortunately, now paywalled. However, Dr Sax has kindly republished it i…
@grok @PlantsBikesBass @DeirdreBoleyn @AdnanHussainMP @tombruhcks @grok See the link below. The 1.7% figure includes Klinefelter syndrome, Turner syndrome, and late-onset adrenal hyperplasia, which produce standard sexed bodies and are not considered to be intersex conditions. https://t.co/f3axnhnoZk
RT @zaelefty: For a similar analysis, look at Leonard Sax’s paper, which was a response to the 1.7% statistic. https://t.co/wSzz80udkK
RT @zaelefty: For a similar analysis, look at Leonard Sax’s paper, which was a response to the 1.7% statistic. https://t.co/wSzz80udkK
RT @zaelefty: For a similar analysis, look at Leonard Sax’s paper, which was a response to the 1.7% statistic. https://t.co/wSzz80udkK
@zaelefty The full text version in J Sex Res is, unfortunately, now paywalled. However, Dr Sax has kindly republished it in full on his personal website - https://t.co/Rn8sm4iZWG
@hyphymermaid @SmartCaseStrat @GianmarcoSoresi That is an outdated figure based on the questionable Fausto-Sterling who later admitted she had included many conditions that are not intersex for example PCOS and MRKH. https://t.co/L2ILGcNibN
RT @BiologyStupid: @zaelefty Leonard Sax's response is here for those without the inclination to find it: https://t.co/A9I2ECHFxo
@zaelefty Leonard Sax's response is here for those without the inclination to find it: https://t.co/A9I2ECHFxo
@TomFromTheFarm @Kaida_B_ @CactusCuddler17 @patriotnheels @GovRonDeSantis @grok She didn't just include DSD found later in life. She included conditions like PCOS. https://t.co/L2ILGcNQ1l
@hutton_trisha07 @Brewpubpolitics @DefiantLs https://t.co/L2ILGcNibN
@tombroido @Jonathafrye @winwithwinsome 1. Intersex is about 1-2 births in 10,000. About 100 times rarer than the estimate above. Per sax, 2002. https://t.co/2rgHpU8irv 2. Intersex is clinically defined as a mismatch between genotype and phenotype, or internal reproductive anatomy and external genitalia, Per Medline
RT @HatzKatzn: calculations. These conditions are so rare, that they are catalogued and listed at NORD, GARD, and Orphanet. Clinicians and…
@EnarialP @DC_DeWitt "How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling - PubMed" https://t.co/U03wnsHXaS
RT @HatzKatzn: calculations. These conditions are so rare, that they are catalogued and listed at NORD, GARD, and Orphanet. Clinicians and…
RT @HatzKatzn: calculations. These conditions are so rare, that they are catalogued and listed at NORD, GARD, and Orphanet. Clinicians and…
RT @HatzKatzn: calculations. These conditions are so rare, that they are catalogued and listed at NORD, GARD, and Orphanet. Clinicians and…
calculations. These conditions are so rare, that they are catalogued and listed at NORD, GARD, and Orphanet. Clinicians and biologists agree with these percentages, not Fausto-Sterling's 1.7%. https://t.co/vQ8H6N13Wq https://t.co/Km3tkDYfd3
Took 5 seconds to find. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling - PubMed pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/
You're citing a transactivist org that of course points to an old, discredited study that the authors themselves later agreed was wrong. 90% of the 1.7% was a condition that isn't intersex. But it's still cited by transactivists in 2025 for reasons of propaganda. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/
@pamelabacon5 @DACDAC4DAC https://t.co/2lYBvxEOOL
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
@dropoutnation You're the only delulu one here petal. 1.7? What are you smoking? https://t.co/qa2t0SWVJF
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
@angelamurphy99 @dropoutnation He's an idiot. https://t.co/ZlmwMIw3jy
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
RT @ForWomenScot: Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex…
Oh dear! Anne Fausto-Sterling has much to answer for, but even she didn't claim this! Yes, she made up the 1.7% "intersex" rubbish, but didn't claim it was chromosomal. Anyway, her thesis is bollocks whichever way you look at it! https://t.co/ZlmwMIw3jy https://t.co/oQhJsvayXT
Eher 0,02% Das stimmt auch ungefähr mit der Zahl der Menschen in Deutschland überein, die für sich den Eintrag "divers" beantragt haben. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/
Although we cannot conduct direct cell counts of intersex persons reporting they were affected by coerced medical interventions, we can leverage studies to infer upper and lower bounds on that count anyway. Citations are in the alt text
The real incidence levels are many orders of magnitude lower. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/
@Kadjoy_ @UnRayananas @CerfiaFR https://t.co/XU3FJwZz4j
RT @HatzKatzn: @xertias13425 https://t.co/vQ8H6N1BLY
RT @HatzKatzn: @xertias13425 https://t.co/vQ8H6N1BLY
@xertias13425 https://t.co/vQ8H6N1BLY
@dbousou @EspanYolo91 Juist: schaf die self-id af. Geslacht is in > 99% van de gevallen duidelijk. Cheekswabs zijn simpel en goedkoop. Een man hoort niet in een vrouwencompetitie, zelfs niet als hij zich een handicap aanmeet. https://t.co/6F0W9rTPvT
@alexafaucher @Leo_Lefrancois Alexa Faucher : "L'humanité est binaire du point de vue de la sexuation". La science : https://t.co/EbRViojaCF https://t.co/HhdPayCL0b https://t.co/Sx31OK3oOa https://t.co/RL6BEqGTCK https://t.co/CEhlJIz4xA
@Jaidusable @cath482688041 @shame96785 @Tanit2121 Calmez vous, et relisez tranquillement https://t.co/DcmjeLcuUE https://t.co/sGbQPTCNIl
@Jaidusable @cath482688041 @shame96785 @Tanit2121 Vos 1,7% comprennent toutes les variations chromosomiques, … … mais toutes les variations chromosomique ne comprennent pas des ambiguïtés génitales caractérisant les personnes intersexuées. https://t.co/Eg1V3b9rhf
Have you looked into the fact that science, shows intersex individuals exist at a rate of 1/1000 if not more? pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/ Or the fact that , mainly from plastics, there are Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals on Male and Female Reproduction pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...
@randobeantv @bernese02 @BarksAtStars @TransDiaries @jk_rowling What about intersex conditions? These are developmental anomalies, not 3rd sexes. They’re rare (<0.018% for ambiguous genitalia) & mostly non-reproductive, e.g. evolutionary dead-ends, not adaptive alternatives. Sax, L. (2002), Journal of Sex Research https://t.co/QUsjsW8oAq
The 1.7%Fausto-Sterling estimate is way too high. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/
So it's a hand-drawn sketch based on data that includes secondary characteristics, and the only hard information is incorrect. The proportion of people with genuine 'intersex' conditions is more like 0.018%. Shall I sketch a visualisation for you? pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/
Sax, L. (2002). “How common is intersex? A response to Anne Fausto-Sterling.” Journal of Sex Research, 39(3), 174–178.
@grok @amps_kaizen @irene_gp @dixebriegapll @honrubiahurtado This is false. Whilst 1.7% have DSDs 99% of those people have conditions that do not involve any traits that are or even appear to be if the other sex. This was explained in detail in the paper by Leonard Sax in the Journal of Sex Research. https://t.co/GG4DBbJQjG
RT @Mathild99701066: @AndyMpolitics @Femi_Sorry @mwboyle @tigerax "Applying this more precise definition, the true prevalence of intersex i…
@AndyMpolitics @Femi_Sorry @mwboyle @tigerax "Applying this more precise definition, the true prevalence of intersex is seen to be about 0.018%, almost 100 times lower than Fausto‐Sterling's estimate of 1.7%." https://t.co/D6Uwdzxkzq
@Falconer084 mind you, the woman who authored that claim is NOT a physician. she's a woowoo gender idealogue with a degree in genetics using her non-clinical knowledge of DSDs to mislead people into believing sex is made up. https://t.co/5PFb3ejIlO
@slutriarch well, no! https://t.co/5PFb3ejIlO
@slutriarch hardly. it's a business, they don't do research and have a vested interest in manipulating facts to be more attractive towards customers. here's an actual article clarifying what intersex really means https://t.co/5PFb3ejIlO
That's a myth that Anne Fausto-Sterling made up. People whose sex is truly inconclusive is less than 0.02% of people. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/
That's called the "Fausto-Sterling myth". It's less than 0.02% pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/
@Samvalentin97 @davisanxe Este artículo que citas fue controvertido por Leonard Sax: https://t.co/KlvHCkPqX6
There are Intersex people and chromosomes specifying gender can get mixed up. More importantly, nobody cares! Be your own pronouns, just do good work and be nice. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/
A true Intersex individual is quite rare. Less than 1% of Americans. It does exist. There are NOT just 2 genders. It is a lie. .018 % of 331,000,000 Americans is almost 6 million people. They are real. They matter. Created by God, or whatever your belief is. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/
@TheMaineWire @WBUR Election fraud is about as common as intersex folks. Sax L. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. J Sex Res. 2002 Aug;39(3):174-8. doi: 10.1080/00224490209552139. PMID: 12476264.
. INTERSEX “Just male and female” reveals MAGA ignorance. One of every 100 USA births are’Intersex.’ Intersex infants are born with both male and female reproductive organs. BE SURE TO POINT THIS OUT TO YOUR MAGA FRIENDS AND FAMILY. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/
@ada_lluch Sax, Leonard. 2002. “How Common Is Lntersex? A Response to Anne Fausto‐Sterling.” The Journal of Sex Research 39 (3): 174–78. doi:10.1080/00224490209552139.
RT @DrMariekedOuden: Cijfers afkomstig van Leonard Sax: How common is intersex? https://t.co/7ezzTGy3o9
Cijfers afkomstig van Leonard Sax: How common is intersex? https://t.co/7ezzTGy3o9
@benryanwriter @SwipeWright There is also this rebuttal to Fausto‐Sterling by Leonard Sax. https://t.co/vyw6Vyl2Vw
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/
Ok, this paper (https://t.co/xFmE9hTa3T) suggest 0.02% of intersex in humans. This seems tiny. Other studies suggest about 2% - which seems large. But even with 0.02%, per 3.5M births/year in the US, that's nearly 1000 new children being intersex each year! Forget them?
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC... www.webmd.com/sex/what-is-... www.sciencenews.org/article/biol... isna.org/faq/frequency/ www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK581... Also one that you cited, the author of which argues for a very restrictive definition of intersex. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/
@JayOrsi @SarahHuckabee OFFS…intersex accounts for 0.018% of all births. It’s a birth defect, not some new gender How common is lntersex? A response to Anne Fausto‐Sterling: The Journal of Sex Research: Vol 39, No 3 https://t.co/h0Xrlt7r2d
At estimated 0.018% of world population - roughly 1 in 5000 - intersex is not so rare pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/
Sax L. (2002). How common is intersex? a response to anne fausto-sterling. J. Sex. Res. 39 (3), 174–178
RT @ThevoiceAlexa: @Gilbro2010 Intersex représente 0,018 % de la population et non pas 1 à 2 %. Je laisse ça ici : https://t.co/e9uU9L0PpI
@Gilbro2010 Intersex représente 0,018 % de la population et non pas 1 à 2 %. Je laisse ça ici : https://t.co/e9uU9L0PpI
On Twitter a few years ago, many "intersex" people objected to that label. They have DSDs and VSDs. "the true prevalence of intersex is seen to be about 0.018%" pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/ www.realityslaststand.com/p/intersex-i... article by Colin Wright -- Dec 07, 2020
@BenJu92386989 @ADnl Het zijn er nog veel minder dan dat. Slechts 0.018% van de mensen heeft een DSD (Disorder of Sexual Development) aandoening. In de vrouwensport zijn mannelijke DSD's zwaar oververtegenwoordigd en daar komen dus ook nog niet-DSD mannen bij. https://t.co/zqGTg6AF83
Thank you for actually providing citation instead of just an infographic. I shall respond in kind. Everything between "typical biological female" and "typical biological male" accounts for /maybe/ between .018% & 1.7% of the entirety of the human population. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/
@EpeeFaune @vZenCowW @s_manzouri @CerfiaFR "1% sont flagrant génétiquement" dans la propagande woke. Dans le monde réel, c'est 0,02 %. https://t.co/2ZV5eD0rvW
@clement__69 @TitouOne @CerfiaFR 1,7 % dans la propagande wokiste. Dans le monde réel, celui qu'étudient les scientifiques, c'est 0,02 %. https://t.co/2ZV5eD0rvW
@GorinMoti @jessesingal "[A]nd by a lot" - yup, by about two orders of magnitude: https://t.co/H4XwZTPBqG
@tg128 J Sex Res . 2002 Aug;39(3):174-8. doi:10.1080/00224490209552139. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling
@JessRay1977 @rka0102 @DefiyantlyFree That person is lying https://t.co/308Wd5akvn
@VictoriaMaxima1 @el_nagashi https://t.co/VzKiuaXozf Das die Chromosomen nicht mit dem Phenotype bzw der Phenotype nicht klassifizier ist kommt bei ca 0,018% aller Geburten vor. https://t.co/TKoXHeAcyz Wir reden hier von Biologie und nicht von “Ich fühl mich als…”.
@Andysk8foryou @thomas_guenole @TPMP @Cyrilhanouna Ici : https://t.co/kRSMph2Qvi.
@sunsopeningband ... conditions in which chromosomal sex is inconsistent with phenotypic sex, or in which the phenotype is not classifiable as either male or female. Applying this more precise definition, the true prevalence of intersex is seen to be about 0.018% https://t.co/7V1VE8zKOT
@SoytoUnleashed @OSilenciosa @neldernei @Baronesa_Zorrea @GodKH90 @womaninfight @Emilio_M_M @donnaCotilla @SrAfrusfrus @FityhhNSA @histoytodayandt https://t.co/QhEboP2GiJ https://t.co/Rz2C4NbNQB https://t.co/IJOejqdXCG https://t.co/FyyO7mZfLv https://t.co/bOFaZqj5uR https://t.co/pa7HDJBxfq https://t.co/1Uxzn2zaNy https://t.co/0jNZQrZjMr
@_Floragato_ @Pinko69420 That article is wrong. 1-2% of people "intersex"? Nonsense - they are mixing up DSDs like Turner and Klinefelter syndrome, or late‐onset adrenal hyperplasia with sex being ambiguous at birth. All of these people are either male or female. https://t.co/hDneujWNy3
@redactedhills @honestsabe @Disapager__ Conditions in which chromosomal sex is inconsistent with phenotypic sex, or in which the phenotype is not classifiable as either male or female the prevalence of intersex is seen to be about 0.018% https://t.co/qGQ0E9CKKl
RT @DrMariekedOuden: @LinkedIn Ik raad huisartsen e.a. aan om zeker ook het filmpje over 'genderkoek', 'genderspectrum' en allerlei buitenw…
RT @DrMariekedOuden: @LinkedIn Ik raad huisartsen e.a. aan om zeker ook het filmpje over 'genderkoek', 'genderspectrum' en allerlei buitenw…
@LinkedIn Ik raad huisartsen e.a. aan om zeker ook het filmpje over 'genderkoek', 'genderspectrum' en allerlei buitenwetenschappelijke opvattingen te bekijken. Interessant hoe alle DSD's worden gepresenteerd als intersekse. Apert onjuist. .https://t.co/x8pFRr0h5t
longe de mim invalidar uma só pessoa mas esse dado é uma estimativa pré-ano 2000 altamente questionado, com a fraçao sugerida como real sendo 0.018% pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/
@PLPDinamarca @Juliiietha57624 @MatiAromi Mira q facil es pasarlo completo https://t.co/x03k4TzNCh
@Edrialyse @putayter @HeatherFFS @ThomasWillett9 1.7%, Fausto-Sterling et al: https://t.co/mhF3kyLroY 0.17%, Fausto-Sterling Recant of above: https://t.co/NCaIGWBSha 0.018%, Sax, https://t.co/EeSF9aX7Oq Please, cite some sources for your claims.
@KalistiQuix @BiBiBopMop @CurseThyLife @michael72725034 @Ginger0G @HumansNoContext Still 1.7% is too big of a number, because many "Intersex" like XXY and XO are phenotypically male and female, and because of this they can also not be counted. A more recent study shows 0.018% of the population is intersex. https://t.co/y0qwd4tRfM
@KalistiQuix @BiBiBopMop @CurseThyLife @michael72725034 @Ginger0G @HumansNoContext According to other studies they may be 0.018% of the population. https://t.co/y0qwd4tRfM
@Tachardiella @JustMisogyny and TRUE prevalence 0.018% source: Sax L. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. J Sex Res. 2002 Aug;39(3):174-8. doi: 10.1080/00224490209552139. PMID: 12476264.
That is false. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/ “The true prevalence of intersex is seen to be about 0.018%, almost 100 times lower than Fausto-Sterling’s estimate of 1.7%.” Intersex is an outlier. It’s not really relevant to this trans in sports discussion.
No Only 99.982% of humans are either male or female. The other 0.018% have a condition in which chromosomal sex is inconsistent with phenotypic sex, or in which the phenotype is not classifiable as either male or female. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/
Wow baby….you’ve got major insecurity issues. Therapy would probably be very beneficial for you. You clearly don’t know a lot about the real world so Here’s a scientific study done on intersex. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/
The true prevalence of intersex is seen to be about 0.018%, almost 100 times lower than Fausto-Sterling s estimate of 1.7%. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/
@Itay2y @stickydacat @botchasaurus92 @TwitchSupport Wrong. https://t.co/aklVGpfAQh
@derMitDemEssen @Vorzimmerdame2 Allgemein zur geschlechtlichen Binarität: https://t.co/XWnlWFLmmC Im klinischen Sinne kommt Intersex nur ca. 1:5000 oft vor: "How common is Intersex?" https://t.co/PmxfcnkB7P Beste Grüße
@derMitDemEssen @Vorzimmerdame2 Allgemein zur geschlechtlichen Binarität: https://t.co/XWnlWFLmmC Im klinischen Sinne kommt Intersex nur ca. 1:5000 oft vor: "How common is Intersex?" https://t.co/PmxfcnkB7P
@Solias8 @shamanspirit13 @IHaveOTDSD @joeschmoe102 @NerdoChris @Rothmus published elsewhere, like PubMed & TandF. Green studies cells at the molecular level, he has 0 background on the evolution/development of sex. He's NOT an expert on biology of sex itself, he cannot even properly cite sources. 1b https://t.co/7cK5Wkti4i https://t.co/SrzNJNNN8e
@doodoms @Vizekonig @CNviolations https://t.co/oO8KekL4Ma "the true prevalence of intersex is seen to be about 0.018%"
@hhhenrymercury @liraelsao3 @ArchLuminous So what's your excuse for dismissing this source then? https://t.co/ZkMTkK3rjH
@hhhenrymercury @liraelsao3 @ArchLuminous Source https://t.co/ZkMTkK3rjH
@BeatrKiero @MatheuxALB19 @ChairoNuclear @fightwithmemes It's not 1.7%, it's more like .018%. doi: 10.1080/00224490209552139
@ChairoNuclear @fightwithmemes Sax L. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. J Sex Res. 2002 Aug;39(3):174-8. doi: 10.1080/00224490209552139. PMID: 12476264.
RT @zeno001: References 1 Sax L. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. J Sex Res 2002;39:174–8. doi:10.1080/002244902…
RT @zeno001: References 1 Sax L. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. J Sex Res 2002;39:174–8. doi:10.1080/002244902…
RT @zeno001: References 1 Sax L. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. J Sex Res 2002;39:174–8. doi:10.1080/002244902…
RT @zeno001: References 1 Sax L. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. J Sex Res 2002;39:174–8. doi:10.1080/002244902…
RT @zeno001: References 1 Sax L. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. J Sex Res 2002;39:174–8. doi:10.1080/002244902…
@_miriku_ @AJCASoubrier67 Lo que caracteriza al sexo como clase natural, como vienen diciendo Coyne y Dawkins, son los gametos https://t.co/zx6VTGvtQB Es revelador que haya tanta desinformación sobre la cantidad de intersexuales, que tampoco refutan la clase natural del sexo https://t.co/hNpThVleER
RT @zeno001: References 1 Sax L. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. J Sex Res 2002;39:174–8. doi:10.1080/002244902…
RT @zeno001: References 1 Sax L. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. J Sex Res 2002;39:174–8. doi:10.1080/002244902…
References 1 Sax L. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. J Sex Res 2002;39:174–8. doi:10.1080/00224490209552139 2 Cunningham AL, Jones CP, Ansell J, et al. Red for danger: the effects of red hair in surgical practice. BMJ 2010;341. doi:10.1136/bmj.c6931 3/3
@bordera_f @eco3t @FPJ_Loretta Tiene usted razón, la cifra la dije de memoria y cometí una inexactitud. La cifra real es el 99.982% de los casos. https://t.co/u6DOVNBoNx https://t.co/rninq9oB69
@Seinneann @Foxy_KB_ @quollhorreur @ewendj @billybragg And here it is again, published in a science journal. https://t.co/SrzNJNNN8e
@Poliandrico @educaciocat2022 @NoSoyFranCuesta "if the term intersex is to retain any meaning, the term should be restricted to those conditions in which chromosomal sex is inconsistent with phenotypic sex, or in which the phenotype is not classifiable as either male or female" https://t.co/CUC258HkLa
@thebazingababy @EightTheThot @JJCrosstrainers @WildfireWhisper https://t.co/0aB3z0lYIA
@thebazingababy @JJCrosstrainers @WildfireWhisper It was debunked a long time ago Here’s one study explaining it https://t.co/0aB3z0lYIA
@Bardissimo Ja, människan har bara två kön, de som producerar spermier (män) och äggceller (kvinnor). 99.98% av befolkningen har könsorgan som överensstämmer med deras karyotyp (män har Y). De återstående 0.018% är intersex och kan behöva hormoner. https://t.co/3jMmL0fLwW
@sk8rgrlcrazi @killroy42 @Muhturrx @hankgreen True intersex conditions--where chromosomes don't match evident reproductive anatomy--is about 0.018% of births, about 1 in 5500. So, 99.982% of births do not have a mismatch between chromosomes and anatomy. Link: https://t.co/2RGmlDGsW9
RT @mkeulemans: 4/ Geslachtsdelen tonen dus maar? Leidde tot nogal vernederende toestanden.
@mus_nico Klik ik er op, dan krijg ik dit te lezen. 1:500 lijkt me een kans van 0,2 toch? Of zie ik hier iets over het hoofd? (2/2) https://t.co/eVcyCmWFaZ https://t.co/Sr62nXg4s9
RT @mkeulemans: 4/ Geslachtsdelen tonen dus maar? Leidde tot nogal vernederende toestanden.
4/ Geslachtsdelen tonen dus maar? Leidde tot nogal vernederende toestanden.
@streamkamala @monmoushoujo あれ？Sourceに明記されているのは、 https://t.co/0HEdoHdRYZ…じゃないのかな？でもそんな図はないなあ。 データを使ったのなら、こっちじゃないのかな？ Paradox Institute の方の流儀は私の知っている 研究の流儀と違うのかな？ https://t.co/6GlvvHnJHC
@fvcked_indigo @A_RaneyDay @emilykmay Ive not once said intersex individuals should be raised as male or female. Ive explicitly stated they shouldn't be raised as something theyre not. You made the claim that, statistically, most intersex people felt violated. I can provide a source, can you? https://t.co/ii6VRCArq1
@StopPseudo @VaryIngweion Hombre, eso es una petición de rigor un poco extrema. Te dejo la referencia de dónde he sacado el dato. El debate que hay no es sobre los datos brutos, sino como interpretarlos. https://t.co/IYu8jgBmPh
@Noegguerrero Enlace 1 https://t.co/ZxS8pwslTR
@mairitaluse Jā, pilnvērtīga dzimuma attīstība ir sarežģīts process, kas iekļauj vairākus faktorus, taču problēmas noteikt dzimumu ir tikai 0.02% gadījumu. Turklāt dzimuma definīciju nosaka dzimumšūnes ne hromosomas un hormoni. https://t.co/6suBPXMZYH
@MailePRMedia example: "Applying this more precise definition, the true prevalence of intersex is seen to be about 0.018%..." https://t.co/IexCGSOCbr
@Bill_Tasselli @disseminatrix13 @RichardDawkins The woman who is cited with the 1.7 % statistic disavowed it. 1.7% is people with reproductive defects that are not considered intersex. Real intersex is roughly 0.018%. https://t.co/PfAml3RW2Q
RT @Miroandrej: 1,7 Prozent der Bevölkerung mit Intersex-Syndrom? Das ist eine Ente. Die Zahl ist 100 mal niedriger: 0.018%. Siehe hier: ht…
@NZZde @judith_blage 1,7 Prozent der Bevölkerung mit Intersex-Syndrom? Das ist eine Ente. Die Zahl ist 100 mal niedriger: 0.018%. Siehe hier: https://t.co/R7f1UdvVWY
1,7 Prozent der Bevölkerung mit Intersex-Syndrom? Das ist eine Ente. Die Zahl ist 100 mal niedriger: 0.018%. Siehe hier: https://t.co/R7f1Udvo7q https://t.co/p9yXZZEtt7
@DezGroves @FreddieFishFin1 @Mr_Reality5 @WinnowingWind @vctrfrts @gc_hedgehog @SmokenMirrors24 @NoPercivement @Lilith_Atheist No, it is specifically regarded as an inflation of the term, mostly by people like you, who do not understand it: https://t.co/dOsMnllqpi https://t.co/KHQ3yEYwS8
@damomen76 @TheGuardingSoul @PopAndDrop_RE @shadow_lxrd @Gelatart @TheAntifaTurtle @BillboardChris What do you mean with prove? Is the existence of 280.000 intersex people born last year not proof enough? Are multiple peer reviewed papers not enough? https://t.co/Ah8Wqnd8gq
@Texas_jeep__guy @bama_angel4life 2022-08-??: How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling Leonard Sax 1 Affiliations expand PMID: 12476264 DOI: 10.1080/00224490209552139 Abstract Anne Fausto-Sterling s suggestion that the prevalence of intersex might be as high as 1.7% has attracted wide attention
@MillerMatthew20 @Texas_jeep__guy @bama_angel4life 2022-08-??: How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling Leonard Sax 1 Affiliations expand PMID: 12476264 DOI: 10.1080/00224490209552139 Abstract Anne Fausto-Sterling s suggestion that the prevalence of intersex might be as high as 1.7% has attracted wide attention
@vulvabloom The 2% for intersex includes non-intersex congenital reproductive disorders, like Klinefelter's, a more accurate incidence is 0.018% https://t.co/fd8wFlgTA6
@milofux @KatieInBoston1 @Sihd @Pinko69420 @LivingXXY It excludes them because most clinicians do not recognize them as "intersex" as they are unambiguously male or female and there is no lack of agreement between sex chromosomes/gonads/external genitalia. This is inaccurate inflation of the true prevalence. https://t.co/a9gLfNLiaB
*including only persons with a sexual phenotype that is ambiguous or discordant with their chromosomal sex **using the original review's numbers, but different definition 1st screenshot:https://t.co/Ns9nWVpQTI 2nd: https://t.co/78RMWjZ7I7 3rd: https://t.co/f5fxvnEZyt (2/2)
@DoubleDkaty @Foxy_KB_ @KaniRosi @Bill40655711862 Your source isn't a source, dingbat. That 1.7% statistic is from Fausto Sterling (because she's the only one who gave that percentage) , and they say it's an estimate, and it is not verifiable because they don't reference the source. YOU COPE. Source. ⬇️ https://t.co/SrzNJNOkXM
@michael_b197 @WalderNicolas @LesVertsCH Le problème avec vous la gauche, c'est que vous manipulez les faits à des fins de propagande, encore et toujours : https://t.co/zJzbQFpYBm C'est bien 0.018%.
No. The higher figure is absurd in including conditions which are unambiguously male or female. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/ Even Fausto-Sterling withdrew her claim
RT @rorybowman: Leonard Sax, 2002. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Journal of sex research, 39(3), 174–178. ht…
Leonard Sax, 2002. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Journal of sex research, 39(3), 174–178. https://t.co/wGAoF0roei. https://t.co/awCxZltBCX
@DoyougrokGary @bennyjohnson That's only if you consider e.g. a woman with facial hair to be intersex, a definition which effectively marginalizes actual intersex individuals- those with mismatched genitalia (e.g. female with ovaries but also a functional penis) https://t.co/gjReDjEvBK
@byrne_a How about "the term should be restricted to those conditions in which chromosomal...the true prevalence of intersex is seen to be about 0.018%, almost 100 times lower than Fausto-Sterling's estimate of 1.7%. https://t.co/W2fI2KYAZl
@McWyrm @brad_polumbo Let’s cite an actual peer-reviewed scientific article, shall we? “the true prevalence of intersex is seen to be about 0.018%” The 1.7% figure includes people whose sex is not in doubt (e.g., Klinefelter’s and Turner’s syndromes). https://t.co/YU9zclCToO
@PJLM @atrupar Very few variations in sex development manifest as ambiguous genitals at birth, and such conditions are readily sorted as "male" and "female" with cheek-swab or ultrasound. https://t.co/wGAoF0roei. Leonard Sax (2002) How common is lntersex? A response to Anne Fausto‐Sterling
@Ashleymongus @ErinInTheMorn Wrong. The 1.7% "includes conditions which most clinicians do not recognize as intersex". "the true prevalence of intersex is seen to be about 0.018%, almost 100 times lower than Fausto-Sterling's estimate of 1.7%" https://t.co/2M1hlA4T7R
@SeanSaifaWall @LSMakeUp @LeilaFadel @NPR Thanks for bringing attention to the issue of early and unnecessary surgeries on children with variations in sex development, usually ambiguous genitalia. I wish @NPR had fact-checked VSD frequency, as per Sax 2002, https://t.co/wGAoF0roei. There should be NO confusion here.
RT @voorzij: Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual developm…
RT @voorzij: Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual developm…
RT @voorzij: Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual developm…
RT @voorzij: Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual developm…
RT @voorzij: Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual developm…
RT @voorzij: Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual developm…
RT @voorzij: Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual developm…
RT @voorzij: Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual developm…
RT @voorzij: Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual developm…
RT @voorzij: Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual developm…
RT @voorzij: Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual developm…
RT @voorzij: Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual developm…
RT @voorzij: Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual developm…
RT @voorzij: Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual developm…
RT @voorzij: Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual developm…
RT @voorzij: Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual developm…
RT @voorzij: Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual developm…
RT @voorzij: Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual developm…
RT @voorzij: Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual developm…
RT @voorzij: Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual developm…
RT @voorzij: Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual developm…
RT @voorzij: Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual developm…
RT @voorzij: Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual developm…
RT @voorzij: Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual developm…
RT @voorzij: Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual developm…
RT @voorzij: Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual developm…
RT @voorzij: Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual developm…
Gênant! Minister van Onderwijs, Cultuur & Wetenschap beweert dat maar liefst 1 op de 90 mensen een disorder of sexual development (DSD) hebben. In werkelijkheid is het 0,018%. Bijna 100 keer zo laag. https://t.co/WzGgX9qglN https://t.co/OfMP210Y7Z
@CaffeineCalico @Kathleenandron @HollyWroteit @free_equal Indeed. Leonard Sax, 2002. How common is lntersex? A response to Anne Fausto‐Sterling, The Journal of Sex Research, 39:3, 174-178, DOI: 10.1080/00224490209552139, https://t.co/wGAoF0roei…. Accepted 05 Feb 2002, Published online 11 Jan 2010.
@fletcherkathy8 @Kathleenandron @HollyWroteit @free_equal Indeed, and on prevalence: Leonard Sax, 2002. How common is lntersex? A response to Anne Fausto‐Sterling, The Journal of Sex Research, 39:3, 174-178, DOI: 10.1080/00224490209552139, https://t.co/wGAoF0roei…. Accepted 05 Feb 2002, Published online 11 Jan 2010.
RT @rorybowman: @LeorSapir @eanderh @YouTube "[T]he true prevalence of intersex is seen to be about 0.018%..." Leonard Sax (2002) How comm…
RT @rorybowman: @LeorSapir @eanderh @YouTube "[T]he true prevalence of intersex is seen to be about 0.018%..." Leonard Sax (2002) How comm…
@LeorSapir @eanderh @YouTube "[T]he true prevalence of intersex is seen to be about 0.018%..." Leonard Sax (2002) How common is lntersex? A response to Anne Fausto‐Sterling, The Journal of Sex Research, 39:3, 174-178, DOI: 10.1080/00224490209552139, https://t.co/wGAoF0roei. https://t.co/lWREQwx221
RT @rorybowman: A useful reference associated with this topic is Leonard Sax, 2002. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterl…
@imnotsurebout @mochilovecos @KyleKto @DrewAfualo People with variations in sex development are still either male or female. Leonard Sax, 2002. How common is lntersex? A response to Anne Fausto‐Sterling, The Journal of Sex Research, 39:3, 174-178, DOI: 10.1080/00224490209552139, https://t.co/wGAoF0roei.
RT @rorybowman: A useful reference associated with this topic is Leonard Sax, 2002. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterl…
@tristaneldritch @thejournal_ie @aoifegall Because the author has almost no idea what they're talking about. Leonard Sax, 2002. How common is lntersex? A response to Anne Fausto‐Sterling, The Journal of Sex Research, 39:3, 174-178, DOI: 10.1080/00224490209552139, https://t.co/wGAoF0roei.
@FemCondition @girls_women @SwipeWright https://t.co/rc4PnHNOIO https://t.co/YBbtYzDcU4
@GocmezJames @Liesl_lseil @HackneyTerven Is that a screenshot of an inaccurate TCLU pamphlet? Try Leonard Sax, 2002. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Journal of sex research, 39(3), 174–178. https://t.co/wGAoF0qQoK https://t.co/wcvXbilCh2
RT @rorybowman: @washingtonpost The term "intersex" is intentionally vague and should be deprecated for physical variations in sex developm…
The term "intersex" is intentionally vague and should be deprecated for physical variations in sex development, NEVER confused with claims about "gender identity." Also 1.7% is far too high an estimate, as per Leonard Sax 2002, https://t.co/wGAoF09f0a, How common is lntersex? https://t.co/jF3AICFtld
@washingtonpost The term "intersex" is intentionally vague and should be deprecated for physical variations in sex development, NEVER confused with claims about "gender identity." Also 1.7% is far too high an estimate, as per Leonard Sax 2002, https://t.co/wGAoF09f0a, How common is lntersex?
@KlinefelterDSD A useful resource is Leonard Sax, 2002. How common is lntersex? A response to Anne Fausto‐Sterling, The Journal of Sex Research, 39:3, 174-178, DOI: 10.1080/00224490209552139, https://t.co/wGAoF09f0a…. Accepted 05 Feb 2002, Published online 11 Jan 2010.
Variations in sex-development are ALSO not as common as claimed. See Leonard Sax, 2002. How common is lntersex? A response to Anne Fausto‐Sterling, The Journal of Sex Research, 39:3, 174-178, DOI: 10.1080/00224490209552139, https://t.co/wGAoF0qQoK for more details.
RT @rorybowman: Leonard Sax, 2002. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Journal of sex research, 39(3), 174–178. htt…
RT @rorybowman: The first portion of the video grossly overstates the number of "intersex" people with DSD differences in sex development.…
RT @rorybowman: The first portion of the video grossly overstates the number of "intersex" people with DSD differences in sex development.…
The first portion of the video grossly overstates the number of "intersex" people with DSD differences in sex development. Leonard Sax, 2002. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Journal of sex research, 39(3), 174–178. https://t.co/wGAoF09f0a.
@skdh All "trans women" are unambiguously male at birth, and this video (a) conflates that with DSD's while (b) oversestimating frequency. Leonard Sax, 2002. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Journal of sex research, 39(3), 174–178. https://t.co/wGAoF09f0a.
Leonard Sax, 2002. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Journal of sex research, 39(3), 174–178. https://t.co/wGAoF09f0a, August 2002.
@DotMcFarlane @Esqueer_ To help give you a head start, Leonard Sax, 2002. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Journal of sex research, 39(3), 174–178. https://t.co/wGAoF09f0a. https://t.co/w1eCf3nDs1
@protransfemnst I used the term "variations of sex development," Kitten. Sax L. (2002). How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Journal of sex research, 39(3), 174–178. https://t.co/wGAoF09f0a.
@protransfemnst I thought were onto "intersex," Kitten, but perhaps all this handwaving has me confused. Sax L. (2002). How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Journal of sex research, 39(3), 174–178. https://t.co/wGAoF09f0a. Are you back on teh "pink brainz" again?
RT @rorybowman: @MaelJade_ @millihill @ElllieS The "red hair fallacy" about the frequency of VSD is clearly false. See Leonard Sax, 2002.…
@zzzmisanthrope @MaelJade_ @millihill @ElllieS Thank you! Leonard Sax, 2002. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Journal of sex research, 39(3), 174–178. https://t.co/wGAoF09f0a.
@MaelJade_ @millihill @ElllieS The "red hair fallacy" about the frequency of VSD is clearly false. See Leonard Sax, 2002. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Journal of sex research, 39(3), 174–178. https://t.co/wGAoF09f0a. VSD's are much rarer, and rarely ambiguous.
@ChrisGuk1 @LSMakeUp @UN @free_equal For those unfamiliar: Leonard Sax, 2002. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Journal of sex research, 39(3), 174–178. https://t.co/BMqgqTtSj4.
RT @rorybowman: @doctorowl_ @druminor For stats see Leonard Sax, 2002. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Journal…
@doctorowl_ @druminor For stats see Leonard Sax, 2002. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Journal of sex research, 39(3), 174–178. https://t.co/wGAoF0qQoK.
@SexEduNation Um, no: Leonard Sax, 2002. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Journal of sex research, 39(3), 174–178. https://t.co/wGAoF09f0a.
A useful reference associated with this topic is Leonard Sax, 2002. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Journal of sex research, 39(3), 174–178. https://t.co/wGAoF09f0a.
@jesseb4me @EHRC Medical personnel normally observe sex based on genitals, with variations in sex development often going unnoticed or entirely undiagnosed until puberty or later (as with fertility concerns). https://t.co/wGAoF09f0a Which complicate identification enough to be an issue?
@pedromorgado @helenatrigueir0 Portugal tem cerca de 10141303 humanos. Se multiplicarmos pela percentagem de indivíduos intersexo de 0,018% (dado compatível com a publicação, com origem no https://t.co/A0rtZOFsVs) temos 1825 indivíduos. O que faz a classificação de 4917647
@every1wearamask @ajventer @AlcoholicRobot People with differences in sex development are still either male or female, and indeed the various DSD conditions are often categorized that way. https://t.co/wGAoF09f0a People these variations are human and not some bizarre, third or fourth or fifth sex.
@every1wearamask @ajventer @AlcoholicRobot There are dozens of recognized variations in sex development, named and catalogued. https://t.co/wGAoF09f0a Which of those do you think involves BOTH a penis and uterus? What US athlete has EVER claimed such a condition?
@maxpowerspeaks @chasestrangio How familiar are you with VSD's? Sax L. (2002). How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Journal of sex research, 39(3), 174–178. https://t.co/wGAoF09f0a. Klinefelter, Turner, and late-onset adrenal hyperplasia only affect females, with ambiguities < .02%
@ngatiskippy_mal @GeorgeTakei "[T]he true prevalence of intersex is seen to be about 0.018%..." Leonard Sax (2002) How common is lntersex? A response to Anne Fausto‐Sterling, The Journal of Sex Research, 39:3, 174-178, DOI: 10.1080/00224490209552139, https://t.co/wGAoF09f0a. VSD's are not a third sex.
@rigger_john @AppleTart1500 @NoLieWithBTC Sex is a biological fact, and medical personnel can be trusted for that marker in edge cases. Leonard Sax (2002) How common is lntersex? A response to Anne Fausto‐Sterling, The Journal of Sex Research, 39:3, 174-178, DOI: 10.1080/00224490209552139, https://t.co/wGAoF09f0a.
@pica_sapien @callie_h_burt @LGBAlliance_USA @ajc @AlexAlicit "[T]he true prevalence of intersex is seen to be about 0.018%..." Leonard Sax (2002) How common is lntersex? A response to Anne Fausto‐Sterling, The Journal of Sex Research, 39:3, 174-178, DOI: 10.1080/00224490209552139, https://t.co/wGAoF09f0a.
@AlexAlicit Leonard Sax (2002) How common is lntersex? A response to Anne Fausto‐Sterling, The Journal of Sex Research, 39:3, 174-178, DOI: 10.1080/00224490209552139, https://t.co/wGAoF09f0a. Accepted 05 Feb 2002, Published online 11 Jan 2010.
Leonard Sax, 2002. How common is lntersex? A response to Anne Fausto‐Sterling, The Journal of Sex Research, 39:3, 174-178, DOI: 10.1080/00224490209552139, https://t.co/p7UUe0voJg. Accepted 05 Feb 2002, Published online 11 Jan 2010.
RT @rorybowman: Terrific summary drawn from Leonard Sax (2002) How common is lntersex? A response to Anne Fausto‐Sterling, The Journal of S…
RT @rorybowman: Terrific summary drawn from Leonard Sax (2002) How common is lntersex? A response to Anne Fausto‐Sterling, The Journal of S…
Terrific summary drawn from Leonard Sax (2002) How common is lntersex? A response to Anne Fausto‐Sterling, The Journal of Sex Research, 39:3, 174-178, DOI: 10.1080/00224490209552139, https://t.co/wGAoF09f0a. Accepted 05 Feb 2002, Published online 11 Jan 2010. https://t.co/Gpyrt7ACum
RT @zeno001: @tedxlondon @suztemko @Ted No, they don't. The figure is about 100 times lower.[1] You're embarrassing yourselves. 1 Sax, L.…
RT @zeno001: @tedxlondon @suztemko @Ted No, they don't. The figure is about 100 times lower.[1] You're embarrassing yourselves. 1 Sax, L.…
RT @zeno001: @tedxlondon @suztemko @Ted No, they don't. The figure is about 100 times lower.[1] You're embarrassing yourselves. 1 Sax, L.…
RT @zeno001: @tedxlondon @suztemko @Ted No, they don't. The figure is about 100 times lower.[1] You're embarrassing yourselves. 1 Sax, L.…
@tedxlondon @suztemko @Ted No, they don't. The figure is about 100 times lower.[1] You're embarrassing yourselves. 1 Sax, L. (2002). How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Journal of Sex Research, 39(3), 174–178. https://t.co/3aHHvdB8Ps
@anna_wakefield @quodinfrequens @SexnotGender2 @MuirDragonne @SVPhillimore Nope. These might help you: https://t.co/Y4Spnce6wt https://t.co/U7S04qtMMH https://t.co/vpdkfRobCx
RT @femadettiriel: @collweeenie @alexskinner96 @burst_phoenix @Footnotegirl @nyarglebargle69 @thedoorgal @MyGuyKilljoy @_celia_bedelia_ @Al…
How common is intersex? A response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Journal of Sex Research 39(3): 174–178. 11. MacIntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue. Notre Dame, IN ...
definition – the prevalence of intersex is 1 in 5 500 births or 0.018% (reference Sax L Aug. 2002 “how common is intersex a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling” ...
Sax, How Common Is Intersex? A Response to Anne Fausto-Sterling, 6 (2002). 6. T. C. Ngun, N. Ghahramani, F. J. Sánchez, S. Bocklandt, E. Vilain, The ...
Leonard Sax, 2002, How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling · (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12476264), in Journal of Sex Research ...
Sax, 'How Common Is Intersex? A Response to Anne Fausto-Sterling', The Journal of Sex. Research 39 (2002), pp. 174–178. 15. Op. cit. 16. D.A. Griffiths ...
Sax L. How common is intersex a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. J Sex Res. 2002 Aug;39(3):174-8. Available at https ...
Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. [4] Sax, L. (2002). How common is intersex? A response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. [5] Graham ...
REV. 349, 358 (2005) (citing Leo- nard Sax, How Common is Intersex? A Response to Anne Fausto-Sterling, 39 J ...
... How Common Is Intersex? A response to Anne Fausto-Sterling.”16 In my paper, I showed that Fausto-Sterling was boosting the numbers of “intersex” individuals ...
How common is intersex? A response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 174-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224490209552139; Schacter ...
(2002), “How Common Is Intersex? A Response to Anne Fausto-Sterling,” Journal of. Sex Research 39(3), 174–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490209552139. Page ...
(2002). How common is intersex? A response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Journal of Sex Research. [8] Vilain, E. (2016).
By Anne L. Washington, Joshua Arrayales, Nicole Contaxis, Rachel S Kuo ... How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling Leonard Sax https ...
How common is intersex? A response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. 2002, Journal of Sex Research. View all citing articles on Scopus · View full text. Copyright © 2001 ...
How common is intersex? A response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. J Sex Res 2002;39:174–178. Thyen U, Lanz K, Holterhus PM, Hiort O. Epidemiology and initial ...
... intersex in: “How common is Intersex? A response to Anne Fausto-Sterling (Sax, 2002) ... How common is Intersex? A response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Von ...
Anne Fausto-Sterling (née Sterling; born July 30, 1944) is an American ... "How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling". Journal of Sex ...
2002 Aug;39(3):174-8. doi: 10.1080/00224490209552139. PMID: 12476264. May be a graphic of text that says 'XXY XXY SRY SRY Testis Turer FUN · May be an image ...
2002 Aug;39(3):174-8. doi: 10.1080/00224490209552139. PMID: 12476264. Ist möglicherweise eine Grafik von Text „XXY XXY SRY SRY Testis Turer FUN FACT FRIDAY.
DOI: 10.1080/00224490209552139 “Gender and Genetics,” Genomic Resource Centre, World Health Organization, http://www.who.int/genomics/ gender/en/index1.html ...
10.1080/00224490209552139. Scheim, A. I., Baker, K. E., Restar, A. J., & Sell, R. L. (2022). Health and. Health Care Among Transgender Adults in the United ...
3 (August 2002): 174–78, https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490209552139. 96 The Secular Creed. not match their anatomy. For example, a few years back, a friend of
... 10.1080/00224490209552139. 9. Babu R, Shah U. Gender identity disorder (GID) in adolescents and adults with differences of sex development (DSD): A ...
https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490209552139. Scott, Joan . (1986) 1988. 'Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis' [reprint]. In Gender and the ...
doi: 10.1080/00224490209552139. PMID: 12476264. , 'XXY XXY SRY SRY Testis Turer FUN FACT FRIDAY Intersex' எனச்சொல்லும் வாசகம் இன்.
doi: 10.1080/00224490209552139. PMID: 12476264. Kan een graphic zijn van de tekst 'XXY XXY SRY SRY Testis Turer FUN FACT · Kan een afbeelding zijn van de ...
doi: 10.1080/00224490209552139. PMID: 12476264. Võib olla graafika järgmisest: tekst sisuga: XXY XXY SRY SRY Testis Turer FUN FACT · Võib olla pilt järgmisest ...
How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. J Sex Res. 2002 Aug;39(3):174-8. doi: 10.1080/00224490209552139. Author. Leonard Sax. Affiliation.
Sterling 's estimate of 1.7%. Sometimes a child is born with genitalia which cannot be classified as female or male. A genetically female child (i.e., with ...
How common is intersex? A response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Journal of Sex Research, August, 2002, by Leonard Sax. "A fascinating and essential book, at once ...
3 (August 1, 2002), leonardsax.com/how—common—is—intersex—a—response—to—anne—fausto—sterling/;. “What' s Intersex?,” Planned Parenthood (Website), accessed ...
... intersex” according to Fausto-Sterling. Sax, L. (2002). How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. J Sex Res. 39 (3): 174-8. [Link] ↩︎ ...
How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. L Sax. Anne Fausto-Sterling s suggestion that the prevalence of intersex might be as high as 1.7 ...
How common is intersex? A response to Anne Fausto-Sterling - Sax - 2002 - Article. When a child is born with both female and male genitalia, that is called ...
DOI: 10.1080/00224490209552139. WILHELM, Dagmar; KOOPMAN, Peter. Sex determination and gonadal development in mammals. Physiological Reviews ...
SaxL. How common is intersex? A response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. J Sex Res [Internet]. (2002). PangS. et al. Worldwide experience in newborn ...
Find answers to common questions about Biological Integrity's ... How Common is Intersex? A response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. J. Sex ...
... 10.1080/00224490209552139. PMID: 12476264. Log in ... 2002 Aug;39(3):174-8. doi: 10.1080/00224490209552139. PMID: 12476264 ...
2002 Aug;39(3):174-8. doi: 10.1080/00224490209552139. PMID: 12476264. May be a graphic of text that says 'XXY XXY SRY SRY Testis Turer FUN.
2002 Aug;39(3):174-8. doi: 10.1080/00224490209552139. PMID: 12476264. May be a graphic of text that says 'XXY XXY SRY SRY Testis Turer FUN.
... intersex.” Leonard Sax debunked her claim in “How Common Is Intersex? A Response to Anne Fausto-Sterling,” The Journal of Sex Research 29, no.
1. Sax L. How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. · 2. Wiersma R. Management of the African child with true hermaphroditism.
Here's an article that you might find interesting from the NIH.. "PMID: 12476264 DOI: 10.1080/00224490209552139 Abstract Anne Fausto ...
Citation: doi: 10.1080/00224490209552139. 9 mos. 1. Profile photo of Dave. Dave Melanson Sr. Stephanie Wasko Does science typically define a ...
org/10.1080/00224490209552139). 'Gender' for humans however is frequently not binary, it has clear societal influences, which can vary ...
doi: 10.1080/00224490209552139. PMID: 12476264. May be a graphic of text that says 'XXY XXY SRY SRY Testis Turer FUN · May be an image of text ...
Leonard Sax (2002) How common is Intersex? A response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Journal of Sex Research, 3, 174-178. 11. In German, not quite ...
How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. J Sex Res. 2002 Aug;39(3):174-8. doi: 10.1080/00224490209552139. PMID ...
... 10.1080/00224490209552139). Οπότε θα ήταν προτιμότερο να υπάρχει μια ανακοίνωση τύπου που να μας λέει γιατί το 1,7% είναι το πραγματικό ...
... Anne Fausto-Sterling. J Sex Res. 2002 Aug;39(3):174-8. doi: 10.1080/00224490209552139. PMID: 12476264. Baguettes_are_cool. • 10mo ago.
DOI: 10.1080/00224490209552139. WILHELM, Dagmar; KOOPMAN, Peter. Sex determination and gonadal development in mammals. Physiological Reviews ...
1 z 5555, viz 10.1080/00224490209552139. Ale myslím si že když se o tom bude učit, o tom víc než ty základní, že z toho ty děcka pak zmagoří ...
... Aug;39(3):174-8. doi: 10.1080/00224490209552139. PMID: 12476264. karlgiberson.com. An Open Letter to a New Evangelical College President. 1 yr.
... 10.1080/00224490209552139 Abstract Anne Fausto-Sterling s suggestion that the prevalence of intersex might be as high as 1.7% has attracted ...
How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. J Sex Res. 2002 Aug;39(3):174-8. doi: 10.1080/00224490209552139. PMID: 12476264 ...
doi: 10.1080/00224490209552139. PMID: 12476264. Weiss E. No Bones About It: Sex Is Binary. Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Apr 2. doi: 10.1007/s10508 ...
doi: 10.1080/00224490209552139. PMID: 12476264. Weiss E. No Bones About It: Sex Is Binary. Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Apr 2. doi: 10.1007/s10508 ...
... (2003);. Leonard Sax, How Common Is Intersex? A Response to Anne Fausto-Sterling, 39 J. SEX. RSCH. 174 (2002) [https://doi.org/10.1080 ...
... Transgender Justice, Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, 2018. Sax, Leonard, How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling.
... Anne Fausto-Sterlin and it's been challenged. In “How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling” it says 0.018%. https://pubmed ...
“How Common Is Intersex? A Response to Anne Fausto-Sterling.” Journal of Sex Research 39 (3): 174–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Soh D ...
Sax, L. (2002). How common is intersex? A response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. Journal of Sex Research, 39(3), 174–178. https://doi.org/10.1080 ...
How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. This is a worldwide site and “ginge. Continue Reading.
... response to sex hormones by the body before birth (prenatal) or ... How common is intersex? A response to Anne Fausto-Sterling [Abstract].
the aforementioned names/abbreviations regarding intersex or intersexuality ... How common is intersex? A response to Anne Fausto-sterling.
How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. J Sex Res. 2002;39:174–178. doi: 10.1080/00224490209552139. [PubMed] [CrossRef] ...
doi:10.1080/00224490209552139 (http s://doi.org/10.1080%2F00224490209552139). PMID 12476264 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.ni h.gov/12476264) ...
How common is intersex? a response to anne fausto-sterling. J. Sex. Res. 39 (3), 174–178. doi:10.1080/00224490209552139. Shah, K., McCormack ...
/10.1080/00224490209552139 , https: //www.frontiersin.org/.../10.../fnhum. 2019.00029/full , https://academic.oup. com/molehr/article/20/12 ...
Leonard Sax: "How Common is Intersex?" https://www.leonardsax. com/how-common-is-intersex-a- response-to-anne-fausto-sterling/ .• Rules for ...
. Leonard Sax, How Common is Intersex? A Response to Anne Fausto-Sterling, 39 J. OF SEX. RESEARCH 174 (2002).
source：DOI: 10.1080/00224490209552139. 另外，你确定你知道光谱是什么意思吗？不是说有两个以上的类别就可以算作光谱。“生理性别是光谱这是事实”你 ...
How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling - PubMed. Anne Fausto-Sterling s suggestion that the prevalence of intersex might ...
How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. J ... intersex-a-response-to-anne-fausto-sterling/. Have a read. The actual ...
... 10.1080/00224490209552139 https://sci-hub.tw/10.1080/00224490209552139. 生物学家科林·赖特：“[...]声称根据解剖学和遗传学对人的性别进行分类 ...
... 10.1080/00224490209552139 https://sci-hub.tw/10.1080/00224490209552139. Biologist Colin Wright: "[...]the claim that classifying people's sex ...
... sua statistica dell'1,7% è errata https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00224490209552139 ). Saluti! Altre risposte · conceptalbum. • 7 ...
(plus her 1.7% stat is flawed https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00224490209552139 ). Cheers! More replies · conceptalbum. • 7y ...
... Fausto-Sterling's claims on intersex: http://www.leonardsax.com/how-common-is-intersex-a-response-to-anne-fausto-sterling/. Radio says ...
DOI: 10.1080/00224490209552139. [2] Lee, Peter A., Christopher P. Houk, S. Faisal Ahmed, Ieuan A. Hughes. 2006. “Consensus Statement on ...
"How common is intersex? a response to Anne Fausto-Sterling". Journal of Sex Research. 39 (3): 174–178. Retrieved 2007-04-08 ...
... Fausto-Sterling's conclusions (see “How Common Is Intersex? A Response to Anne Fausto-Sterling,” Journal of Sex Research 39 [Aug 2002], pp.
... hermaphrodite, pseudo-hermaphrodite and intersex. The term itself ... 'How Common Is Intersex? A Response to Anne Fausto-Sterling'. The ...
How common is intersex? A response to Anne Fausto-Sterling. J Sex Res 2002;39:174–178. Article PubMed Google Scholar. Nutrition Division ...
6. Sax. L. How common is intersex? A response to Anne Fausto-Sterling . J Sex Res. 2002. ;. 39. : 174. –. 8 . Google Scholar · Crossref · Search ...
FS
A
AH
VM
H
NJ
SK
AI
MT
風
存
三
禊
黙
リ
い
C
健
ね
し
K
W
GT
E
ML
O
MC
S
M
WK
RB
AC
GA
A
CD
I
VD
G
M
DG
W
JG
TA
NC
TS
FD
B
TA
S
BF
JH
O
OG
DL
E
SE
PK
BR
SK
SS
M
PM
LG
D
DR
C
NH
D
HR
J
VP
JS
KE
DP
F
C
A
J
KC
IC
TA
L
CD
N
AB
PT
AK
LL
NO
GT
MO
HN
WL
JT
T
SM
C
AO
IK
RC
NH
U
KP
P
O
M
D
KB
AJ
M
P
S
XX
SE
DI
IK
S
CC
CS
LD
A
N
MM
WW
AD
TM
G
DR
OO
MM
S
H
E
BB
MH
SU
A
IB
N
BA
BE
W
BF
RF
W
SR
CD
DB
GK
GF
VG
G
AP
AL
M
CK
G
DC
CH
NF
CC
JB
S
RO
SD
M
PP
L
SJ
OS
CC
H
TS
CE
PX
GZ
O
BL
SN
PS
D
GG
TS
ÅA
B
KH
AK
MK
あG
G
DS
G
AP
D
TP
XK
MI
BH
P
EW
SS
Q
A
E
MK
R
AR
RS
MS
AJ
O
GS
MM
HV
A
D
EB
TS
P
AB
JG
CF
RS
A
JW
WW
IN
L
W
J
E
KA
D
S
S
H
G
T
DD
GC
GA
I
GC
CW
O
B
DL
P
W