Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Overall, the social discussions highly regard Hill's 1965 paper, citing its criteria and emphasizing the importance of scientific rigor, with some posts debating and analyzing the criteria's application, which demonstrates both broad interest and deep engagement in understanding causality, suggesting a significant impact on public health and epidemiology understanding.
Most posts acknowledge the importance of Hill's work and generally support the significance of scientific criteria for establishing causation.
Posts demonstrate high interest, referencing detailed principles, classic papers, and discussing complex concepts like Bradford Hill criteria.
Many posts actively analyze and critique the criteria, cite historical sources, and debate interpretation, showing deep engagement.
Discussions indicate that the article influences thinking about causality in health science, with users emphasizing the importance of rigorous evidence and framework.
"The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the 9 criteria that serve to infer a causal relationship between a presumed cause and certain disease. An insightful paper: https://t.co/PpiTQ1vGcT https://t.co/Zj9Vf1YG36
MEDYCYNA TO NIE ZABAWA NIEUKÓW I ZŁOCZYŃCÓW Z LUDZKIM ŻYCIEM. WYMAGA SPECJALISTYCZNEJ WIEDZY I ETYKI. Hill, Austin Bradford (1965). "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?". Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine. 58 (5): 295–300. https://t.co/QNonN1Ihm9
Thanks Francois @DrAFvanWyk. If only those who argue that any association, however slight, proves causation had actually studied the work of the doyen, Dr Bradford Hill. https://t.co/dL7omzUSjQ Hill argued that unless the Hazard Ratio (HR) is greater than 2 (and a series of https://t.co/LucFyn3UK1
3/ The environment and disease: association or causation Austin Bradford Hill (1965) This is the best guide to distinguishing association and causation - perennial problem in all epidemiology and social science. https://t.co/2GIsTVaBUU
/9 Paper #5: What aspects of an association should you examine before making conjectures about the possibility that this association may in fact reflect a causal mechanism? A short (yet clever and timeless!) classic. https://t.co/pUy3Ybnd1I
This video discusses how environmental factors influence disease development, emphasizing the difference between association and causation and the importance of scientific evidence to establish causality.
The text discusses how environmental factors can influence disease development, emphasizing the difference between association and causation. Scientific studies and evidence are essential to determine whether…
RT @ProfTimNoakes: Thanks Francois @DrAFvanWyk. If only those who argue that any association, however slight, proves causation had actually…
RT @ProfTimNoakes: Thanks Francois @DrAFvanWyk. If only those who argue that any association, however slight, proves causation had actually…
RT @ProfTimNoakes: Thanks Francois @DrAFvanWyk. If only those who argue that any association, however slight, proves causation had actually…
RT @ProfTimNoakes: Thanks Francois @DrAFvanWyk. If only those who argue that any association, however slight, proves causation had actually…
RT @ProfTimNoakes: Thanks Francois @DrAFvanWyk. If only those who argue that any association, however slight, proves causation had actually…
RT @ProfTimNoakes: Thanks Francois @DrAFvanWyk. If only those who argue that any association, however slight, proves causation had actually…
@YounisJoseph Well obviously anti-hypertensives don't because they don't reduced CHD risk https://t.co/dL7omzUSjQ But of course, your arrogant answer doesn't address what was being discussed.
RT @ProfTimNoakes: Thanks Francois @DrAFvanWyk. If only those who argue that any association, however slight, proves causation had actually…
Thanks Francois @DrAFvanWyk. If only those who argue that any association, however slight, proves causation had actually studied the work of the doyen, Dr Bradford Hill. https://t.co/dL7omzUSjQ Hill argued that unless the Hazard Ratio (HR) is greater than 2 (and a series of https://t.co/LucFyn3UK1
@grauhase @grok @carioca13170569 @xicosa @rafapsoares A correlação epidemiológica r = -0,92 é muito forte e atende os critérios de Hill. Referência: Hill, A. B. (1965). “The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?”.
@RogerSeheult https://t.co/1tIG2FdsVx It's from Hill himself https://t.co/0oHqNSJIoo
@GooodasssMD یا مثلا مقاله بردفورد هیل در مورد علیت در بهداشت عمومی: Hill AB. The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine.1965;58:295-300.
The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? - PMC https://t.co/wDRmit1oij
@withered_haze @tommyspianocor1 @saraheeberry The interesting thing is that viewing Hill’s viewpoints as “criteria” (I.e. that if one is not met then we ought to reject the hypothesis) is revisionist and antithetical to what he actually wrote. https://t.co/Z1qks6udsa https://t.co/m6GZ3OS2Mk
@Tom_Jove Mais dans ce cas je vous encourage à relire Bradford Hill. « All scientific work is incomplete […] That does not confer upon us a freedom to ignore the knowledge we already have, or to postpone the action that it appears to demand at a given time. » https://t.co/srH4y0x13N
@stkirsch https://t.co/eUjtsHHR9S https://t.co/K6YMtXmwBe
RT @AtomsksSanakan: 8/B Left as an exercise to the reader to determine why Kirsch's claim fails on specificity + analogy. (hint: the thre…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: 6/B Exposure to vaccine antigens, Al-/Hg-containing compounds, etc. is nowhere near high enough to explain autism rate…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: 5/B Autism rates explained by factors that arose prior to vaccine administration. Rates also increasing before increas…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: 4/B Withholding vaccines didn't correlate with changes in autism rates. So failure on experiment. https://t.co/QUQ80…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: 3/B Increased vaccine dosage, antigenic load, etc. didn't increase autism risk. So failure on gradient. https://t.co…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: 2/B Plenty of studies show vaccination doesn't correlate with autism. That's a failure on correlation/association, st…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: 8/B Left as an exercise to the reader to determine why Kirsch's claim fails on specificity + analogy. (hint: the thre…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: 6/B Exposure to vaccine antigens, Al-/Hg-containing compounds, etc. is nowhere near high enough to explain autism rate…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: 5/B Autism rates explained by factors that arose prior to vaccine administration. Rates also increasing before increas…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: 4/B Withholding vaccines didn't correlate with changes in autism rates. So failure on experiment. https://t.co/QUQ80…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: 3/B Increased vaccine dosage, antigenic load, etc. didn't increase autism risk. So failure on gradient. https://t.co…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: 2/B Plenty of studies show vaccination doesn't correlate with autism. That's a failure on correlation/association, st…
8/B Left as an exercise to the reader to determine why Kirsch's claim fails on specificity + analogy. (hint: the thread above cites enough information to explain why) https://t.co/eJzCmrzRJm https://t.co/zg5bVKjJy7 https://t.co/gvUOplluMi
6/B Exposure to vaccine antigens, Al-/Hg-containing compounds, etc. is nowhere near high enough to explain autism rates. Vaccine ethylHg =/= dangerous methylHg nor elemental Hg. So failure on plausibility https://t.co/akwUWldrx0 https://t.co/9Vs4tkwK6m https://t.co/zg5bVKjJy7 https://t.co/ycEb4UMOzN
5/B Autism rates explained by factors that arose prior to vaccine administration. Rates also increasing before increased thimerosal exposure. So failure on temporality + coherence https://t.co/QUQ80SuApk https://t.co/GEdQc6JR9K https://t.co/vIHzwcf8Pq https://t.co/zg5bVKjJy7 https://t.co/vAr8VjL3T0
4/B Withholding vaccines didn't correlate with changes in autism rates. So failure on experiment. https://t.co/QUQ80SuApk https://t.co/NUNmqTgtuT @c0nc0rdance: https://t.co/uqpmgpUGeF https://t.co/8U7KH5LdC4 [https://t.co/TxufkKTAp1] https://t.co/zg5bVKjJy7 https://t.co/tBaDxWQLUs
3/B Increased vaccine dosage, antigenic load, etc. didn't increase autism risk. So failure on gradient. https://t.co/YDVqCTQDJp https://t.co/o1qgnRHz9Q https://t.co/YqHL0ojzZY https://t.co/6aJetiVh0I https://t.co/XrTxQzxfrn https://t.co/Wy4yk9Wjaq https://t.co/zg5bVKjJy7 https://t.co/05qC113VXI
2/B Plenty of studies show vaccination doesn't correlate with autism. That's a failure on correlation/association, strength, + consistency. https://t.co/6aJetiVh0I https://t.co/OJGjYuNIlD https://t.co/XrTxQzxfrn https://t.co/wvHCCa3gs2 https://t.co/zg5bVKjJy7 https://t.co/qXkyZcK7Al
@JordanSchachtel If you want to get up to speed on what epidemiology can and cannot do, read the lecture by Sir Austin Bradford Hill, The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? https://t.co/Nx7TFrddjk
Dude doesn’t know that the Bradford-Hill “criteria” aren’t actually criteria, yet is asking others if they know what the “criteria” is
RT @profmarkcollard: This week in my Research Design course we're going to discuss Austin Bradford Hill's 1965 piece 'The environment and d…
This week in my Research Design course we're going to discuss Austin Bradford Hill's 1965 piece 'The environment and disease: association or causation?', which outlines nine principles for inferring causation from correlation. It's a cracker of a paper. https://t.co/p6uJen3mrz
1/2 09 categories to determine causality Hill, A. B. (1965). The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 58(5), 295–300. doi:10.1177/003591576505800503 https://t.co/IU6ap8Pd4M https://t.co/Z7uB6aUeQ0
RT @fermatslibrary: PAPER "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establish…
"The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the 9 criteria that serve to infer a causal relationship between a presumed cause and certain disease. @fermatslibrary #healthliteracy https://t.co/kaVEMbZ9sp https://t.co/owzEaxk7ZY
@XavBike « All scientific work is incomplete […] That does not confer upon us a freedom to ignore the knowledge we already have, or to postpone the action that it appears to demand at a given time. » Bradford Hill, 1965 https://t.co/srH4y0OBVl
@AndorraOsteo @Ruben4Mans @OBandarchi They support this claim by citing a 1965 paper by Austin Bradford Hill (https://t.co/CX9VQ2yZnC) I’ll go through it searching for an answer. Thank you
Hill's criteria for causationの論文読んでみたけど、最後に不完全なエビデンスのなかでも行動していく専門家としての考え方が主張されててよかった☺ https://t.co/s7rRIyeR9H
Or another theory on ‘causation’ https://t.co/fNkDgZRmZY
Sir Austin Bradford Hill's paper "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?"
@AK_Meier Zum Teil: wie gesagt, Kausalität ist sehr schwierig. Ich empfehle Ihnen das hier: https://t.co/OGV6FQEy8n
RT @drZHalat: MEDYCYNA TO NIE ZABAWA NIEUKÓW I ZŁOCZYŃCÓW Z LUDZKIM ŻYCIEM. WYMAGA SPECJALISTYCZNEJ WIEDZY I ETYKI. Hill, Austin Bradford (…
RT @drZHalat: MEDYCYNA TO NIE ZABAWA NIEUKÓW I ZŁOCZYŃCÓW Z LUDZKIM ŻYCIEM. WYMAGA SPECJALISTYCZNEJ WIEDZY I ETYKI. Hill, Austin Bradford (…
RT @drZHalat: MEDYCYNA TO NIE ZABAWA NIEUKÓW I ZŁOCZYŃCÓW Z LUDZKIM ŻYCIEM. WYMAGA SPECJALISTYCZNEJ WIEDZY I ETYKI. Hill, Austin Bradford (…
RT @drZHalat: MEDYCYNA TO NIE ZABAWA NIEUKÓW I ZŁOCZYŃCÓW Z LUDZKIM ŻYCIEM. WYMAGA SPECJALISTYCZNEJ WIEDZY I ETYKI. Hill, Austin Bradford (…
RT @drZHalat: MEDYCYNA TO NIE ZABAWA NIEUKÓW I ZŁOCZYŃCÓW Z LUDZKIM ŻYCIEM. WYMAGA SPECJALISTYCZNEJ WIEDZY I ETYKI. Hill, Austin Bradford (…
RT @drZHalat: MEDYCYNA TO NIE ZABAWA NIEUKÓW I ZŁOCZYŃCÓW Z LUDZKIM ŻYCIEM. WYMAGA SPECJALISTYCZNEJ WIEDZY I ETYKI. Hill, Austin Bradford (…
RT @drZHalat: MEDYCYNA TO NIE ZABAWA NIEUKÓW I ZŁOCZYŃCÓW Z LUDZKIM ŻYCIEM. WYMAGA SPECJALISTYCZNEJ WIEDZY I ETYKI. Hill, Austin Bradford (…
RT @drZHalat: MEDYCYNA TO NIE ZABAWA NIEUKÓW I ZŁOCZYŃCÓW Z LUDZKIM ŻYCIEM. WYMAGA SPECJALISTYCZNEJ WIEDZY I ETYKI. Hill, Austin Bradford (…
RT @drZHalat: MEDYCYNA TO NIE ZABAWA NIEUKÓW I ZŁOCZYŃCÓW Z LUDZKIM ŻYCIEM. WYMAGA SPECJALISTYCZNEJ WIEDZY I ETYKI. Hill, Austin Bradford (…
RT @drZHalat: MEDYCYNA TO NIE ZABAWA NIEUKÓW I ZŁOCZYŃCÓW Z LUDZKIM ŻYCIEM. WYMAGA SPECJALISTYCZNEJ WIEDZY I ETYKI. Hill, Austin Bradford (…
RT @drZHalat: MEDYCYNA TO NIE ZABAWA NIEUKÓW I ZŁOCZYŃCÓW Z LUDZKIM ŻYCIEM. WYMAGA SPECJALISTYCZNEJ WIEDZY I ETYKI. Hill, Austin Bradford (…
RT @drZHalat: MEDYCYNA TO NIE ZABAWA NIEUKÓW I ZŁOCZYŃCÓW Z LUDZKIM ŻYCIEM. WYMAGA SPECJALISTYCZNEJ WIEDZY I ETYKI. Hill, Austin Bradford (…
RT @drZHalat: MEDYCYNA TO NIE ZABAWA NIEUKÓW I ZŁOCZYŃCÓW Z LUDZKIM ŻYCIEM. WYMAGA SPECJALISTYCZNEJ WIEDZY I ETYKI. Hill, Austin Bradford (…
RT @drZHalat: MEDYCYNA TO NIE ZABAWA NIEUKÓW I ZŁOCZYŃCÓW Z LUDZKIM ŻYCIEM. WYMAGA SPECJALISTYCZNEJ WIEDZY I ETYKI. Hill, Austin Bradford (…
RT @drZHalat: MEDYCYNA TO NIE ZABAWA NIEUKÓW I ZŁOCZYŃCÓW Z LUDZKIM ŻYCIEM. WYMAGA SPECJALISTYCZNEJ WIEDZY I ETYKI. Hill, Austin Bradford (…
RT @drZHalat: MEDYCYNA TO NIE ZABAWA NIEUKÓW I ZŁOCZYŃCÓW Z LUDZKIM ŻYCIEM. WYMAGA SPECJALISTYCZNEJ WIEDZY I ETYKI. Hill, Austin Bradford (…
RT @drZHalat: MEDYCYNA TO NIE ZABAWA NIEUKÓW I ZŁOCZYŃCÓW Z LUDZKIM ŻYCIEM. WYMAGA SPECJALISTYCZNEJ WIEDZY I ETYKI. Hill, Austin Bradford (…
RT @drZHalat: MEDYCYNA TO NIE ZABAWA NIEUKÓW I ZŁOCZYŃCÓW Z LUDZKIM ŻYCIEM. WYMAGA SPECJALISTYCZNEJ WIEDZY I ETYKI. Hill, Austin Bradford (…
RT @drZHalat: MEDYCYNA TO NIE ZABAWA NIEUKÓW I ZŁOCZYŃCÓW Z LUDZKIM ŻYCIEM. WYMAGA SPECJALISTYCZNEJ WIEDZY I ETYKI. Hill, Austin Bradford (…
RT @drZHalat: MEDYCYNA TO NIE ZABAWA NIEUKÓW I ZŁOCZYŃCÓW Z LUDZKIM ŻYCIEM. WYMAGA SPECJALISTYCZNEJ WIEDZY I ETYKI. Hill, Austin Bradford (…
RT @drZHalat: MEDYCYNA TO NIE ZABAWA NIEUKÓW I ZŁOCZYŃCÓW Z LUDZKIM ŻYCIEM. WYMAGA SPECJALISTYCZNEJ WIEDZY I ETYKI. Hill, Austin Bradford (…
RT @drZHalat: MEDYCYNA TO NIE ZABAWA NIEUKÓW I ZŁOCZYŃCÓW Z LUDZKIM ŻYCIEM. WYMAGA SPECJALISTYCZNEJ WIEDZY I ETYKI. Hill, Austin Bradford (…
RT @drZHalat: MEDYCYNA TO NIE ZABAWA NIEUKÓW I ZŁOCZYŃCÓW Z LUDZKIM ŻYCIEM. WYMAGA SPECJALISTYCZNEJ WIEDZY I ETYKI. Hill, Austin Bradford (…
MEDYCYNA TO NIE ZABAWA NIEUKÓW I ZŁOCZYŃCÓW Z LUDZKIM ŻYCIEM. WYMAGA SPECJALISTYCZNEJ WIEDZY I ETYKI. Hill, Austin Bradford (1965). "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?". Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine. 58 (5): 295–300. https://t.co/QNonN1Ihm9
Traduction et lecture de l'article scientifique de 1965 Bradford Hill. Environnement et Maladie: Association ou Causalité? https://t.co/ttcjoUxrPP #Zététique #EspritCritique #TeB #MrPhi #Acermendax #Aberkane #Science4All #Astronogeek #Astronogeek #DocPrimum #Asclepios #Aviscene https://t.co/iqvJ5S6RAb
@MaartenvSmeden @leeflang_m @federicarusso @PhyllisIllari Perhaps this also? https://t.co/aj02OOQWD1
@stevensenior Coincidentally, one of my favourites, “The environment and disease: association or causation?” was also 6 pages long: https://t.co/OPanhXYa7l
Hill AB: The environment and disease: Association or causation?. Proceed Roy Soc Medicine – London. 1965, 58: 295-300. https://t.co/G5PHEI7epH
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @Pottegard: /9 Paper #5: What aspects of an association should you examine before making conjectures about the possibility that this as…
RT @Pottegard: /9 Paper #5: What aspects of an association should you examine before making conjectures about the possibility that this as…
/9 Paper #5: What aspects of an association should you examine before making conjectures about the possibility that this association may in fact reflect a causal mechanism? A short (yet clever and timeless!) classic. https://t.co/pUy3Ybnd1I
@NoahHaber Not disagreeing with the sentiment but it was published in a journal and was a President’s Address to a Royal Society, not a self published 5 minute read on Medium. https://t.co/ne3U37LTrB
RT @OhhiyoGarmen: @FoodFirst_Ty @The_Nutrivore @JesseLunsford @KenDBerryMD As Sir Austin Bradford Hill put it, if it's biologically plausib…
RT @OhhiyoGarmen: @FoodFirst_Ty @The_Nutrivore @JesseLunsford @KenDBerryMD As Sir Austin Bradford Hill put it, if it's biologically plausib…
RT @EpidemyErc:
RT @EpidemyErc:
...and the field of occupational health as it emerged to elaborate how conditions of work lead to injury, sickness and how the workplace might constitute a threat to public's health. #correlation The article: https://t.co/8eDmEvjvKG Project #zotero: https://t.co/0j1mftAWRE
@LajXtra @thereal_truther Anyway, other Bradford Hill considerations come into play to figure out causes in particular situations, as in they would in other instances of causation, whether it's smoking causing cancer, gunshot wounds causing deaths, etc. https://t.co/pXT1z42qMx https://t.co/zg5bVKjJy7 https://t.co/chHw6UnWkR
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
@ScottAdamsSays Here's a way to mitigate the Observer Problem. I hope to see this on your white board. Objectiveness is not here. https://t.co/rZL76WB42S
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
RT @fermatslibrary: "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the…
"The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establishes the 9 criteria that serve to infer a causal relationship between a presumed cause and certain disease. An insightful paper: https://t.co/PpiTQ1vGcT https://t.co/Zj9Vf1YG36
RT @tim_esPH: 3/ The environment and disease: association or causation Austin Bradford Hill (1965) This is the best guide to distinguishin…
A few classic papers to finish for now. If you work in public health, at some point you will have to ask yourself how you can *know* that 'x causes y'. Huge literature on this, but Austin Bradford Hill's 1965 paper is still a reference point https://t.co/CMEKedRffq
@Montaigne01 @jojo_nazara @thereal_truther Re: "“Plausibility”? No, show causality." And your willful ignorance continues. You're like a kid who doesn't understand algebra, but thinks they're competent to debate math experts on calculus
.@GlobalHealthBMJ @felly500 sometimes in #PublicHealth it is worth while going back to the basis of cause and effect as Doll and Hill did with tobacco and lung cancer #tobacco Hill AB . The environment and disease: association or causation? Proc R Soc Med 1965; 58: 295–300
RT @fermatslibrary: PAPER "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establish…
@therealrthorat @KenMathis @Cornvelious_Dan @jameshamblin Re: "See causation/correlation. Take remedial courses" You don't know what "Bradford Hill considerations" are, do you? Leave science to those with more expertise + integrity than you, OK Ryan? https://t.co/AAWLYYrYC5 https://t.co/zg5bVKjJy7 https://t.co/EXkEUsHG57
RT @fermatslibrary: PAPER "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establish…
@FoodFirst_Ty @The_Nutrivore @JesseLunsford @KenDBerryMD As Sir Austin Bradford Hill put it, if it's biologically plausible this is helpful in regards to causation. Nick's take was about people who use a mechanism as a standalone. https://t.co/xb0iP0wkTs
@gregggonsalves @EthonRaptor Gregg & others Good experts in situations like this utilize the knowledge base available & their brains There's a framework published >50 years ago that I recommend Hill AB "The environment and disease: association or causation?" Proc R Soc Med 58:295-300 (1965)
RT @fermatslibrary: PAPER "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establish…
RT @fermatslibrary: PAPER "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establish…
The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? annotated/explained version. https://t.co/LsBsbMoAI7
RT @fermatslibrary: PAPER "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establish…
RT @fermatslibrary: PAPER "The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?" published in 1965 by Sir Austin Bradford Hill establish…
When talking about #causality in #medicine and #epidemiology, a good starting point is this address by Hill (the epidemiologist who linked cigarettes to cancer): https://t.co/4V3uUk7svX
@BrownAdey @chr1styharrison “Causality” in medicine/epidemiology is always a tricky subject, and one the cigarette companies use to their advantage for >50 years. A good starting point for me is the Hill Criteria talk in the 60s: https://t.co/4V3uUk7svX
RT @tim_esPH: 3/ The environment and disease: association or causation Austin Bradford Hill (1965) This is the best guide to distinguishin…
RT @tim_esPH: 3/ The environment and disease: association or causation Austin Bradford Hill (1965) This is the best guide to distinguishin…
RT @tim_esPH: 3/ The environment and disease: association or causation Austin Bradford Hill (1965) This is the best guide to distinguishin…
RT @tim_esPH: 3/ The environment and disease: association or causation Austin Bradford Hill (1965) This is the best guide to distinguishin…
RT @tim_esPH: 3/ The environment and disease: association or causation Austin Bradford Hill (1965) This is the best guide to distinguishin…
3/ The environment and disease: association or causation Austin Bradford Hill (1965) This is the best guide to distinguishing association and causation - perennial problem in all epidemiology and social science. https://t.co/2GIsTVaBUU
@DanLane911 @ClinEpi2 @WesternU @srrezaie @EMSwami @reverendofdoubt @Rick_Pescatore @AliRaja_MD @CaulfieldTim Always good to go back to the primary literature. Here is the source for the Bradford-Hill criteria from the mid 1960’s. https://t.co/V6BDaLzTtm
FL
ZH
TN
TS
TE
AP
LD
JB
DD
TC
DH
AY
BB
AS
DA
M
S
SC
F
VA
LR
J
AS
PM
AI
M
MC
BC
P
GA
KM
WI
CM
GK
M
M
JK
MS
MW
W
KC
LK
A
WS
RB
VS
R
R
A
P
PD
AK
J
S
G
DO
WM
JS
BA
G
CS
BT
DC
E
S
JN
G
DT
K
BA
H
GP
CG
DA
MB
NT
AP
EL
?
P
AO
IA
JS
IH
AK
AH
T
E
IP
GG
B
DS
L
S
EJ
E
RR
SB
NL
RR
IT
WR
SK
AK
DR
AR
JO
多
T
AV
MM
GO
MU
AA
AA
KM