Mentions
Extended reach
Total likes
Video views
AI synopsis
Overall, discussions emphasize the importance of default settings, with examples like organ donation choices and nudging, highlighting how small procedural changes can lead to significant life-saving outcomes; the tone is analytical and curious, reflecting the perceived influence of foundational research on policy debates.
Most discussions acknowledge the significance of defaults and routines in decision-making, referencing Johnson and Goldstein's 2003 study as foundational evidence.
Posts show high interest by engaging deeply with the topic, questioning conflicts of interest, and connecting the research to broader debates about health policies and ethics.
Participants actively analyze the implications, citing specific examples like organ donation defaults and nudging strategies, indicating thoughtful consideration.
The conversations reflect an understanding that these practices influence real-world decisions, suggesting moderate to high impact on policy and individual choices.
Organdonation Aktivt tilvalg eller aktivt fravalg? Her lidt input til debatten fra en sundhedsøkonom. (NB ikke mit eget forskningsfelt.) Billede: Johnson, Eric J., and Daniel Goldstein. "Do defaults save lives?." Science 302.5649 (2003): 1338-1339. https://t.co/BWJteWbsB5 1/ https://t.co/zsmExZq55X
@massimosandal quando si parla di nudge, è uno degli esempi più citati in assoluto.. è nato tutto da questa pubblicazione del 2003: https://t.co/mfGRHeZ0QA.
Quelle: Johnson, E. J., & Goldstein, D. (2003). Do defaults save lives? Science, 302, 1338–1339. https://t.co/qmP9AR66Dc
@FeeRedfern @Jikkyleaks @carl_jurassic @chrismartenson https://t.co/FUomxhrSPh
RT @Aquarius3_0: #GinoGate All these "everybody-to-become-an-organ- donator" fans are quoting a study from 2003: Johnson and Goldstein: "Do…
RT @Aquarius3_0: @FeeRedfern @Jikkyleaks @carl_jurassic @chrismartenson https://t.co/FUomxhrSPh
Send us a text httpswwwbuzzsproutcomtwiliotextmessages2535304opensms How many of your choices are truly yours and how many are defaults disguised as decisions? This episode explores the power of defaults, from organ…
RT @Aquarius3_0: #GinoGate All these "everybody-to-become-an-organ- donator" fans are quoting a study from 2003: Johnson and Goldstein: "Do…
@ThatOneMate55 @Dexerto Sources: 1: https://t.co/kWVGxfygW6 2: https://t.co/1juBgQic7l 6/6
RT @Aquarius3_0: @FeeRedfern @Jikkyleaks @carl_jurassic @chrismartenson https://t.co/FUomxhrSPh
@FeeRedfern @Jikkyleaks @carl_jurassic @chrismartenson https://t.co/FUomxhrSPh
#GinoGate All these "everybody-to-become-an-organ- donator" fans are quoting a study from 2003: Johnson and Goldstein: "Do Defaults Save Lives" - has anyone access to the full text version and find some conflicts of interest? ->@jikkyleakds https://t.co/FUomxhrSPh
Decision making: In the countries with yellow bars citizens needed to make an active choice to become organ donors. In countries with blue bars the inactive/passive choice was to become organ donor. Source: Science, 2003.https://t.co/i3XL1FiH0H https://t.co/FmvHr7AnEy
Organdonation Aktivt tilvalg eller aktivt fravalg? Her lidt input til debatten fra en sundhedsøkonom. (NB ikke mit eget forskningsfelt.) Billede: Johnson, Eric J., and Daniel Goldstein. "Do defaults save lives?." Science 302.5649 (2003): 1338-1339. https://t.co/BWJteWbsB5 1/ https://t.co/zsmExZq55X
@massimosandal quando si parla di nudge, è uno degli esempi più citati in assoluto.. è nato tutto da questa pubblicazione del 2003: https://t.co/mfGRHeZ0QA.
似てるなーとも思うのは、opt in/outのドナーカードのやつ あえてoutにするくらいだから、なんらかの意味があるのだろうと類推 https://t.co/nIDwgqzlhg
Quelle: Johnson, E. J., & Goldstein, D. (2003). Do defaults save lives? Science, 302, 1338–1339. https://t.co/qmP9AR66Dc
FL
CC
IA
AE
JC
F
J
MN
よ